Domain name system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The five-layer TCP/IP model

5. Application layer

DHCP ⋅ DNS ⋅ FTP ⋅ Gopher ⋅ HTTP ⋅ IMAP4 ⋅ IRC ⋅ NNTP ⋅ XMPP ⋅ POP3 ⋅ SIP ⋅ SMTP ⋅ SNMP ⋅ SSH ⋅ TELNET ⋅ RPC ⋅ RTP ⋅ RTCP ⋅ RTSP ⋅ TLS/SSL ⋅ SDP ⋅ SOAP ⋅ BGP ⋅ GTP ⋅ STUN ⋅ NTP ⋅ RIP⋅ ...

4. Transport layer

TCP ⋅ UDP ⋅ DCCP ⋅ SCTP ⋅ RSVP ⋅ IGMP ⋅ ICMP ⋅ OSPF⋅ ...

3. Network/Internet Layer

IP (IPv4 ⋅ IPv6) ⋅ IS-IS ⋅ IPsec ⋅ ARP ⋅ RARP ⋅ ...

2. Data link layer

802.11 ⋅ Wi-Fi ⋅ WiMAX ⋅ ATM ⋅ DTM ⋅ Token Ring ⋅ Ethernet ⋅ FDDI ⋅ Frame Relay ⋅ GPRS ⋅ EVDO ⋅ HSPA ⋅ HDLC ⋅ PPP ⋅ PPTP ⋅ L2TP ⋅ ...

1. Physical layer

Ethernet physical layer ⋅ ISDN ⋅ Modems ⋅ PLC ⋅ SONET/SDH ⋅ G.709 ⋅ OFDM ⋅Optical Fiber ⋅ Coaxial Cable ⋅ Twisted Pair ⋅ ...

This box: view • talk • edit

On the Internet, the Domain Name System (DNS) associates various sorts of information with so-called domain names; most importantly, it serves as the "phone book" for the Internet: it translates human-readable computer hostnames, e.g. en.wikipedia.org, into the IP addresses that networking equipment needs for delivering information. It also stores other information such as the list of mail exchange servers that accept email for a given domain. In providing a worldwide keyword-based redirection service, the Domain Name System is an essential component of contemporary Internet use.

Contents 1 Uses 2 History 3 How DNS works in theory 3.1 Parts of a domain name 3.2 Address resolution mechanism 3.3 Circular dependencies and glue records 4 In practice 4.1 Caching and time to live 4.2 Caching time 4.3 In the real world 4.3.1 Broken resolvers 4.4 Other applications 4.5 Extensions to DNS 5 Standards 6 Types of DNS records 7 Internationalized domain names 8 Security issues 9 Legal users of domains 9.1 Registrant 9.2 Administrative contact 9.3 Technical contact 9.4 Billing contact 9.5 Name servers 10 Politics 10.1 Truth in Domain Names Act 11 See also 12 References 13 External links

[edit] Uses

The most basic use of DNS is to translate hostnames to IP addresses. It is in very simple terms like a phone book. For example, if you want to know the internet address of en.wikipedia.org, the Domain Name System can be used to tell you it is 66.230.200.100. DNS also has other important uses.

Preeminently, DNS makes it possible to assign Internet destinations to the human organization or concern they represent, independently of the physical routing hierarchy represented by the numerical IP address. Because of this, hyperlinks and Internet contact information can remain the same, whatever the current IP routing arrangements may be, and can take a human-readable form (such as "wikipedia.org") which is rather easier to remember than an IP address (such as 66.230.200.100). People take advantage of this when they recite meaningful URLs and e-mail addresses without caring how the machine will actually locate them.

The Domain Name System (DNS) distributes the responsibility for assigning domain names and mapping them to IP networks by allowing an authoritative server for each domain to keep track of its own changes, avoiding the need for a central registrar to be continually consulted and updated.

[edit] History

The practice of using a name as a more human-legible abstraction of a machine's numerical address on the network predates even TCP/IP, and goes all the way to the ARPAnet era. Back then however, a different system was used, as DNS was only invented in 1983, shortly after TCP/IP was deployed. With the older system, each computer on the network retrieved a file called HOSTS.TXT from a computer at SRI (now SRI International). The HOSTS.TXT file mapped numerical addresses to names. A hosts file still exists on most modern operating systems, either by default or through configuration, and allows users to specify an IP address (eg. 192.0.34.166) to use for a hostname (eg. www.example.net) without checking DNS. As of 2006, the hosts file serves primarily for troubleshooting DNS errors or for mapping local addresses to more organic names. Systems based on a hosts file have inherent limitations, because of the obvious requirement that every time a given computer's address changed, every computer that seeks to communicate with it would need an update to its hosts file.

The growth of networking called for a more scalable system: one that recorded a change in a host's address in one place only. Other hosts would learn about the change dynamically through a notification system, thus completing a globally accessible network of all hosts' names and their associated IP Addresses.

At the request of Jon Postel, Paul Mockapetris invented the Domain Name System in 1983 and wrote the first implementation. The original specifications appear in RFC 882 and 883. In 1987, the publication of RFC 1034 and RFC 1035 updated the DNS specification and made RFC 882 and RFC 883 obsolete. Several more-recent RFCs have proposed various extensions to the core DNS protocols.

In 1984, four Berkeley students — Douglas Terry, Mark Painter, David Riggle and Songnian Zhou — wrote the first UNIX implementation, which was maintained by Ralph Campbell thereafter. In 1985, Kevin Dunlap of DEC significantly re-wrote the DNS implementation and renamed it BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain, previously: Berkeley Internet Name Daemon). Mike Karels, Phil Almquist and Paul Vixie have maintained BIND since then. BIND was ported to the Windows NT platform in the early 1990s.

Due to BIND's long history of security issues and exploits, several alternative nameserver/resolver programs have been written and distributed in recent years.

[edit] How DNS works in theory

The domain name space consists of a tree of domain names. Each node or leaf in the tree has one or more resource records, which hold information associated with the domain name. The tree sub-divides into zones. A zone consists of a collection of connected nodes authoritatively served by an authoritative DNS nameserver. (Note that a single nameserver can host several zones.)

When a system administrator wants to let another administrator control a part of the domain name space within his or her zone of authority, he or she can delegate control to the other administrator. This splits a part of the old zone off into a new zone, which comes under the authority of the second administrator's nameservers. The old zone becomes no longer authoritative for what goes under the authority of the new zone.

A resolver looks up the information associated with nodes. A resolver knows how to communicate with name servers by sending DNS requests, and heeding DNS responses. Resolving usually entails iterating through several name servers to find the needed information.

Some resolvers function simplistically and can only communicate with a single name server. These simple resolvers rely on a recursing name server to perform the work of finding information for them.

[edit] Parts of a domain name

A domain name usually consists of two or more parts (technically labels), separated by dots. For example wikipedia.org.

• The rightmost label conveys the top-level domain (for example, the address en.wikipedia.org has the top-level domain org).
• Each label to the left specifies a subdivision or subdomain of the domain above it. Note that "subdomain" expresses relative dependence, not absolute dependence: for example, wikipedia.org comprises a subdomain of the org domain, and en.wikipedia.org comprises a subdomain of the domain wikipedia.org. In theory, this subdivision can go down to 127 levels deep, and each label can contain up to 63 characters, as long as the whole domain name does not exceed a total length of 255 characters. But in practice some domain registries have shorter limits than that.
• A hostname refers to a domain name that has one or more associated IP addresses. For example, the en.wikipedia.org and wikipedia.org domains are both hostnames, but the org domain is not.

The Domain Name System consists of a hierarchical set of DNS servers. Each domain or subdomain has one or more authoritative DNS servers that publish information about that domain and the name servers of any domains "beneath" it. The hierarchy of authoritative DNS servers matches the hierarchy of domains. At the top of the hierarchy stand the root nameservers: the servers to query when looking up (resolving) a top-level domain name (TLD).

Iterative and recursive queries:

• An Iterative query is one where the DNS server may provide a partial answer to the query (or give an error). DNS servers must support non-recursive queries.
• A recursive query is one where the DNS server will fully answer the query (or give an error). DNS servers are not required to support recursive queries and both the resolver (or another DNS acting recursively on behalf of another resolver) negotiate use of recursive service using bits in the query headers.

[edit] Address resolution mechanism

(This description deliberately uses the fictional .example TLD in accordance with the DNS guidelines themselves.)

In theory a full host name may have several name segments, (e.g ahost.ofasubnet.ofabiggernet.inadomain.example). In practice, in the experience of the majority of public users of Internet services, full host names will frequently consist of just three segments (ahost.inadomain.example, and most often www.inadomain.example).

For querying purposes, software interprets the name segment by segment, from right to left, using an iterative search procedure. At each step along the way, the program queries a corresponding DNS server to provide a pointer to the next server which it should consult.

As originally envisaged, the process was as simple as:

1. the local system is pre-configured with the known addresses of the root servers in a file of root hints, which need to be updated periodically by the local administrator from a reliable source to be kept up to date with the changes which occur over time.
2. query one of the root servers to find the server authoritative for the next level down (so in the case of our simple hostname, a root server would be asked for the address of a server with detailed knowledge of the example top level domain).
3. querying this second server for the address of a DNS server with detailed knowledge of the second-level domain (inadomain.example in our example).
4. repeating the previous step to progress down the name, until the final step which would, rather than generating the address of the next DNS server, return the final address sought.

The diagram illustrates this process for the real host www.wikipedia.org.

The mechanism in this simple form has a difficulty: it places a huge operating burden on the root servers, with each and every search for an address starting by querying one of them. Being as critical as they are to the overall function of the system such heavy use would create an insurmountable bottleneck for trillions of queries placed every day. The section DNS in practice describes how this is addressed.

[edit] Circular dependencies and glue records

Name servers in delegations appear listed by name, rather than by IP address. This means that a resolving name server must issue another DNS request to find out the IP address of the server to which it has been referred. Since this can introduce a circular dependency if the nameserver referred to is under the domain that it is authoritative of, it is occasionally necessary for the nameserver providing the delegation to also provide the IP address of the next nameserver. This record is called a glue record.

For example, assume that the sub-domain en.wikipedia.org contains further sub-domains (such as something.en.wikipedia.org) and that the authoritative nameserver for these lives at ns1.en.wikipedia.org. A computer trying to resolve something.en.wikipedia.org will thus first have to resolve ns1.en.wikipedia.org. Since ns1 is also under the en.wikipedia.org subdomain, resolving ns1.en.wikipedia.org requires resolving ns1.en.wikipedia.org which is exactly the circular dependency mentioned above. The dependency is broken by the glue record in the nameserver of wikipedia.org that provides the IP address of ns1.en.wikipedia.org directly to the requestor, enabling it to bootstrap the process by figuring out where ns1.en.wikipedia.org is located.

[edit] In practice

When an application (such as a web browser) tries to find the IP address of a domain name, it doesn't necessarily follow all of the steps outlined in the Theory section above. We will first look at the concept of caching, and then outline the operation of DNS in "the real world."

[edit] Caching and time to live

Because of the huge volume of requests generated by a system like DNS, the designers wished to provide a mechanism to reduce the load on individual DNS servers. To this end, the DNS resolution process allows for caching (i.e. the local recording and subsequent consultation of the results of a DNS query) for a given period of time after a successful answer. How long a resolver caches a DNS response (i.e. how long a DNS response remains valid) is determined by a value called the time to live (TTL). The TTL is set by the administrator of the DNS server handing out the response. The period of validity may vary from just seconds to days or even weeks.

[edit] Caching time

As a noteworthy consequence of this distributed and caching architecture, changes to DNS do not always take effect immediately and globally. This is best explained with an example: If an administrator has set a TTL of 6 hours for the host www.wikipedia.org, and then changes the IP address to which www.wikipedia.org resolves at 12:01pm, the administrator must consider that a person who cached a response with the old IP address at 12:00pm will not consult the DNS server again until 6:00pm. The period between 12:01pm and 6:00pm in this example is called caching time, which is best defined as a period of time that begins when you make a change to a DNS record and ends after the maximum amount of time specified by the TTL expires. This essentially leads to an important logistical consideration when making changes to DNS: not everyone is necessarily seeing the same thing you're seeing. RFC 1537 helps to convey basic rules for how to set the TTL.

Note that the term "propagation", although very widely used in this context, does not describe the effects of caching well. Specifically, it implies that [1] when you make a DNS change, it somehow spreads to all other DNS servers (instead, other DNS servers check in with yours as needed), and [2] that you do not have control over the amount of time the record is cached (you control the TTL values for all DNS records in your domain, except your NS records and any authoritative DNS servers that use your domain name).

Some resolvers may override TTL values, as the protocol supports caching for up to 68 years or no caching at all. Negative caching (the non-existence of records) is determined by name servers authoritative for a zone which MUST include the SOA record when reporting no data of the requested type exists. The MINIMUM field of the SOA record and the TTL of the SOA itself is used to establish the TTL for the negative answer. RFC 2308

Many people incorrectly refer to a mysterious 48 hour or 72 hour propagation time when you make a DNS change. When one changes the NS records for one's domain or the IP addresses for hostnames of authoritative DNS servers using one's domain (if any), there can be a lengthy period of time before all DNS servers use the new information. This is because those records are handled by the zone parent DNS servers (for example, the .com DNS servers if your domain is example.com), which typically cache those records for 48 hours. However, those DNS changes will be immediately available for any DNS servers that do not have them cached. And any DNS changes on your domain other than the NS records and authoritative DNS server names can be nearly instantaneous, if you choose for them to be (by lowering the TTL once or twice ahead of time, and waiting until the old TTL expires before making the change).

[edit] In the real world

Users generally do not communicate directly with a DNS resolver. Instead DNS-resolution takes place transparently in client-applications such as web-browsers, mail-clients, and other Internet applications. When an application makes a request which necessitates a DNS lookup, such programs send a resolution request to the local DNS resolver in the local operating system, which in turn handles the communications required.

The DNS resolver will almost invariably have a cache (see above) containing recent lookups. If the cache can provide the answer to the request, the resolver will return the value in the cache to the program that made the request. If the cache does not contain the answer, the resolver will send the request to one or more designated DNS servers. In the case of most home users, the Internet service provider to which the machine connects will usually supply this DNS server: such a user will either have configured that server's address manually or allowed DHCP to set it; however, where systems administrators have configured systems to use their own DNS servers, their DNS resolvers point to separately maintained nameservers of the organization. In any event, the name server thus queried will follow the process outlined above, until it either successfully finds a result or does not. It then returns its results to the DNS resolver; assuming it has found a result, the resolver duly caches that result for future use, and hands the result back to the software which initiated the request.

[edit] Broken resolvers

An additional level of complexity emerges when resolvers violate the rules of the DNS protocol. Some people have suggested^{[citation needed]} that a number of large ISPs have configured their DNS servers to violate rules (presumably to allow them to run on less-expensive hardware than a fully-compliant resolver), such as by disobeying TTLs, or by indicating that a domain name does not exist just because one of its name servers does not respond.

As a final level of complexity, some applications (such as web-browsers) also have their own DNS cache, in order to reduce the use of the DNS resolver library itself. This practice can add extra difficulty when debugging DNS issues, as it obscures the freshness of data, and/or what data comes from which cache. These caches typically use very short caching times — of the order of one minute. Internet Explorer offers a notable exception: recent versions cache DNS records for half an hour.^[1]

[edit] Other applications

The system outlined above provides a somewhat simplified scenario. The Domain Name System includes several other functions:

• Hostnames and IP addresses do not necessarily match on a one-to-one basis. Many hostnames may correspond to a single IP address: combined with virtual hosting, this allows a single machine to serve many web sites. Alternatively a single hostname may correspond to many IP addresses: this can facilitate fault tolerance and load distribution, and also allows a site to move physical location seamlessly.
• There are many uses of DNS besides translating names to IP addresses. For instance, Mail transfer agents use DNS to find out where to deliver e-mail for a particular address. The domain to mail exchanger mapping provided by MX records accommodates another layer of fault tolerance and load distribution on top of the name to IP address mapping.
• Sender Policy Framework and DomainKeys instead of creating their own record types were designed to take advantage of another DNS record type, the TXT record.
• To provide resilience in the event of computer failure, multiple DNS servers are usually provided for coverage of each domain, and at the top level, thirteen very powerful root servers exist, with additional "copies" of several of them distributed worldwide via Anycast.

DNS primarily uses UDP on port 53 ^[2] to serve requests. Almost all DNS queries consist of a single UDP request from the client followed by a single UDP reply from the server. TCP comes into play only when the response data size exceeds 512 bytes, or for such tasks as zone transfer. Some operating systems such as HP-UX are known to have resolver implementations that use TCP for all queries, even when UDP would suffice.

[edit] Extensions to DNS

EDNS is an extension of the DNS protocol which enhances the transport of DNS data in UDP packages, and adds support for expanding the space of request and response codes. It is described in RFC 2671.

[edit] Standards

• RFC 882 Concepts and Facilities (Deprecated by RFC 1034)
• RFC 883 Domain Names: Implementation specification (Deprecated by RFC 1035)
• RFC 920 Specified original TLDs: .arpa, .com, .edu, .org, .gov, .mil and two-character country codes
• RFC 1032 Domain administrators guide
• RFC 1033 Domain administrators operations guide
• RFC 1034 Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities.
• RFC 1035 Domain Names - Implementation and Specification
• RFC 1101 DNS Encodings of Network Names and Other Types
• RFC 1123 Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Application and Support
• RFC 1183 New DNS RR Definitions
• RFC 1706 DNS NSAP Resource Records
• RFC 1876 Location Information in the DNS (LOC)
• RFC 1886 DNS Extensions to support IP version 6
• RFC 1912 Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors
• RFC 1995 Incremental Zone Transfer in DNS
• RFC 1996 A Mechanism for Prompt Notification of Zone Changes (DNS NOTIFY)
• RFC 2136 Dynamic Updates in the domain name system (DNS UPDATE)
• RFC 2181 Clarifications to the DNS Specification
• RFC 2182 Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers
• RFC 2308 Negative Caching of DNS Queries (DNS NCACHE)
• RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation
• RFC 2671 Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)
• RFC 2672 Non-Terminal DNS Name Redirection (DNAME record)
• RFC 2782 A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)
• RFC 2845 Secret Key Transaction Authentication for DNS (TSIG)
• RFC 2874 DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation and Renumbering
• RFC 3403 Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) (NAPTR records)
• RFC 3696 Application Techniques for Checking and Transformation of Names
• RFC 4398 Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System
• RFC 4408 Sender Policy Framework (SPF) (SPF records)

[edit] Types of DNS records

Main article: List of DNS record types

Important categories of data stored in DNS include the following:

• An A record or address record maps a hostname to a 32-bit IPv4 address.
• An AAAA record or IPv6 address record maps a hostname to a 128-bit IPv6 address.
• A CNAME record or canonical name record is an alias of one name to another. The A record to which the alias points can be either local or remote - on a foreign name server. This is useful when running multiple services (like an FTP and a webserver) from a single IP address. Each service can then have its own entry in DNS (like ftp.example.com. and www.example.com.)
• An MX record or mail exchange record maps a domain name to a list of mail exchange servers for that domain.
• A PTR record or pointer record maps an IPv4 address to the canonical name for that host. Setting up a PTR record for a hostname in the in-addr.arpa. domain that corresponds to an IP address implements reverse DNS lookup for that address. For example (at the time of writing), www.icann.net has the IP address 192.0.34.164, but a PTR record maps 164.34.0.192.in-addr.arpa to its canonical name, referrals.icann.org.
• An NS record or name server record maps a domain name to a list of DNS servers authoritative for that domain. Delegations depend on NS records.
• An SOA record or start of authority record specifies the DNS server providing authoritative information about an Internet domain, the email of the domain administrator, the domain serial number, and several timers relating to refreshing the zone.
• An SRV record is a generalized service location record.
• A TXT Record allows an administrator to insert arbitrary text into a DNS record. For example, this record is used to implement the Sender Policy Framework and DomainKeys specifications.
• NAPTR records ("Naming Authority Pointer") are a newer type of DNS record that support regular expression based rewriting.

Other types of records simply provide information (for example, a LOC record gives the physical location of a host), or experimental data (for example, a WKS record gives a list of servers offering some well known service such as HTTP or POP3 for a domain).

When sent over the internet, all records use the common format specified in RFC 1035 shown below.

RR (Resource Record) Fields

Field	Description	Length (Octets)
NAME	Name of the node to which this record pertains.	(variable)
TYPE	Type of RR. For example, MX is type 15.	2
CLASS	Class code.	2
TTL	Signed time in seconds that RR stays valid.	4
RDLENGTH	Length of RDATA field.	2
RDATA	Additional RR-specific data.	(variable)

For a complete list of DNS Record types consult IANA DNS Parameters.

[edit] Internationalized domain names

Main article: Internationalized domain name

While domain names technically have no restrictions on the characters they use and can include non-ASCII characters, the same is not true for host names.^[3] Host names are the names most people see and use for things like e-mail and web browsing. Host names are restricted to a small subset of the ASCII character set that includes the Roman alphabet in upper and lower case, the digits 0 through 9, the dot, and the hyphen. (See RFC 3696 section 2 for details.) This prevented the representation of names and words of many languages natively. ICANN has approved the Punycode-based IDNA system, which maps Unicode strings into the valid DNS character set, as a workaround to this issue. Some registries have adopted IDNA.

[edit] Security issues

DNS was not originally designed with security in mind, and thus has a number of security issues. DNS responses are traditionally not cryptographically signed, leading to many attack possibilities; DNSSEC modifies DNS to add support for cryptographically signed responses. There are various extensions to support securing zone transfer information as well.

Even with encryption it still doesn't prevent the possibility that a DNS server could become infected with a virus (or for that matter a disgruntled employee) that would cause IP addresses of that server to be redirected to a malicious address with a long TTL. This could have far reaching impact to potentially millions of internet users if busy DNS servers cache the bad IP data. This would require manual purging of all affected DNS caches as required by the long TTL (up to 68 years).

Some domain names can spoof other, similar-looking domain names. For example, "paypal.com" and "paypa1.com" are different names, yet users may be unable to tell the difference when the user's typeface (font) does not clearly differentiate the letter l and the number 1. This problem is much more serious in systems that support internationalized domain names, since many characters that are different, from the point of view of ISO 10646, appear identical on typical computer screens.

[edit] Legal users of domains

[edit] Registrant

Most of the NICs in the world receive an annual fee from a legal user in order for the legal user to utilize the domain name (i.e. a sort of a leasing agreement exists, subject to the registry's terms and conditions). Depending on the various naming convention of the registries, legal users become commonly known as "registrants" or as "domain holders".

ICANN holds a complete list of domain registries in the world. One can find the legal user of a domain name by looking in the WHOIS database held by most domain registries.

For most of the more than 240 country code top-level domains (ccTLDs), the domain registries hold the authoritative WHOIS (Registrant, name servers, expiry dates, etc.). For instance, DENIC, Germany NIC, holds the authoritative WHOIS to a .DE domain name.

However, some domain registries, such as for .COM, .ORG, .INFO, etc., use a registry-registrar model. There are hundreds of Domain Name Registrars that actually perform the domain name registration with the end user (see lists at ICANN or VeriSign). By using this method of distribution, the registry only has to manage the relationship with the registrar, and the registrar maintains the relationship with the end users, or 'registrants'. For .COM, .NET domain names, the domain registries, VeriSign holds a basic WHOIS (registrar and name servers, etc.). One can find the detailed WHOIS (registrant, name servers, expiry dates, etc.) at the registrars.

Since about 2001, most gTLD registries (.ORG, .BIZ, .INFO) have adopted a so-called "thick" registry approach, i.e. keeping the authoritative WHOIS with the various registries instead of the registrars.

[edit] Administrative contact

A registrant usually designates an administrative contact to manage the domain name. In practice, the administrative contact usually has the most immediate power over a domain. Management functions delegated to the administrative contacts may include (for example):

• the obligation to conform to the requirements of the domain registry in order to retain the right to use a domain name
• authorization to update the physical address, e-mail address and telephone number etc. in WHOIS

[edit] Technical contact

A technical contact manages the name servers of a domain name. The many functions of a technical contact include:

• making sure the configurations of the domain name conforms to the requirements of the domain registry
• updating the domain zone
• providing the 24×7 functionality of the name servers (that leads to the accessibility of the domain name)

[edit] Billing contact

The party whom a NIC invoices.

[edit] Name servers

Namely the authoritative name servers that host the domain name zone of a domain name.

[edit] Politics

Critics commonly claim abuse of domains by monopolies or near-monopolies, such as VeriSign, Inc. Particularly noteworthy was the VeriSign Site Finder system which redirected all unregistered .com and .net domains to a VeriSign webpage. For example, at a public meeting with VeriSign to air technical concerns about SiteFinder ^[4], numerous people, active in the IETF and other technical bodies, explained how they were surprised by VeriSign's changing the fundamental behavior of a major component of Internet infrastructure, not having obtained the customary consensus. SiteFinder, at first, assumed every Internet query was for a website, and it monetized queries for incorrect domain names, taking the user to VeriSign's search site. Unfortunately, other applications, such as many implementations of email, treat a lack of response to a domain name query as an indication that the domain does not exist, and that the message can be treated as undeliverable. The original VeriSign implementation broke this assumption for mail, because it would always resolve an erroneous domain name to that of SiteFinder. While VeriSign later changed SiteFinder to have this behavior only in response to true Web queries, there was still widespread protest about VeriSign's action being more in its financial interest than in the interest of the Internet infrastructure component for which VeriSign was the steward.

Despite widespread criticism, VeriSign only reluctantly removed it after the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) threatened to revoke its contract to administer the root name servers. ICANN published the extensive set of letters exchanged, committee reports, and ICANN decisions ^[5].

There is also significant disquiet regarding the United States' political influence over ICANN. This was a significant issue in the attempt to create a .xxx top-level domain and sparked greater interest in alternative DNS roots that would be beyond the control of any single country.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Truth in Domain Names Act

Main article: Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

In the United States, the "Truth in Domain Names Act" (actually the "Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act"), in combination with the PROTECT Act, forbids the use of a misleading domain name with the intention of attracting people into viewing a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct on the Internet.

[edit] See also

• Dynamic DNS
• Alternative DNS root
• Comparison of DNS server software

[edit] References

1. ^ How Internet Explorer uses the cache for DNS host entries. Microsoft (2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-07.
2. ^ Mockapetris, P (November, 1987). RFC1035: Domain Names - Implementation and Specification. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
3. ^ The term host name is here being used to mean an FQDN for a host, such as eg. en.wikipedia.org., and not just (to use the same example) en .
   While most domain names do indeed designate hosts, some domain name DNS entries may not. In this sense, a (FQDN) hostname is a type of domain name, but not all domain names are actual host names. Cf. this host name vs domain name explanation from the DNS OP IETF Working Group.
4. ^ McCullagh, Declan (2003-10-03). VeriSign fends off critics at ICANN confab. CNET News.com. Retrieved on 2007-09-22.
5. ^ Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Verisign's Wildcard Service Deployment. Retrieved on 2007-09-22.

[edit] External links

• dmoz.org overview of web-based DNS tools
• DNS Complexity, Paul Vixie, ACM Queue
• Open Source Guide - DNS for Rocket Scientists, an on-line technical book for further reading
• DNS Reporting Tool, an online tool for testing specified domain's DNS record and identify problems or issues
• Web based DNS Checking Tool, an online tool to find domain's DNS record