BY JAMES TARANTO
Wednesday, February 8, 2006 3:29 p.m. EST
Not Another
Wellstone Spectacle
After reading about it on the Drudge Report, we expected to be appalled by the
Coretta Scott King funeral, which, according to Drudge, "turned suddenly
political as one former president took a swipe at the current president, who
was also lashed by an outspoken black pastor!" More on the "former
president" in a moment; the "outspoken black pastor" was Joseph
Lowery, a co-founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. According
to Reuters,
Lowery "gave a playful reading of a poem in eulogy of Mrs. King":
"She extended Martin's message against poverty, racism and war / She
deplored the terror inflicted by our smart bombs on missions way afar," he
said.
"We know now there were no weapons of mass destruction over there /
But Coretta knew and we knew that there are weapons of misdirection right
down here / Millions without health insurance. Poverty abounds. For war
billions more but no more for the poor."
Lowery is a civil rights hero, as this
biography makes clear:
Lowery began his work with civil rights in the early 1950s in Mobile, Alabama,
where he headed the Alabama Civic Affairs Association, an organization devoted
to the desegregation of buses and public places. During this time, the state
of Alabama sued Lowery, along with several other prominent ministers, on charges
of libel, seizing his property. The Supreme Court sided with the ministers,
and Lowery's seized property was returned.
He is also a lousy poet and a worse foreign-policy analyst. Hey, nobody's perfect.
But when we watched a TV clip of part of his poem, we just could not be offended.
This is one of those cases in which tone is more important than substance, and
the tone of this funeral, from what we've seen, was largely a high-spirited
and celebratory one--in sharp contrast with the creepy manic rage that prevailed
at Sen. Paul Wellstone's funeral in 2002.
After Lowery spoke, President Bush embraced him on the stage. Later, as New
York's Daily
News notes, George H.W. Bush poked fun at Lowery's metrical maladroitness:
"Maya [Angelou] has nothing to worry about. Don't give up your day job." Baptist
Bill Clinton, in turn, poked fun at his Episcopal predecessor: "That ain't bad
for one of the frozen chosen." Even ultraliberal Sen. Ted Kennedy and Rep. John
Conyers left contemporary politics aside and delivered entirely appropriate
eulogies, according to the CNN
transcript.
The one moment of true malice came when Jimmy Carter got up to speak. He said
of Dr. and Mrs. King, "It was difficult for them then personally with the
civil liberties of both husband and wife violated as they became the target
of secret government wiretaps"--clearly a swipe against President Bush's
terrorist surveillance program.
Does Carter really mean to suggest that Robert F. Kennedy's spying on Martin
Luther King is the equivalent of the current administration spying on al Qaeda
terrorists? What an ugly and invidious comparison.
Plenty
of Nothing
The November election is still 272 days off, but already the Democrats are fighting
over why they lost, the New York Times reports:
Democrats are heading into this year's elections in a position weaker than
they had hoped for, party leaders say, stirring concern that they are letting
pass an opportunity to exploit what they see as widespread Republican vulnerabilities.
Maybe the problem is that a political party can't be successful if it stands
for nothing more than exploiting the vulnerabilities of the other party. Not
all Dems agree, however:
"It's absolutely required that the party talk about things in addition to
the Abramoff scandal," said Martin Frost, former leader of the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee. "I think the climate is absolutely right
to take back the House or the Senate or both. But you can't do it without
a program."
And [Sen. Evan] Bayh said, "I don't believe we will win by just not being
them."
Ms. Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, did not dispute that
argument. But, pointing to the Democratic strategy in defeating Mr. Bush's
Social Security proposal last year, she said there was no rush.
"People said, 'You can't beat something with nothing,' " she said, arguing
that the Democrats had in fact accomplished precisely that this year. "I feel
very confident about where we are."
John Kerry* throws some surplus metaphors into the mix:
"We are fighting to find a voice under difficult circumstances,
and I'm confident, over the next few months, you are going to see that happen,"
Mr. Kerry said in an interview. "Our megaphone is just not as large
as their megaphone, and we have a harder time getting that message
out, even when people are on the same page."
Early this afternoon we received an e-mail message from Kerry's "campaign,"
titled "You're Not Invited!":
Dick Cheney will be there. So will Rick Santorum...Phyllis Schlafly...Newt
Gingrich...Ann Coulter...Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman...and Grover
Norquist, a figure at the center of the Jack Abramoff Republican lobbying
scandal.
Tomorrow, at 9:30 a.m., the gavel will drop on CPAC 2006--the Conservative
Political Action Conference. Soon a parade of Bush administration and Republican
Party leaders will trek over to kiss the rings of the right-wing political
operatives who work so hard to push the reckless Bush agenda through Congress--and
of the right-wing agitators that stop at nothing to keep Bush-backing candidates
in power.
They've got a lot to talk about. Because from excusing the incompetence
of the Katrina response...to denying the illegality of warrantless domestic
spying...to condoning the corruption of the DeLay/Abramoff wing of the GOP...to
disguising Bush policy failures on everything from Iraq to Social Security
to the botched prescription drug program...
...Republican and right-wing activists have been getting a lot of practice
trying to hide their incompetence, corruption and failures from the American
people.
While they plot strategy, here's what we're going to do: raise the money
we need to break their grip on power and drive them from office.
Actually, it looks to us as though anyone can attend CPAC
who is willing to shell out a $125 registration fee. Anyway, here's John Kerry
raising money for a party that stands for nothing. Seems to us the Democrats
are in dire straits.
* The haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat, who
at least isn't as angry as Hillary Clinton.
Where's
Don King When You Need Him?
"Boxer Urges Sheehan to Not Challenge Feinstein"--headline, San Francisco
Chronicle, Feb. 7
Eat
Your Heart Out, Woodstein!
The Washington Post's crack investigative team of Thomas B. Edsall and Jonathan
Weisman goes digging for dirt on the new Republican leader:
Rep. John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), who was elected House majority leader last
week, is renting his Capitol Hill apartment from a veteran lobbyist whose
clients have direct stakes in legislation Boehner has co-written and that
he has overseen as chairman of the Education and the Workforce Committee.
The relationship between Boehner, John D. Milne and Milne's wife, Debra R.
Anderson, underscores how intertwined senior lawmakers have become with the
lobbyists paid to influence legislation. Boehner's primary residence is in
West Chester, Ohio, but for $1,600 a month, he rents a two-bedroom basement
apartment near the House office buildings on Capitol Hill owned by Milne,
Boehner spokesman Don Seymour said yesterday.
So Boehner is getting a cut-rate deal on an apartment in exchange for his lobbyist-landlord's
access to him? Well, uh, not exactly:
Boehner's monthly rent appears to be similar to other rentals of two-bedroom
English basement apartments close to the House side of the Capitol in Southeast,
based on a review of apartment listings.
Wow, Edsall and Weisman have uncovered another Watergate! But only in the sense
that the Watergate is an apartment building.
This
Porridge Is Too Hot, and It's Bush's Fault!
Sooner or later, someone had to place the blame for the Danish cartoon imbroglio
where it belongs: on President Bush. The blame for everything belongs
on President Bush, and columnist Eugene Robinson explains how in this case:
Eventually the focus of this conflict will shift back to the United States,
the undisputed leader of "the West." With all his talk of freedom as a universal
right, President Bush pretends to understand that U.S. support of corrupt
dictatorships in places such as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan contributes
to the feeling that Muslims are under attack and helps give strength to fundamentalism
and jihad. Yet, the Bush administration continues to prop up these same autocrats,
some of whom happen to sit on huge reserves of oil, while giving little more
than lip service to those in the crowds that took to the streets over some
undistinguished Danish cartoons.
The United States and its allies easily conquered Iraq, only to see religious
parties dominate the recent elections. The radical religious movement Hamas
won control of the Palestinian Authority and the religious Muslim Brotherhood
is now the only coherent opposition force in Egypt.
Those Danish cartoonists and their editor set out to teach Muslims a lesson
about free speech. They ended up giving the rest of us a startling illustration
that while Bush and his allies speak of a post-9/11 global war against terrorism,
terrorism is nothing but a tactic. This is really a war of ideas, a battle
for hearts and minds, and it's a war in which "the West" will lose ground
until its deeds are more consonant with its high-minded words.
So let's see if we follow this. President Bush is to blame for continuing to
"prop up" autocrats. This democratization process is too slow.
But he's also to blame for encouraging elections in Iraq, Egypt and the disputed
territories. This democratization process is too fast. OK, Goldilocks,
what exactly do you think he should do?
Of
Course You Know This Means War - Bugs
"Stop Cartoon Violence - Bush"--headline, News24.com (South Africa),
Feb. 8
Innovations
in Oceanography
"West Beginning to See Islamic Protests as Sign of Deep Gulf"--headline,
New York Times, Feb. 8
Zero-Tolerance
Watch
A 6-year-old boy has been suspended from school for "sexual harassment,"
reports the Enterprise of Brockton, Mass.:
[The] boy was suspended from his Brockton elementary school for three days
last week after officials said he put two fingers inside a girl's waistband,
touching her skin, during a class. . . .
Berthena Dorinvil, the boy's mother, said he does not know what sexual harassment
is and in the wake of the Downey school's action, she wants him transferred
to another school.
As an expert
on the subject once said, "Did you know that when one little panda pulls
on another little panda's underwear, that's sexual harassment? That makes me
a sa-a-a-a-ad panda."
'Rommel,
You Magnificent Bastard'
"Oklahoma Picks Patton as Offensive Line Coach"--headline, Associated
Press, Feb. 6
And
to Think He Was Already a Legend
"Guitar Legend Les Paul Improves"--headline, Associated Press, Feb. 7
Bird Lovers
"Woman Does 'Mouth-to-Beak' to Save Chicken"--headline, Associated
Press, Feb. 7
"Lance Armstrong Pays Radio Tribute to Crow"--headline, Associated
Press, Feb. 7
Bottom
Story of the Day
"Bus Departs"--headline, Calgary Sun, Feb. 6
How
De-Pressing
"The editorial staff of the alternative weekly New York Press walked out
[yesterday], en masse, after the paper's publishers backed down from printing
the Danish cartoons that have become the center of a global free-speech fight,"
reports the New York Observer's Ben Smith, quoting an e-mail from erstwhile
editor Harry Siegel:
New York Press, like so many other publications, has suborned [sic] its own
professed principles. . . . Having been ordered at the 11th hour
to pull the now-infamous Danish cartoons from an issue dedicated to them,
the editorial group--consisting of myself, managing editor Tim Marchman, arts
editor Jonathan Leaf and one-man city hall bureau Azi Paybarah, chose instead
to resign our positions. . . .
We have no illusions about the power of the Press (NY Press, we mean), but
even on the far margins of the world-historical stage, we are not willing
to side with the enemies of the values we hold dear, a free press not least
among them.
Siegel is a talented young man and we expect he'll land on his feet. Besides,
he's probably too high-minded to have been a good fit at the Press, which at
its best was totally unpredictable and irreverent. (Disclosure: We wrote a few
articles for it in those days.)
But blogger Robert
McCain, also an erstwhile Press contributor, notes the real absurdity of
the current owners' refusal to publish the cartoons:
It's kind of weird that NYPress's current ownership is worried that the Danish
cartoons would be offensive to Muslims. When they used to mail NYPress to
my house, my wife would have to hide it from the kids because the back
half of the tabloid is full of ads for gay bars, sex-toy shops and transvestite
hookers.
So I'm sure devout Muslims, flipping through NYPress, browsing the "personals"
(e.g., "SHM LOOKING FOR TOP MAN") would be absolutely horrified to
come across those Danish cartoons, y'know?
We can see his point. Check out this article about "Aspen Gay Ski Weekend":
Serena Williams, or at least her drag-queen stunt double, didn't stand a
chance. Sporting three blond wigs, a leather corset and faux diamonds the
size of cough drops, Miss Elaine Lancaster sashayed down Aspen Mountain and
made downhill skiing look as effortless as runway modeling.
As the transvestite skier ascended the outdoor stage, the subdued spectators
put down their champagne flutes and erupted into applause. Whether they were
cheering for athletic technique or sartorial grace wasn't clear. But the judges,
a bit tipsy by now, sprinkled confetti in the air and granted a perfect 10.
"The bigger the hair, the closer to God," declared Miss Lancaster, a drag
performer from Miami whose real name is James Davis. The Chanel sunglasses
came off, but the milelong eyelashes stayed on. "I'm the queen of Aspen."
Oh wait. Actually, that article isn't from the New York Press but from the
New
York Times--which also isn't running the cartoons for fear, it says, of
offending Muslims.
(Carol Muller helps compile Best of the Web Today. Thanks to Nick Olson, Julie
Beck, Vincent Giandurco, Frank Russo, Dan Giles, Tom Mayer, Ethel Fenig, Ed
Lasky, Orin Ryssman, Kathleen Sullivan, Anne McCaughey, John Peterson, Ruth
Papazian, Andrew Strnad, Kevin Hudson, Paul Stajduhar, Kevin Kaufman, Michael
Nunnelley, Ken Mersmann, Daniel O'Donnell, Alex Selim, Aaron Gross, Joe Christian,
Clark Perkins, Mark Schulze, Anita Gorman, James Currin, Jose Carbonell, Bryan
Fischer, John Barrett, John Sanders, Paul Beach, Lawrence Weiss, Kevin Littleton,
Bob Batts, Randy Riness, Brian Ball, Andrew Haberern, Ben Sandler, Tom Dziubek,
Mary Ann Lomascolo, Sean Gaffney, Bill Rambo, David Remus, Tom Neven, Steven
Thompson, John O'Connell, Charlie Gaylord, James Eckert, Hylton Kalvaria, Lori
Cohen, Brian Cook, W. Simmons, Monty Krieger, Dan Friedman, Bill Jones, Steve
Tefft, Jeffrey Spiegel, Dave Chomas, Bill Hunt, Thomas Dillon, Dan O'Shea, Ed
Ryman, Michael Mroz, Jerry Newcombe, David Hyman, Bill Katz, Jonathan Rothenberg,
Jeff Parker, Buddy Smith, R. Mermelstein, Greg de Moksconyi, Jason Craven, Jeff
Stuckman and C.E. Dobkin. If you have a tip, write us at opinionjournal@wsj.com,
and please include the URL.)
Today on OpinionJournal:
- Amir
Taheri: Islam prohibits neither images of Muhammad nor jokes about religion.
- Heather
Robinson: I'm a Zionist, and I liked "Munich."
- John
Fund: Museums in Washington, Berlin and Budapest pay tribute to communism's
victims.