Thelema

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Thelema is a philosophy of life based on the rule or law, "Do what thou wilt." The ideal of "Do what thou wilt" and its association with the word Thelema goes back to François Rabelais, but was more fully developed[1] and proselytized[2] by Aleister Crowley, who founded a religion[3] named Thelema based on this ideal. The word itself is the English transliteration of the Koine Greek noun θέλημα: "will", from the verb θέλω: to will, wish, purpose. Early Christian writings use the word to refer to the will of God,[4] the human will,[5] and even the will of God's opponent, the Devil.[6]

In the 16th century, François Rabelais used Thélème, the French form of the word, as the name of a fictional Abbey in his famous books, Gargantua and Pantagruel.[7][8] The only rule of this Abbey was "fay çe que vouldras" ("Fais ce que tu voudras," or, "Do what thou wilt"). This rule was revived and used in the real world in the mid 18th century by Sir Francis Dashwood, who inscribed it on a doorway of his abbey at Medmenham,[9][10][11][12] where it served as the motto of The Hellfire Club.[9]

The same rule was used in 1904 by Aleister Crowley[12][13][14] in The Book of the Law. This book contains both the phrase "Do what thou wilt" and the word Thelema in Greek, which Crowley took for the name of the philosophical, mystical and religious system which he subsequently developed. This system includes ideas from occultism, Yoga, and both Eastern and Western mysticism (especially the Qabalah).[15]

Shri Gurudev Mahendranath, in speaking of svecchachara, the Sanskrit equivalent of the phrase "Do what thou wilt",[16][17][18] wrote that "Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia."[12]

Contents

[edit] Historical background

The word θέλημα (thelema) is of some consequence in the original Greek Christian scriptures, referring to divine and human will. One well-known example is from “The Lord’s Prayer” in Matthew 6:10, “Your kingdom come. Your will (θέλημα) be done, On earth as it is in heaven.” Some other quotes from the Bible are:

He went away again a second time and prayed, saying, "My Father, if this cannot pass away unless I drink it, Your will be done." —Matthew 26:42

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. —John 1:12-13

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. —Romans 12:2

…and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will. —2 Timothy 2:26

Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created. —Revelation 4:11

In the 5th century, Augustine of Hippo wrote "Love, and do what you will" (Dilige et quod vis fac) in his Sermon on 1 John 7, 8.[19]

In the Renaissance, a character named "Thelemia" represents will or desire in the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili of the Dominican monk Francesco Colonna. Colonna's work was, in turn, a great influence on the Franciscan monk Francois Rabelais, whose Gargantua and Pantagruel includes an Abbey of Thélème.

[edit] Rabelais' Thélème

François Rabelais
François Rabelais

François Rabelais was a Franciscan and later a Benedictine monk of the 16th century. Eventually he left the monastery to study medicine, and so moved to Lyon in 1532. It was there that he wrote Gargantua and Pantagruel, a connected series of books. They tell the story of two giants—a father (Gargantua) and his son (Pantagruel) and their adventures—written in an amusing, extravagant, and satirical vein.

It is in the first book (ch. 52-57) where Rabelais writes of the Abbey of Thélème, built by the giant Gargantua. It pokes fun at the monastic institutions, since his abbey has a swimming pool, maid service, and no clocks in sight.[7]

One of the verses of the inscription on the gate to Thélème says:

Grace, honour, praise, delight,
Here sojourn day and night.
   Sound bodies lined
   With a good mind,
Do here pursue with might
Grace, honour, praise, delight.

But below the humour was a very real concept of utopia and the ideal society.[20] Rabelais gives us a description of how the Thelemites of the Abbey lived and the rules they lived by:

All their life was spent not in laws, statutes, or rules, but according to their own free will and pleasure. They rose out of their beds when they thought good; they did eat, drink, labour, sleep, when they had a mind to it and were disposed for it. None did awake them, none did offer to constrain them to eat, drink, nor to do any other thing; for so had Gargantua established it. In all their rule and strictest tie of their order there was but this one clause to be observed,

Do What Thou Wilt;
because men that are free, well-born, well-bred, and conversant in honest companies, have naturally an instinct and spur that prompteth them unto virtuous actions, and withdraws them from vice, which is called honour. Those same men, when by base subjection and constraint they are brought under and kept down, turn aside from that noble disposition by which they formerly were inclined to virtue, to shake off and break that bond of servitude wherein they are so tyrannously enslaved; for it is agreeable with the nature of man to long after things forbidden and to desire what is denied us.[7]

Many scholars think the French author wrote from a specifically Christian perspective,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] while pointing to disagreements with the Church.[23][25] Alexander Pocetto of the Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales argues that Martin Luther influenced Rabelais. He draws many parallels between Rabelais and Francis de Sales.[4] M. A. Screech emphasized the satirist's orthodox views.[21] Another source has Rabelais mocking Luther and the Church from a reformist perspective:

The informality of Rabelais' "masses" shows his agreement with Erasmus, who denounced the formalized ritual of the Roman Church as "Judaic." Most Humanists and reformers decried the fixed and convention-bound celebration of the Last Supper, calling it idolatry. Rabelais' masses therefore show the Pantagrueline companions communing with each other, partaking of the "bread" and the "wine."...Between radical reformers and arch conservatives in the Church, moderation is in danger of being crushed, and yet Pantagruel will maintain his ideals regardless of risk.[28]

Erich Auerbach in 1946 disagreed with all these, writing that the revolutionary thing about Rabelais' way of thinking

is not his opposition to Christianity, but the freedom of vision, feeling and thought which his perpetual playing with things produces, and which invites the reader to deal directly with the world and its wealth of phenomena. On one point, to be sure, Rabelais takes a stand, and it is a stand which is basically anti-Christian; for him, the man who follows his nature is good, and natural life, be it of men or things, is good...[29]

[edit] Francis Dashwood and the Hellfire Club

Sir Francis Dashwood adopted some of the ideas of Rabelais[30] and invoked the same rule in French when he founded a group called the Monks of Medmenham (better known as The Hellfire Club).[9][11][12] An abbey was established at Medmenham, described in the 1911 Britannica as follows:

At Medmenham, on the Thames above Marlow, there are fragments, incorporated into a residence, of a Cistercian abbey founded in 1201; which became notorious in the middle of the 18th century as the meeting-place of a convivial club called the Franciscans after its founder, Sir Francis Dashwood, afterwards Lord le Despencer (1708–1781), and also known as the Hell-Fire Club, of which John Wilkes, Bubb Dodington and other political notorieties were members. The motto of the club, fay Ce que voudras (do what you will), inscribed on a doorway at the abbey, was borrowed from Rabelais description of the abbey of Thelema in Gargantua.[9]

We have little direct evidence of what Dashwood's Hellfire Club did or believed.[31] The one direct testimonial comes from John Wilkes, a member who never got into the chapter-room of the inner circle.[32][31] He describes their origin as follows:

A set of worthy, jolly fellows, happy disciples of Venus and Bacchus, got occasionally together to celebrate woman in wine and to give more zest to the festive meeting, they plucked every luxurious idea from the ancients and enriched their own modern pleasures with the tradition of classic luxury.[33]

The group derived more from Rabelais than the inscription over the door, in the opinion of Lt.-Col. Towers, who wrote "My interpretation of the caves remains as stated, that they were used as a Dionysian oracular temple, based upon Dashwood’s reading of the relevant chapters of Rabelais."[30]

Sir Nathaniel Wraxall in his Historical Memoires (1815) accused the Monks of performing Satanic rituals, but these claims have been dismissed as hearsay.[31] Gerald Gardner and others such as Mike Howard[34] say the Monks worshipped "the Goddess." Daniel Willens argued that the group likely practiced Freemasonry, but also suggests Dashwood may have held secret Roman Catholic sacraments. He asks if Wilkes would have recognized a genuine Catholic Mass, even if he saw it himself and even if the underground version followed its public model precisely.[35] The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon minimizes the connection with Freemasonry.[31]

[edit] Subsequent historical references

Later, Sir Walter Besant and James Rice referred to Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in their novel The Monks of Thelema (1878), as did C.R. Ashbee in his utopian romance The Building of Thelema (1910).

People living between Rabelais and Crowley sometimes used the word "Thelemites" to mean people who do as they please.[36] Sometimes they even used the term positively, but did so with some degree of secrecy and deniability.[37]

[edit] Aleister Crowley's work

Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) was an English occultist, writer, and social provocateur. Rabelais was one of Crowley's heroes[38] and his books Gargantua and Pantagruel may have provided Crowley with part of the philosophic basis for the Law of Thelema,[13][39][12][14][1] namely the phrase "Do what thou wilt".[40] In The Antecedents of Thelema, Crowley referred to Rabelais as "Our Master",[41] and Rabelais was also included among the Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica along with Virgil, Catullus and Swinburne.[42]

In 1904, Crowley claimed to have received Liber AL vel Legis, the Book of the Law from an entity named Aiwass, which was to serve as the foundation of the religious and philosophical system he called Thelema.[8][43] Crowley summed up his Law of Thelema[44] in these phrases from the Book:

  • "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law"[45]
  • "Love is the law, love under will"[46]
  • "There is no Law beyond Do what thou wilt"[47]

Shri Gurudev Mahendranath and others have written that Crowley revived the Thelemic Law from Rabelais.[12][11][14][1] Aleister Crowley wrote in The Antecedents of Thelema (1926) that Rabelais "set forth in essence the Law of Thelema, very much as it is understood by the Master Therion himself," and further that "the masterpiece of Rabelais contains in singular perfection a clear forecast of the Book which was to be revealed by Aiwass to Ankh-f-n-khonsu 370 years later."[41] But Crowley biographer Lawrence Sutin disagrees, writing that in his opinion,

Questions of prophecy aside, Rabelais was no precursor of Thelema. Joyous and unsystematic, Rabelais blended in his heterodox creed elements of Stoic self-mastery and spontaneous Christian faith and kindness.[2]

[edit] The Book of the Law

Main article: The Book of the Law

Crowley's system of Thelema begins with The Book of the Law, which bears the official name Liber AL vel Legis. It was written in Cairo, Egypt during his honeymoon with his new wife Rose Crowley (née Kelly). This small book contains three chapters, each of which he wrote in one hour, beginning at noon, on April 8, April 9, and April 10, 1904. Crowley claims that he took dictation from an entity named Aiwass, whom he later identified as his own Holy Guardian Angel.[48] However, an analysis by Dan Evans shows similarities not only with Rabelais, but also to The Beloved of Hathor and Shrine of the Golden Hawk,[49] a play by Florence Farr.[50]

Crowley wrote several commentaries on The Book of the Law, the last of which he wrote in 1925. This brief statement called simply "The Comment" warns against the study of the Book and discussing its contents, and states that all "questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings" and is signed Ankh-af-na-khonsu.[51] The only known writings of Ankh-af-na-khonsu appear on the Stèle of Revealing.

[edit] True Will

Main article: True Will

According to Crowley, every individual has a True Will, to be distinguished from the ordinary wants and desires of the ego. The True Will is essentially one's "calling" or "purpose" in life. Crowley's concept assumes that this includes the goal of attaining self-realization by one's own efforts, without the aid of God or other divine authority.[52] Crowley was more specific about the True Will of women. He wrote that "women are nearly always conscious of an important part of their true Will; the bearing of children. To them nothing else is serious in comparison..."[53] (For more context on Crowley's apparent sexism, see sexism).

Crowley believed that in order to discover the True Will, one had to free the desires of the subconscious mind from the control of the conscious mind, especially the restrictions placed on sexual expression, which he associated with the power of divine creation.[54] He taught that the True Will of each individual was identified with the Holy Guardian Angel, a daimon unique to each individual.[55]

See also: Thelemic mysticism

[edit] Skepticism

Crowley taught skeptical examination of all results obtained through meditation or magick, at least for the student.[56] He tied this to the necessity of keeping a magical record that attempts to list all conditions of the event (see practices and observances, below).[57] In Liber ABA (Magick, Book 4) Part 1 (written 1912-1913), Crowley makes this optimistic remark while drawing similarities between various influential religious teachers:

Diverse as these statements are at first sight, all agree in announcing an experience of the class which fifty years ago would have been called supernatural, to-day may be called spiritual, and fifty years hence will have a proper name based on an understanding of the phenomenon which occurred.[58]

[edit] Cosmology

The Stèle of Revealing, depicting Nuit, Hadit as the winged globe, Ra-Hoor-Khuit seated on his throne, and the creator of the Stèle, the scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu
The Stèle of Revealing, depicting Nuit, Hadit as the winged globe, Ra-Hoor-Khuit seated on his throne, and the creator of the Stèle, the scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu

Crowley's Thelema draws its principle gods and goddesses from Ancient Egyptian religion. The highest deity in the cosmology of Thelema is in fact a goddess, Nuit. She is the night sky arched over the Earth symbolized in the form of a naked woman. She is conceived as the Great Mother, the ultimate source of all things.[59]

The second principle deity of Thelema is the god Hadit, conceived as the infinitely small complement and consort of Nuit. Hadit symbolizes manifestation, motion, and time.[59] He is also described in Liber AL vel Legis as "the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star."[60]

The third deity in the cosmology of Thelema is Ra-Hoor-Khuit, a manifestation of Horus. He is symbolized as a throned man with the head of a hawk who carries a wand. He is associated with the Sun and the active energies of Thelemic magick.[59]

Other deities within the cosmology of Thelema are:

  • Hoor-paar-kraat (or Harpocrates), god of silence and inner strength, the brother of Ra-Hoor-Khuit.[59]
  • Babalon, the goddess of all pleasure, known as the Virgin Whore.[59]
  • Therion, the beast that Babalon rides, who represents the wild animal within man, a force of nature.[59]

[edit] Magick

Main article: Magick

The magick of Thelema is a system of discipline for physical, mental, and spiritual training.[61] Crowley defined magick as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will".[62] He recommended magick as a means for discovering the True Will[63] and wrote about what the Law of Thelema says about, for example, working with the astral plane.[64] Crowley described the general process in Magick, Book 4:

One must find out for oneself, and make sure beyond doubt, 'who' one is, 'what' one is, 'why' one is...Being thus conscious of the proper course to pursue, the next thing is to understand the conditions necessary to following it out. After that, one must eliminate from oneself every element alien or hostile to success, and develop those parts of oneself which are specially needed to control the aforesaid conditions.[65]

[edit] Practices and observances

The practice of magick in Thelema is largely an individual affair. Generally, practices are designed to assist in finding and manifesting the True Will, although some include celebratory aspects as well.[66]

Crowley integrated Eastern practices with Western magical practices from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.[67] He recommended a number of these practices to his followers, including:

[edit] Ethics

Thelema is an individual philosophy and does not have a concept of ethics in the usual sense.[71] Crowley wrote in the "New Comment" to Liber AL vel Legis (II,28) that:

There are no "standards of Right". Ethics is balderdash. Each Star must go on its own orbit. To hell with "moral principle"; there is no such thing.[72]

Liber AL vel Legis does make clear some standards of individual conduct. The most primary of these is "Do what thou wilt" which is presented as the whole of the law, with no further law beyond it. It is also presented as a right—the only right—and an indefeasible one.[71] Some interpreters of Thelema suppose that this right includes an obligation to allow others to do their own wills without interference, but such a concept is absent from Liber AL.[71]

Crowley wrote several additional documents presenting his personal views on individual conduct in light of the Law of Thelema, some of which do address the topic interference with others: Liber Oz, Duty, and Liber II.

[edit] Liber Oz

Liber Oz enumerates some of the rights of the individual implied by the one overarching right, "Do what thou wilt".[71] For each person, these include the right to: live by one's own law; live in the way that one wills to do; work, play, and rest as one will; die when and how one will; eat and drink what one will; live where one will; move about the earth as one will; think, speak, write, draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build, and dress as one will; love when, where and with whom one will; and kill those who would thwart these rights.[73]

[edit] Duty

Duty is described as "A note on the chief rules of practical conduct to be observed by those who accept the Law of Thelema."[74] It is not a numbered "Liber" as are all the documents which Crowley intended for A.'.A.'., but rather listed as a document intended specifically for Ordo Templi Orientis.[74] There are four sections:[75]

  • A. Your Duty to Self: describes the self as the center of the universe, with a call to learn about one's inner nature. Admonishes to develop every faculty in a balanced way, establish one's autonomy, and to devote to the service of one's own True Will.
  • B. Your Duty to Others: admonishes to eliminate the illusion of separateness between oneself and all others, to fight when necessary, to avoid interfering with the Wills of others, to enlighten others when needed, and to worship the divine nature of all other beings.
  • C. Your Duty to Mankind: admonishes that the Law of Thelema should be the sole basis of conduct. That the laws of the land should have the aim of securing the greatest liberty for all individuals. Crime is described as being a violation of one's True Will.
  • D. Your Duty to All Other Beings and Things: admonishes the application of the Law of Thelema to all problems and states that "It is a violation of the Law of Thelema to abuse the natural qualities of any animal or object by diverting it from its proper function" and "The Law of Thelema is to be applied unflinchingly to decide every question of conduct."

[edit] Liber II

In Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion, the Law of Thelema is summarized much more succinctly as "Do what thou wilt--then do nothing else".[76] The author also describes the pursuit of Will as tireless activity without attachment to result, writing "The conception is, therefore, of an eternal motion, infinite and unalterable. It is Nirvana, only dynamic instead of static—and this comes to the same thing in the end."

[edit] Contemporary Thelema

The unicursal hexagram is one of the common symbols of modern Thelema
The unicursal hexagram is one of the common symbols of modern Thelema

[edit] Diversity of Thelemic thought

The core of Thelemic thought is "Do what thou wilt." However, beyond this, there exists a very wide range of interpretation of Thelema. Modern Thelema is a syncretic philosophy and religion.[77] One of the more significant influences on Thelema has been Asian Buddhist and tantric traditions.[10][77][78][79] It also has elements of inverted and heretical Christianity (primarily Gnosticism) and is considered a Left-Hand Path.[77] (Note, however, that Crowley used this term in a different sense in his writings.)[80]

Many Thelemites avoid strongly dogmatic or fundamentalist thinking. Crowley himself put strong emphasis on the unique nature of Will inherent in each individual:

I admit that my visions can never mean to other men as much as they do to me. I do not regret this. All I ask is that my results should convince seekers after truth that there is beyond doubt something worth while seeking, attainable by methods more or less like mine. I do not want to father a flock, to be the fetish of fools and fanatics, or the founder of a faith whose followers are content to echo my opinions. I want each man to cut his own way through the jungle.[81]

Thus, contemporary Thelemites may practice more than one religion, including Discordianism, Wicca, Gnosticism, Satanism, Setianism, and Luciferianism.[77] Many adherents of Thelema, none moreso than Crowley, recognize correlations between Thelemic and other systems of spiritual thought; most borrow freely from the methods and practices of other traditions, including alchemy, astrology, qabalah, tantra, tarot, and yoga.[77] For example, Nu and Had are thought to correspond with the Tao and Teh of Taoism, Shakti and Shiva of the Hindu Tantras, Shunyata and Bodhicitta of Buddhism, Ain Soph and Kether in the Qabalah.[82]

Some organizations purport to stay true to Crowley's system, such as the A∴A∴ and Ordo Templi Orientis, though the current National Grand Master General of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge dismisses Rabelais as "some meaningless diversion",[83] an opinion which was quickly rebutted.[84]

Other organizations and persons who consider themselves Thelemites regard Crowley's system to be only one possible manifestation of Thelema, creating original systems, such as those of Nema (see below), Kenneth Grant, and Amado Crowley.[85] Some of these accept The Book of the Law in some way, but not the rest of Crowley's "inspired" writings or teachings. Others take only specific aspects of his overall system, such as his magical techniques, ethics, mysticism, or religious ideas, while ignoring the rest.

The Fraternitas Saturni (Brotherhood of Saturn), founded in 1928 in Germany, accepts the Law of Thelema, but extends it with the phrase "Mitleidlose Liebe!" ("Compassionless love!"). The Thelema Society, also located in Germany, accepts Liber Legis and much of Crowley's work on magick, while incorporating the ideas of other thinkers, such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Charles S. Peirce, Martin Heidegger, and Niklas Luhmann.

In America, the writings of Maggie Ingalls (Nema) have inspired a movement called Maat Magick, along with an organization called the Horus-Maat Lodge, founded in 1979. This movement combines Crowley's essential elements of Thelema with Nema's system based on the Egyptian goddess Ma'at, as established in her received work, Liber Pennae Praenumbra. HML aims to combine the current Aeon of Horus with the future Aeon of Ma'at, where the combined mind of humanity will awaken and mankind will achieve balance.

One can also find Thelemites in other organizations. The president of the Church of All Worlds, LaSara Firefox, identifies as a Thelemite and sex magician. A significant minority of other CAW members also identify as Thelemites.[77]

[edit] Contemporary literature

By far, the bulk of writing on the topic of Thelema remains that of Aleister Crowley. He was highly prolific and wrote on the subject of Thelema for over 35 years, and many of his books remain in print. During his time, there were a few who wrote on the subject, including Charles Stansfeld Jones and J.F.C. Fuller. Since his death in 1947 only a few writers' accounts of Thelema have appeared in published books. Perhaps the four most published writers have been:

  • Israel Regardie, who not only edited many of Crowley's works, but wrote a biography of him — The Eye in the Triangle — and penned many books on the teachings of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, such as A Garden of Pomegranates, The Middle Pillar, The Tree of Life, and The Golden Dawn.
  • Kenneth Grant, who has written many books on Thelema and the occult, such as The Magical Revival, Aleister Crowley and the Hidden God, Outside the Circles of Time, and Hecate's Fountain.
  • Lon Milo DuQuette, a popular author whose books are mostly dedicated to analyzing and exploring Crowley's system, including such books as Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot, The Chicken Qabalah of Rabbi Lamed Ben Clifford, The Magick of Aleister Crowley, and The Key to Solomon's Key.
  • Nema, whose Liber Pennae Praenumbra announces and explains the Ma'atian current has influenced Thelemites for over 25 years. She now has several books on Ma'atian Thelema including her book, Maat Magick.

Other notable contemporary writers who address Thelema include Jerry Edward Cornelius, Gerald del Campo, Allen H. Greenfield, Christopher Hyatt, Jason Augustus Newcomb, James Wasserman, and Sam Webster.

There are also numerous publications that print original Thelemic writing, such as the journals Cornelia, Journal of Thelemic Studies, Light In Extension, Lion & Serpent, The Scarlet Letter. (See External links).

[edit] Thelemic organizations

The two most prominent modern organizations were headed by Crowley during his lifetime, the A∴A∴—a teaching order designed to guide initiates through Crowley's mystical system of Thelema—and Ordo Templi Orientis—a fraternal order that initially developed from the Rite of Memphis and Mizraim of Freemasonry (which is considered irregular by most Masonic Grand Lodges and Grand Orients) and includes Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (which celebrates the Gnostic Mass).

Since Crowley's death in 1947, other organizations have formed to carry on his initial work — for example, Phyllis Seckler's College of Thelema, the Ordo Templi Orientis of Kenneth Grant, Society O.T.O. of Marcelo Ramos Motta, the Chthonic-Ouranian OTO, OTO Foundation, the Horus-Maat Lodge, the Thelemic Order of the Golden Dawn, the Holy Order Of Ra-Hoor-Khuit, The Open Source Order of the Golden Dawn, The Order of Thelemic Knights, and Ecclesia Gnostica Universalis.

Other groups of widely varying character exist which have drawn inspiration or methods from Thelema, such as the Illuminates of Thanateros and the Temple of Set. Groups such as Fraternitas Saturni, the Hawk and Jackal Covens, and the Thelema Society accept the Law of Thelema, but omit certain aspects of Crowley's system while incorporating the works of other mystics, philosophers, and religious systems.[citations needed]

[edit] Thelema in comparative religion

Bishop of the Free Catholic Church of Wiesbaden Federico Tolli, in his German book Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon, presented Thelema as the dialectical consequence of Christianity. Christianity for Tolli exists as a community in Christ, whereas Tolli sees Thelema as a necessarily individualistic response to the world.[86]

Tolli discusses Crowleyan Thelema in the context of 'salvation history' (Heilsgeschichte). Tolli regards Crowley's Heilsgeschichte as one in which the whole Universe (therefore the Will of God) is to combine (analogous to the Alchemical formula 'coagula'). "Love", in the form of combinatory attraction ("Love is the law, love under will"), is a universal principle — therefore akin to the concept of natural religion. The main difference (for Tolli) is that in Christianity salvation of the entire Universe ("Ganzheit") cannot be made by 'solipsistic' man. Tolli sees Crowley as a failed — however talented — artist or "Mystagogie", but not as a "Satanist".[86]

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ a b c "Crowley is misunderstood if he is seen primarily as the teacher of a new path to liberation, his sexual yoga and the abbey as a means of imparting this, with the theory behind it boiled down to the crude schematism of paths to enlightenment, often understood as a religion. He was part of a greater, far more intelligible tradition. Thelema itself is a rationally intelligible ideal that goes back to Rabelais, via Sir Francis Dashwood. Crowley gave this distinguished western tradition a new degree of development." Moore, John S. Aleister Crowley as Guru in Chaos International, Issue No. 17.
  2. ^ a b Sutin, Lawrence. Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley, p. 126. New York, NY: St. Martin's Griffin, 2002. ISBN 978-0312288976.
  3. ^ Greer, John Michael. The New Encyclopedia of the Occult, p. 478. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2003. ISBN 1567183360
  4. ^ a b Pocetto, Alexander T. Rabelais, Francis de Sales and the Abbaye de Thélème, retrieved July 20, 2006.
  5. ^ e.g. John 1:12-13
  6. ^ e.g. 2 Timothy 2:26
  7. ^ a b c Rabelais, François. Gargantua and Pantagruel at Project Gutenberg
  8. ^ a b "The origin of 'Do what though wilt' is Rabelais' Abbey of Thelema in Gargantua and Pantagruel. The Hell Fire Club was deliberately copying Rabelais. Crowley, of course, had read Rabelais and undoubtedly knew about the Hell Fire Club (which is more correctly called the Abbey of Saint Francis, by the way), but he claimed to have received the Law of Thelema ... from a Higher Intelligence which contacted him in Cairo in 1904." Wilson, Robert Anton. The Illuminati Papers. Ronin Publishing, 1997. ISBN 1579510027
  9. ^ a b c d Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). Buckingham.
  10. ^ a b IAO131. Thelema & Buddhism in Journal of Thelemic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, Autumn 2007, pp. 18-32
  11. ^ a b c "Francis Dashwood, who revived the Rablelais 'Abbey of Thelema'..." Adams, Ron. Ecumenical Thelema in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 71-78
  12. ^ a b c d e f "Many years later, Sir Francis Dashwood revived the Abbey and its delightful law in the grounds of his country residence not far from London.", "In more recent history Saint Aleister Crowley, who did much to reform and revive the Western Occult Tradition, in reverence to the Rabelaisian masterpiece also revived the Thelemic Law; and even, for a short period, established an Abbey on an Italian island.", "It may be new to those who read this manuscript, but the identical rule or law has been held in the highest respect in India and neighboring countries for thousands of years. It has been the amoral philosophy of the Nathas, Tantriks, and Siddha saints and sadhus. It made possible the Parivrajaka or homeless wanderer saints, and eventually led to the highest grade of Indian spiritual attainment known as Avadhoota or emancipated one. Thus Rabelais, Dashwood, and Crowley must share the honor of perpetuating what has been such a high ideal in most of Asia." Mahendranath (1990).
  13. ^ a b Skinner, Stephen (ed). The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923, p.149, n. 12. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569
  14. ^ a b c "Therefore, we can say, by this [Rabelais'] definition, a Thelemite is a person who is free, well-born, well-bred and capable of interacting in honest company. A Thelemite has an inherent sense of honour and a sense of proportion and discretion. ... Much of Crowley's work is an interpretation and extension of this simple summary." Alamantra, Frater. Looking Into the Word: Some Observations in Ashé Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring Equinox 2004, pp. 39-59
  15. ^ Crowley, Aleister.Liber XIII vel Graduum Montis Abiegni: A Syllabus of the Steps Upon the Path, retrieved July 7, 2006. For confirmation that the order in question took the Book of the Law as an official document of the order that "may be changed not so much as the style of a letter," A syllabus of the official instructions of the A∴A∴ by Aleister Crowley. "This book is the foundation of the New Aeon, and thus of the whole of our Work." First section, list of Class "A" Publications, retrieved July 7, 2006. And finally, for the part calling Thelema the word of the Law: Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:39-40
  16. ^ "Svecchacara [a Sanskrit term meaning roughly 'the practice of following one's own will']" John, Jeffrey. Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion, p. 430. University of Chicago Press, 2007. ISBN 0226453693
  17. ^ "The guiding tenet of this religious philosophy is svecchacara, do as you please, and its psychological justification is grounded in the profound Hindu psycho-analytical insight" Singh, Kapur; Singh, Piar; Kaur, Madanjit. Pārāśarapraśna: an enquiry into the genesis and unique character of the order of the Khalsa with an exposition of the Sikh tenets, p. 16. Amritasar: Dept. of Guru Nanak Studies, Guru Nanak Dev University, 1989.
  18. ^ "Such an one is a Svechacari whose way is Svechacara or 'do as you will'." Woodroffe, John. Shakti and Shakta, ch. 27. ISBN 1595479201
  19. ^ Augustine of Hippo Sermon on 1 John 7, 8 [1] Cf. Augustine On Galatians 6:1: "And if you shout at him, love him inwardly; you may urge, wheedle, rebuke, rage; love, and do whatever you wish. A father after all, doesn’t hate his son; and if necessary, a father gives his son a whipping; he inflicts pain, to insure well-being. So that’s the meaning of in a spirit of mildness (Gal. 6:1).” Sermon 163B:3:1, The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century, (Sermons 148-153), 1992, part 3, vol. 5, p. 182. ISBN 1565480074
  20. ^ Stillman, Peter G. "Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Rousseau's Thought" in Rubin & Stroup (1999), p. 60
  21. ^ a b "in 1959...Screech was writing against the view first articulated by Abel Lefranc but still widely defended at the time that Rabelais was a closet freethinker...Ned Duval has recently shown that Rabelais set out to write a Christian antiepic," according to Benson, Edward, writing in Sixteenth Century Journal Vol. 28, No. 3 (Autumn, 1997), pp. 961-963. Review of the book Rabelais and the Challenge of the Gospel: Evangelism, Reformation, Dissent by Michael Screech. Baden-Baden: Éditions Valentin Koerner, 1992.
  22. ^ Rigolot, Francois, "Rabelais, misogyny, and Christian charity: biblical intertextuality and the Renaissance crisis of exemplarity." PMLA v. 109 (March 1994) p. 225-37
  23. ^ a b Williams, Alison. SICK HUMOUR, HEALTHY LAUGHTER: THE USE OF MEDICINE IN RABELAIS'S JOKES. The Modern Language Review 101 pt3 671-81 Jl 2006.
  24. ^ Nash, J. C. 'Fictional Evil and the Reader's Seduction: Rabelais's Creations of "l'Esprit Maling".' Romanic Review v. 93 no. 4 (November 2002) p. 369-86 see also cited sources Griffin & Screech
  25. ^ a b Krause, V. "Idle works in Rabelais' Quart livre: the case of the Gastrolatres." The Sixteenth Century Journal v. 30 no. 1 (Spring 1999) p. 47-60
  26. ^ Russell, A. P. Epic agon and the strategy of reform in Folengo and Rabelais. Comparative Literature Studies v. 34 no. 2 (1997) p. 119-48
  27. ^ Marsh, L. Of horns and words: a reading of Rabelais's signs. Romanic Review v. 88 (January 1997) p. 53-66. Reads Christian symbolism into "frozen words" event.
  28. ^ a b Weinberg, F. M. Layers of emblematic prose: Rabelais' Andouilles. The Sixteenth Century Journal v. 26 (Summer 1995) p. 367-77
  29. ^ Aeurbach, Erich (1946). Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (50th Aniv. Edition). Princeton University Press, 2003. ISBN 978-0691113364
  30. ^ a b Towers (1987) quoted in Coppens (2006)
  31. ^ a b c d Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon. The Hell-fire Clubs, retrieved July 22, 2006
  32. ^ Coppens, Philip (2006). Hell, no damnation. Retrieved July 21, 2006.
  33. ^ quoted in Sainsbury (2006), p.111
  34. ^ Howard, Mike. The Hellfire Club, retrieved July 22, 2006
  35. ^ Willens, Daniel. The Hell-Fire Club: Sex, Politics, and Religion in Eighteenth-Century England in Gnosis, summer 1992. Retrieved July 22, 2006
  36. ^ "The Modern Thelemites", 29 October 1863. Published in Soldier and Scholar: Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve and the Civil War by Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve. University of Virginia Press, 1998. [Online preview from Google Books] retrieved February 8, 2008.
  37. ^ poem, The Ladies' Crambambull, "by A Thelemite". Published in Tait's Edinburgh Magazine by William Tait, Christian Isobel Johnstone, 1841. Online version from Google Books retrieved February 8, 2008.
  38. ^ Skinner, Stephen (ed). The Magical Diaries of Aleister Crowley: Tunisia 1923, p. 79, n. 8. Weiser, 1996. ISBN 0877288569
  39. ^ Meretrix, Magdalene. The Thelema Tradition in Witchvox, July 14, 2001
  40. ^ Skinner, p.149, n. 12
  41. ^ a b Crowley, Aleister (1926). The Antecedents of Thelema in Thelema Lodge Calendar for November 1993 e.v., retrieved July 4, 2006
  42. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber XV, The Gnostic Mass.
  43. ^ Crowley, Aleister. "De Lege Libellum", in The Equinox III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919).
  44. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber II The Message of The Master Therion in The Equinox III(1) (Detroit: Universal, 1919), retrieved July 6, 2006
  45. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:40
  46. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, I:57
  47. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, III:60
  48. ^ Crowley, Aleister. The Equinox of the Gods. New Falcon Publications, 1991. ISBN 978-1561840281
  49. ^ Farr, F., & Shakespear, O. The Beloved of Hathor and the Shrine of the Golden Hawk. Croydon. Farncombe & Son. Dating uncertain, approx. 1902
  50. ^ Evans, Dan. Aleister Crowley and the 20th Century Synthesis of Magick, p. 10, pp. 26-30. Hidden Publishing, Second Revised Edition, 2007. ISBN 978-0-9555237-2-4
  51. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis
  52. ^ Frater U.D. High Magic: Theory & Practice. Llewellyn Worldwide, 2005. ISBN 0738704717
  53. ^ Crowley, Aleister. The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL, I,52.
  54. ^ Sutin, p. 294.
  55. ^ Hymenaeus Beta (ed.) in Crowley, Aleister. The Goetia: The Lesser Key of Solomon the King, p. xxi. Red Wheel, 1995. ISBN 087728847X
  56. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber O, I.2-5
  57. ^ Liber E vel Exercitiorum, section I in its entirety.
  58. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4
  59. ^ a b c d e f Orpheus, Rodney. Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thelemic Magick, pp. 33-44. Weiser, 2005. ISBN 1578633265
  60. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber AL vel Legis, II,6.
  61. ^ DuQuette, Lon Milo in Orpheus, Rodney. Abrahadabra, p. 1
  62. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4, Introduction to Part III
  63. ^ Gardner, Gerald Brosseau. The Meaning of Witchcraft, p. 86. Red Wheel, 2004. ISBN 1578633095
  64. ^ "Concerning they Travellings in thy Body of Light, or Astral journeys and Visions so-called, do thou lay this Wisdom to thy Heart, o my Son, that in this Practice, whether Things Seen and Heard be Truth and Reality, or whether they be Phantoms in the Mind, abideth this Supreme Magical Value, namely: Whereas the Direction of such Journeys is consciously willed, and determined by Reason, and also unconsciously willed, by the true Self, since without It no Invocation were possible, we have here a Cooperation of Alliance between the Inner and the Outer Self, and thus an Accomplishment, at least partial, of the Great Work." Crowley, Aleister. DE VIA PER EMPYRAEUM in Liber Aleph Vel CXI: The Book of Wisdom or Folly (cap. 15). Weiser Books. ISBN 978-0877287292
  65. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4
  66. ^ a b c d DuQuette, Lon Milo. The Magick of Thelema
  67. ^ Pearson, Joanne. A Popular Dictionary of Paganism, p. 44. Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0700715916
  68. ^ Orpheus, pp. 9-16, 45-52
  69. ^ Wasserman, James. Aleister Crowley and the Practice of the Magical Diary. Weiser, 2006. ISBN 1578633729
  70. ^ Urban, Hugh. Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism. University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 0520247760
  71. ^ a b c d Hessle, Erwin. "The Ethics of Thelema" in The Journal of Thelemic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn 2007).
  72. ^ Crowley, Aleister. The Old and New Commentaries to Liber AL, II,28.
  73. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber OZ
  74. ^ a b Crowley, Aleister. Magick, Book 4, Appendix I: "Official Instructions of the O.T.O", p. 484
  75. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Duty.
  76. ^ Crowley, Aleister. Liber II: The Message of the Master Therion
  77. ^ a b c d e f Rabinovitch, Shelley; Lewis, James. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism,, pp. 267–270. Citadel Press, 2004. ISBN 0806524065
  78. ^ Webster, Sam. Entering the Buddhadharma. Retrieved April 5, 2005.
  79. ^ De Lupos, Rey. The Golden Topaz of Radiant Light in Silver Star, No. 1. Retrieved April 5, 2005.
  80. ^ The Left Hand Path, Chapter XII of Magick Without Tears. Online version retrieved February 8, 2008.
  81. ^ Crowley, Aleister. The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, ch. 66
  82. ^ Crowley, Aleister. "777 Revised" in The Qabalah of Aleister Crowley. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1973. ISBN 0-87728-222-6
  83. ^ National Grand Master General Sabazius X°. Address delivered by National Grand Master General Sabazius X° to the Sixth National Conference of the U.S. O.T.O. Grand Lodge, August 10, 2007
  84. ^ Miller, Jason. Rabelaisian Rebuttal in Silver Star: A Journal of New Magick, Issue 8, Fall Equinox, 2007, p. 32
  85. ^ Evans, Dave. The History of British Magick After Crowley, pp. 229-284. Hidden Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9555237-0-0
  86. ^ a b Tolli, Federico. Thelema — Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Christentum, Logentradition und New Aeon. Leipzig, 2004.

[edit] Sources

[edit] References

[edit] Further reading

  • Frater Choronzon, THE HELLFIRE CLUB AND OTHER SWINGERS
  • Del Campo, Gerald. Rabelais: The First Thelemite. The Order of Thelemic Knights.
  • Melton, J. Gordon (1983). "Thelemic Magick in America." Alternatives to American Mainline Churches, ed. Joseph H. Fichter. Barrytown, NY: Unification Theological Seminary.
  • Starr, Martin P. (2004) A Hundred Years Hence: Visions of a Thelemic Future (Conference Paper presented at the Thelema Beyond Crowley )
  • Starr, Martin P. (2003). The Unknown God: W.T. Smith and the Thelemites. Bolingbrook, IL: Teitan Press.
  • van Egmond, Daniel (1998). "Western Esoteric Schools in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." in van den Broek, Roelof and Hanegraaff, Wouter J. Gnosis and Hermeticism From Antiquity To Modern Times. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Voxfire, Thomas (2004). "Something from Nothing: the Essence of Creation" in Essays for the New Aeon. Retrieved April 5, 2005.

[edit] External links

Wikiversity
At Wikiversity, you can learn about: Topic:Thelema

[edit] Thelemic journals

[edit] Podcasts

Personal tools