Bacchus Revels in a
Warmer World!
- Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D.
- Assistant Professor of Geography
- Southern Oregon University
Roman agricultural writer Plinius
once wrote, "Vitis amat colles" – the vine loves
the hills. Most grape growers and winemakers know this to be a fact
and have searched out perfect places in the world where topography,
soil, and climate come together to produce high quality grapes and
wine. Today, however, many grape growers and winemakers might change
their tune to "Vitis amat global warming."
Global warming – popularly
characterized by temperature increases, rising sea level, and melting
ice caps accompanied by increased incidence of drought, flood, hurricanes
and disease – is generally anticipated to have negative consequences
for earth’s plant and animal systems. Such climate-related events
are mostly blamed on increases in fossil fuel use and the consequent
increase in greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. While
such threats can and may be real under certain circumstances, many
of the relationships and interactions in the earth/atmosphere system
are still unknown or are not well defined.
Current research from
the Napa and Sonoma regions of California – two of the world’s highest
quality wine regions – indicates that the grapevine loves a warmer
world. California produces 90% of all US wine and dominates the
$16 billion a year domestic retail wine industry. Since the 1950s,
California’s wine grape growers have seen dramatic increases in
grape yield, crop value, and premium wine quality (along with decreased
year-to-year variability in quality). Advances in viticulture practices
such as irrigation, nutrition, trellising, and pest/disease control
accompanied by greater experience in winemaking certainly have contributed
to their success. However, despite
such advances, grape growers generally believe climate plays the
most significant role in determining the overall quality and style
of wine from a given region. Climate variability also controls year-to-year
variations in the quantity and quality of vintages, they believe.
Depending on the magnitude
and seasonality of climate changes, their agricultural impact can
be either positive or negative. For example, warmer winter and spring
temperatures would reduce frost damage and increase the length of
the growing season in northern latitudes. Research by Nemani
et al. revealed this effect for the Napa and Sonoma grape growing
areas where climatic changes were documented to be diurnally and
seasonally asymmetric, meaning the greatest warming was at night
and during spring.
As a consequence of
this asymmetric warming, the range in diurnal temperature (the difference
between daily maximum and minimum temperatures) declined by 1.9°C
over 47 years. Although the average annual warming trend was a modest
1.1°C over the 47 years, there was a 71% decline in frost frequency
(a 20-day reduction) and a 25% increase in the length of the frost-free
growing season (a 65-day increase). If the current trend in frost
frequency continues, Napa/Sonoma will become a frost-free climate
in another decade or two. For grape growers, longer growing seasons
allow for greater flexibility in scheduling various viticulture
operations such as pruning and harvest.
The Napa and Sonoma
regions have enjoyed a 0.22 point per year increase in their wine
quality ratings between 1963 and 1996, as compiled by Sotheby’s
(Figure 1). This is given on a 100-point
scale, averaged for each vintage. While wine quality ratings are
a subjective measure of the vintages that are compared, they can
have a major impact upon wine value. For example, analysis of Wine
Spectator data showed that for the 1995 vintage, Napa wines
had an average rating increase of 10 points over the previous year.
That translated into a 220 percent price increase per bottle.
Among the Napa and
Sonoma climate variables that were studied (daily and monthly temperature,
precipitation, vapor pressure deficits, and growing degree days,
among others), the decline in frosts was significantly correlated
with the increase in wine ratings. This is depicted in Figure
2 where R2 = 0.41.
A possible explanation
for this relationship could be that frost damages buds on the vine,
delaying subsequent plant physiology and ultimately leading to uneven
maturity and poor wine quality. It should also be noted that grape
yields grew 34 percent (from 7.3 tons per hectare to 9.8 tons per
hectare) during the same time period (Figure 1) and found
to be significantly influenced by minimum temperatures in spring
and decreases in summer vapor pressure deficits (R2 =
0.56, not shown). Consequently, increasing quality and quantity
raised the value of the grape crop from $640 per hectare in 1963
to $19,600/hectare in the Napa Valley in 1996.
Findings similar to
those of the Napa and Sonoma regions have been documented in Bordeaux,
France – a region long considered to be one of the (if not the)
finest wine regions of the world. Research by Jones and Davis reveals
that the highly-prize, high-priced Bordeaux Grand Cru Classés
reds have experienced increased vintage ratings (with decreased
year-to-year variability) over the last three decades. These increases
in vintage quality have been related to better grape composition
levels (mainly sugar and acid levels which largely determine wine
quality) coupled with earlier budding, flowering, and harvest and,
ultimately, warmer and longer growing seasons in the Bordeaux region.
Other wine-producing
regions in Australia, South Africa, and Chile may be reaping benefits
from minimum temperature warming trends of similar or higher magnitude.
Easterling et al., in two separate analyses on climatic extremes,
have documented that the most significant temperature changes in
many of these grape-growing regions are a rise in minimum temperatures
and fewer frost days.
Unfortunately, along
with the positive effects from recent climatic changes, there could
be future negative impacts for the wine industry. Although Napa
and Sonoma humidity levels currently are optimal, a trend toward
increasing humidity and air temperature suggests that, in the future,
the risk of fungal and vector-borne disease outbreaks may increase.
Pierce's disease, a fatal bacterial (Xylella fastidiosa)
disease transmitted by sharpshooter beetles (of the Cicadellidae
family) and that apparently is limited by frost occurrence, is increasing
in Napa and Sonoma. Climatic change may therefore require increased
investment in application of pesticide, disease-resistant rootstocks,
or more advanced bio-control mechanisms.
Beyond these mostly
beneficial changes in temperature and frost occurrence, Big Media
presumes rising greenhouse gas concentrations to be detrimental.
As a greenhouse gas by-product of fossil fuel combustion, carbon
dioxide is tagged as the biggest culprit. However, if one steps
back and examines the issue with an eye toward plant systems, CO2
generally is found to be the limiting factor to plant growth. The
question then becomes how might increased levels of CO2
affect grapevine growth and wine quality?
An article in Climate
Research reported on the relationship of climate and grapevine
yield. Bindi et al. studied the effects of increased CO2
levels and associated changes in climate on Cabernet Sauvignon and
Sangiovese grapes in Northern Italy. Using field data from 1992-1994
and a model of grapevine growth and yield, they found that doubled
concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere result in a 36
percent increase in yield. While increased temperature reduced yield
under some future climate scenarios, CO2 increases clearly
outweighed the temperature effects. Additionally, with land prices
skyrocketing in the best grape growing regions and with land availability
declining, new viticulturists are seeking other regions where they
can produce high quality grapes and wine. Today’s site selection
procedures increasingly include an assessment of the ability of
the site to accumulate CO2. This is accomplished by finding
optimum slopes that facilitate CO2 accumulation (pooling),
thereby potentially increasing water-use efficiency and plant growth.
Myriad other studies
have documented this CO2 fertilization effect
for many other plant species. While we can not be certain about
the precise magnitude of the impact that climate change may have
on future yields, it appears that more CO2 in the atmosphere
is not all bad for grapevines. Salute!
References:
Nemani, R. R., White,
M. A., Cayan, D. R., Jones, G. V., Running, S. W., and J. C. Coughlan,
"Asymmetric climatic warming improves California vintages."
Proceedings of the International Conference of Biometeorology,
Sydney, Australia, November 1999. (Also submitted to Climate
Research).
Jones, G. V. and
Davis, R. E., "Climate Influences on Grapevine Phenology,
Grape Composition, and Wine Production and Quality for Bordeaux,
France," American Journal of Viticulture and Enology,
(in press 1/2000).
Bindi, M., et al.
1996, "Modeling the Impact of Future Climate Scenarios on
Yield and Variability of Grapevine." Climate Research,
7, 213-224.
Easterling, D.R.,
et al., 1997. "Maximum and minimum temperature trends for
the globe." Science, 277, 364-367.
Easterling, D.R.,
et al., 2000. "Observed variability and trends in extreme
climate events: a brief review." Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society, 81(3), 417-425.
Figure 1:
Trends in Napa and Sonoma Valley wine quality and Napa Valley yields.
Figure 2:
Relationship between spring frosts and vintage ratings for Napa
and Sonoma Valleys. Frequency of spring frosts was the only significant
climate variable describing wine quality. The major exception to
the relationship represents the 1964 vintage, which had a high number
of frosts, but was followed by a miraculous climatic turn-around
in the late stages of growth.
Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., is an Assistant
Professor of Geography at Southern Oregon University. His BA in
Environmental Sciences (1993) and his Ph.D. (1997) with a focus
in Atmospheric Sciences were awarded by the University of Virginia.
Dr. Jones’ dissertation was "A Synoptic Climatological Assessment
of Viticultural Phenology" (Bordeaux, France). His research
interests include the effects of climate variability and change
on agriculture (grapes, pears, and other orchard fruits), climatic
controls on wildland fires and pollution events in the Inter-Mountain
West, the economics of grape growing and wine making, and atmospheric
circulation variability and control on regional climates.
|