Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Articles

Posted On January 20, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list



Mad Cow Q & A


You've got questions. We've got answers. We consulted with university scientists, farmers, government agencies, and other experts to answer the questions most frequently asked of us by American consumers. As the mad-cow hype thickens, we'll be expanding this resource -- so check back often.

  1. Now that a single U.S. cow has tested positive for mad cow disease, is eating beef risky?
    The short answer is “no.” The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) says that “beef is absolutely safe to eat.” Nearly every reputable expert on the subject agrees that there’s no added risk from eating steaks, hamburgers, or any other beef product.

  2. What do scientific experts say?
    Dr. Ron DeHaven, the USDA’s chief veterinarian, has declared that “the U.S. consumer has every reason to remain confident in the safety of U.S. beef.”

    David Ropeik of the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis says that the risk is “as close to zero as you can get.”

    Dr. Ken Petersen of the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service asserts: “Clinical studies tell us there’s virtually zero risk.”

  3. What are the chances that I can get mad cow disease if I eat beef from an infected cow?
    Probably about the same chance that you’ll win the Powerball lottery and get struck by lightning on the same day.

    According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the risk of contracting the disease from eating beef and beef products, even when infected cows are in the food supply, “appears to be extremely small, perhaps about one case per 10 billion servings.”

  4. If there’s no risk of getting sick, why was so much ground beef recalled?
    USDA veterinarian Dr. Kenneth Petersen says: “The recalled meat represents essentially zero risk to consumers.” Still, government officials seem to have reasoned that zero risk was preferable to essentially zero.

    But it’s important to understand that eating the meat from a cow infected with BSE almost always has no effect on people, since the disease lives in nerve and brain tissue (not muscle meat). And compared to other foodborne illnesses, mad cow disease does not move between animals and humans very easily. Conditions must be perfect for the disease to transfer from one species to another.

  5. Then why all this concern?
    Prior to December 23, the United States was the last of the world’s major beef producers to avoid a case of mad-cow. The U.S. also happens to be home to an enormous community of anti-business, anti-free-trade, organic-agriculture, and animal-rights activists—many of whom have been publicly wishing this problem on us for years.

    Even though the risk to Americans is insignificant, these activists have axes to grind and millions of dollars to spend. They began flooding media outlets with doom-and-gloom messages just minutes after USDA Secretary Ann Veneman made her first statement on mad cow disease.

    Animal rights radicals want to turn America into a vegetarian utopia. Organic-food zealots want us so afraid of our food that we’ll shell out three or four times as much money for so-called “natural” beef. Anti-free-trade activists welcome barriers to U.S. beef exports. And anti-corporate radicals, conditioned to hate the free-market economy and capitalism in general, just love any misfortune that threatens to cripple U.S. businesses.

  6. Just who are these scare-mongering activists? How can I spot their bias in the news?
    Activist groups promoting the U.S. mad-cow scare include: The names of some of these groups may make them seem harmless, but don’t be fooled. A list of their radical spokespersons and activist spin-meisters can be found on a frequently updated list at www.MadCowScare.com.

  7. How old was this one cow and why does it matter?
    The USDA and Canadian agriculture officials have confirmed that the animal was born in April of 1997, making it about 6-1/2 years old at the time of slaughter. The age matters because a ban on certain cattle feeding practices—put in place in response to the British mad-cow crisis—didn’t take effect until August of 1997. This means that the cow in question was alive for four months under the old system, and may have contracted the disease through its feed.

  8. Does this have something to do with “factory farms”?
    Only in the land of make-believe. Mad cow disease and other similar disorders may have been around for centuries. And because the human population has grown, a larger number of domesticated livestock animals are raised for food.

    However, there’s no evidence to suggest that large-scale agriculture is at the root of the current mad-cow news. The mis-folded proteins (called “prions”) that cause mad cow disease can show up spontaneously. A prion doesn’t care whether its host is in a large livestock facility or a tiny organic farm; whether it eats grass or soy-meal; or which century it is.

    Having said all of that, some relatively reckless British farming practices accelerated the disease’s spread during the 1980s and 1990s. But these practices were banned in the United States over 6 years ago. And the United States stopped importing beef from Great Britain in 1985.

  9. Do chickens get mad cow disease? What about pigs?
    No, and no. There are no documented cases of mad-cow or similar diseases among chickens or pigs. The same can be said of fish.

  10. Is Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) the same as human mad cow disease?
    No. While the two diseases are from the same “family” of illnesses, CJD is not the result of mad-cow transmission from a cow to a person.

    CJD is usually referred to as “sporadic” since it often appears as the result of a random, spontaneous mutation. The human form of mad cow disease, on the other hand, is typically called “variant” CJD, or “vCJD” for short. Equating the two would be like confusing one virus (say, AIDS) with another (like the common cold).

    About 300 cases of “sporadic” CJD are diagnosed each year in the United States. Some organic-food and animal-rights groups are now claiming that these cases are connected to eating beef. They’re not.

  11. What about Chronic Wasting Disease and “Scrapie” ... are these the same as mad cow?
    Scrapie is a sickness in sheep that comes from the same family of illnesses as mad cow disease. For farmers, scrapie has been a fact of life for over 250 years. Some epidemiologists believe that mad cow disease first arose when scrapie-infected sheep remains were fed to cows in Great Britain. Chronic Wasting Disease is a similar illness that strikes deer and elk.

    Neither disease has ever been directly transmitted to human beings (despite some clever activist spin suggesting otherwise), so there’s no reason to stop eating venison or mutton if you enjoy it.

  12. Is it safer to not eat meat at all?
    Animal rights groups, led by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and its quasi-medical front group, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), are trying to leverage the U.S. mad-cow situation in order to scare Americans into become vegetarians. But each year there are more cases of food-borne illness attributable to organic fruits and vegetables than to meat. (Organic vegetables are grown in E. coli rich manure.)

    That’s not to say that fruits and veggies are dangerous. Overall, the American food supply is the safest in the history of mankind. The incidence of food-borne illness in the U.S. has decreased over time, and represents a tiny fraction of what people in many other nations are routinely exposed to.

  13. Is it safer to eat organic meat?
    There’s absolutely no evidence that organic or so-called “natural” meat is any safer than conventional beef. The only guarantee is that it costs more money.

    A wide variety of organic-food activists are engaged in an aggressive PR offensive on behalf of so-called “natural” beef marketers. But the truth is that organic meat is no better or worse than the conventional products consumers buy every day.

  14. Is milk safe to drink?
    There is absolutely no evidence that milk, cheese, or other dairy products can transmit mad cow disease. James Cullor, director of the University of California Davis’s Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, asks: “What should consumers know? … [They] should feel comfortable with their milk.”

  15. Is veal any more or less safe than other beef?
    Veal, like other beef, is perfectly safe to eat. Most veal calves are slaughtered by the time they are one year old, and no case of mad cow disease has ever been diagnosed in an animal younger than two years. And scientists say it takes several years for the disease to incubate after exposure to the infection.

  16. How come the United States does not test every cow for mad cow disease?
    For the same reason American doctors don’t x-ray every patient for lung cancer. Some segments of the population are at greater risk for certain diseases, and others are not.

    According to Dr. Will Hueston, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, testing all animals “would be a colossal waste of taxpayer funds.”

  17. How many people have died from mad cow disease?
    Worldwide, barely 150 people have died from mad cow disease since it was first isolated and identified nearly ten years ago—and none of them contracted the disease in the United States. By contrast, far more of us are killed every year by bolts of lightning, bee stings, dog bites, or the flu.

  18. If there’s no real danger, why is mad cow disease all over the news?
    Because activist groups have an incentive to hype the mad-cow story and media outlets know frightening news translates into higher television ratings. Scare tactics help organic-food and animal-rights groups raise money.

  19. Is mad cow disease being spread from cow to cow because of blood protein in cattle feed?
    There's no science to back up this claim, heard most often from activists with anti-meat and anti-farming axes to grind. It's true that a blood transfusion can pass the disease from one person to another, but the infectious agent (called a "prion") thought to cause mad cow disease has never been found in cattle blood. So mixing some of this protein in with cattle feed doesn't endanger humans or farm animals. And don't take our word for it: The overly cautious European Union writes: “It has not been possible to detect the presence of the BSE [mad cow] prion in the blood of cattle, either sick or incubating the disease.”

  20. Is the risk of mad-cow infection any less if I cook my beef thoroughly?
    Unfortunately, exposure to heat doesn't kill infectious prions, so your mad-cow risk is the same whether you eat a well-done sirloin burger or steak tartare. But it's important to remember that the overall risk of any exposure is still very, very low. People should be far more worried about an automobile accident on the way home from the grocery store. Or lightning strikes (which claim 64 American lives every year), or dog bites (25 deaths), or being scalded to death by hot tap water (51), or ... well, you get the idea.

  21. If (1) a "mad" cow is rendered into chicken or pig feed, then (2) a pig or chicken eats it, and (3) the pig or chicken is then rendered into cattle feed, can the cow that eats that feed get infected?
    Animal-rights group have actually been trying to confuse newspaper reporters with this exact scenario. But according to a 2001 statement from the World Health Organization, even if swine or poultry were to eat mad-cow-infected animal tissue, they can't pass it on to cows in the form of cattle feed.

Scientific Glossary
TSE: Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy - the class of brain-wasting illnesses that includes mad cow disease
BSE: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, or mad cow disease
CJD: Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease - a human TSE that is not related to meat (a/k/a "classic" CJD or "sporadic" CJD)
vCJD: New Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease - the human version of BSE, not to be confused with "classic" or "sporadic" CJD (a/k/a nvCJD)
Scrapie: A TSE that occurs in sheep, which has never been found in humans
CWD Chronic Wasting Disease - a TSE that occurs in deer and elk, which has never been found in humans



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Headlines


One Weight-Loss Plan That Actually Works
Posted On: Monday 3/13/2006

Tons Of Fun With Statistics
Posted On: Thursday 3/9/2006

Tales Of The Obvious
Posted On: Tuesday 3/7/2006

Clinton To Governors: Why Do Research When You Can Have Spin?
Posted On: Wednesday 3/1/2006

BMI Report Cards: The 'F' Is For 'Futility'
Posted On: Tuesday 2/28/2006

'This Wonderful Capacity For Ignoring Negative Evidence'
Posted On: Tuesday 2/14/2006

Read This, Then Get On With Your Life
Posted On: Wednesday 2/8/2006

Steelers Win Super Bowl Despite Being Fat, Fat, Fat
Posted On: Monday 2/6/2006

CCF Debunks Flawed North Carolina Obesity Study
Posted On: Wednesday 1/4/2006


ActivistCash.com

Center for Science in the Public Interest
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

Op-Eds

No Flabby Excuses: Take Responsibility
Sometimes it seems as if life is conspiring to prevent us from exercising. We all know it's good for us. And yet there's never any time. read more here »

Industry salivates over new cash cow
Having given its imprimatur to what it surely knew was a big fat lie, the CDC must fully retract its fatally flawed study. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2006 Center for Consumer Freedom. PO Box 27414, Washington, DC 20038, Tel: 202-463-7112