Welcome to Exchange Team Blog Sign in | Join | Help

Can Exchange 2003 be installed on 64-bit editions of Windows Server 2003?

It seems like a question of compatibility / incompatibility of current versions of Exchange (mainly Exchange 2003) and Windows Server 2003 x64 editions is coming up more and more, so let’s address it.

 

In short – running current versions of Exchange, including Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2003 x64 editions is not supported.

 

In fact, Exchange 2003 does not even install properly under WOW64. There are several reasons for this – some are related to Exchange 2003 IIS dependency but the biggest problem is that Exchange Setup installs the IFS (Installable File System) driver (exifs.sys) which is a 32 bit driver. On x64 editions of Windows, all of the Kernel mode components (which includes drivers) have to be native 64 bit components, while the User mode applications can be run under WOW64. This problem can not be addressed in future Exchange 2003 Service Packs either.

 

Now – the future is bright, we have plans, just not with current versions of Exchange. There is a list of applications that will run under Windows Server 2003 x64 in either 32 bit compatible or 64 bit native mode and you can find it here.

 

For more information on Exchange 2003 installation requirements, please go to this page.

 

- Nino Bilic
Published Monday, July 11, 2005 9:43 AM by Exchange
Filed Under: , ,

Comments

 

Devin L. Ganger said:

Just to be clear, you're talking about running Exchange 2003 in the 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003, correct? We could still run the 32-bit version of Windows Server 2003 on an Opteron server and run Exchange without any problems?
July 11, 2005 5:58 PM
 

Clive Watson's Weblog said:

This is an often asked question...the answer to which is basically "no" but for those who wish...
July 11, 2005 6:31 PM
 

Clive Watson's Weblog said:

This is an often asked question...the answer to which is basically "no" but for those who wish...
July 11, 2005 6:36 PM
 

Barnaby's Canadian IT Pro WebLog said:

I just came across a post from the Exchange team that explains the issues with trying to run current...
July 11, 2005 6:48 PM
 

Exchange said:

David,

Yes you are correct - we are talking about trying to install Exchnge 2003 (32 bit application) onto 64 bit OS (x64 editions of Windows), not on 32 bit OS (32 bit versions of server) while running on 64 bit capable hardware.
July 11, 2005 8:42 PM
 

Tiernans Comms Closet said:

July 12, 2005 2:53 AM
 

(e)Mail Insecurity said:

July 12, 2005 2:57 PM
 

subject: exchange said:

July 15, 2005 5:11 AM
 

subject: exchange said:

July 15, 2005 10:16 AM
 

Ian Fretwell said:

Being unable to install the full server on the x64 OS is fair enough. Why has no mention been given to the administration of Exch2003 from say the x64 XP OS...surely I ought to be able to install the Exch2003 version of AD Users & Computers somehow ?
July 19, 2005 6:15 AM
 

Barnaby's Canadian IT Pro WebLog said:

I just came across a post from the Exchange team that explains the issues with trying to run current...
July 28, 2005 8:32 AM
 

Barnaby's Canadian IT Pro WebLog said:

I just came across a post from the Exchange team that explains the issues with trying to run current...
July 28, 2005 8:33 AM
 

Barnaby's Canadian IT Pro WebLog said:

I just came across a post from the Exchange team that explains the issues with trying to run current...
July 28, 2005 8:35 AM
 

Barnaby's Canadian IT Pro WebLog said:

I just came across a post from the Exchange team that explains the issues with trying to run current...
August 24, 2005 4:46 PM
 

.: Daniel Melanchthon :. said:

Nach dem Start des Beta1-Programm nimmt der Exchange "12"-Zug ganz langsam Fahrt auf. Die Beta1 steht...
February 27, 2006 12:00 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

News

This is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified in the Terms of Use.

New! Would you like to suggest a topic for the Exchange team to blog about? Send suggestions to us.

Post Calendar

<July 2005>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
262728293012
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456