"ED IS SLOW" YOU SAY? YEAH WE KNOW. QUIT WHINING. ED NEEDS MOAR BANDWIDTH. TIME TO HELP! DONATE IS NOT A CITY IN CHINA: CLICK HERE AND HELP US!

WikiFur

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

GreenRaeper, WikiFur's ruthless dictator-for-life, looks like he has fucking giantism or some shit

WikiFur is a wiki that, in theory, categorizes and chronicles the perversions of furries, but in practice is a one-sided ignorant crapfest (which they themselves acknowledge!) where they slag on mundanes and boost their own pathetic basement dwelling ego like a Twilight Zone episode of Æ. Of course, it pales in comparison to the furry articles on Wikipedia that are controlled by ContiE, the leader of the furluminati. WikiFur is run by GreenReaper and his loyal bitches of foxes, wolves, lions, cheetahs, rats, ferrets, and snow leopards, who have shamelessly dressed up this article in the past, hiding their perversion, disguising their ineptitude and so on.

1 Center of self love (a.k.a. The WikiFur drinking game)
2 Overnight popularity, moar liek overweight popularity
3 WikiFur on Wikipedia
- 3.1 Links to Wikifur to be classified as spam by Wikipedia
4 Vandalism Ideas
5 Important dramas
6 Administrators
7 External links

[edit] Center of self love (a.k.a. The WikiFur drinking game)

And the sound of fapping was heard for miles.

WikiFur is saturated by the semen of countless furries masturbating furiously. A fun drinking game can be played to their chronic wanking and shameless self promotion.

Simply pick any one random article from the People section, and check the edit history. Take one shot if you find a history page with the same user on WikiFur having edited it at least 100 times. Take three shots if you find a user that's edited it less than twice. Take five shots where obvious WikiEdit Drama has taken place. Take ten shots if you find a history page where the same user has not edited their own article. Repeat until tanked. Win the Internets if you last longer than three minutes.

Of course, not one entry in the entire database details the darker side of any furry, nor their various perversions; any user caught telling the truth about another is immediately accused of fursecution and subjected to the banhammer. Some furries think different - but then, they're furries!

[edit] Overnight popularity, moar liek overweight popularity

WikiFur's Main Page

Having gained way too many articles in less than three weeks due to none of the editors having lives or standards, it had already generated a tremendous amount of drama. Just two days after being promoted, it was made into Something Awful's Awful Link of the Day, which may have some connection to its growth in "popularity". Another reason is its Google Adwords advertising, which led to great lolz when GMail started telling people to go there while reading their secret furry hentai subscription.

LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD LOL FUCKTARD

[edit] WikiFur on Wikipedia

[edit] Links to Wikifur to be classified as spam by Wikipedia

There is a huge debate going on at Wikipedia in the external links page where they are considering blocking links to Wikifur as spam. They say "Wikifur is a site for people who follow the furry sexual lifestyle". Showing that instead of reading Wikipedia's own articles on furries, they came straight to ED.

Someone mentioned, "some of the articles it [links to wikifur] was on were weird. Taxidermy and Kopa standing out." Now WikiFur doesn't have a taxidermy article, but they do have an "Anthropomorphic taxidermy", which isn't regular taxidermy, but instead it's the same thing as what's described in the ED article taxidermy.

"I am a furry and I consider WikiFur to be a terrible source or external link. The wiki is, to say the least, kind of sketchy. I know a number of people who have articles on WikiFur and they are often poorly written, highly biased, do no reflect reality, ect. There are several articles on people who are disliked in the furry community which are poorly written, and a lot of furry authors have glowing articles, probably written by themselves or their friends. The whole Wiki is not a reliable source of information, and just because you have 8000 monkeys typing doesn't mean that they're going to produce something Wikipedia can use. -Perhaps- we could use it for limited purposes, such as stating what at least some furries think, but it is not an acceptable source of information and promoting it via wikipedia is unethical at best. Wikipedia has high standards, and WikiFur does NOT meet our standards. Titanium Dragon 09:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)"

However last Thursday Wikipedia's WikiFur article was restored, and it looks like it is here to stay. You can help by vandalising the shit out of it.

[edit] Vandalism Ideas

First idea.....

Everybody does blatant vandalism on wikifur, but nobody does sneaky. Make an account there. Don't worry, wikia doesn't keep track of new accounts or have a log and it'll look like you coulda been activa elsewher on wikia and decided to drop by (except that GreenReaper has lookupcontribs, so he can tell). Wikifur isn't all elitist about high edit counts like Wikipedia. Soooo you make a wikifur account and go around doing ordinary edits mixed in with sneaky vandalism. See how long the sneaky lasts. Don't be obvious like making your vandalism look like trolling. Don't touch any ED-related articles or you'll look from ED, that include their articles on ED, anything anti-furry, their article on Prince Jeremy, and wikifur's article on Blu Aardvark -- just avoid those so you look like the normal furfag or closet-furfag or diaperfur of their site..