Wikipedia:Patent nonsense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from WP:PN)
Jump to: navigation, search
✔ This page is considered a deletion guideline on Wikipedia. It is generally accepted among editors and is considered a standard that users should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this page's talk page.
Shortcut:
WP:PN
WP:NONSENSE
Wikipedia guidelines
Content
Article Inclusion
Notability
Classification
Editing
Discussion
Behavior
Style
Manual of Style
See also policies

Wikipedia writers and editors contribute a lot of brilliant prose, but occasionally some patent nonsense. This falls into two categories:

  1. Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "akdjaioodjosfd5sdgjgdsiu489eh4 ohe89dsgjoisdjgo4dgsjha[j'z", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed (or typed with the eyes closed).
  2. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

[edit] Not to be confused with...

The following, while often regrettable, are not patent nonsense, and should not be treated as such. Check the Deletion policy for information on how to handle these things.

[edit] Dealing with patent nonsense

There are various ways to deal with total nonsense—use your good judgment to decide which is most appropriate:

  • Replace it with brilliant prose.
  • Move it to the article's talk page.
  • Move it to the user's talk page.
  • Remove it from the article if there is anything left in the article after that.

However, if anybody objects, because they believe that the content is not total nonsense, then it is best to discuss the issue with them and to try to reach a consensus. In particular, if someone says that they think they can rework the "nonsense" into something worthwhile, then please give them some time and space to do so.

If an article contains nothing but patent nonsense, use your good judgment to decide whether to:

[edit] See also

Personal tools