Science Insights: Exploring Matter and Energy
I recently received the 1996 version of Exploring Matter and
Energy, and I experienced a moment of hope when I saw "NEW
EDITION" on its cover. Alas, that hope died as soon as I opened
the book. The 1996 version is virtually the same as the 1994, and
it hardly deserves to be called a revised printing, let alone a
"NEW EDITION." The book's structure and pagination remain
unchanged, and Addison-Wesley's writers have stood pat on their
immense ignorance of science and their gross disrespect for
numbers.
The most noticeable changes in the 1996 version involve some of
the sales gimmicks -- namely, the "Skills WarmUp" and "Skills
WorkOut" items in the page-margins. These have acquired a
slightly fancier format (including the heading "Activity"), and
one or two new items have been added. None of this is
significant. As far as significant alterations are concerned, I
have seen only four:
Otherwise, the 1996 version looks just like the 1994, and it still
is full of howlers. I cannot begin to catalogue all of them here,
but I can give some typical examples of the glaring errors and
misconceptions that the Addison-Wesley writers have reprinted in
their "NEW EDITION":
Page 19 still has the absurd tale of Rosa and Raul -- the twins
whose length at birth was zero! On page 91 a floating iceberg
still experiences a buoyant force that exceeds its weight.
(Besides misrepresenting one of the laws of buoyancy, this
violates Newton's first law of motion.) On page 211 both the
Kelvin temperature scale and its use are misrepresented. On page
246 the account of how a Diesel engine operates is still wrong.
The electric motor shown on page 296 still will not work. Neither
will the galvanometer on page 297. The generator on page 302
still shows an impossible pole configuration. The diagram on page
316 is still wrong in stating that a telephone microphone has a
"disk" that "sets the air into motion creating sound." The sketch
on page 376 still misrepresents the interference of sound waves and
still misuses the term "amplitude." Even the description of the
musical score depicted on page 391 is still wrong. (That score
does not show a melody on the upper staff and a harmony on the
lower. It is a piano score, and it has two parts on each staff.)
On page 456 the writers again assert, falsely, that photographic
development is an etching process. On page 573 they continue to
claim, falsely, that fusion is a "more powerful type of nuclear
reaction" than fission. On page 577 they continue to use wildly
unrealistic numbers in a problem involving radioactive decay, and
they continue to bewilder the student with the meaningless
question "How many half-lives pass before the amount of carbon-14
nears zero?" And on page 617 they repeat their wild guess that
plate glass is made by "squeezing molten glass between rollers."
(Plate glass is produced by floating molten glass on liquid tin --
hence the common term "float glass.")
An "Activity" box in the section about "Reflection and Mirrors" is
worth comment because, here again, an item that was dumb has been
made worse. In the 1994 book, the item said: "The word
AMBULANCE is often printed backward on the front of the
vehicle. Why do you think the word is printed backward?" The
writers evidently had seen an ambulance marked with symbols that
would spell AMBULANCE when reflected in another vehicle's rear-view
mirror, but the writers were wrong in guessing that those symbols
constituted the word AMBULANCE printed backward. Now, in the 1996
book, they have repeated the item and have emphasized their own
ignorance by adding ECNALUBMA (i.e., AMBULANCE spelled
backward) as a headline. This shows that they don't understand how
a mirror works. (The mirror image of ECNALUBMA is illegible
gibberish, and you can confirm this for yourself: Write ECNALUBMA
on a sheet of paper, then hold the paper in front of your bathroom
mirror and look at the resulting image.)
I could go on, but I think my message is clear. As I said when I
reviewed the 1994 version, Exploring Matter and Energy is a
product of writers whose knowledge of science is not just spotty
but absent. Addison-Wesley brought only shame to itself when it
published the 1994 version, and now that shame has been doubled.
Lawrence S. Lerner is a professor in the Department of Physics and
Astronomy at California State University, Long Beach. His
specialties are condensed-matter physics, the history of science,
and science education.
Reviewing a middle-school book in physical science
1996. 672 pages. ISBN of the student's edition: 0-201-44597-2.
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 2725 Sand Hill Road,
Menlo Park, California 94025.
Now Addison-Wesley's Shame Is Doubled
Lawrence S. Lerner
Faithful readers of TTL will remember my dispiriting review
of the 1994 version of Addison-Wesley's Exploring Matter and
Energy. The book was riddled with scientific and numerical
nonsense -- even such basic concepts as acceleration and the
conservation of momentum were bungled -- and pious sidebars invited
the student to give opinions about "issues" that were distorted and
inane. The Addison-Wesley writers seemed to display a total
disregard for anything but sales gimmicks.