Navigate:

Advice
Beginners
BIOS Guide
CPUs
Links
Mainboards
Memory
Network
Storage
Video/Sound Cards

Contact
Forum
SiteMap
Sponsors
WebNews
Home

. .


CPU
Intel
P4 840 D
P4 820 D
P4 630
P4 640
P4 650
P4 660
P4 670

AMD
Athlon64
3500+
3700+
3800+
4000+
X2-3800+
X2-4200+
X2-4400+
X2-4600+
X2-4800+

1-Way Opteron
Opteron 144
Opteron 146
Opteron 148
Opteron 150
Opteron 152

2-Way Opteron
Opteron 240
Opteron 242
Opteron 244
Opteron 246
Opteron 248
Opteron 250
Opteron 252

2-Way Dual Core Opteron
Opteron 270
Opteron 275

nVidia
GF 7800GT
GF 6800GT
GF 6600GT

ATI
R X850 XT PE
R X850 XT
R X800 XT PE
R X800 XT
R X800 XL

Memory

Corsair
Crucial
Kingston
Mushkin
OCZ

What are you
shopping for?







































































LOSTCIRCUITS

SHORTCUTS:
Top page
Clocking Strategies
OCD-Calibration
On-Die-Termination
Posted CAS-Additive Latency
All At One Glance
The Grand Picture
Winners And Not-So-Winners

Your Comments?

 DDR II   
A Technology Overview
Article by MS, January 6, 2003
updated last: Nov. 28, 2006


Summary

DDR (I) is approaching the end of its dominating role in the desktop space to be replaced by the second generation of double data rate memory starting at 400 MHz and using a conventional 64/72 bit parallel bus interface. Lower operating voltage, new features like on-die termination, off-chip driver calibration, Posted CAS and variable write latency sound intriguing but what is really lurking behind the new standard. We have seen claims of up to 72% power savings over DDR I and other miracle cures for any bandwidth issues faced by the PC industry. We have done the math ourselves found a few convenient errors in some of the manufacturer's descriptions of DDR II. Otherwise, DDR II looks very promising but who will benefit in the end?

If the DRAM makers have their way, DDR or DDR I as we know it will be succeeded at some point in the coming year by the next generation of mainstream SDRAM: DDR II. The second generation of DDR has been anticipated by consumers and DRAM manufacturers alike, however, for rather different reasons.

Hypothetical DDR II Registered ECC DIMM using Elpida components (altered after Elpida). The pin count on the DIMM has increased from 184 pins in DDR (I) to 240 pins in the new DDR II format.

Most consumers associate primarily higher performance with DDR II. Starting speed grades of 400 MHz data rate for system memory and already going up to 1 GHz in graphics applications, even before the new technology has hit the streets sound like some real progress has been made in DRAM technology. This is especially true in light of the difficulties in current DDR I technology to yield DDR400 MHz components in sufficient quantity.

So what are the magic ingredients that makes DDR II wiggle so much faster than DDR I? More importantly, we have heard all the rumors of DDR II being backward compatible with DDR I but we also heard the opposite. For the graphics card manufacturers, the compatibility may not be such a crucial factor but what will happen to the consumer who wants to upgrade his memory to DDR II on an existing mainboard? Last not least, since there is no such thing as a free lunch, will DDR II be more expensive than current DDR (I) or what other trade-offs will there be e.g. in terms of latency vs. bandwidth?

We have seen the wildest speculations about DDR II floating on the web, including the use of very inventive math by some DRAM manufacturers to hi-light the benefits of the new standard. We have heard terms like "DDR II in emulation mode" and "poor man's DDR", we have seen articles using all the correct buzz words albeit somewhat out of context. But what is really behind the new technology?

next page:    => SDRAM, DDR, DDR II: the basics =>

If you enjoyed reading this article and found it useful, please consider making a small donation to LostCircuits.
Thank you!

General disclaimer: This page only reflects the author's personal opinion and assumes no responsibility whatsoever regarding any of the contents or any damages that may occur explicitly or implicitly from reading the contents of this site. All names and trademarks mentioned in this review are the exclusive property of the respective parent companies.
All contents of this site are protected by international copyright laws. Reproduction of the contents even in parts is not allowed except after written permission by the author and referral to this site.
Copyright 1998 - 2007 LostCircuits