Explore by Subject
Get 4 extra free issues and unlimited free access to NewScientist.com
Health
 

Hair test cuts breast cancer errors

  • 07 February 2008
  • From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit

Detecting breast cancer from changes in the structure of hair could cut down false alarms from mammograms.

The test bombards strands of hair with X-rays from a synchrotron particle accelerator. In hair from healthy people, the pattern produced by the X-rays is a series of arcs, while in people with breast cancer a distinctive ring is superimposed on top of the arcs.

Though the test first showed promise in 1999 (Nature, vol 398, p 33), other researchers failed to repeat the results. Now Peter French and Gary Corino of the company Fermiscan in Sydney, Australia, say this is because hair is damaged by products such as dyes, by stretching as it is held in the X-ray beam, or because it is wrongly aligned in the beam. Their device holds hair in the correct position, does not stretch it and tests only the untreated hair a few millimetres from the scalp.

So far, they have correctly identified 12 out of 15 women already diagnosed with breast cancer (International Journal of Cancer, vol 122, p 847). Although the test generates a high rate of false positives, incorrectly identifying 2 out of every 10 women as having breast cancer, Fermiscan says it is useful. In an ongoing trial, the people it has flagged as false positives tend not to be the same ones incorrectly flagged by mammograms, suggesting that together the two tests could reduce the overall false positive rate.

No one is sure what causes the signature ring. One suggestion is that proteins released by cancer cells alter the hair follicle to produce hair with a different structure.

Cancer - Learn more about one of the world’s biggest killers in our comprehensive special report.

From issue 2642 of New Scientist magazine, 07 February 2008, page 27
 
Add a comment
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
   
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine