I was fascinated by the description of social insect societies in beehives, but alarmed by Francis Ratnieks's attempt to extend the conclusions to human society (15 January, p 42).
No doubt he is correct that among honeybees "good policing acts as a deterrent" and leads to the lowest levels of cheating by individuals. And he might even be right that a similar social structure - a police state - would lead to the lowest possible levels of crime for a human society, preventing, as he says, "individuals from disrupting the society as a whole".
But humans, unlike bees, have other goals, such as freedom and happiness, and sometimes it is good when individuals disrupt society - Gandhi being an obvious example. Let's not forget these concerns as we consider ways to decrease crime. Our modern obsession with being "tough on crime" often ignores the negative side effects of the consequent policies. We do not want, after all, to model ourselves upon honeybees, do we?
- Subscribe to New Scientist and you'll get:
- New Scientist magazine delivered to your door
- Unlimited access to all New Scientist online content -
a benefit only available to subscribers - Great savings from the normal price
- Subscribe now!
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.