Synoptic Gospels
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with synoptic problem. (Discuss) |
The synoptic gospels (from Greek, συν, syn, together, and όψις, opsis, seeing) are the first three gospels—Matthew, Mark, and Luke—found in the New Testament of the Bible. These gospels often recount the same stories about Jesus, generally follow the same sequence and use similar wording. The hows and whys of these books' similarities and differences to each other and to other gospels is known as the synoptic problem. The synoptic gospels are contrasted with the fourth gospel, John.
Contents |
[edit] Origin
The term synoptic comes from Greek and means "seeing with the same eyes", but was coined specifically to deal with analyzing and understanding the similarities and differences between the first three gospels. The term synopsis might have first been used in 1583 by Georg Siegel, but it was not until 1774, when Johann Jakob Griesbach published his Synopsis that the base term entered the scholastic vernacular, and not until about the 1840s that the term began to be used as an adjective.[1] From the 1830's onward, scholars generally began using the term synoptic gospels instead of the term first three gospels.
However, the origin of the concept, per se, stems from much earlier: As early as the 4th century, these three books were "seen together with the same eyes", starting with the Church historian Eusebius of Caesarea, who had devised a method that enabled scholars to find parallel texts. In the 5th century, Augustine of Hippo developed what was later known as the Augustinian hypothesis, which proposed why these three gospels were so similar. In this view, the gospels were written in order of presentation, but that Mark was Matthew's "lackey and abbreviator" and that Luke drew from both sources, that is:
Matthew -> Mark
\__ _ __/
V
Luke
This view went unchallenged until the late 18th century, when Anton Büsching posited that Luke came first, and Mark conflated Luke and Matthew, that is:
Luke -> Matthew
\__ _ __/
V
Mark
In 1774 Griesbach published his landmark parallel study, calling it a Synopsis. Over the subsequent years, he developed what became known as the Griesbach hypothesis, and now called the two-gospel hypothesis, or simply "2GH". This hypothesis maintains the primacy of Matthew, but proposes that Luke is directly based on it, while Mark is based on both. Thus we have:
Matthew -> Luke
\__ _ __/
V
Mark
Since then, other hypotheses have been proffered in order to deal with the synoptic problem. These hypotheses include the Ur-Gospel hypothesis (1778), the two-source hypothesis (1838, 1863), Farrer hypothesis (1955), the Lindsey hypothesis (1963), Jerusalem School hypothesis (1973), and the Logia Translation hypothesis (1998).[2]
The widely accepted modern scholastic understandings (the two-source and four-source hypotheses) agree that Mark's Gospel was the first written, and published in Rome in the early 60s AD. This Gospel was independently available, along with other verbal traditions, to Matthew and Luke, both of whom were writing in the 70's and 80's. Hence:
MARK
/ \
LUKE MATT
Yet other material is common to Luke and Matthew that is absent from Mark. The name given to this material (without implying that it was ever a textual source) is Quelle, abbreviated to Q. Hence the two source hypothesis:
MARK Q | \/ | | /\ | LUKE MATTHEW
The question of the origin of the remainder of the content of each of the latter two synoptics remains an open one, yet the name commonly given to sources unique to these authors is L for Luke, or M for Matthew. Again, this is not to imply that the sources were ever documentary. In the culture at the time, it was very common for communities to preserve and pass on important stories and evidence by word of mouth from person to person.
[edit] Dating
Scholars generally date the synoptic gospels as having been written after the epistles of Paul and before the gospel according to John, thus between 60 and 115 AD. As to the specific dates for each book, this largely depends on (or supports) the particular hypothesis used to account for the books' textual relationship.
[edit] Similarities
The relationship between the texts is the subject of the synoptic problem, which essentially seeks answers to the question of why the texts are so similar — at times using exactly the same wording and mentioning the same sequence of events, despite the fact that other intervening events must have happened, even if they were mundane events such as Jesus sleeping or people gossiping about him.
The synoptic gospels all tell the story of Jesus, proclaiming him the Son of God, the Son of Man, the Messiah (Christ), the judge of the future apocalypse. The synoptic gospels start either with Jesus' birth or his baptism and conclude with the empty tomb and resurrection appearances, though some texts of Mark end at the empty tomb (see Mark 16). In these gospels, Jesus cures diseases, exorcises demons, forgives sins, displays dominion over nature, knows the secret thoughts and past of others, speaks "with authority," calls God his own Father and says that the Father had handed over to him "all things."
[edit] See also
- [[Omissions in the Gospel of Jo]
[edit] References
- ^ Stephen C. Carlson's professional blog, quoting from Peter M. Head and the Online Etymology Dictionary. January 02, 2004.
- ^ Synoptic Problem Home Page. Retrieved on 2007-07-08.
