iTunes 6 in Linux Install Guide

I used this guide over the weekend to install iTunes 6.0 in Linux (Fedora Core 4). I had to compile the latest Wine source (0.9.7) as the wine RPM for Fedora is too old, but iTunes works. Network shares play fine, and you can browse the iTunes store (but previews don't work). Note: iTunes 6.0.2 isn't supported yet.

comments

Comment View Threshold: 
  1. Oh, and before anyone says, "don't submit your own blog," I just want to make clear I'm not. Heck I've never been to that site prior to Sunday.
    SDNick484 posted by SDNick484 (1) at 02:45 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  2. "I have not tested the iPod." --dear lord... why the hell would I want to run iTunes without an iPod... to buy music?
    puzzud posted by puzzud (0) at 05:09 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  3. Apparently their is some godly Linux Music manager...So I don't know why you'd want to use itunes...
    pbjorge12 posted by pbjorge12 (0) at 07:32 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  4. Good to know for those occasions when I need to run iTunes on an open source OS. Especially when I don't use that open source OS. + Digg.
    computerdude33 posted by computerdude33 (0) at 07:39 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  5. Port it to Musix. It'd be loved there.
    saysaknow posted by saysaknow (5) at 07:40 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  6. Wait until Banshee goes final. It's definitely going to a major asset to the Linux community.
    binarymelon posted by binarymelon (0) at 07:44 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  7. frankscorner.org is a really good WINE resource. It's not a blog, it's all about how to get specific apps working in WINE.
    yakk0dotorg posted by yakk0dotorg (0) at 07:47 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  8. No Digg. It didn't work. I just get a message saying

    "1607: Unable to install InstallShield Scripting Runtime"

    when I try to run the quicktime installer. I followed the directions exactly as on this site. Also, what use is iTunes without support for my iPod? That's the whole purpose of it as far as I'm concerned.
    Apreche posted by Apreche (2) at 07:48 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  9. anyone know if you can sync your ipod with this method, i still haven't found a good linux program for downloading podcasts AND syncing to ipod without looking like crap.
    Singee15 posted by Singee15 (18) at 07:50 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  10. With Amarok there's really no need for iTunes in Linux, unless you absolutely must buy music from iTMS.
    mcbean posted by mcbean (0) at 07:52 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  11. Yeah, could someone test the iPod support? I try not to use anything proprietary, but nothing else works with my nano, so if this will, I'd really have no choice but to use it.
    bieber posted by bieber (0) at 07:53 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  12. Seems kinda stupid. Not sure why everyone was making such a big deal about iTunes for linux...
    0troy posted by 0troy (0) at 07:54 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  13. iTunes is retarded
    kday posted by kday (8) at 08:05 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  14. Seriously, WTF is apple's problem. I would just LOVE to hear Steve (blow) Jobs tell me why there is no iTunes for Linux yet???? It has to be because Steve and Bill must be dating still. I cannot fathom for the life of me why Apple has not done this yet. Get on the ball Apple! You're too good of a company not to do this!
    culebra posted by culebra (0) at 08:13 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  15. I agree with most of the issues listed above.

    Not news.
    Blog post.
    Why would anyone want to use iTunes as a general music player?
    How is this even digg worthy, this is no work around hack. It's just the basic use of WINE.
    Probably old too...
    xafan posted by xafan (0) at 08:17 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  16. I've done this before.. long time ago.
    No specific reason, I was just bored.

    amaroK is the god of music players.
    ricapar posted by ricapar (0) at 08:17 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  17. No, this is a cool thing. It's working (in fact, better than described in the tutorial) right now.

    There is no good music player for Linux. The best is Rhythmbox, which is a clone of iTunes. it is really lacking in features, so iTunes on Linux would be nice.
    kimastergeorge posted by kimastergeorge (0) at 08:18 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  18. Why exactly would you want to run iTunes on Linux? You can sync to the iPod, no CD burning, there are plenty of native iTunes clones out there. It is cool that you can buy music I guess, but if Apple really wanted your money there would be a Linux client. After all doesn't Linux have roughly the same marketshare as OSX?
    cduquette posted by cduquette (0) at 08:19 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  19. If any of you guys have HOWTOs about wine and Linux, post them up on http://www.wine-wiki.org .
    HumanUSB posted by HumanUSB (0) at 08:34 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  20. why when we have amaroK?
    mbro posted by mbro (0) at 08:58 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  21. I repeat...what is there for linux to get podcasts and sync them to your ipod without it looking like crap. That is why i want iTunes, thats all i use it for on windows anyway - it is literally the only reason for me not switching from linux (and a lack of PSP transcoding software)
    Singee15 posted by Singee15 (18) at 09:05 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  22. to linux*
    Singee15 posted by Singee15 (18) at 09:05 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  23. Awesome, I have been trying to do this with wine for months. I'll let you know how it works out in Ubuntu.
    cenarta posted by cenarta (1) at 09:42 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  24. Amarok is the best app out there for music organization (for non-itms users) so for linux I don't see the use. Now an amarok port to windows, thats what i'm down for :).
    sudonim posted by sudonim (0) at 09:51 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  25. amaroK makes iTunes all but superfluous.
    dick-richardson posted by dick-richardson (0) at 10:17 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  26. Aside from the "fun" factor (like visiting the dentist?), I don't really see any point to this. Sure, I got iTunes running under Crossover Office a few years ago by copying some dll's over...basically it was a big mess. But Linux has plenty of great players already. I personally use Amarok...it's got a clean UI, it's easy to use (yet powerful), and it works. Of course, you can also use Rhythmbox (ick), Muine, Banshee, bmpx....

    If you're running Linux and haven't given amarok a try, do yourself a favor and try it. Even if you aren't a fan of iTunes (I'm certainly not), chances are, you'll like it.
    zaofreek posted by zaofreek (0) at 10:27 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  27. I personally use Amarok...it's got a clean UI, it's easy to use

    I hope that was sarcasm.

    Oh, and you should give Rhythmbox CVS a try..

    Another very cool concept is http://listengnome.free.fr/
    sanmarcos posted by sanmarcos (0) at 10:30 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  28. There are no *good* DAAP clients for linux, so that's my only justification for using it... now i can access my library through iTunes music sharing.

    Good find
    digg++
    cypher35 posted by cypher35 (1) at 10:39 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  29. WINE RPMS for fedora core are now maintained in Extras... The author needs to explore more.
    mooninite posted by mooninite (0) at 10:44 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  30. "Seriously, WTF is apple's problem. I would just LOVE to hear Steve (blow) Jobs tell me why there is no iTunes for Linux yet???? It has to be because Steve and Bill must be dating still. I cannot fathom for the life of me why Apple has not done this yet. Get on the ball Apple! You're too good of a company not to do this!"

    Why on earth would Apple give iTunes to their biggest competition? The only reason Apple releases iTunes and Quicktime for Windows is because Windows makes up 90% of the market, and wants to get users to switch to OS X. Apple doesn't want people to think Linux is a viable option on the desktop. The less people know about Linux, the more likely they'll buy a Mac when their Windows machine falls apart. Think about it.
    benstockwell posted by benstockwell (3) at 11:36 PM 2/08/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  31. If OS X is based on BSD, shouldn't porting itunes to one of the BSDs be somewhat simple?

    I would love to use my ipod on linux w/ itunes but still no linux workig ver = (
    sillihkram posted by sillihkram (0) at 12:49 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  32. Only girls use iTunes, and girls don't use Linux. :P
    EyeDye posted by EyeDye (2) at 02:55 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  33. Hey this doesn't personally apply to me!!! So therefore it has no place on digg.
    seriously get a life guys, you are not the center of the universe.
    I've personally been looking for a good way to get Itunes running on linux for awhile. Crossover is alright but only works with an ancient version. Sure there may be technically better programs, but I like itunes for managing/subscribing to podcasts, that's all I use it for but I find it helpful, and I bet I'm not alone.
    Cool now I'm gonna go flame some stories that don't apply to me.
    brispet1 posted by brispet1 (0) at 05:48 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  34. How many of the open source players can play Apple's protected AACs?

    I can't wait to give this a try just to play my music while logged into my Debian box. I can still sync my iPod to my Mac for now since I only do that maybe once a week and it's Apple formatted.

    @sillihkram Porting implies having the source code. I think benstockwell hit the nail on the head. Apple wants folks to think the only alternative to Windows is Apple.

    +digg

    bmauter posted by bmauter (0) at 06:32 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  35. "How many of the open source players can play Apple's protected AACs?"

    This is kind of the problem with iTunes to start off with - DRM infested files that don't work elsewhere unless you've found a codec for it somewhere. I prefer to rip my music into ogg and play on Open Source players then migrate to my iRiver, but then there's plenty of reason for other people to need iTunes to run on Linux.

    Always good to find useful guides.
    rutty posted by rutty (0) at 07:31 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  36. I'd like to have iTunes on Linux so I could play the shared playlists on my linux pc from my powerbook. Are there any linux players that allow me to share playlists with iTunes?
    swindmill posted by swindmill (0) at 07:52 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  37. "Why on earth would Apple give iTunes to their biggest competition? The only reason Apple releases iTunes and Quicktime for Windows is because Windows makes up 90% of the market, and wants to get users to switch to OS X. Apple doesn't want people to think Linux is a viable option on the desktop. The less people know about Linux, the more likely they'll buy a Mac when their Windows machine falls apart. Think about it."

    Where is the logic in stating that Linux, the most difficult OS to use, is the main competitor of the most intuitive and easiest to use OS? Many people ditch Windows because they get tired of all the problems or they are exposed to OS X and find it nice looking and easy to use, but I doubt those same people are thinking about Linux as an alternative. Linux is for advanced users
    swindmill posted by swindmill (0) at 08:21 AM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  38. Amarok, while very nice, is no iTunes. If you just need to sync music, its passable, as is gtkpod+rhythmbox. What all those miss, though, is real podcasting handling. They basically just download all episodes available and let you do the sorting and stuff. I listen to lots of podcasts very much appreciate iTunes handling my stash of podcasts. I'm installing it now! (man, they aren't kidding when they say it takes awhile)
    quietglow posted by quietglow (0) at 03:17 PM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  39. Latest rhythmbox and banshee can play DAAP shares, burn CDs, submit songs to audioscrobbler, support a ton of file formats, etc. No reason to use itunes, except for ITMS, and there is pymusique and sharmusique for this.
    dioxmat posted by dioxmat (0) at 03:19 PM 2/09/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]
  40. What is wrong with you people? iTunes is so much better then AmaroK... iTunes is the best jukebox around.
    diggnationdevon posted by diggnationdevon (1) at 09:50 PM 2/10/06 score:
    --
     [block/report]

Login to comment. Don't have an account? Create one here.