Welcome to TechNet Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

I went to the Computing magazine's awards dinner last week as Microsoft had been nominated for a couple of Technology awards.  At each table, one of the main sponsors had placed a BlackBerry so that we could send messages to other tables.  I was keen to have a try, and decided to text the next table to see how easy it was.

The BlackBerry has characters arranged in the standard QWERTY style, and I think it's really counter intuitive and difficult to send messages quickly.  For a start, I can't get both hands onto the key pad, so I can't touch type, and finding the keys takes ages using just one finger.  I've used a Smartphone for a couple of years now, and can effectively respond to emails, or texts using the text keypad and one thumb (The teenagers next door can text messages to their friends with their mobile phones in their pockets but I haven't reached that stage yet).

I was curious as to why the BlackBerry has it's keys arranged in such a way, and did a bit of investigating on the history of the QWERTY design.  In 1872, E. Remington & Sons produced the first mechanical typewriter, patented by C. Latham Sholes. Soon typists were going so fast that they were able to jam the keys which flew up to hit the typewriter ribbon.  In 1873, Remington set their engineers to work to on the design. One of their keyboard layout changes was driven by a clever marketing idea. The Remington brand name, TYPE WRITER, could be most speedily typed if all of its letters were on the same row. Remington's salesmen used this slight bit of subterfuge to impress potential customers.  In the late 1870's: the "improved" QWERTY layout was designed to slow down typing, so that keys would not jam anymore. Here is the speed trap we are stuck with today, 130 years later.

I learnt to touch type at college using the old manual typewriters, and spent many hours tying the asdf jkl; sequence over and over again until my typing speed increased to well over 45wpm (words per minute), I use both hands on the keyboard, and now don't have to look at the keys at all.  This has held me in really good stead for working at my laptop ever since. But typing on a BlackBerry?  It took me over 5 minutes to type the message to the next table, and I never did get a response..

 

Published Monday, November 01, 2004 12:31 PM by Eileen_Brown
Filed Under:

Comments

Monday, November 01, 2004 2:00 PM by AndrewSeven

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

Ever tried a Dvorak keyboard?
Monday, November 01, 2004 4:34 PM by Daniel Auger

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

I have one of these bad-boys: http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/6800 and I love it. You type gamepad style with your thumbs.
Monday, November 01, 2004 5:00 PM by Jason

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

It has been proven that no matter which layout you use your speed will increase to nearly the same level after some amount of practice.

Dvorack has nothing on QWERTY other than some evangilists that like to be different.

Of course there are the differences in each person and research is meant to be generalized and not tuned to one particular person.
Monday, November 01, 2004 7:28 PM by Brandon Paddock

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

I respectfully disagree.

I have a Treo 600 and I couldn't be happier with the QWERTY layout. I use both thumbs when typing messages and it's far preferrable to me over handwriting.

My next phone may be the PPC 6601 device (I believe it's the same as the MDA III in Europe) which Sprint says they'll have soon. It's a Windows Mobile device with a slide-up screen that reveals a QWERTY keyboard much like the Treo's. But when it's not needed, it is concealed and full device real-estate is given to the display. Given the other features of the device, I think it's the ideal form factor for me.

Monday, November 01, 2004 8:36 PM by Neyah

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

There's a heck of a lot more words that you can type without moving your fingers from the home row on a Dvorack layout.

Compare QWERTY's home row:
a s d f g h j k l ;
To:
a o e u i d h t n s

I would also imagine that there is also a reduction in repetetive motion injuries when you do not have to move your fingers as much.
Monday, November 01, 2004 8:48 PM by Michael Paine

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

I thought the QWERTY keyboard's layout was based on statistical facts -- the outside fingers have the least used letters while the inner keys are opposite.
Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:42 PM by Neyah

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

Dvorak is based on that method Michael. QWERTY was designed to cripple your typing speed so that the fingers on the original typewriters wouldn't jam up.

There's a relatively good write up at http://www.theworldofstuff.com/dvorak/
The author has a chart comparing the two layouts on the 100 most common words in the English language at http://www.theworldofstuff.com/dvorak/compare.html
There is also an online Dvorak course at http://www.gigliwood.com/abcd/abcd.html where if you scroll down to lesson 9, you can see the comprehensive home row lesson.
Monday, November 15, 2004 10:18 AM by GEORGE

# re: QWERTY on a cellphone? - no thank you!

ASDFGHJKLPOIUYTREWQZXCVBNM
New Comments to this post are disabled