World Cultures: A Global Mosaic
The 1993 version of World Cultures was the subject of three reviews
published in TTL for March-April 1994 -- one review written by
James Giese, one by Charles Paul, one by me. All three said
World Cultures had little or nothing to do with the study of
cultures.
Giese observed that the book seemed to be a mass of material that
had been produced for other purposes, and he inferred that much
of this material had been thrown into World Cultures as filler.
World Cultures lacked any coherent idea of what the word culture
meant, he said, and it could not help students to learn about
cultures or cultural affairs.
Paul said that Prentice Hall's writers evidently didn't know what
cultures were, and he rejected the writers' efforts to equate
cultures with nation-states. He also deplored the book's
incoherence, superficiality, errors of fact, and misconceived
perspectives.
In my own review, I asserted that the book failed to give an
account of any culture anywhere, that much of its text consisted
of meaningless factoids, that it was pervaded by overt racism,
and that the writers' chief skills seemed to lie in the realms of
pandering and sloganeering. World Cultures, I said, was a fake.
My reading of the 1996 version hasn't given me any reason to
alter that judgment.
As a part of my appraisal of the 1996 book, I randomly chose 77
of its text pages (starting with page 3 and ending with page
772), and I compared each of these with the same-numbered page in
the 1993 version. Here are the chief observations which have
emerged from that sampling:
World Cultures is still a chaotic collection of bits and pieces,
most of which seem to have been taken from old world-history
books. It still fails to show any awareness of cultural
anthropology, still fails to show any comprehension of what
cultures are, and (as far as I can see) still fails to give any
account of any culture anywhere.
Many false or absurd items are still in place (even the utterly
nonsensical section about "Stone Age People") and the book, as a
whole, is still pervaded by racism and by racial, ethnic and
ideological pandering: It continues to treat various groups of
people with contempt while it coats other groups with thick
layers of treacle and whitewash. For example, Prentice Hall's
"history" of Japanese policies and actions in the 1930s and
during World War 2 is just obscurantist molasses. No student who
reads it will understand why 50-year-old memories of Japanese
conquests, Japanese war crimes, and Japan's hideous treatment of
subjugated peoples are still affecting Japan's relations with
other nations.
I would characterize World Cultures as a physical embodiment of
the notion that social-studies teachers are awfully dumb -- so
dumb that they will purchase any book that has pretty covers and
has "cultures" or "cultural" in its title.
William J. Bennetta is a professional editor, a fellow of the
California Academy of Sciences, the president of The Textbook
League, and the editor of The Textbook Letter. He writes
frequently about the propagation of quackery, false "science" and
false "history" in schoolbooks.
Reviewing a high-school book in social studies
1996. 828 pages. ISBN of the student's edition: 0-13-831801-8.
Prentice Hall, 113 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632.
Like the 1993 Version,
This Book Is WorthlessWilliam J. Bennetta
In all major respects, the 1996 version of World Cultures is
interchangeable with the 1993 version. As far as essential
content and structure are concerned, the two books are the same,
right down to their chapter titles and their pagination. Where
the 1996 book shows changes, the changes are generally small and
skimpy. Most of them involve nothing more than the revision of a
caption or the rewording of a line or two of text.
Besides conducting a formal sampling of pages, I've looked
through the 1996 book to see if it displays any changes in
fundamental content or organization. It does not.