Building Fun Telescopes for less than $10

by Robert Monaghan Astronomy May 1987 p.46-48

Related Links:
Astrophoto group using MF/35mm Lenses (yahoo)
Build a PhotoCopy Lens Telescope
Eyepiece Homebrew Ideas
Eyepiece Making Ideas
MPJA copy machine lens ($8) [12/2000]

Telescopes started out as a playground accident; the spectacle-maker's children played with some discarded lenses and by chance hit upon a combination of lenses that made distant objects look close. Within a few years word of the discovery spread to Italy, where an ambitious scientist, one Galileo Galilei, turned an ''optic tube'' skyward and started a major revolution in astronomy.

Too few of us play with lenses anymore. We prefer to buy ready-made telescopes and computerized cameras and then carefully follow the directions for their use instead of experimenting with bits and pieces of optical equipment and learning from our experiments.

Here are some simple ideas for things you can make and do with lenses, things you can really enjoy trying. There's something here for any curious person - a beginner, an old pro, or someone somewhere in between. The optics may be surplus, obsolete, or gathering dust in your closet or camera bag. Obsolete junk has one big advantage: it's really cheap. Break out the junk and start experimenting! And don't be surprised if some of these crazy ideas become a permanent part of your stock of astronomical equipment.

Start off by dredging up that old 8mm movie camera, the old kind with a screw-in lens. Remember that relic from the days before home video? If you find an old camera with a three-lens turret, you're in luck, but the really obsolete, non-Super-8, know-nothing camera is perfect. These usually bring a couple of dollars at yard sales.

Why search for these ancient 8mm cameras? The answer is simple; the lens, used backwards, makes a very acceptable eyepiece. A normal lens for such cameras is roughly 13mm focal length at f/2. The aperture is around 7mm in diameter when fully open. The lenses are high-quality, highly color-corrected formulas designed to put images on 8mm film that will be blown up to wall size. It's relatively easy to make good-quality glass lenses in such small sizes. Even so, the original lens often costs a substantial sum, especially when converted into today's dollars. Because they're obsolete, they're a real bargain.

Do you have an old 2.4 inch refractor? You know, the same kind you saw being sold as a ''Comet Clobberer'' during the Halley craze but is twenty years old? Try this; compare the 8mm movie camera lens to your economy 0.965'' eyepiece. The first time I did this I was amazed. The movie camera lens gave greater sharpness and clarity than the eyepiece did, and it hadn't cost me a cent. Most of the old color fringeing was gone too. So, for a couple of bucks at most, you'll have an amazingly good quality eyepiece. Your old ''Comet Clobberer'', equipped with its obsolete 8mm camera lens, now turns out to be a nice scope. You might even feel the urge to start using it again. Sure, I know a standard eyepiece might be even better, but try finding one for the cost of a burger.

To make your junk-box eyepiece more permanent, use some metal or plastic tubing, epoxy, black paint, a black cardboard stop (optional), and voila - you've just built your own experimental eyepiece. It may even become your favorite.

Now let's try building a telescope. What can you use for an objective lens? We need a good magnification ratio, and a fair amount of ''glass'' area would add to its appeal. Low cost is essential too. Where can you find such a beast? Enter the photographer's screw-in diopter lens set. These were used for close-up photography before macro-zoom lenses were invented. Millions of diopter lens sets are lying around gathering dust - inconvenient and ''obsolete''. (There's that magic word again!) Practically any such lens will do for experiments - we aren't particular. Any filter size is fine too. So what if the lens was made for an Exacta camera? The larger the glass area the better. One or two dollars per lens seems to be the going price in stores and ads, which really isn't bad for a 50mm diameter lens with a focal length of 1000mm. The camera store will call it a +1 diopter lens.

At the hardware store pick up a 1-meter length of 2-inch diameter PVC pipe for the tube, a pipe coupler to serve as a lens retaining ring and dew cap, and a 2'' to 1'' coupler to hold your 8mm movie camera lens eyepiece. The magnification will be 1000mm/13mm, or about 80X. Assemble it and you have built yourself a fun telescope. It's about twice as powerful as the one Galileo used and probably better optically. For $10 you can afford to let this scope take a beating (translation: it's a perfect project scope for kids). Or would you rather they play with yours?

Want low magnification? You can get it by using a longer focus eyepiece or a shorter focus objective. Will the 50mm lens from that decrepit SLR your brother-in-law dropped in the lake (and you fished out) fit the bill? The camera doesn't work anymore, so try the lens. What can you lose? If it works, you'll get 1000mm/50mm, or 20X.

If you buy a three-lens close-up kit, you can build quite a variety of scopes. Get the clerk in your favorite camera store to dig around in that box of stuff the store couldn't sell the last time it held an 80 percent off sale. Aha, here they are - three closeup lenses for $8.95. Offer him $5. Note that the focal length of diopter-rated close-up lenses is 1000mm divided by the strength of the lens in diopters, so a lens rated +2 diopters has a focal length of 1000mm/2, or 500mm. With one eyepiece coupler unit and three lens-and-tube sections you can make three scopes for about $15, or $5 each.

These scopes will have magnifications from 15X to 80X, a nice complement to the magnification you can get with your primary scope but beyond that of ordinary binoculars. You should be able to see craters on the Moon, the phases of Venus, the ovalness of Saturn (if not its ring system), Jupiter's disk and satellites, hundreds of double stars, and dozens of deep sky objects.

Optically, though, diopter lenses leave quite a bit to be desired, especially in terms of color correction. More obsolete junk to the rescue. Unearth that 135mm f/2.8 telephoto lens you don't use anymore. It's a high quality, well color-corrected optical assembly. Set it to infinity and attach it to your 8mm move camera eyepiece lens. How? Mount the eyepiece on a rear lens cap, preferably the older metal style.

Drill out a central hole and epoxy in an appropriate bit of PVC pipe or metal tubing. Blacken the inside with flat black spray paint. Plug in your ''eyepiece'' and set the focus; you've got a nice 10x40mm finder with excellent optics.

For really low magnification dig out that 50mm normal lens, attach your eyepiece to it, and you've got a dandy 4x finder. This is an especially satisfying way to recycle old screw mount thread camera lenses in today's bayonet-mount world. Radio antenna clamps and muffler clamps are a big help in mounting such finders on a telescope, though you may well think up something better. Be creative.

A 200mm f/4 camera lens gives you a nice 16x scope with a respectable 50mm aperture. Since virtually any lens from any camera will work, feel free to experiment. Haunt flea markets. Visit a few pawn shops. Poke around a surplus store. Scrounge from your photographer friends. Take your junk to a swap meet and see if you can trade it for somebody else's junk. Discovery is a thrill.

Once you've built a couple of telescopes and spotting scopes, you may want to investigate making a few more eyepieces. Lenses for 16mm movie cameras were frequently traded in for zoom lenses. Many are gathering dust in camera store with prices around $10. Typically these are f/2 or faster 25mm lenses. They are high quality, highly color corrected, and quite a bargain. Any design we've mentioned for an 8mm movie lens ought to work with a 16mm camera lens - and the price is just a few dollars more. Again, have fun experimenting with all of them!

If you don't have a nice loupe for examining those tiny, millimeter-size astro images on your slides, you can make one. Cut the sides out of a 2'' to 1'' PVC pipe adapter to form a little tripod and slide your movie camera eyepiece in. A lens mounted in a coupler can be used directly on a light table.

Experiment with whatever optics you can find around the house, in the attic and closets, and in neighborhood garage sales. Sure, you'll find stuff you'll never use. But you might also turn up a real winner for just a few bucks.

If you're an old pro, here's your reward for browsing through this article. These 8mm and 16mm lenses are superb copy lenses for making one-step duplicates of astronomical slides. Construction is simple; remove your present lens from its bellows or extension tubes. Mount the 8mm movie lens on a camera body cap over the bellows with the inner surface of the lens facing out.

Using this rig is easy. Place a slide on a light table and use standard bellows focusing techniques. You can blow up an astrophoto 500 to 2,000 percent with crisp definition, good contrast, and excellent color fidelity. Try it. You probably already have the lens. Even if you don't, all you have to lose is a couple of dollars. I predict you'll be pleased with your bargain bellows enlarging lens, especially after you price an equivalent bellows lens. What you save in cold cash will please you even more.

If you're a serious astrophotographer, consider using an 8mm or 16mm movie lens for eyepiece-projection photography. Those lenses were designed to project super-sharp images on tiny film, and they work beautifully in reverse for enlarging tiny planetary images. You can use them in a commercial eyepiece-projection rig or put together something of your own.

The telescopes you build with obsolete optics may not be world-class creations. They may be a bit wiggly around the edges or show somewhat more chromatic aberration than you'd like. But you've gained something you couldn't get in a store-bought scope: the fun of doing. Try whatever lenses you can find and experiment with different combinations. So what if the images are a bit fuzzy? You'll learn how telescopes work, and why.

Use these cheap but good-quality scopes as gifts for the kids or as ideas for the budding astronomer. One final thought; when you've done your thing with them, don't put them back in the junk box. Pass your creations on to some of the neighborhood kids. Give them a chance to learn and play too. It's only fair. After all, aren't kids the ones who invented telescopes in the first place?


Date: 5 Apr 2000
From: baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov (Ron Baalke)
Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro
Subject: Did The Vikings Make The First Telescope?

Did the Vikings make a telescope?
By Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News
April 5, 2000

The Vikings could have been using a telescope hundreds of years before Dutch spectacle makers supposedly invented the device in the late 16th century.

This remarkable possibility has emerged from a study of sophisticated lenses just recognised from a Viking site on the island of Gotland in the Baltic Sea. They were initially thought to be merely ornaments.

"It seems that the elliptical lens design was invented much earlier that we thought and then the knowledge was lost," says Dr Olaf Schmidt, of Aalen University in Germany.

Full story here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_702000/702478.stm


From: baalke@zagami.jpl.nasa.gov (Ron Baalke) Newsgroups: sci.space.news Subject: Off-The-Shelf Camera Device to Hunt for Distant Planets Date: 7 Mar 2002 Organization: Jet Propulsion Lab MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PASADENA, CALIF. 91109 TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov Contacts: JPL/Jane Platt (818) 354-0880 Caltech/Robert Tindol (626) 395-3631 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 7, 2002 OFF-THE-SHELF CAMERA DEVICE TO HUNT FOR DISTANT PLANETS It could fit on your desk, and it's made mostly from parts bought at a camera shop, but two scientists believe their new instrument will help them find a slew of large planets orbiting stars in our Milky Way galaxy. "An amateur astronomer could do this, except maybe for the debugging of the software, which requires several people working 10 hours a day," said Dr. David Charbonneau of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "But it's easy to understand what's going on and cheap to build the equipment. That's why everyone thinks it's an ideal project, if it works." The assembly of the new instrument is a cooperative effort between Charbonneau and Dr. John Trauger of NASA'S Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, which is managed by Caltech. "David's approach promises to locate new planets orbiting distant stars. The instrument is simple and straightforward, taking advantage of spare parts and computer code we already have on hand at JPL, and we hope to have it up and running in a few months," Trauger said. Charbonneau and his colleagues will soon use their gizmo to begin a three-year survey for extra-solar planets at Palomar Observatory in San Diego County. The instrument is based on a standard telephoto lens for a 35-millimeter camera. It will sweep the skies, looking for "hot Jupiters," or large, gaseous planets, as their fast orbits take them in front of other stars, into the line of sight between a star and Earth. Astronomers will watch for the "wink" from the star as an orbiting planet partially blocks its light. Charbonneau, a recent import to the Caltech astronomy staff from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Mass., is a leading authority on the search for such "transiting planets." The new instrument uses a standard 300-millimeter Leica camera lens, with a charge-coupled device, or CCD. The CCD, which costs $22,000, will be mounted in a specially constructed camera housing to fit at the back of the lens. The entire device will be fitted onto an inexpensive equatorial mount, available at many stores carrying amateur astronomical equipment. "Basically, the philosophy of this project is that, if we can buy the stuff we need off the shelf, we'll buy it," Charbonneau said. The project costs $100,000, a fraction of the cost of most large Earth and space-based telescopes. The Palomar staff will provide a small dome for the instrument, and the system will be automated so it can be operated remotely. The new telescope will be linked with an existing weather system, which will monitor atmospheric conditions and determine whether the dome should be opened. Charbonneau will be able to photograph a single square of sky about five degrees by five degrees. About 100 full moons or an entire constellation could fit in that field of view. With special software Charbonneau helped develop at Harvard- Smithsonian and the National Center for Atmospheric Research, he will compare many pictures of the same patch of sky to see if any of the thousands of stars in each field has "winked." If the software reveals a star has dimmed slightly, it could mean a planet passed in front of the star between exposures. Repeated measurements will allow Charbonneau to measure the orbital period and size of each planet. Further work with the 10-meter (33-foot) telescopes at Keck Observatory at Mauna Kea, Hawaii, will provide spectrographic data, and thus, will infer more detailed information about the planet. Weather permitting, Charbonneau will gather up to 300 images a night. With 20 good nights per month, about 6,000 images would be gathered each month for computer analysis. The ideal time will be in the fall and winter, when the Milky Way is in view, and an extremely high number of stars can be squeezed into each photograph. "It's estimated that about one in three stars in our field of view will be like the Sun, and one percent of Sun- like stars have a hot Jupiter, or a gas giant that is so close to the star that its orbit is about four or five days," Charbonneau said. "One-tenth of this 1-percent will be inclined in the right direction so that it will pass in front of the star, so maybe one in 3,000 stars will have a planet we can detect. Or if you want to be conservative, about one in 6,000." # # # # #


From: "A.Gent" still.cranky@spam.bots
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro.ccd-imaging
Subject: Re: Digital vs. Film in Astrophotography
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003
"Chris L Peterson" clp@alumni.caltech.edu wrote ...
> Using a webcam (really, video in general) allows for a kind of user guided, post
> processed adaptive optics that is nearly impossible with any other camera, since
> it requires collecting hundreds or thousands of individual images over a short
> period.

FWIW, I heartily endorse Chris' sentiments. I have about 15 data CDs full
of raw astro AVIs which yielded perhaps 20 or 30 half-decent still shots.

The effect of seeing on these video clips is nicely illustrated in this
little animation from about 4-5 years ago:
http://faxmentis.org/html/seeing.html

Jeff






End of Page

Broken Links:
Homemade Eyepieces page was at http://www.crbest.com/astronomy/