Advice Beginners BIOS Guide CPUs Links Mainboards Memory Network Storage Video/Sound Cards Contact Forum SiteMap Sponsors WebNews Home |
. | . |
CPU Intel P4 840 D P4 820 D P4 630 P4 640 P4 650 P4 660 P4 670 AMD Athlon64 3500+ 3700+ 3800+ 4000+ X2-3800+ X2-4200+ X2-4400+ X2-4600+ X2-4800+ 1-Way Opteron Opteron 144 Opteron 146 Opteron 148 Opteron 150 Opteron 152 2-Way Opteron Opteron 240 Opteron 242 Opteron 244 Opteron 246 Opteron 248 Opteron 250 Opteron 252 2-Way Dual Core Opteron Opteron 270 Opteron 275 nVidia GF 7800GT GF 6800GT GF 6600GT ATI R X850 XT PE R X850 XT R X800 XT PE R X800 XT R X800 XL Memory Corsair Crucial Kingston Mushkin OCZ |
LOSTCIRCUITS | ||
DDR II A Technology Overview | ||
Article by MS, January 6, 2003 updated last: Nov. 28, 2006 |
Summary
DDR (I) is approaching the end of its dominating role in the desktop space to be replaced by the second generation of double data rate memory starting at 400 MHz and using a conventional 64/72 bit parallel bus interface. Lower operating voltage, new features like on-die termination, off-chip driver calibration, Posted CAS and variable write latency sound intriguing but what is really lurking behind the new standard. We have seen claims of up to 72% power savings over DDR I and other miracle cures for any bandwidth issues faced by the PC industry. We have done the math ourselves found a few convenient errors in some of the manufacturer's descriptions of DDR II. Otherwise, DDR II looks very promising but who will benefit in the end?
If the DRAM makers have their way, DDR or DDR I as we know it will be succeeded at some point in the coming year by the next generation of mainstream SDRAM: DDR II. The second generation of DDR has been anticipated by consumers and DRAM manufacturers alike, however, for rather different reasons.
Hypothetical DDR II Registered ECC DIMM using Elpida components (altered after Elpida). The pin count on the DIMM has increased from 184 pins in DDR (I) to 240 pins in the new DDR II format.
Most consumers associate primarily higher performance with DDR II. Starting speed grades of 400 MHz data rate for system memory and already going up to 1 GHz in graphics applications, even before the new technology has hit the streets sound like some real progress has been made in DRAM technology. This is especially true in light of the difficulties in current DDR I technology to yield DDR400 MHz components in sufficient quantity.
So what are the magic ingredients that makes DDR II wiggle so much faster than DDR I? More importantly, we have heard all the rumors of DDR II being backward compatible with DDR I but we also heard the opposite. For the graphics card manufacturers, the compatibility may not be such a crucial factor but what will happen to the consumer who wants to upgrade his memory to DDR II on an existing mainboard? Last not least, since there is no such thing as a free lunch, will DDR II be more expensive than current DDR (I) or what other trade-offs will there be e.g. in terms of latency vs. bandwidth?
We have seen the wildest speculations about DDR II floating on the web, including the use of very inventive math by some DRAM manufacturers to hi-light the benefits of the new standard. We have heard terms like "DDR II in emulation mode" and "poor man's DDR", we have seen articles using all the correct buzz words albeit somewhat out of context. But what is really behind the new technology?
next page: => SDRAM, DDR, DDR II: the basics =>
If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.