From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
|
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
|
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
|
 |
The following user(s) is/are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
This in no way implies page "ownership"; all editors are encouraged to contribute. |
 |
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for U2 3D: |
|
|
LIST COMPLETE! –Dream out loud (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sections to create from scratch
Editing (sub-section of Production)Reception
- Expansions needed
Audio editing [1]Video editing [2]Synopsis in "Setlist" section (currently in progress at User:Dream out loud/Sandbox)Critical receptionModells' history with Owens and U2 [3]Lead sectionReturn engagements / unlimited run length [4]Details on filming locations (what, where, when, etc.)
- Other
Quick cuts/slow dissolves vs. long takes/hard cuts (add to editing)Get band quotes from interview videos on film's website (add to reception)Length criticized for being too short, compared to the full concert (add to reception) (only one source found stating this)Film was enjoyed by non-U2 fans (add to reception)Add info on film's web widget to "Marketing"Add info on types of 3D glasses used to view film
|
Has anyone heard any further info about a DVD release? I know that the producer originally said that it wasn't going to be released on DVD, but I find that a little hard to believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.30.8 (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Director Catherine Owens stated that she wants to release the film exclusively in a 3-D format. It's not that there are no plans to release it on DVD, but there are no plans to release it on DVD as a 2-D film. Since a 3-D home video is not yet possible, the film is not planned to be released outside of theaters until such a format becomes available. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] future film tag
Please stop removing the future film tag from the article. The fact that the article states it is an upcoming film is irrelevent. The tag is still appropriate for use, as all other future films are tagged with this template regardless of whether the article states it is an upcoming film or not - • The Giant Puffin • 10:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Picture
That is not a screen cap from U2 3D that is clearly from their Live 8 preformance. 2 ways to know, Bono is wearing a jean jacket because Paul McCartney stole his leather one before the show. And the screen is a solid screen. U2s Vertigo tour set up used spaced LED like screens, not solid. It needs to be changed back to the screen cap from the trailer that simply says U2 3D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.69.34.133 (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
http://www.imax.com/minnesota/films/u23d.htm That has some songs not listed in the article, more than 2 others as the article says.--64.161.57.81 (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nice work...
Well done to User:Dream out loud for continuing to maintain and building this article to a high standard – others should be thanked too, but mostly DOL. Also, the consistent use of in-line cites is a great example for the rest of wikipedia. Nice one. --Merbabu (talk) 04:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate the recognition. This article has sure come a long way since I first created it in April 2007 (link). I really hope to get this article to GA-status soon, and eventually turn it into a featured article. I've covered just about every topic related to the film in the article, except for its reception, which anyone is welcome to do. –Dream out loud (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2D version
I was at IMAX Melbourne yesterday to see U2 3D. We were told that the 3D projector wasn't working and that the film would be shown in 2D instead. So I, along with about 150 others, watched the movie in a normal 2D format, so obviously a 2D version exists. I don't know how this info would fit into the article itself, but it at least lets you know that the film is available in 2D. Joelster (talk)
- Every source I've read states that the film was only released in 3-D, and there is no 2-D version available. I'm not doubting that what you say isn't true, however based on all the sources, I've yet to see any mention of the film in 2-D aside from the first half of the film editing process. If you can find an article, press release, or some other source thats states that there is a 2-D version, which may be used when 3-D theater equipment is not properly working, let me know and I'll look into it. Unfortunately, without any sources I can't implement that into the article at all as per WP:OR. –Dream out loud (talk) 04:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Yeah I kinda knew that. But I though I may as well let you know. Joelster (talk) 04:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'll make a post about this on a U2 forum and see if anyone else has information about this and can possibly refer me to a source. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:U2 3D/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Wow! What a great article. The only thing I think needs improvement is that the lead needs to be expanded a bit. Perhaps, add a bit about critical response and distribution to better comply with WP:LEAD (summarizing all the main points of the article. That's about it...the article meets all the GA criteria otherwise. The article will be placed on hold for seven days to allow for the minor fix. Nikki311 02:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- After re-reading the lead, I think it is sufficient enough for GA. I'll pass the article. Nikki311 22:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
To-do list for U2 3D:
