Introductory Physical Science
Introductory Physical Science is short -- it has only 268 pages,
rather than the 600 to 800 pages found in typical
physical-science texts -- because the authors are intent on showing
students how to do science, not on stuffing their heads with
disjointed results. The authors achieve their purpose by
guiding the students through the development of a central concept
in physical science, which is announced in the book's preface:
Other themes might have served as well, but the development of
the atomic picture of matter works just fine. The student moves
through a series of experiments and analyses that amount to an
abridged account of the development of chemistry (and of physics,
to some extent) from the mid-1700s to the early 1900s. The
authors generally ignore the artificial distinctions between
chemistry and physics; for example, they never ask the student
to waste time by making lists that segregate the "chemical
properties" and "physical properties" of matter.
The authors' pedagogical philosophy is set forth in a message to
the student, titled "About the Course." Here is an excerpt:
Modern chemistry and physics can give a much more meaningful
account of the properties of matter. If this account is to have
any meaning for you, we shall have to begin at the beginning. We
cannot just throw new words at you. Each step must be filled in
with experiments that you will perform. Then all the words and
ideas will correspond to something real for you, and you will
reach conclusions on your own.
Though the authors do not say that they have arranged their
material in a sequence that generally parallels the historical
development of chemistry and physics, knowledgeable teachers will
recognize this -- especially when they read the first half of the
book, which deals with the macroscopic properties of matter. In
a series of experiments that use the simplest possible
equipment, the student learns to measure the volume and mass of
solids, liquids and gases, and he comes to recognize that even
these basic quantities must be interpreted carefully. The
student starts by measuring the volume of a rectangular solid,
then progresses to measuring the volume of a stack of coins, a
quantity of water, and an irregular solid. He sees that if the
volume of a quantity of sand is measured by two different
methods, the measurements give different results; and he is led
to understand why this is so, and what it implies about the need
for precision in the use of words.
The experiments with gases recreate one of the hard-won triumphs
of 18th-century science: the recognition that gases have mass,
density and other specific properties. In the crucial
experiment, the student puts an Alka-Seltzer tablet into a test
tube of water, collects (and measures the volume of) the gas that
evolves, and compares the before-and-after weights of the test
tube and its contents. The values obtained are not precise, but
they suffice to teach two essential points: The density of a gas
is typically much lower than the density of a solid or a liquid
(by a factor of a thousand or so); and gases must be taken into
account during studies of chemical reactions, even though the
densities of gases are small.
From this experimental work, the law of conservation of mass
emerges naturally. In the other physical-science books that I
have seen, it is simply declared as if it were a sacred
commandment.
Now the student is guided through laboratory measurements of
boiling points, melting points, densities and solubilities,
followed by experiments with various separation procedures:
solution, filtration, flotation, fractional distillation,
fractional crystallization, and paper chromatography. These
prepare the student for experiments which involve the synthesis
and decomposition of chemical compounds, and which elucidate the
law of definite proportions and (later) the law of multiple
proportions.
The concept of a chemical element arises from the student's
laboratory work, with some help from the book's skillful authors.
It is instructive to compare their approach with the one used in
a conventional book, Prentice Hall's Chemistry of Matter. The
Prentice Hall book just hands down some sacerdotal esoterica
from on high:
In Introductory Physical Science, however, we find real science
instead of priestly pronouncements. The student, during his
laboratory work, has weighed a sample of sodium chlorate, has
heated it and weighed it again, has inspected the substance
produced by the heating, and has compared that substance with
the starting material. He has carried out a similar process with
a sample of powdered copper. He has dissolved copper oxide in
water, and he has plated copper onto a strip of zinc. Now, on
page 125 of his textbook, he reads:
Contrast this behavior of copper with that of sodium chlorate . .
. . When you heat sodium chlorate, oxygen is given off, and the
resulting sodium chloride has a smaller mass than the original
quantity of sodium chlorate. We reason, therefore, that sodium
chloride is a simpler substance than sodium chlorate.
[Analogous tests show that] sodium and chlorine must be simpler
substances than sodium chloride. However, just as with copper,
none of the methods that can be used to break up other
substances work for either sodium or chlorine. Pure substances
that do not break up by heating, electrolysis, reacting with
acids, or similar methods are called elements.
The authors emphasize the tentative nature of this definition by
telling that Lavoisier, in 1789, classified lime as an element
because he could not make it decompose, and he classified
chlorine as a compound (for theoretical reasons that later turned
out to be erroneous). Those two substances were not reclassified
until Humphry Davy, some 30 years later, showed that lime could
be broken down and chlorine could not.
Throughout Introductory Physical Science, simple experiments
enable the student to arrive at exciting and useful conclusions.
After using a droplet of oleic acid to make a monolayer on
water, the student (by using just a little arithmetic) estimates
the size and mass of an oleic-acid molecule. To compare the
level of radon in a basement with the level of radon in a room
upstairs, the student uses a vacuum cleaner, some filter paper
and an inexpensive Geiger counter. To measure electric charge,
he uses a test tube that collects hydrogen from the electrolysis
of water. And when this charge-measuring apparatus is used in
conjunction with a watch, it becomes an ammeter.
The text pages are peppered with appropriate, thought-provoking
problems -- some easy, some moderately hard, a few that are
really difficult. A few essay assignments are offered at the
ends of chapters, and they differ from all the essay questions
that I have seen in other physical-science books. Why? Because
they are useful and make sense. Here are a few examples:
The terms "conserve" and "conservation" have different meanings
in science and in everyday life. . . . Write a brief essay
explaining the difference . . . . [page 38]
"Seeing is believing" is a common saying. But does "not seeing"
imply "not believing"? Neither hydrogen nor oxygen is visible
[in an electrolysis experiment performed] in the laboratory. Is
there, perhaps, a form of indirect seeing? Express your thoughts
on this subject [page 134]
Vacuum tubes were invented early in this century. They played a
crucial role in the development of radios and, later, computers.
Today they are hardly used anymore, having been replaced by
transistors and integrated circuits. Other inventions, such as
the steam locomotive and dirigible, have also played an important
role in technology only to be replaced by newer inventions. Read
about an invention of your choice and write a paper titled "The
Rise and Fall of . . . ." [page 248]
The use of fluoride to reduce tooth decay was quite controversial
in the past. Today, irradiating fruits and vegetables to reduce
spoiling is controversial. Interview your teachers, parents, and
friends to assess their feelings on this issue. Try to determine
the basis for these feelings. [page 150]
The assignment dealing with irradiation is particularly
interesting because many other books have exercises that are
similar to that one, except for the final sentence. Those other
exercises are useless. Merely assessing "feelings" is, in
itself, an empty pastime -- especially if the persons who are
surveyed know little or nothing about the subject involved. The
assignment in Introductory Physical Science, however, has real
merit, because the last sentence points to an important question:
Are people's attitudes based on evidence and reason, or on
speculation and emotion? This question arises often during
debates about public-policy matters involving science.
Introductory Physical Science has a few shortcomings, but they
are slight. Some of the photographs of laboratory setups are not
clear enough to show important details, and the book's index is
too skimpy. It should be more detailed.
As far as accuracy is concerned, Introductory Physical Science is
outstanding. While conventional books often have one or two
serious errors per page, Introductory Physical Science has only
one mistake per ten pages or so, and most of the mistakes are
minor. Here are examples drawn from chapters 1 through 6 (the
first half of the book):
The "fundamental unit of mass in the metric system" is the
kilogram, not the gram (page 15). The hydrometer in figure
3.7(a) has not sunk to the bottom of the container, as the text
says; the hydrometer is resting on the bottom because the
container is too shallow. The trees shown in figure 4.11 are on
Whiteface (not "White Face") Mountain. The text on page 85
includes a non sequitur: "Lead seems to affect young children
more than adults. Perhaps this is because lead is not eliminated
from the body quickly . . . ." The labels A, B, C and D are
missing from figure 5.2. The essay question on page 110 refers
to a "sludge test," but the text seems to lack any description of
that test. Figure 6.1 shows only one burner, but the
introductory text refers to "two burners." On page 114 a
question about an electrolysis experiment speaks of the "mass
ratio of hydrogen to oxygen," though the student has measured
volumes, not masses. In table 6.2, Fluorine is misspelled. And
in figure 6.10, the siphon's inlet is lower than its outlet.
The slip-ups that I've noticed in chapters 7 through 12 include
some minor mistakes and some items that lack clarity. For
example, the caption under figure 7.3 includes an unclear
reference to a Geiger counter "held in front." The statement
that "Atoms cannot be seen even with strong microscopes" is no
longer true (page 154). On page 204, in a passage about
hydrogen-production in two electrolysis cells, the authors don't
make clear that they are describing the production in each cell
(not in the two cells taken together); this leads to ambiguous
interpretation of figure 10.9. On pages 231 and 232, the
description of the operation of a dry cell is vague (as the
Teacher's Guide admits). And the discussion of sacrificial
electrodes (on page 234) should be rewritten more clearly.
All in all, however, Introductory Physical Science is a delight,
and students who spend a school year with this book will learn a
great deal. What is more, they will be very well prepared to
take more advanced science courses in high school, because they
will have made scientific methodology their own. Still more, the
teacher will find pleasure in teaching a course based on this
book because the beauty of the subject matter is evident on
every page, and the exposition is elegant.
Lawrence S. Lerner is a professor in the Department of Physics
and Astronomy at California State University, Long Beach. He
served on the panel that wrote the current framework for science
education in California's public schools, and he is a director of
The Textbook League.
Reviewing a physical-science text for grades 8 and 9
Sixth edition, 1994. 268 pages. ISBN: 1-882057-04-X.
Science Curriculum Inc., 24 Stone Road, Belmont, Massachusetts 02178.
The Authors Are Knowledgeable,
and the Book Is a DelightLawrence S. Lerner
Of the five physical-science books that I have reviewed for The
Textbook League, Introductory Physical Science is the best by
far and the only one that I can recommend to teachers. This is
an outstanding book, written by authors who know what science is
about, know their subject matter, and know how to teach it to
8th-graders and 9th-graders.
The theme of the course is the development of evidence for an
atomic model of matter. Rather than broadly surveying the entire
field of physical science, we have taken a well-defined path
toward this major objective. The method employed . . . is one of
experimentation and guided reasoning based on the results of
student experiments.
If someone explained that a TV works because invisible gremlins
paint the picture on the front of the tube, would you be
satisfied? Using the word "gremlin" does not help you understand
how a TV works. Nor does the statement "matter is made of atoms"
help you much in understanding matter or atoms.
Atoms are the basic building blocks of all the substances in the
universe. . . . [T]here are only 109 different elements.
Elements are the simplest type of substance. Elements are made
of only one kind of atom. . . . Atoms of elements combine with
one another to produce new and different substances called
compounds. . . . The combining of atoms of elements to form new
substances is called chemical bonding.
Heating copper in air is not the only way to produce a reaction
with copper. There are many other reactions, and they all have
one feature in common: The product of the reaction always has a
larger mass than the mass of copper. Neither heating nor
electrolysis will change copper into something that has a smaller
mass than did the copper with which we started.
Sustaining Fascination
A friend wants to use your balance during the summer. Write a
complete set of instructions for her so that she will be able to
do so successfully on her own without anybody being present to
help her. [page 26]
Helping the Teacher