Welcome to Exchange Team Blog Sign in | Join | Help

The new Search in Exchange Server 2007

In Exchange Server 2007, we completely rewrote Search - we upgraded from MS-Search 2.0 to 3.0 (which SQL Server 2005 also uses) and we changed from a "crawl" model to an "always up to date" model - we also rewrote the indexing part to be more efficient in how it communicates with the Exchange Information Store - the end result is an 35x improvement in indexing speed.

Because Search used so much resources, it was disabled by default in Exchange Server 2003, In Exchange Server 2007, it is enabled by default, and all our Microsoft Dogfood servers have it running - it hums along nicely, taking between 2 and 5% of CPU in steady state, rather than bringing the machine to its knees every night. Another added benefit of being on top of things is that the new messages are still fresh in the Jet cache, so reading them doesn't cause any additional I/Os.

Two new services handle the indexing work:

  • The Exchange Search Indexer is the component responsible for driving the creation and the updates of the search index. Think of it as the conductor - it constantly monitors changes in the system and schedules work in response. For example:
    • Adding a new Mailbox Database (MDB) triggers a crawl of the new MDB
    • Moving a new Mailbox triggers a crawl of the new mailbox
    • Receiving a new email causes the indexer to add the message to the index
  • MS-Search: The Search Indexer sends to MS-Search batches of messages (documents in the MS-Search terminology) that need to be indexed. To retrieve the contents of these documents MS-Search calls into an Exchange specific protocol handler that we wrote to get data out of the Exchange Information Store, and then uses a set of filters that are able to understand specific formats (HTML, PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint...) and decode them into plain text. To identify the words in the document, MS-Search uses another set of components called word breakers (in some languages like Chinese or Japanese for example, it is not very easy to tell how symbols are grouped to form a word).  This is no different that the Windows Content Indexing Service or the Windows Desktop Search.

You might notice that a third process actually uses most of the CPU - it is because MS-Search is actually composed of the core indexer (msftesql.exe) and a sacrificial filter daemon (msftefd.exe) which can be recycled at will. That's where the protocol handler, filters and word breakers live.

The performance of local search in Exchange Server 2007 is significantly better than in Exchange 2003. Search results are returned within seconds, and the search index is also typically updated within seconds after a message is created.

Full crawl is also much faster, but still uses a significant amount of CPU, memory and I/O. During more intensive processing phases, this could in principle disrupt regular mail flow. Since delivery of mail must take precedence over indexing, indexing backs off (throttles) when the load on mailbox server becomes too high. The indexing load is controlled by regulating the number of items (document chunks) that are processed per unit of time. A monitoring thread keeps track of the load on each MDB using the average latency it takes to retrieve documents from the MDB.  If this latency crosses a certain threshold (the default is 20 ms), it starts to restrict indexing by setting progressively higher processing delays per MDB (the delay value).  Before fetching a document from the MDB, the indexer checks the current throttling delay value, if it's larger than zero, it sleeps accordingly (throttling only occurs during full-crawls).

The delay value (DVt) for period t is calculated according to the following formula:

Errort = Max(0, Latencyt- LatencyThreshold)

PKt = KP*Errort

DVt = Min(MaxDV, (1- alfa )*PKt - alfa*DVt-1))

where LatencyThreshold is the latency that triggers  throttling, MaxDV is the maximum allowed delay value,  KP is the proportional gain factor and alfa is the feedback factor.

Here is a Performance Monitor screenshot of throttling in action (click on the picture if the width looks cut off for you):

Notice the white line (which shows the delay value) - the red line is the CPU utilization - which shows a dramatic decrease when the delay value increases - the greenish line is the latency.

Remi Lemarchand

Published Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:56 AM by Exchange
Filed Under: ,

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Christian Schindler said:

I know this is a little bit off-topic, but do you really mean SQL Server 2007(!) not 2005...?

Christian
October 12, 2006 3:25 AM
 

Remi said:

Indeed - I meant SQL Server 2005.
October 12, 2006 12:12 PM
 

Exchange said:

OK fixed the typo in the article. :)
October 12, 2006 12:18 PM
 

tt said:

None of this matters a whit unless you've persuaded the Outlook team to allow usage of this new Exchange search when Outlook is running in cached Exchange mode.  Current versions of Outlook unbelievably merely thrash the local disk in a brute force search.  It is so bad I recommend our Outlook users use Copernic desktop search to run searches on their Outlook email.
October 15, 2006 12:43 PM
 

Remi said:

Well it does matter to some extent - not everybody runs cached mode Outlook, and most people do use OWA and/or Airsync which make full use of the new Exchange Search.

If you're running cached mode, you can install Windows Desktop Search or equivalent (I don't know Copernic Desktop Search but I imagine it's similar) - or upgrade to Outlook 2007.
October 17, 2006 7:19 PM
 

Matt Wilbur said:

Very interesting. I'm curious if you've considered adding, as a feature, an ability to search against the catalog at a mailbox store level?  We are in the middle of trying to hunt down and remove some proprietary phrases that fell into some mailboxes (compliance issues) and it is IMPOSSIBLE to use anything but a dumb ascii viewer to look inside the edb files directly - its a shame that the search index is unreachable to admins to look for potential audit/compliance/security issues when needed. (should be easy to add?)

just my $.02. sounds very nice - would make this weekend a lot better for me if something like that was available for 2003 :)
October 28, 2006 2:50 PM
 

Exchange said:

Matt,

Good news - we DO have something like this available in Exchange 2007... great point, I'll work on getting a blog post on this written as it definitely deserves its own entry and more detail!
October 30, 2006 1:02 PM
 

Chris24 said:

Remi,

I am anxious to hear what your team is doing for Administrative search (keyword search) against the catalog across the stores. Multi-mailbox is a feature we could use right away. Thx.
November 9, 2006 8:21 PM
 

Kumar said:

Hello Chris & Matt,

I'm Kumar Cunchala, the PM for Exchange 2007 Search. We are in the process of posting a blog article which will talk about performing keyword searches (in subject and body) against multiple mailboxes. If you have any other questions about Search in Exchange 2007, please feel free to email me at kumarcs@microsoft.com.

Regards,
Kumar
November 20, 2006 4:01 PM

What do you think?

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

News

This is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified in the Terms of Use.

New! Would you like to suggest a topic for the Exchange team to blog about? Send suggestions to us.

Post Calendar

<October 2006>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234