Home · About & Contact · Forum · Boston Events | ||
Recent Entries
Links
Blogroll Me! :Blogs: Adloyada Agam's Gecko Amy Ridenour Andunie The Argus Armies of Liberation Asian Security Astute Blogger Atlas Shrugs Augean Stables Banagor Beautiful Atrocities Boker tov, Boulder Celestial Blue Classical Values Colin Meade Coming Anarchy Common Sense & Wonder Daily Scorecard Dancing w/Dogs Davids Medienkritik DC Debate Dean Esmay Dodgeblogium Done With Mirrors Elegance Against Ignorance Exit Zero Fightin' w/Grabes Free Thoughts The Ghost of a Flea Hatshepsut Head Heeb Hidden Nook Hyscience If You Will It... In Context Israpundit Israellycool Jerusalem Posts Jihad/Dhimmi Watch JPundit Kesher Talk Little Green Footballs Louisiana Conservative Marathon Pundit Marmot Matt May MentalBlog Michelle Malkin Mick Hartley Miss O'Hara My Wide Blue Seas Mythusmage Opines Nice Jewish Boy Normblog On The Third Hand One Hand Clapping One Jerusalem Peaktalk Pillage Idiot PoliBlog Ranting Sandmonkey Regnum Crucis Riding Sun Rishon Rishon Roger L. Simon Seawitch Simulev Smooth Stone Snapshots Soccer Dad Somewhere on A1A Southern Knight Stand for Israel TigerHawk Truth in Love Undercaffeinated VietPundit The View From Here The Wandering Jew White Pebble Who Knew? Winds of Change The World You Big Mouth, You! Yourish :New England Blogs: Accidental Verbosity Alphecca And Rightly So Boston Common Carpundit Daleynews Daniel in Brookline Dog Snot Diaries Ex-Donkey Insomnomaniac JRTelegraph Libertarian Leanings N.E. Republican Neo-Neocon Viking Pundit Weekend Pundit Note on Permissions:
Site (C)2003-2005 Solomonia.com |
Wednesday, August 24, 2005Where do Islamist journalism students go when they graduate? Why, to NPR, of course.You may not remember Mariam Sobh, a regular columnist for the Daily Illini, the student newspaper of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and a member of the Muslim Students Association while she was a journalism student there. You may remember some of the things she wrote, however. As a columnist, Sobh had a "thing" for Israel, and apparently made it the frequent target of her poison pen, perhaps most infamously in her column, Stop turning a blind eye, in which she recycled several clearly fabricated quotes attributed erroneously to Ariel Sharon. CAMERA has a very good synopsis, here, Anti-Israel Venom at University of Illinois Paper: (emphasis in all quotes is mine) ...Mariam Sobh introduced her Dec 11 piece with the following statement, purportedly uttered by Ariel Sharon, in order “to show a clearer picture of the Israeli leadership:”
"I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian woman is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do," Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said in an interview with General Ouze Merham in 1956. This shocking quote, a staple on Arab propaganda Web sites, is an internet hoax for which the journalism student, not surprisingly, provided no source. There is no record of any “General Ouze Merham” or any truth to the claim that Sharon made the quoted comments. The paper’s decision to run such an inflammatory statement with no attribution is indefensible. The Sharon quote was not the only fabrication. Sobh alleged that former Israeli Chief of Staff, Raphael Eytan was quoted in the April 14, 1983 New York Times as saying: “We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel ... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” However, a Nexis search of all Times coverage reveals that no one, not Eytan or anyone else, was ever quoted by the paper making the purported statement... Pressure on the paper resulted first in a defense of the columnist, then a grudging admission on her part, and finally a more full apology which CAMERA credits here: University of Illinois Columnist Fully Apologizes That article was merely the most egregious example of the repetition of outright falsehood. As I mentioned, Sobh had a thing for Israel. CAMERA: ...Sobh’s recklessness in misusing sources is longstanding. In one of her first columns for the DI, Sobh wrote that the security barrier Israel is building will separate Palestinians from the water supply and that “they [Palestinians] will eventually be driven to starvation if this wall is completed” (“Modern wall of apartheid” Aug. 28, 2003) . She added “I think that it is sad that we can pay for genocide and act like it’s no big deal.” Her source for the “genocide” charge was an article from the site Antiwar.com. The Web site, which devotes an entire section to Israel’s alleged role in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, can hardly be considered credible.
In another column, the journalism student charged that Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty ship in 1967 “was one of the most horrific and deliberate attacks against the United States” (emphasis added). Her claim is primarily based on a conversation she had with Jim Ennes, a leading conspiracy proponent who has called Israel’s leaders “amoralistic murderers” who are “worse” than the Nazis. She portrayed Ennes as reliable while Sobh did not even mention the more than six government inquiries into the event. Each and every one of the probes concluded the attack was accidental and not, as she claims, “deliberate.” Illini regular Mariam Sobh has had a free hand to regurgitate baseless propaganda with little or no supervision by the DI editors, faculty or board members of the Illini Media, the entity that owns the newspaper. No doubt the lax attitude toward Sobh’s screeds encouraged other DI staff to vilify Israel and Jews... And here is Sobh defending Mahathir Mohamad's bizarro-world anti-Semitic screed two years ago. (See entries here, here, here, here and here as well as others -- search 'Mahathir' -- for background) See also this entry at Dean's World on Sobh. So here we have a person, a former member of an Islamist group, with a background involving a history of writing inaccurate, virulently anti-Israel and even anti-Semitic (there is usually little difference) screeds. Where do they go after graduation? According to Sobh's resume: Jan 2004-present
WILL AM... Urbana, IL Saturday Morning Host for Weekend Edition from NPR * Research and write news, sports and weather and read live on-air. * Sub as Host for cut-in's during All Things Considered from NPR. Yes, she's researching, writing news and hosting for a National Public Radio affiliate. Update: Thanks to the emailer who points out that Ms. Sobh also interns, at the news desk, for Chicago Public Radio. Posted by Solomon at August 24, 2005 10:57 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.solomonia.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-renamedtb.cgi/4641 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Where do Islamist journalism students go when they graduate? Why, to NPR, of course.' from Solomonia.
Entry Title: WILL Hires Controversial Islamist at the blog IlliniPundit.com
Excerpt: From solomonia.com, via Ace of Trump: Solomon tells us that Mariam Sobh, a former University of Illinois student notorious for writing anti-Israeli propaganda in the Daily Illini newspaper, and a member of an Islamist group, is now employed doing res... Comments
Comments: Where do Islamist journalism students go when they graduate? Why, to NPR, of course.
I am shocked, SHOCKED! that NPR would hire someone with such a dubious past and obvious, transparent agenda. No doubt they did an extensive talent search before hiring her and unfortunately Osama bin Laden was unavailable. Posted by: Mike on Hilton Head Island at August 25, 2005 12:56 AMNPR has not exactly been noted for fair or equitable reporting. That they are now using propogandists on their staff should not be a surprise. Another example of our tax dollars being used to push a polital and social agenda at odds with the values and feelings of most Americans. Posted by: Tom Glennon at August 25, 2005 02:29 PMHonestly, have you come to expect anything less from NPR? NPR may as well stand for Nazi Propagandist Radio! Posted by: Nightcrawler at August 25, 2005 11:33 PMGenerally excellent lumping on NPR, but one caveat: Without regard to the findings of twice as many Navy investigations, no reasonable person can regard the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty as being accidental. For whatever reasons, someone didn't want that ship collecting data that day (FYI, the Liberty was a U.S. Navy communications reconnaissance resource placed there to copy electronic transmissions.) It pays to remember that Israel is not our friend. Nations don't have friends. Nations have interests and any nation that expects to survive had better place its own interests first. Posted by: Stan Bussey at August 26, 2005 01:53 PMI have called NPR's DC office to complain and have sent a letter to the ombudsman as well. Here is the text of my letter. Anyone is free to use it when they compose their own complaints to NPR: ombudsman@npr.org I am appalled to hear that the NPR office in Chicago has hired Mariam Sobh as, of all things, a journalist! When journalists at other news outlets are caught lying, they are promptly fired by any respectable organization. How is it that NPR is either unaware of or unconcerned with the ethics of their employees? If ethics are of no concern, how about the possibility of lawsuits if someone finally calls Ms. Sobh to account for the atrocious falsehoods she concocts? Rather than go search back over the past few years for articles detailing Ms Sobh's history, I would like to refer you to a few online sites which detail some of the more egregious exploits of your new employee: Link... Information on the Muslim Student's Association, which Ms Sobh has been active in: If NPR is to maintain it's position as a respected source of news and information, a good first step would be to not hire employees with such questionable backgrounds. Another step would be to fire those you have already hired, simple enough to do in the interest of integrity. Posted by: Lily Downing at August 26, 2005 02:25 PMOne of the reasons I'm so pro-Israel is that I'm really offended that Jewish children have to breathe the same air as individuals like Stan Bussey. Given the apple rarely falls far from the tree, I shudder to even contemplate the people who raised him. Truly he is an ugly stain on a very great nation. Posted by: Joshua at August 26, 2005 02:34 PMStan, with all due respect, please try doing a little homework (beyond james banford and whatreallyhappened.com): Posted by: Lynn B. at August 26, 2005 02:42 PMThis child's writing is indeed disgraceful. But she's still young, and just getting started. It'd be mighty harsh to trash her career at its very beginning. I say, let her be and see if her work gets better now that she's a pro instead of a silly student. Posted by: Jes' me at August 26, 2005 02:47 PM"I say, let her be and see if her work gets better now that she's a pro instead of a silly student." Why is it that gentiles are always telling Jews to turn the other cheek, even in the most provocative circumstances, when they are so rarely willing to do it themselves? Posted by: Joshua at August 26, 2005 05:57 PMRecent revelations about journalistic technique are disturbing and a distinct pattern of bias is emerging he BBC, NPR, CNN... my oh my I am begining to think that journalists would rather make news than report it. It is a propaganda war, and the enemy got a head start. Posted by: Dubiously D at August 26, 2005 06:07 PMI agree with the person who wrote and called NPR. C'mon. If she can't tell that Sharon quote at least has a high probability of being faked, she needs to review her level of skepticism. Posted by: Amir at August 26, 2005 06:34 PMI will reply more completely to this issue soon. For the moment, though, I never know when or where I'll hear it, but at least once a week I get a clear reminder of why I never voluntarily[1] contribute money to WILL, my local NPR affiliate. It's sad, because some parts of their operation are so very good. I'm thinking especially of Ed Kieser & Mike Sola, who produce the best weather segments on radio today. [1]: Of course, some of my tax money is sent to NPR without my consent. Posted by: Bill White at August 26, 2005 09:37 PMActually I am shocked they hired her. Usually they go for more subtle innuendo, not outright lies. Must be getting nervous...and sloppy. Posted by: Patricia at August 26, 2005 11:01 PMIt should be noted that Jim Ennes is a retired career naval officer and survivor of the U.S.S. Liberty, and definitely not a conspiracy theorist. Why does it become necessary to smear the good name of this American hero? Posted by: ansonicus at August 26, 2005 11:58 PMI am liberal democrat and 20 year KCRW subscriber who is outraged and disgusted that this Sobh would be given a job at WINN. I wrote the NPR Ombudsmen (thanks Lilly) and WINN station manager requesting that she be allowed to compose fiction elsewhere on her own time. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Steve Posted by: Steve Jung at August 27, 2005 07:47 PMHere's the smug reply I got from the Ombudsman: Dear Mr. Jung, Miriam Sobh does not work for NPR. I complained to the ombudsman, and sure enough, she works for local NPR affiliates, but no one at NPR has ever heard of her. Posted by: Lily Downing at August 28, 2005 10:06 AMWhat a bunch of lies and crap about the USS Liberty... and what do you know? It's FRONT PAGE news, yet again on the "Washington Middle East Report." That's a true mark of a conspiracy theory: the old parts NEVER die, the conspiracy theorists NEVER admit that any old part is so much crap, despit overwhelming evidence. THAT'S why you can still by "The Protocols Of The Learned Elders of Zion", hot off the presses, at davidduke.com, whatreallyhappened.com, and bookstores all over the world. That's why they are STILL citing "Clinton's massacre at Waco" and "Clinton trashed Air Force One the day he left office" and "Hillary decorated the Whitehouse Christmas Tree with crackpipes and tiny penises." "Friendly fire" has been with us since they invented the long-range trajectory missile. Israel friendly-fired us, plain and simple. For one thing alone, there is NO WAY to prove intent. It's like proving the differnece between sex and rape. It can't be proven. If you don't believe me, just ask the woman who was "raped" by Kobe Bryant, and "proved it" by saying he had big hands that could reach all the way around her neck. (PS... for those of you not in-the-know, it was later found that she had the semen of three different men in her underware. I don't know that much about female hygiene, but I think that most women change their underware at least once every three days or so...) If YOU were going to sink a ship, would YOU fire only ONE torpedo, or would you fire a dozen torpedos? Israel fired ONE and only ONE torpedo at the Liberty. Looks like the Israel bashers' theory about "they wanted to sink the Liberty" just... sunk. Let's talk about something you've never heard of: the USS Starke. An American ship was patrolling the shore of an "ally" who was engaged in a war. The "ally" had the full backing of the United States. The "ally" attacked the USS Starke and killed a bunch of sailors. They realized that they made an error and halted the attack. An investigation concluded that it was friendly fire. Now for the differences: The USS Starke was attacked by Iraq. ....do a google search and see for yourself the proof that the Liberty incident, like all things involved with Israel, is hyped waaaaay out of proportion. (When last I checked, about a year ago, there were over 200,000 hits for "USS Liberty" and less that 50 for "USS Starke.") Please keep in mind that Iraq had the benefit of fighting an OFFENSIVE war, not a defensive war in which invading armies promised to destroy Iraq and kill every single Iraqi (as was the case with Israel.) Every five or so years since then, and every five or so years from now until the End of Days there's going to be a renewed interest in "really" finding out "the truth" about what happened to the Liberty and more calls for YET ANOTHER investigation. [Sidebar: Like I said before, just see the headlines of the latest "Washington Middle East Report". To them, the allegations about Israel of 1967 are not only considered newsworthy, but are actually afforded FRONT-PAGE headlines! Nothing about the rape of Sudan with 2,000,000 murders since 1990 (compared to less than 10,000 in Israel), nothing about FGM, nothing about Tehran publicly hanging homosexual teenagers and beheading a teenage girl for having "a sharp tongue", nothing about the ruin of Lebanon by Syria and Iran, nothing about Saudi Arabia destroying EVERY building in Mecca from the days of Mohammed, lest a "cult" spring up and detract from Islam..... But I digress.] Soon all the Liberty survivors will be dead, but already their kids are leading the way to keep the "controversy" alive for another 30 years or so. And when they're all dead, the grandkids can--with the help of David Duke, the "palestinians" and sundry other misfits--will keep carrying the torch of Jew hatred. Posted by: fustercluck at August 28, 2005 12:20 PM"A smear campaign by the usual suspects?" Does anyone find Dworkin's reply offensive? Smug? Arrogant? This young woman belongs to an Islamist organization - the Muslim Students Association. She has published a string of articles that can only be considered hate-speech against the Jewish state and its statesmen. She works, as Solomonia carefully reported, for not one but two NPR affiliate stations. Perhaps Dworkin could have taken some responsiblity here. Like, he could have looked her up. As Posted by: Anna at August 28, 2005 09:21 PMIt is with great regret that I see NPR has added another anti-semite to their assortment of Israel bashers. Calling people like her an anti-semite comes from the mouths of the Rev. Martin Luther King:"Those that hate Israel by nature are anti-semites". I am sure this will not change NPR's anti-semitic rhetoric. But,it is your choice to support clitorizers,woman being treated like garbage,suicides of children(totally anti-Koranic,the biggest heroin dealers in the world and the deadly sequellae;ad naseum. But as they say you are known by the company you keep! How do you sleep? Posted by: Alan at August 29, 2005 10:31 AMCould you comment on this Dear Rabbi Kaplan: Thank you for taking the time to write to WMHT-FM about someone named Please be advised that there is no one by that name working at WMHT-FM As you might be aware, the 795 public radio stations around the country Again, we appreciate your interest in contacting WMHT-FM and apologize Sincerely, -- www.wmht.org MHT appears to be in New York, so that's correct. The entry notes that the stations she works for are Illinois NPR affiliates, WILL and WBEZ. The national people clearly feel it's an important distinction that she officially works for locals and not the national NPR office. That may be so. I would say that to the layman, however, and I say this as someone who's listened to plenty of Public Radio over the years (WBUR in Boston, mostly), that that's something of a distinction without a difference. I think they'd be better served by explaining why that's not so than going with what appears to be a "cute" response -- "Ummm, uhhh...nope, no one here knows her." There must be many radio stations in the Chicago area that offer news, yet she wound up at two Public Radio stations. The national people seem to be trying to say that because she's not employed directly by NPR national that it's all a big lie and it doesn't reflect on them at all. I don't think that's very honest of them. It's certainly not the whole truth. The fact is, she apparently has her hands on the news at two Chicago NPR affiliates. I think to most people that reflects on "NPR" -- all parsing aside. That may feel unfair to the people at the national office, but that's the way it is. If one of your franchisees is behaving badly, it can't help but reflect on the national office, and just washing your hands and saying "Nope, we don't know anything about it," isn't going to exactly cut it in the minds of most people. Posted by: Solomon at August 31, 2005 08:28 AMHere is an email a reader received from the Station Manager at WILL confirming that Sobh worked there, but assuring her that Sobh had no real opportunity to influence the news slant there. A fair and straightforward response. I will likely put up a new post as an update later. Thank you for elaborating on your specific concerns. At WILL, Mariam delivered brief local news reports, sports and weather reports. She basically assembled and read material from our news staff and The Associated Press. I assure you, there was nothing about her job that would put her in a position to influence our programming editorially. A few other differences between the attack on LIBERTY and the attack on STARK. STARK was fired on at night from about 25 km distance. LIBERTY was fired on in daylight from less than 500 meters distance. STARK was fired on by one aircraft, which fired one salvo of missiles. LIBERTY was fired on by multiple aircraft, using both incendiary bombs and cannon, and making multiple firing passes, then fired on by multiple warships, using torpedoes and cannon, over a period of 30 minutes. Given that Israel in 1967 had possibly the most competent military in history (IDF won _every_ _battle_ in that war), the claim of a mistake is hard to swallow. BTW, I live in Illinois and will be looking into the Sobh business. It sounds all too typical. Clueless liberals who can't spot a crazed radical spewing garbage, because they half believe it themselves. Shades of Britain's Guardian. She's not "in a position to influence our programming editorially"? _Maybe_ not - but who decides what AP stories get 'assembled and read'? Would WILL trust a neo-Nazi or Klansman with this job? Or even an outspoken Republican? Hah! Posted by: Rich Rostrom at September 1, 2005 03:16 AMPost a comment
|
To support this site: Paypal Donate Amazon Donate Amazon Purchase "...estimable...Sol, my hat is off to you." "...I am deeply honored to merit a link from Solomon -- who lives up to the venerated ancient name with his wisdom and sagacity...' "...good writing, great content..." "I enjoy your writing A LOT." "I have seen your blog, liked what you're doing, and am linking it
(we've gone through a similar transformation)." "...if Solomonia isn't on your regular-read list, you're missing out."
Archives
November 2005
1/28/03-2/4/03
October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 Now Reading: Recommended:
(Some of my better posts) . |