Welcome to TechNet Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Exchange 2003 and WINS

I've had this conversation before - several times, but ths same old thing keeps cropping up in various distribution lists, messages to various furums and emails send to me asking the question.  And the answer is Yes! Exchange needs WINS! (Do I need to put it in capitals EXCHANGE 2003 USES WINS!)  If you don't use WINS, you'll run into problems as described here...

(dont forget about all of the other bits that need WINS too...) but just look out for the caveats in the KB is you dont implement wins correctly:
“Server clustering in Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, and Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 requires NetBIOS, but server clustering does not necessarily require WINS for name resolution.”
“Name collisions cannot occur when you use WINS. In a WINS environment, only one computer can be named SERVERA. In DNS, multiple computers can be named SERVERA.”

so now you know (Garry) again......!

 

Published Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:04 PM by Eileen_Brown

Comments

Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:21 PM by Christian Schindler

# re: Exchange 2003 and WINS

I hope someday we get rid of the whole NETBIOS stuff. Networks(in terms of packets) work more efficient without it. Maybe in E12...?
Friday, January 27, 2006 1:14 PM by Eileen_Brown

# re: Exchange 2003 and WINS

Christian,
Actually I disagree with you as I quite like the whole NETBIOS concept as it really simplifies things on the networking front. DNS can be a nightmare to troubleshoot, especially when you get stuff stuck in the cache and you can't find out what or where the DNS problem is, NETBIOS, and WINS does make things a lot easier for the admin.
As for whether WINS will be dropped for Exchange 12 - I can't remember seeing anything in the documentation last week, nothing jupmed out at me (but I may be wrong). Maybe in Exchange 13 (will we release E13 or jump straight to 14? I wonder?) Maybe then? But that's quite a long way away yet!...
Friday, January 27, 2006 7:25 PM by Bill Buchan

# re: Exchange 2003 and WINS

Why on earth does Exchange 2003 still use WINS ? Why cant it use DNS like every other piece of software ?

Honestly. So the DNS folks at Exchange companies have to support a complementary WINS structure too ?


Eh ?

Well. Are they removing this Netbios DNS-lite bodge for E12 ?

Stunned.

---* Bill
http://www.billbuchan.com
Saturday, January 28, 2006 3:07 PM by Christian Schindler

# re: Exchange 2003 and WINS

Thanks for your comments Eileen! In my expericnce NETBIOS is even more difficult to troubleshoot in a distributed network. Recently I did a migration from NT4 to W2K3 and the whole wins stuff was going crazy... Remember those "a duplicate name exists on the network" messages? This won't happen with DNS. Sure, you have to carefully plan the infrastructure - but when it's up an running it's easy to administer.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:03 AM by Eddie Hulme

# re: Exchange 2003 and WINS

Eileen - thanks for this thought provoking blog. Unfortunately to me its all around business continuity and supporting the legacy environments - legacy being where you have moved your infrastructure forward but are maintaining applications and infrastructure from the past. How many thousands of applications are still out there where standards were not adhered to and 'true' network aware applications were not developed. Not to forget that even Microsoft development tools until recently had issues reading and evaluating registry keys to resolve fqdn's - so no wonder developers used shortcuts.
We may get to a new world DNS without WINS but not whilst we have to maintain our legacy world and business continuity.
Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:50 PM by Full of I.T.

# Best of Q&A from Webcast: Exchange Server 2003 Performance Tuning

Hi!
Below I’ve pasted an edited and cleaned up copy of most of the Q&A from today’s...
Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:53 PM by Full of I.T.

# Best of Questions and Answers from Webcast: Exchange Server 2003 Performance Tuning

Hi!
Below I’ve pasted an edited and cleaned up copy of most of the Q&A from today’s...
New Comments to this post are disabled