|
|
21 August 2000 |
Kursk fate shows up gaps in Russia's rescue system
By Richard Scott JDW Naval Editor, London
Norwegian
divers have confirmed that the Russian submarine Kursk, stranded on the
floor of the Barents Sea, is completely flooded, effectively ending the
last faint hopes that some members of the submarine's crew could be found
alive.
Whether there was ever any possibility of rescuing survivors from the
stricken submarine is still subject to debate. While the Russian Navy
insists that SOS messages were picked up from inside the Kursk, US intelligence
sources suggest that nothing was heard from the submarine in the time
after it suffered two catastrophic internal explosions on the morning
of 12 August.
What is clear, however, is the chronic state of Russia's own submarine
rescue organisation in its vain attempts to rescue what survivors there
might have been aboard Kursk. The three rescue submersibles deployed found
themselves poorly equipped to cope with the poor weather, strong currents
and turbidity encountered in the vicinity of the submarine. Their limited
manoeuvrability repeatedly prevented docking on the aft escape hatch.
That this hatch was itself subsequently found to be damaged illustrated
another weakness in the Russian rescue capability. It was, in fact, Norwegian
divers who, in the space of 24 hours, succeeded in prising open the outer
and inner escape hatches to ascertain that the entire submarine was indeed
flooded. The Russian Northern Fleet apparently had no specialist diving
team of its own, and is reported as having turned down offers of assistance
from former naval divers.
There is a large body of opinion which suggests that, given the huge damage
sustained by the Kursk, all thoughts of rescuing survivors were largely
academic. But to a Russian population holding out lingering hopes that
at least some of the crew would be found alive, the handling of the rescue
- and not least the delay in accepting overseas assistance - paints a
picture of mismanagement and institutional disarray which tarnishes the
Russian government almost as much as the navy itself.
There may be worse to come. Attempts will now proceed to recover the dead
and identify options for salvage. Should it emerge that some of the crew
had indeed survived for some time after the Kursk went to the bottom,
the criticism of the rescue operation and the government's handling of
the incident will grow louder still.
|
Russian
TV footage showing Norwegian divers attempting to prise open the rear
escape hatch on the Kursk
PA; 0073348 |
|
|
|
|
N
a v a l F o r c e s
S p o n s o r :
Kursk:
did collision trigger explosion?
Tragedy may
lead to purge, but no new funds
Russian Submarine
Disaster - Update
Russian Submarine
Emergency
Russian
Navy: Assessment
Rehearsing
for DISSUB (Sept 96)
Background
Information:TYPE 65/DT/DST 92
Background
Information:LR5
Background
Information: Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicles
Background
Information: OSCAR II (ANTYEY) (TYPE 949A) (SSGN)
Intelligence Review
Fighting Ships
All the World's Aircraft
International Defense Review
DEFENCE
Allies assess implications of EP-3E in Chinese hands
Aries Photo Gallery
'Bridges of Friendship' brings out some rare naval sightings
AIR FORCES
USMC report casts doubt about future of Osprey
'Smart' payloads offered for Russian air-launched rockets
Boeing considers feasibility of plasma-based weapons
LAND FORCES
China markets Type W99 mortar
Djibouti to get Caspir APCs
Myanmar heat turned up with SAMs from China
NAVAL FORCES
Russia's navy looks to show the flag again
France will modernise its Exocets
UAE commits to missile boat
|