OpinionJournal OpinionJournal


opinionjournal store
Contents On the Editorial Page Reader Responses
Taste

Bookstore
Contents
On The Editorial Page
Today's Featured Article
Also on WSJ.com
International Opinion
Best Of The Web Today
E-mail Updates
"Political Diary"
Free Updates
On the Trail
Peggy Noonan
opinionjournal federation
featured article
poll watch
The Journal Editorial Report
Presidential Leadership
American Conservatism
Electoral College Calculator
Poetry for the War
A Marine's Journal
Reader Responses
Our Favorite Sites
Special Features
Archives
TASTE
Leisure & Arts
Columnists
Pete du Pont
Daniel Henninger
Brendan Miniter
RSS Feed
About Us
Our Philosophy
Who We Are
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
Subscribe WSJ
How To Advertise
Op-Ed Guidelines

SEARCH
go
OpinionJournal
WSJ Online


WSJ.COM SUBSCRIBERS go
directly to

WSJ.COM NETWORK
Wall Street Journal
CareerJournal
CollegeJournal
RealEstateJournal
StartupJournal
WSJbooks
CareerJournalAsia
CareerJournalEurope
MarketWatch

subscribe to wsj.com subscribe to wsj subscribe to Barron's Register for MarketWatch

FROM THE EDITOR

A Knoebel Endeavor
Introducing the OpinionJournal Electoral College Calculator.

BY JAMES TARANTO
Tuesday, June 1, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT

The Wall Street Journal editorial page launched this Web site on July 28, 2000, just before the Republican National Convention. OpinionJournal.com expanded the page's ability to cover the 2000 presidential campaign, chiefly by allowing us to publish articles much more quickly than we could have were we constrained by a newspaper publication cycle. (See, for instance, this Bob Bartley column recapping our coverage of the George W. Bush DUI story, or this John Fund column with a Sunday night Florida re-re-recount update.)

This year we're taking advantage of the technology in a new way. Political cartography buffs have long been fascinated by those Electoral College projection maps, which show the states in which the two party nominees are leading. But what if your local paper publishes a map and you think it has a state or two wrong?

Introducing the OpinionJournal.com Electoral College Calculator. Click here or on the left-hand navigation bar, and a window will pop up with this nifty interactive map. (Note: The preceding link will work only if you're reading this article on OpinionJournal.com. If it's been e-mailed to you, click here to go to the site.) The ECC is the brainchild and the work of Christian Knoebel, the producer of our site. He's the guy we "content providers"--Webspeak for writers and editors--call on when we need help with the technical side of things.

Go to the calculator and up pops a map showing each party's base. Republicans (red) have 22 states--much of the South, the Great Plains and the Rockies, plus Alaska and Indiana--worth 190 electoral votes. Democrats (blue) have 11 states--a Northeastern cluster, plus California, Hawaii and Illinois--and the District of Columbia, worth 168 votes. That leaves 17 battleground states, which we've colored a neutral yellow. Click on a state to cycle through the colors--yellow, red, blue, yellow again--and the electoral-vote total at the bottom of the window is automatically updated. A check mark appears when a party exceeds the 270 votes needed to win.

We figured the Republican base consists of the states George W. Bush won by a margin of at least 7%, plus Tennessee, where Bush's 3.6% margin was surely closer than it would have been were it not for Al Gore's connections to the state. The Democratic base, likewise, consists of those states in which Mr. Gore won by more than 7%.

Of course, part of the fun of prognosticating is that little can be taken for granted. There's always the possibility of an outcome so one-sided that one party carries many states in the other's base, as Republicans did in 1980, 1984 and 1988 and Bill Clinton did (to a lesser extent) in 1992 and 1996. John Kerry, for instance, is eyeing Louisiana (Bush by 7.7% in 2000), while there are polls showing surprising strength for Mr. Bush in places like New Jersey (Gore by 15.8%).

States also have been known to change party loyalty. The hapless Michael Dukakis managed to carry only 10 states in 1988, which you'd think would be solidly Democratic. But six of them--Iowa, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin--are too close to call this time around. On the other hand, of the 11 states in today's Democratic base, four--California, Illinois, New Jersey and Vermont--went Republican in every election from 1968 through 1988.

More features: There's a pull-down menu you can use to color the entire map red, blue or yellow, or call up the results of the previous six elections. (If you do the latter, the vote totals shown will be for 2004, not the year in question--so that, for example, the 2000 scenario gives Mr. Bush 278 electoral votes instead of the 271 he had that year.) Another pull-down menu allows you to save your own scenario and call it up again later. Shift-click on a state to bring up a capsule description of its voting history. And the menu tab marked "articles" takes you to a library of articles on presidential elections--some from 2000, some from this year, some previously published only in our paid e-mail newsletter, Political Diary. (Click here for information on subscribing.)

We'll change the default scenario as events (new polling, Mr. Kerry's vice presidential choice, etc.) warrant. Have fun.

Speaking of presidents, this seems a good time to mention our forthcoming book, "Presidential Leadership: Rating the Best and the Worst in the White House." Co-edited by yours truly and Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society, "Presidential Leadership" is based on the 2000 Federalist/WSJ survey of scholars on the presidents, originally published on this Web site as Hail to the Chief. In addition to the survey, the book includes a foreword by William Bennett, an essay on each president and several thematic essays on presidential leadership. Among them:

  • Forrest McDonald on Thomas Jefferson
  • Lynne Cheney on James Madison
  • Douglas Brinkley on James Polk
  • Christopher Buckley on James Buchanan
  • Jay Winik on Abraham Lincoln
  • John McCain on Theodore Roosevelt
  • Peggy Noonan on John F. Kennedy
  • Robert Dallek on Lyndon B. Johnson
  • Paul Johnson on Bill Clinton
  • Paul Gigot on George W. Bush
  • Robert Bartley on presidential leadership and economic policy
The book will be in stores June 10, or you can order an advance copy from the OpinionJournal bookstore. This is the second Wall Street Journal Book to come out of this Web site; the first, Peggy Noonan's "A Heart, a Cross, and a Flag," is also available from our bookstore.

By reading "Presidential Leadership," you'll learn who were the best presidents, who were the worst and why--information you can use as you mull your choices this November.

Mr. Taranto is editor of OpinionJournal.com.

RESPOND TO THIS ARTICLE     READ RESPONSES     E-MAIL THIS TO A FRIEND     PRINT FRIENDLY FORMAT

HOME     TOP OF PAGE     AUTHOR BIO     ARCHIVE    

SUBSCRIBE TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE OR TAKE A TOUR

SIGN UP TODAY FOR FREE MARKETWATCH MEMBERSHIP

RSS RSS feed


October 16, 2006
5:44pm EDT




PatriotPost.US
Harvard Political Review says, "The Patriot is leading a surprisingly well-organized charge into the world of Internet politics."


PoliticsNationwide.com
The one-stop source for politics and public policy, nationwide.


The American Spectator
The voice of the true conservative -- Ben Stein, the Washington Prowler and R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.


Keep Our Markets Free
Investing commentary
from a conservative
perspective.


Promote Your Company
Distribute a news
release with PR
Newswire and
create visibility


It's Just Lunch


Wall Street Careers


Car Finance


CRM Software
SALESFORCE.COM - Rated #1 CRM.
Free 30-Day Trial and Demo.


$100k+ job search

Advertisement

   dow jones


spacer spacer