Russian Lenses - Rangefinder and 35mm SLR
by Robert Monaghan

Related Local Links:
Medium Format Home Page
Medium Format Cameras List Page
Leica Clones Pages
Rangefinder Notes
Russian/Ukrainian Medium Format Lenses

Related Links:

Lens Name: focal length Max. f/stop Min. f/stop Lens made to fit models: #elements minimum
focus
distance (inch)
Resolution (in lpmm)
center - edge
Helios-40 85 f/1.5 f/22 35mm SLR 6 34 32 16
Helios-44 58 f/2 f/22 35mm SLR 6 18 35 14
Industar-24M 105 f/3.5 f/22 35mm SLR 4 34 28 14
Industar-50 50 f/3.5 f/16 35mm SLR 4 26 38 22
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 35mm SLR 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-21 200 f/4 f/22 35mm SLR 5 96 35 16
Jupiter-6 180 f/2.8 f/22 35mm SLR 5 78 35 16
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/16 35mm SLR 7 34 30 18
Mir-1 37 f/2.8 f/16 35mm SLR 6 27 45 23
MTO-1000 1000 f/10 f/10 35mm SLR 4 400 28 16
MTO-500 500 f/8 f/8 35mm SLR 5 150 28 20
Tair-11 133 f/2.8 f/22 35mm SLR 4 52 28 18
Tair-3 300 f/4.5 f/22 35mm SLR 3 120 36 30
Vega-1 50 f/2.8 f/16 35mm SLR 5 36 35 20
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-12 35 f/2.8 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 6 39 34 12
Jupiter-3 50 f/1.5 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 7 39 30 14
Jupiter-8 50 f/2 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 6 39 30 14
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 7 40 30 18
Orion-15 28 f/6 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 4 39 48 18
Industar-26M 50 f/3.5 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 30 12
Industar-50 50 f/3.5 f/16 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 38 22
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-12 35 f/2.8 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 39 34 12
Jupiter-3 50 f/1.5 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 39 30 14
Jupiter-8 50 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 39 30 14
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 40 30 18
Mercury-1 52 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 39 40 18
MR-2 20 f/5.6 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 19 35 20
Orion-15 28 f/6 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 48 18
Industar 35 f/2.8 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 4 19 42 22
Mir-5 28 f/2 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 7 16 35 20
Mir-6 28 f/2.8 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 5 11 35 20
                 
Lens Name: focal length Max. f/stop Min. f/stop Lens made to fit models: #elements minimum
focus
distance (inch)
center edge
MR-2 20 f/5.6 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 19 35 20
Mir-5 28 f/2 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 7 16 35 20
Mir-6 28 f/2.8 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 5 11 35 20
Orion-15 28 f/6 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 4 39 48 18
Orion-15 28 f/6 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 48 18
Industar 35 f/2.8 f/16 Nartis ultraminiature reflex 4 19 42 22
Jupiter-12 35 f/2.8 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 6 39 34 12
Jupiter-12 35 f/2.8 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 39 34 12
Mir-1 37 f/2.8 f/16 35mm SLR 6 27 45 23
Industar-26M 50 f/3.5 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 30 12
Industar-50 50 f/3.5 f/16 35mm SLR 4 26 38 22
Industar-50 50 f/3.5 f/16 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 39 38 22
Jupiter-3 50 f/1.5 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 7 39 30 14
Jupiter-3 50 f/1.5 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 39 30 14
Jupiter-8 50 f/2 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 6 39 30 14
Jupiter-8 50 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 6 39 30 14
Vega-1 50 f/2.8 f/16 35mm SLR 5 36 35 20
Mercury-1 52 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 39 40 18
Helios-44 58 f/2 f/22 35mm SLR 6 18 35 14
Helios-40 85 f/1.5 f/22 35mm SLR 6 34 32 16
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/16 35mm SLR 7 34 30 18
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 7 40 30 18
Jupiter-9 85 f/2 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 7 40 30 18
Industar-24M 105 f/3.5 f/22 35mm SLR 4 34 28 14
Tair-11 133 f/2.8 f/22 35mm SLR 4 52 28 18
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 35mm SLR 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 Contax (Kiev) 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-11 135 f/4 f/22 Leica (Fed, Zorki..) 4 52 34 19
Jupiter-6 180 f/2.8 f/22 35mm SLR 5 78 35 16
Jupiter-21 200 f/4 f/22 35mm SLR 5 96 35 16
Tair-3 300 f/4.5 f/22 35mm SLR 3 120 36 30
MTO-500 500 f/8 f/8 35mm SLR 5 150 28 20
MTO-1000 1000 f/10 f/10 35mm SLR 4 400 28 16
Source: Herb Keppler, Are Russian Lenses Better? Nyet!, Modern Photography, May 1962, p.75 chart

The above table sorts the lenses first by camera type (35mm SLR..) and lens name. The lower section repeats the lens listing, but shows them sorted by focal length and aperture.

The Russian 35mm SLR and rangefinders have vastly different lens registration distances, but may use similar (Leica) screw thread lens mount threads. So the lenses may fit, but they won't work properly if they are on the wrong camera. The Leica (Fed..) and Contax (Kiev) lenses are not interchangeable; the Contax lenses use the Contax bayonet while the threaded lenses fit the standard thread lens mount only. The two mirror MTO lenses have fixed preset diaphragms (MTO 500mm, MTO 1000mm). The Nartsis has its own lenses which can't be used on the Leica, nor will they couple to Leica style rangefinders, even though the same 39mm thread mount is used. The basic observation is that the use of the same thread mount (Leica) opens up the opportunity for confusion and problems that you should be aware of!

Some more information about the interesting ultrawide lenses from Russian and Ukrainian factories can be found in posting at our ultrawide lenses pages. You can also find some tidbits about the Russian and Ukrainian shift lenses for both medium format and 35mm (Nikon..) at our shift lenses pages.


Related Postings

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999
From: Sergei Matusevich motus@opera.webber.kiev.ua
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Subject: Re: Arsat lenses

welford wrote:

> Anyone here have experience with Arsat PC lenses ? What is
> the optical, and finish quality ? I understand they also have a
> new tilt/shift lens. Where might a lens review be located ?

ARSAT lenses are produced in Ukraine, on Arsenal plant in Kiev and Progress plant in Nezhin. They make manual focus lenses for 35 mm cameras (Nikon F mount and 42 mm screw mount), and for MF cameras as well (Kiev 60/Pentacon Six/Kiev 88 mount). I use Arsat 20/2.8, 50/1.4 and 100/2.8 on my Nikon FE and quite happy with this set.

Arsat PC lens you are talking about is a 35mm/2.8 shift only (not tilt) manual focus lens with a Nikon F mount. Here in Kiev you can buy it for about $100-$110. As all other Arsat lenses, Arsat PC is all metal heavy and solid thing. It has no jumping diaphragm and allows max. shift 11 mm along the frame and 7 mm across. What else? 6 diaphragm blades, stepless diaphragm change, 62 mm filter mount.

The bad thing about Arsat is its quality control. I recommend you to try 2 or 3 lenses to choose from, if it is possible, or buy a new lens with guarantee - otherwise you can run into a true dog! Check justification of the lens and the diaphragm blades - they could have a very strange form!

PS. Actually I beleieve that Arsat lenses sold in US and Europe have extra quality control, so you don't have to worry about it so much.

Have a nice shooting!


From Leica Mailing List;
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999
From: "Johnny Deadman" deadman@jukebox.demon.co.uk
Subject: [Leica] sharpness

I just ran a test pitting the following lenses against each other at all apertures on 'real world subjects' (ie some stuff in my back garden, using Tri-X in Xtol 1:1). Not Erwin-quality testing, obviously, but...

LTM Russar 20/5.6
LTM Canon 28/2.8
M Summilux 35/1.4

Sigma FD 24/2.8
Canon FD 28/2.8
Canon FD 35/2

I used a tripod, but in other respects I wanted this to be like the way I shoot day to day. The reason was that three of the lenses were new and I wanted to check them out.

Easily the winners were the Canon and Leica 35s, though at f8 all of the lenses with the possible exception of the Russar were very sharp (the Russar doesn't do well at the edges, but then no big surprise there).

At f8 and 5.6 respectively I could not detect a difference between the Canon and the Leica lenses, in sharpness at least. There is certainly a difference in character, however, which I am at a loss to describe.

The old Canon 28 is surprisingly good, too.

What is absolutely clear from my testing is that the great limiting factor in the sharpness of my pix is my technique. ALL of the lenses easily outperform my ability hold the camera steady at speeds lower than 1/250.

I just bought a scanner. When the transparency hood arrives I'll post the results to my up and coming website.


[Ed. note: see Kiev Lenses for Kevin's Kiev 60/88 lens tables]
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000
From: Kevin Kalsbeek krkk@earthlink.net
To: Robert Monaghan rmonagha@post.cis.smu.edu
Subject: Re: Kiev 60 and 88 lens table

Hi Bob,

There will be more pages added in a day or so. Yeah, I know about expensive books!! "Leica Copies" by HPR-- MAJOR OUCH$$ !! Well, it certainly can be confusing! I'm sure having fun with my collection of Russian jobbies though. The are really usable and will do a great job if allowed.

Very good optics in general- and the 20mm Russar............!! I don't use it often, but that's a rather spectacular lens. The part I like is that I don't have to outwit a computer chip!

Take care!

Kevin

....