User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

/Archive1

Template:Archive box/box-width/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/image/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/image-width/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/auto/undefinedTemplate:Archive box/1/defined

[edit] E-meter

Hey, I saw your revert on my e-meter edit. I though that the sentence I removed was extraneous and poorly worded.. Daler (talk) 09:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Avoiding contractions

Hi. Basically because it sounds informal, which is the wrong tone for an encyclopedia. See The Wikipedia Manual of Style. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 10:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Problem

I have a problem on the other project. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look into it. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam.J.W.C. (talk • contribs)

[edit] Vandalism

Hi there, I just reverted the worst of it, but you might want to double check to make sure its clean. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 15:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

No worries. He was a bit touchy about his article being deleted, apparently. Quite mature. He was also on a vandalising spree this morning so I reported him and he's been blocked indef. Good to weed out the vandal only accounts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travellingcari (talk • contribs) 15:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bloomfield Hills School District

I removed some of the tags you placed on this article. {{introrewrite}}, {{cleanup}}, and {{expand}} are not really appropriate for stubs. Please reconsider using these tags on stubs in the future are they are really in-actionable for stubs and simply bloat the maintenance categories until someone removes them.--BirgitteSB 15:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Please do not remove that long section. I added to it, much of what you removed was already there; had been for a long time. As it happens, I am still working on it at this precise moment. If you challenge anything, please tell me which bits, or leave tags on the parts where you would like to see sources and I will do what I can to improve it. Right now, I am still tidying the page and putting some touches to it so please observe this. Thank you. Evlekis (talk) 11:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

If you are still here, I accept that finding sources is a little difficult, but what I am now going to do is go back over the entire section and remove anything which appears POV or written as though to promote certain sentiment. Looking back at what I wrote, I accept that there are a few remarks which I should have checked before I submitted, human instict caused me to save first. You are very welcome to assert yourself or question anything if you are not happy with it, I am happy to cooperate. Evlekis (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Zen centers in the United States

Ah why bother? You aren't about to listen anyway. (Mind meal (talk) 11:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC))

[edit] nom

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical persecution by Christians (2nd nomination) seems to be the third nomination. cygnis insignis 17:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The way it was named is my guess, 2nd and second. The template on the article also has a bug that causes the listing to redlink. You might need to get some help from someone who knows about these things, I have never looked into it. Regards, cygnis insignis 18:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nom

Hi Otolemur crassicaudatus, I would suggest you keep the nomination open a little while longer. I really don't see how the article doesn't violate original research policies, and it'd probably be better to see if the wider community agrees... especially given the precedent set by the deletion of the other two "Historical persecution by X" articles. Regards, ITAQALLAH 19:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reversion of reference requests

What is the reason for reverting my good faith request for references? ✤ JonHarder ^talk 19:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand what the problem is with asking an editor to provide the references before jumping to AfD. Can you be more clear? ✤ JonHarder ^talk 19:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

These are fairly new articles (mostly not BLPs) and I think there are refs out there. Do you believe the articles are better left untagged, and the only appropriate process is AfD? Is it improper to use the "unreferenced" tag in these cases? ✤ JonHarder ^talk 19:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, no problem. I will probably restore those tags you reverted when I have time (or you can). I generally speedy or prod articles and only AfD as the last resort because it is so involved. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 19:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FUR

It can be uploaded under Fair Use if you want. Reply on my talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary

Thank you for telling me! I apologise for my forgetfulness. Jump Guru (talk) 22:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flags

Sorry I reverted your revert on White Eagle Aviation - just to explain my position a user is adding flags to all the airline infoboxes without any concensus, I have brought up the subject at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines for guidance. Thanks MilborneOne (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I have left a note at User talk:Tobibln and invited him to join the discussion at project level, although he appears to be going at great speed adding flags to notice! MilborneOne (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] French communes and references

I think you'll find most information particularly on the smaller settlements will only be in French unfortunately -this is why it is so important that more people are willing to translate on wikipedia. Statistical references are from INSEE -try googling that but it is only a statistical website unfortunately. Many of the communes have their own websites. Perhaps you could try looking at them and try to uinderstand the information given there -or use babel fish to get a rough translation perhaps . I'm gradually working through Yvelines but as I say it will be a gradual thing and not my only area of concentration ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 22:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm renaming the categories to prepare for growth in the near future, ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 13:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverts of my edits

Hello. I was just wondering why you had reverted my edits to Ranmoor House and Katy Fox? In the Ranmoor case, the information removed was of no importance - in the Katy Fox case, I removed future spoiler information. In future, please use an edit summary when reverting edits, explaining why you feel it is necessary. Thanks. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 01:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kitano Station (Tokyo)

Edit summary is not a good place to talk with you. You asked why I was replacing night picture with daytime one in that article.

I understand it is not true that a daytime picture is always better than a night picture, but in this case, I believe the new one, the daytime picture, is better than the previous one, the night picture because it better represents original color of the subject under the daylight. In addition, for this short article, two images are excessive so that I replaced the picture instead of adding one. This is the reason why I tried to replace the picture. I don't want an edit war, so please give your concent or comment to my opinion before I make further edit to that article. --Sushiya (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mountain Lake (Virginia)

I have rolled back your massive deletion on this article. I believe that the better and customary procedure for an older WP article which has undisputed but undocumented content which need to be improved is to place a WP:sources template, which I have done. This is one of many articles in the scope of WikiProject:Virginia which we are gradually upgrading. I know of nothing in it which is not accurate, we just need to cite sources using the newer WP methods. If you have any specific items you wish to challenge as incorrect, please do so and cite your source, of course. Please contact me on my User Page if you disagree, rather than engaging in an edit war with the article. Thanks, Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Persecution

I have no objection to any article on the persecution of Religion A by Religion B, provided that it is adequately sourced and is significant. Such persecution certainly occured on a substantial scale during the BJP govenment and I hear examples of it continuing. It appears usually to take the form of trying to force Christians to reconvert to Hinduism, and can be extremely violent. Christians are prosecuted for "forced conversions" when conversion is in fact voluntary, whereas Hindus never seem to be prosecuted for attemopting forceably to converty Christians. I refer to India, of course. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recent Changes

Hi i'm sure you are aware that when you patrol recent changes you should mark them as patrolled. You seem to have forgot on Shift (video games). This saves editors time patrolling articles which have been patrolled already thanks. BigDunc (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your warnings on User talk:Schmidty211

Are you really fed up with User: Schmidty211‎ or did WP:TW have a hiccup? Toddst1 (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test

The b-class milhist criteria are here, if you think I have made a mistake then please seek a third opinion, thanks. Harland1 (^t/_c) 17:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Giorgos Markopoulos

• What was the controversial edit I did? User:Odikuas 19:33 11 March 2008
• The fact that the University of Piraeus was called Higher School for Industrial Studies is included in the relevant Wikipedia article. All the other information can be found in the external links I list at the end of the page. User:Odikuas 19:37 11 March 2008

[edit] Twinkling for instant edits, what's going on here?

I think that a thumbnail size image for this subject Silver line is too small, and I enlarged it slightly. The caption is detailed and there are no other pictures in the article. Before I revert it again, I want you to justify how it is that you are reverting my edit instantly and automatically (twice so far). Looks like an edit war by robot could ensue. Who are you, the Terminator? Weird. Please explain here. JohnClarknew (talk) 22:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ships' pages are handled differently, and the lead depiction is never a thumbnail. See HMS Queen Mary, RMS Queen Elizabeth, RMS Queen Elizabeth 2, RMS Mauretania (1906), etc. & etc. And, BTW, can you keep subject discussion on the same page, so we can all see the thread? To have question and answers on separate pages leads to obscurity, don't you agree? I see you started your contributions just 4 days ago, Otolemur crassicaudatus, and already have made maybe a hundred edits. I respectfully suggest you hang back a bit, and familiarize yourself with the site. And I'm reverting once again, and please stay off my talk page on this subject. JohnClarknew (talk) 12:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Beg pardon, I was wrong, I see that you had archived the past since you signed on last September. JohnClarknew (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Excessive referencing

Please read the talk page on Russia.--Miyokan (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary

Sure thing. Creamy3 (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Melbourne shuffle

Mind holding off a bit, I'm in the middle of a major cleanup. Cheers. NathanLee (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, just trying not to chop so much out of it as to have nothing left. Take a look at the pre-major chop and you'll see what a mess it was. Trying to find if there are any links for any of the stuff. But main thing was to get it looking semi-respectable first. :) NathanLee (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Go for your life, I've done as much digging to try and get references as I can.. Take a look and see what you think. Very poor number of references out there that aren't just chatter on forums. NathanLee (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Animal rights in Nazi Germany DYK

On 14 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Animal rights in Nazi Germany, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] you forgot

to list this on the main checkuser page [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.187.94 (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Islamic University in Uganda

Maybe you'd care to inform me why this article would not fit in Category:Islam in Uganda. That's the one I added it to. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 10:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of slected recordngs box on Madame Butterfly article

Please look at the TALK PAGE and lay out your reasoning rather than just reverting. Viva-Verdi (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] thank you

Thank you for removing the warnings on my talk page. I know that it is good form to provide an edit summary, but I've been replacing {{WikiProject Ballet}} with {{WikiProject Dance|Ballet=yes|nested=yes}} and marking this as a minor edit, which it is. In some cases I have added the latter when the former was not present and in a few rare instances created the talk page where there was none. The other minor edits your Twinkle script has been flagging are equally minor formatting changes, not a word of text. I know it's a bad habit, a wicked thing, to make edits without providing an edit summary, but there's so much work to do and so little time to do it. Thank you again for making your script clever enough to know an incorrigible sinner when it sees one! Robert Greer (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism on Loco Roco

What exactly are you warning me for vandalizing? Strongsauce (talk) 11:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

A vandalism4 for that matter, considering you have not warned me about any previous "vandalism" Strongsauce (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

In the future I'll remember to add something into the summary line when making removals like that. Strongsauce (talk) 11:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank ya

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, here's your very own personal humanoid robot. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 13:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediox

I guess I was just reading a little too much into some of the wording. "One of the most famous consumer electronics brands in Europe" is what caught my attention. Aar☢n Bruce^Talk/_Contribs 19:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Russian submarine Kursk explosion

I think I pointed out to you the milhist assesment criteria which are here, I failed this article as it did not meet al of the criteria, it did not have enough inline citations. Hope that helps! Harland1 (^t/_c) 19:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Palais de justice de Montréal

Whar are you referring to? The info I just added to Palais de justice de Montréal is sourced. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I see. You're referring to the merge I did for the sculpture. If you had checked the Talk page, you would see that I was simpy effecting a merge was discussed there as well as at the Canadian Wikipedians' notice board; b) I added the citation needed tags myself. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Academy Award for Best Picture

Are you asking me why? As in, why did I make that edit? I was not sure what your edit summary meant. Please let me know (at my Talk Page). Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC))

I did not understand this edit. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

When the edit prior to that edit (which you reference above) was made, I had no idea what the effect of the prior edit was. So, I asked the editor who made the edit. He/She said that it was done by mistake. So, I reverted his/her mistake. This (below) is the conversation between me and the editor. Please reply at my Talk Page. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 07:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC))

Hi. I saw that you edited the Milestones Chart for the Best Picture Academy Award article. You added a notation like "border = 1" or something like that. What exactly does that edit do? I did not notice a difference in the chart at all. Please reply at my Talk Page. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC))

Sorry about that. I had numerous Wikipedia sites open and I accidentally edited it into the wrong post. I'm terribly sorry for the inconvenience and I will take better care next time. I'm unsure if I fixed that up or not. Again, sorry about that.Chocaholic29 (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, then I will self-revert. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. Do you have any idea what that command is supposed to do? That "border=1" command. I saw no difference at all in the Chart ...? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC))

[edit] DYK for Crime in Bhutan

On 23 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crime in Bhutan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done! Bencherlite^Talk 08:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Utrecht (city)

Could you please be a bit more constructive. I wrote more then half that article and provided ALL the references so far (which IMHO are decent for a B class article). You reverted edits I made just now (this morning). You could at least have the decency to wait more then 10 minutes for me to provide references that make sense. If you think it is not good enough you can always add lack citations tags yourself rather then destroying my work. Arnoutf (talk) 10:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

There are different ways to enfore WP:V. Yes, if an edit is WP:NONSENSE it should be removed immediately; if it is insulting it should be removed immediately. However, if it is very very likely there are sources (that are easily found), and there is no harmful information whatsoever (as for example the claim that certain highways connect to a city) you should assumes good faith and not seek conflict. The most constructive way would be to try and find the sources yourself, thus contributing to the atmosphere of co-operation which is the core of Wikipedia. If you feel not qualified to find the sources, you migth consider the text, look for statements that are likely to be challenged and mark them with the fact tag (or if you see a whole section such) with the unreferenced tag. You might also consider discussion on the relevant talk page how to take it further.

Removal should be considered the last resource, while it follows the letter of WP:V it goes against the core spirit of the whole of the Wikipedia project. Please consider rule 1 in such cases. Thanks Arnoutf (talk) 10:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that the underconstruction tag is meant for significant changes of a complete article, incremental expansion of a fewsections does not need such a bulky tag. Readers should know that unsourced information is weak. Arnoutf (talk) 11:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hudson River School

I left you a message here:Talk:Hudson River School. If there is material there that needs referencing please tag it, before deleting it. Thank you. Modernist (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Twinkle

You appear to causing alot of havoc for the silliest little things along with stating things are unsourced when they clearly have been sourced, please sort it out.Londo06 15:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

What a major crime, not checking the box to major edit.Londo06 15:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Byzantine Studies

Please give me a second while I add the sources. I'm simply translating the German article section - by - section. Best, --Javits2000 (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

Why thank you. Thank you kindly - it shall sit proudly on my Wikidesk. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 20:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lope de Vega

Hello Otolemur crassicaudatus, I'd like to protest against your recent removal of a large chunk of the text of the Lope de Vega article, with the edit summary "entire article is unsourced", and your subsequent reversion of my "reversion-with the request to you to discuss first". In a quick scan of your talk page above, I see what appear to be similar concerns related to the following articles: Mountain Lake (Virginia), the ? article referred to in the section header "Melbourne shuffle" above; Utrecht (city), Hudson River School, Byzantine Studies? What's up? In the case of Lope de Vega, at least, you have not been deleting newly added questionable text, you deleted longstanding text; yes it needs references, but in my experience on Wikipedia, the usual procedure is to seek to add the references yourself, or to tag, not blanket removal of most of the article. Thanks for taking this into consideration. Lini (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Addition of material without providing WP:RS is violation of WP:V and I am aginst any kind of addition of unsourced material. The procedure should be to find reliable sources first, then add information. No matter if the text is longstanding or not, WP:V must be followed. It is better to remove material instead of tagging, if not, then provide reliable sources. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dragon Bridge

On 24 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dragon Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey congrats on the DYK. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 14:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop reverting and let's talk

Please stop long enough to talk. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want me to look up the sub-categorization guidelines, I will. But in general, for cities like this, the main city category and it's sub-cats are much better organized when most, if not all, of the articles are actually well-categorized down in the sub-categories. That's what the heirarchical categorization system of the project allows for. Thus people who want to find things can easily go to the specific sub-cats that they need, instead of having to wade through many misc articles all jumbled together in the main category. I am slowly working down the list of US cities cleaning up their categorization, and it happens to be Atlanta's turn. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

As for an article like Pace's Ferry, in general articles are not supposed to be in both a category, and a parent/grandparent/etc category of the first one. See Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories for more information. This specific example is already in Category:Atlanta ferries, which is in Category:Transportation in Atlanta, which is in Category:Atlanta, Georgia. Having it also in Category:Atlanta, Georgia is overcategorization, and is clutter on the Category:Atlanta, Georgia category. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I see you put the media list back in the media category. Are we OK now? Can I resume clearing up the Atlanta category? I'm 3/4 done at this point, though I will certainly not get the category down to zero entries directly in it. Anyway, I'll remain halted for a little while longer (an hour or so) to give you time to voice more concerns. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, your categorization is OK. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Blackpool F.C. season 1946-47

How is a book with an ISBN-number link not a reliable reference? - Dudesleeper / Talk 16:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your timely intervention of onslaughts CRUFTS and NONSENCE articles along with additional contribs on crime & historical areas Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 08:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bangladesh Districts

Wikipedia already has a set of pages on bangladesh pages, simply put District after the name, eg. Lalmonirhat already exists at Lalmonirhat District, can you please make all your new pages redirect to the old ones when you make them and the same on all the old ones - Highfields (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Blimey! I did not notice this. I created the district articles by clicking the red links in List of cities and towns in Bangladesh. In List of cities and towns in Bangladesh, the word "district" is omitted. If the articles already exists as "X District", then these should be redirected to the "X District" articles. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Ouch thats rather annoying isn't it!! Can't believe nobody created the redirects. If you want some districts to do, Central African Republic and Sudan need doing. I'll look at creating some templates over the next few days ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 16:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC) I wouldn't rely on google for smaller areas within developing countries, it is extremely inadequate on many places. Burma also is the same. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 16:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Animal rights in Nazi Germany‎

I'll do some updating based on quality german sources. However the notorious Göring picture is not yet available in the german wikipedia - may be one of the Gurus can help? --Polentario (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, you added some unsourced information in the article. I have raised the concern at talk page. Please answer there. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Which talk page? Havent seen the claims nd would like befor i have to leave --Polentario (talk) 08:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Download PDF file

Hi! It times out! I cannot download that PDF file you refer to. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 01:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

I may be lil busy in the next couple of days and I think that your imperative comment is crucial here and here.
--Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 05:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Based on User:RegentsPark’s comment, do you think that we have to alter the intro & other areas of the article in a polished format? --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 06:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bangladeshi bridges

Hi sure, do you have a list or shall I use an existing category? As you can probably see though I am having a quiet few days of editing and have barely been on here the last few days, but I'll try and get something done this evening. Regards ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 19:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

IN case you are interested I created Template:Bridges in Europe some time ago . As you can see the level of development is rather poor. I'll create one for Asia too if you like ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 19:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ontario stubs

Hi, just noticed the series of Ontario location stubs you're creating. Nice work on that, but the articles could be greatly and easily improved by adding categories and references. Do you plan yo go through them and add them later? J Milburn (talk) 23:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, keep up the good work. J Milburn (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] On assessing articles

Hello! It's the first time anyone has suggested to me that one must be a member of a WikiProject in order to assess an article! Any user can do this, AFAIK. Anyhow, perhaps you did not check out the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Members carefully. I'm pretty sure I am there, at Nr. 156. Cheers, Cplakidas (talk) 12:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, it is good, concise and well-referenced, but: it is very short and, in relation to its title, very limited. "Science and technology in Nazi Germany" is a title with a very broad scope, not only missiles & aircraft. It should encompass anything from synthetic fuels to radar, and from nuclear research to biology. "Science" in particular is a very broad term, which would also cover the universities under the Nazis, the general attitude of the Nazis towards "intellectualism", and the exodus of German scientists in the 1930s. If you want to limit your scope a bit, I would suggest renaming the article to "Military technology of Nazi Germany", but still, that would cover much much more than is already covered. I suggest using this article as an introduction, listing the various topics, with a brief outline (as is already pretty much done for missiles and aviation), and providing links to dedicated articles, e.g. "German rocket research during World War II". Also, "Aviation research" should cover much more than just the development of jet engines. The Germans were pioneers in air medicine (making tests on concentration camps inmates), ejection seats and much else that has become standard in post-war aviation. Best regards, Cplakidas (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

It is within scope, as far as most of the topics in it are military-related, and, let's face it, very little of what the Nazis did was not military-related. ;) Cheers, Cplakidas (talk) 13:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Constitution

You added a tag to my entry on the Constitution of the Roman Republic, which said that it needs to be shortened. I am not sure how to do this without breaking the flow of the article, since the Roman constitution was so interconnected. Do you have any ideas on how to do this?RomanHistorian (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The article is at present 163 kilobytes long. According Wikipedia:Article size, such articles are considered too long. Read Wikipedia:Article_size#A_rule_of_thumb. If an article exceeds 100 KB, then the article "almost certainly should be divided up". To maintain wikipedia's standard article size, a length 32 KB is preferred. The article certainly need to be spitted into multiple articles. The History and Origin section should be shortened and the excess information should be mention in a different article. For that, you can create a new article titled History and Origin of the Constitution of the Roman Republic. The Senate section is too long. It should be shortened and details information should be given in the main article Roman Senate. The Executive Branch section is too long. Give information in concise manner and create new article titled The Executive Branch of the Constitution of the Roman Republic where you can give the details. In this way the article can be shortened. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Currently, the executive branch of the Roman Republic is divided into many different articles, one for each office (consul, tribune ect). What do you suggest be done to reconcile a potential article on the entire executive branch, and the articles on the individual offices?RomanHistorian (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The Executive Branch section is clearly too long. If there are different articles present, that's fine. But a confined article is needed only for the Executive Branch. Which is why a new article titled The Executive Branch of the Constitution of the Roman Republic can be created and the information in this article should be mentioned in two to three paragraphs. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Victoria to London Bridge via Gipsy Hill

Why? Because I find that italicising the names of non stations makes the diagrams fractionally easier to read and piping words like and, for and to etc avoids that "black and blue patchy print" effect you can get. Thoughts? Britmax (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Religious violence in India

I noticed that you had contributed a lot to Religious violence in India in a professional WP writing tone. Unfortunately, two users are adding unnecessary long-cruft details in the beginning and spoiling the enhancement of the article. They are only interested in edit warring and not interested in any sort of discussion. I fed up reverting their vandalism and requesting you to solve this issue.
--Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 07:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I moved your suggestion & my comments to admins notice, please participate there. Thanks. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 08:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SKA-B-Q

I speedy deleted this article. I just took a brief moment to look past the article into the event itself to check for notability. -- Longhair\^talk 08:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Hi Otolemur crassicaudatus! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3). I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Corruption in India article

I noticed that u have created and maintain the Corruption in India article. I find some aspects of that article problematic. For one, the second line states that Indian society is corrupt, I really dont know what that means. The reference seems to be unsatisfactory in this regard. Also, I would like it if you placed corruption in India in some context, i.e. compare it with other countries of similar nature, for eg see [2] and compare India with its income average and the South Asian region. I will wait for ur response before editing. Thanks. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unwanted advice

I am sure you will not like this advice, but it is in your interest. Wondering why you behave so strangely I had a look at your editing history for today and came to the conclusion that humour is something relatively abstract for you and you don't get the exact bounds for what is and what isn't generally considered humour. I would say that admins reacting to WP:ANI are likely to do the same, and unless this is part of a meta-joke it might be wise to remove your message there before anybody responds, and apologise to SteveBaker. (Your post to his page was a boundary case, and he does have the right to be offended. Note that Kmweber is poking fun at himself much more than at anybody else. Have you looked at the edits he claims to be proud of?) --Hans Adler (talk) 11:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

PS: Feel free to remove this, of course. :-) --Hans Adler (talk) 12:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pacifica

Can we discuss your recent revert at Pacifica, California? I am curious about your reasoning. Thanks. SaltyBoatr (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I recall that both of those external link edits have a long history of Wikipedia:Single-purpose account editing, going back over many months, which in my judgment they run contrary to WP:COI and WP:EL guidelines. If you check the contribution history of the users, and what I view as indications of IP sockpuppetry. Also, for the surf forecasting[3], I suspect you may agree with me. Much of my opinion comes from memory, as I have had this page on watchlist for a while, and the exact diffs are buried in the page history. SaltyBoatr (talk) 15:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, I agree with you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Deletion sorting??

Because those countries were communist and hence had communist propaganda's of their own. I've missed a few - Germany, Baltic states, Cuba, China. I will rectify this ASAP.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Every country had them. We should draw some limits - other interested editors can learn about this AfD from inclusion in politics and social sciences sorting cats.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Piotrus behaviour in this case is bordering WP:CANVASS. By this logic, any communist-related AfD would be crossposted across multiple listings. --Soman (talk) 18:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] nofootnote tag

I'm about to insert in-line footnotes in the article, but what I really do need is a proofreading by any native English speaker. If you are as such and interested in the content, can you do me a favor of checking my grammar? I want to raise to DYK in my first time, so really need a help. --Appletrees (talk) 05:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

All right, but how did you find the article? The dish is not widely known in English speaking world and I just freshly expanded the article. --Appletrees (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image removal bot

Just going though the images in album infoboxes that were deleted due to either just a missing fair use or license problem. I then restore the image & add the appropriate fair use/license. Can't keep up with the bot, just trying to get some of the album/film images back. SkierRMH (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Awarding Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Civilians killed in World War II

Thanks it will take a lot of work, Im surprised this category wasn't already in existence. -RiverHockey (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BBoC

Thanks for your message. I'd say that 'controversial' should not be included in the opening paragraph, it is a weasel wording which should generally be avoided. Regarding the 'alleged' part, I'll try to come up with an alternate wording. --Soman (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:

I use WP:HUGGLE which warns the users like that automatically :-) Hope this helps! Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 19:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Slovenia

HI howz it going? If you are interested in creating a DYK there should be enough info at here for an article on the main square or the Plague Memorial -this has an article on the SLovenian wiki ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll see but I'd imagine there would be so many it would be best to create by state/county rather than the whole country as the template would take up about 30kb!! I'm a bit preoccupied at present with Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/Slovenia/Municipal templates. There are over a 100 municipalities to create plates for and cover yet ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. Never trust google for info. It does a good job most of the time but in terms of history the Internet (and wikipedia) is still really in its infancy and it will be some time before world resources really develop on absolutely everything. I would imagine there would be various slovene government reports and stuff on it. A 75 m arched iron bridge in a major town is certainly notable . As it is the stub has encyclopedic information ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 10:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hochwohlgeboren

Thank you, I will do this as it seems to be without controversy. Charles 22:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Meghna Bridge

On 3 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Meghna Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 23:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the article, man! --Tarif from Bangladesh (talk) 03:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for a cheering surprise

It does help to know that the work on Iran-Iraq is appreciated by some, as it's certainly a battleground for POV, and I've come close, on several occasions, to giving up. I've copied the Barnstar into the Iran-Iraq section of my userpage, to remind myself as much as others.

In that section, I've tried to describe a reasonable summary of the external, international world involvement in the conflict. While we may not call things "World Wars" any longer, when 30 or more countries are involved, at least as suppliers, it's more than a bilateral issue, or even an issue with a small number of key players.

Also in my userpage section, although I haven't done as much on it, is something that I don't believe violates WP:OR, although I'm just starting on a draft that has the appropriate references: the Tanker War was essentially a separate conflict from the Iran-Iraq War. Certainly, they were at the same time and there were interactions, but I believe there is abundant evidence that the US had quite different motives for its support of Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war, and what might be called the Iran-US war (i.e., the Tanker War). Not only are there declassified Presidential documents referring to freedom of navigation, there is a history of the US being willing to fight over freedom of navigation that goes back to the War of 1812 and the Barbary Wars.

The preceding is not a popular view among people with the POV that the US acted from simple anti-Iranianism. Nevertheless, I believe there is considerable evidence that the two conflicts were generally separate in the minds of U.S. policymakers, and such an analysis actually simplifies the analysis, rather than creating the political equivalent of epicycles to explain US and other behavior.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation is a shining star in the manner in which Wikipedians, of intensely differing POV, manage to work toward consensus and accuracy. While that isn't a major interest of mine, I've had some very interesting and worthwhile interaction with them over defining terror and measures against it, which led to improvements in the counter-terror article and a better understanding of what was meant by counter-terror regarding the Sri Lankan civil war. Just today, I've shared some ways that I was able to help deal with POV clashes regarding Central Intelligence Agency, by setting up a rational set of sub-articles for a very complex topic. Perhaps if that approach works in several places, it may be worth an essay suggesting it for other POV battles.

Again, thank you. The Barnstar came at a time where my emotions needed it. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Newanimal.org

My first instinct is ... no it isnt a RS, for two reasons. 1) it references Wikipedia for the very topic it is discussing. 2) the author appears to be [4], who has dabbled with vanity publishing, but hasnt yet published himself, and I couldnt quickly find a bio which could be used to better evaluate the author/maintainer of the website. I think it is fine to include the link as an external link on Buru (cryptozoology), esp. considering it doesnt have any better links as yet. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 13:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ANI

Thanks for the pointer. I believe it is considered polite form to notify the subject as well, so you should let Firefly know as well. Jfire (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Illegal Bangladesh

I wonder if you've heard of the "allegations of X apartheid?" mess? I'm quite certain this one could start something very similar... resulting in a waste of efforts in a lame wikiwar by all involved instead of doing some productive editing... ¨victor falk 09:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: F&G

I agree. Delete it. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemjok (talk • contribs) 16:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy?

I was very surprised to see an experienced editor like you sending Present tense conjugations of ser and Fpsbanana to AfD. Fpsbanana was a clear candidate for "db|reposted db-web after clear AfD" and with the other one, even if there was no obvious CSD, it was worth trying db-empty, and only if an admin declined to delete it, would you bother with AfD. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tagging is not POINTy, thank you very much

re: here, I think that's a very tacky comment calling my tagging for improved references, which it *still* needs, POINTY. How is it pointy? I think you need to watch how you phrase comments to other editors please. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 11:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The article already has two references. And the article is marked as stub. Refimprove tag is inappropriate for stubs. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree, and this has been discussed at AN/I etc. before. From WP:V "The source should be cited clearly and precisely to enable readers to find the text that supports the article content in question." Nowhere does it say stubs are exempt, in fact WP:CITE says, "Any material that is challenged, and for which no source is provided within a reasonable time (or immediately if it's about a living person), may be removed by any editor" again, no special situation for STUBS. That website has such a dubious claim to notability that refs are essential to keep it from being deleted. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 11:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The article at present has three references. How many references do you want? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The one that you linked appears to be a reliable source. It needs a ref that establishes notability -- the ones I added in Feb only confirm it exists. As it is I'm not sure it meets WP:WEB but that's a horse of another color. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 14:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The website is notable per WP:WEB. WP:WEB says website will be notable if "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations". The article has three references and all cover the subject significantly. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Exit Mundi

I would have been happy to oblige you, however the barking order has made me think very differently.Londo06 12:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

regardless of your continuing threatening tone.Londo06 12:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Not for reporting, no problem with that.Londo06 13:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ANI

Hello, Otolemur crassicaudatus. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. direct link TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 14:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 166th Air Refueling Squadron

What was so "disruptive" or "hard-to-read" about the 166th Air Refueling Squadron's page formatting? This page follows almost every other USAF wing/squadron page on Wikipedia TDRSS (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

What you are talking about? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

this and this it would seem. Benea (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm. I made a mistake. Actually the "Mission" and "History" section were blank, this is why I gave him the template. However the templating was inappropriate. In these cases, a general note is necessary instead of templating. I have removed the message in the user's talk page [5]. Will be careful on this. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean and thanks for clearing that up (you're the first one to ever take the time and actually tell me why). I usually try to include the wing information in the page but that gets complicated when the squadrons were assigned to different wings or the wings have different squadrons. I might end up filling in those sections, at a way later date though. Thanks again. Kevin Rutherford 00:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Mario Kart Wii

I don't think so try if you wish.--Lbrun12415 16:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't see that their before when I clicked on it it really has nothing to do with MK or MKW it should be removed.--Lbrun12415 16:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Macau Fisherman's Wharf

Do you think the confusing tag is needed in the article. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

What tag do you speak of? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 17:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Err, the article has a tag above saying "Part of this article may be confusing". Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

LOL! I can't believe I missed that. I guess I automatically ignore tags on articles I rarely edit. No, I don't find the article confusing. Instead, I think it needs expansion, if possible at all. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 17:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Agapitus

Hi, thanks for your message! I listed Agapitus of Palestrina under "child saints" because he is described as a "young martyr," which I believe has a very specific sense -and he is depicted in terms of iconography in the English source as a child. Peter the Aleut is also described as a "child saint" even though he was around 15 too. But I'll look into it!

--Polylerus (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Slacklining

The entire article is written like garbage; the wikihow doesn't qualify as valid references, and there's far too many for EL. I changed the cleanup templates at the top of the page to reflect it. It needs an almost complete overhaul, and I don't have the time nor ability to re-write it. But I do know what makes a Wikipedia article good, and this doesn't have any of it. Anthony Hit me up... 18:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: MySpace in EL

MySpace should be avoided unless it's being used as a primary source for the account owner's article. You can also use it in external links if it has significance, something which is becoming more and more common for music artists and movie studios today. east.718 at 20:47, April 8, 2008

[edit] Re: Birganj

Thanks for your note on my talk page abouth the Birganj protests. I'll try and obtain some more information. Pahari Sahib 21:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Crime in Russia

Hi. Thanks for taking note of my edits, and thank you for your work on Russia related articles as well. I'd certainly be happy to assist you in improving both the crime article and Operation Amba. Krawndawg (talk) 03:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Josh Kelly

The lead section only has two sentences. I didn't add the tag, but that seems pretty short to me. There is a link to the guidelines in the tag itself that would be helpful to you if you want to know more. --Glennfcowan (talk) 03:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Royal Malaysian Navy

Well, I am not the "primary contributor", if not, in other words, I only started to edit the article this few months. And as you can see, my focus is on recent development. History part is definitely out of my scope. While the name written in capital letters I have no idea too. Since I know nothing about military organization. But anyways, I will try my best to edit them. Regards, ChowHui (talk) 04:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Turks and Caicos Islands

Just noticed the article has an image in the history section "Sunset viewed from Turtle Cove". What this image has anything to do with history? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Otolemur,

Actually the photo has nothing to do with the history of T and C, other than it adds a bit of colour (or color if you prefer) to an otherwise long and somewhat dry section of the article. Any thoughts at your end? Cheers from Halifax! --RobNS 04:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

In my opinion if the photo is not directly associated with history, it should be removed since it is not relevant to the subject. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Quite right. I have moved the photo to a more appropriate area of the article.--RobNS 15:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] wording

you may want to slightly reword your comment in [6]. I thought it was obvious that I meant "on the basis of the sources shown in the search" & the others there seem to think similarly. DGG (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. But my comment was not about your view of the article, but your view of me. In any case, I'm glad you deleted it. Are you going to support the article now? DGG (talk) 14:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Daykin unreferenced tag

Hi, a little confused as to why you tagged the stub Thomas Daykin as unreferenced. It has no inline citations, but does have a references section containing two book sources which cover all material in the stub (infobox, lead sentence, persondata, categories). I've removed the tag, anyway. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oops. I made a silly mistake, did not notice the references below. Sorry for that. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hermann von Gottschall

Hi! I have just added an English reference. Regards, Mibelz 10:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)