World Bank report on the Government of Kenya

Unless otherwise specified the document described here:

• Was first publicly revealed by Wikileaks
• At that time was classified, confidential, censored or otherwise withheld from the public.
• Is of substantial political, diplomatic or ethical significance.
• Has been verified if the analysis, summary or note fields indicate, otherwise has not (yet) been verified. Most documents come in from journalists. Frauds are extremely rare, but possible.

Jan 10 2007 World Bank Department of Institutional Integrity report on the Government of Kenya. 43 pages.

This report is strictly confidential. It contains information of a highly sensitive nature requiring that access be confined to the recipients designated by th Department of Institutional Integrity (INT). Reproduction or further distribution on a need-to-know basis requires prior authorization from INT.

The document is the same as that mentioned in the Wall Street Journal on March 6, 2008, titled Kenya and the World Bank

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120476549379315205.html

[...]

Then there is the corruption in the bank's own projects. In early 2007, the bank's internal anticorruption unit, known as INT, completed a detailed review of four bank projects in Kenya involving $357 million in bank financing. The review was never made public, but a copy can be viewed by clicking on the nearby link. In three of the four projects, INT found "numerous indicators of serious irregularities" as well as "actual occurrences of fraud and corruption consistent with findings of previous forensic audits and examinations."

Take the $50 million Kenya Decentralized Reproductive Health and HIV/AIDS Project. After reviewing $7.2 million in project contracts, INT found "irregularity indicators" in contracts worth $5.2 million. "Credible witnesses informed [INT] that Ministry officials at all levels were engaged in corruption in virtually every component of the project," the review states.

In a second AIDS-related "disaster response project" known as KHADREP, INT uncovered irregularities in 29 of the 36 contracts it reviewed. Among the lowlights: "Grant recipients reported that the continuous requests for bribes made by the government officials diverted funds from the activities' objectives. One grant recipient explained that, instead of paying secondary school fees for orphans, it used grant money to pay bribes. They also stated that this caused orphans to drop out of school and engage in illegal activities, including prostitution, which would inevitably increase the exposure and risk of the HIV/AIDS infection." In other words, a project intended to reduce HIV infection helped to increase it.

To its credit, the bank did take steps against corruption under former presidents James Wolfensohn and Paul Wolfowitz. In 2006, Mr. Wolfowitz withheld some $260 million in lending to Kenya and sought to link future lending to guarantees of press freedom. But he was fought tooth-and-nail both by the bank's bureaucracy and its board, particularly European members. The fight over corruption -- replicated in India and Cambodia, as we have reported here and here -- helped to inspire the staff coup that forced Mr. Wolfowitz out last spring. Lending to Kenya ramped up dramatically as Mr. Wolfowitz was being forced out the door.

Categories: Leaked files | Analysis requested | Kenya | International organization | World Bank | 2008 | 2008-03 | English