Non-denominational Christianity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Non-denominational)
Jump to: navigation, search

In Christianity, the term non-denominational refers to those churches that have not formally aligned themselves with an established denomination, or remain otherwise officially autonomous. This, however, does not preclude an identifiable standard among such congregations. Non-denominational congregations may establish a functional denomination by means of mutual recognition of or accountability to other congregations and leaders with commonly held doctrine, policy and worship without formalizing external direction or oversight in such matters. Some non-denominational churches explicitly reject the idea of a formalized denominational structure as a matter of principle, holding that each congregation must be autonomous.

Non-denominational is generally used to refer to one of two forms of independence: political or theological. That is, the independence may come about because of a religious disagreement or political disagreement. This causes some confusion in understanding. Some churches say they are non-denominational because they have no central headquarters (though they may have affiliations with other congregations.) Other churches say they are non-denominational because their belief structures are unique.

Members of non-denominational churches often consider themselves simply "Christians". However, the acceptance of any particular stance on a doctrine or practice (for example, on baptism), about which there is not general unanimity among churches or professing Christians, may be said to establish a de facto credal identity. In essence, this would mean that each non-denominational church forms its own unofficial "denomination" with a specific set of tenets as defined by the beliefs and practices of its own congregation.

Contents

[edit] What is a denomination?

A denomination refers to a recognised branch of a religion [1] with distinct beliefs and practices. [2] As a result, it is a comparative term that applies when there are at least two subgroups. For example, within Christianity, you may find groups divided between Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Anglican, and Protestant.

Currently there are almost 34,000 distinct Christian denominations.[3]

Assuming a unified religion with no difference of belief, there are no denominations, in theory. An example of a unified religion might be the early Church (see Apostolic Age) prior to any of the doxological schisms (see Great Schism), prior to the Protestant Reformation, or even before congregational splits in the early Church between Jews and Gentiles (see Circumcision controversy in early Christianity), followers of Paul (see Pauline Christianity) and Apollos, et cetera. With the advent of splits in the Church however, differences led to a sharp denominational formation. Within early Christianity, much time and effort was spent preventing the development of heterodoxy with the constant influx of ecumenical councils and creeds, such as those at Nicaea in 325, Constantinople in 381 and Ephesus at 431.

[edit] History

Non-denominational Christian churches are almost exclusively derived from the Protestant movement, as a fundamental part of catholicism is visible organizational unity (Ecclesia militans or the body of the Church consisting of living members).

This is not to say that the visible unity of the Church was not an important doctrine of the Protestant Reformation. The Reformers of the 16th century Magisterial Reformation believed that they were reforming the Catholic Church. Each of them took very seriously the charges of schism and innovation, denying these charges and maintaining that it was the medieval church that had left them. Because of this the fundamental unity of the Catholic Church remained a very important doctrine in the churches of the Reformation. Dr. James Walker wrote in "The Theology of Theologians of Scotland":

The visible church, in the idea of the Scottish theologians, is catholic. You have not an indefinite number of Parochial, or Congregational, or National churches, constituting, as it were, so many ecclesiastical individualities, but one great spiritual republic, of which these various organizations form a part. The visible church is not a genus, so to speak, with so many species under it. It is thus you may think of the State, but the visible church is a totum integrale, it is an empire. The churches of the various nationalities constitute the provinces of this empire; and though they are so far independent of each other, yet they are so one, that membership in one is membership in all, and separation from one is separation from all... This conception of the church, of which, in at least some aspects, we have practically so much lost sight, had a firm hold of the Scottish theologians of the seventeenth century.[4]

Wherever the Protestant Reformation took place, the founders claimed that the result was not a new denomination but a reformation of a supposedly pre-existing "national" church.

Denominationalism was accelerated in the aftermath of the Westminster Assembly convened by the English Parliament to formulate a form of religion for the national churches of England and Scotland. In the debate between the two main parties present at the Assembly, the Presbyterians and the Independents, the Presbyterians were in favor of a form of church government that maintained the visible organizational unity of the Catholic Church while Independents, weary of the ecclesiastical tyranny they experienced under the Episcopal system, wished to organize the churches in a congregational way envisioning no legitimate authority of the church above the local congregation meeting at one time in a single place. Obviously these two parties were not reconciled and following the Assembly the Independents formed their own independent church. Thus instead of a united expression of the Church Catholic in England there were now two churches.

Protestant denominations spread and multiplied, especially in the United States, as Denominational confessional statements began to be used more to exclude than to include Christians with different doctrinal convictions[citation needed]. Each denomination maintains to differing degrees some form of organizational and visible unity with its member churches, albeit radically decentralized compared with the Catholic Church. Today, non-denominational churches, like the Independents at the Westminster Assembly, refuse to recognize any ecclesiastical authority above the local congregation and deny the visible unity of the Church (though not the unity of the invisible Church) despite the fact that the original denominations were formed by substantially the same ideology.

In the United States, the number of evangelical non-denominational churches (often included in the category of American Protestantism) has increased exponentially since the late 1950s[citation needed]. Many historians of American religion cite after-effects of the Scopes Trial and baby boomers, as well as the higher standard of living available in the United States, and the movement away from authority in American culture.

Other reasons of growth may include an increase want to focus on Jesus. Some Christians feel that belonging to a denomination can pull focus off Christ and onto certain principles of the particular denomination that are not Christ. So growth may be caused by Christians (which literally means "partisans of Christ"[5] or "of the household of Christ"[6]) who want to focus on Jesus Christ rather than denominational principles.

Non-denominational churches range from "simple"[7] with only few members to "super" or "mega" churches of congregations of 1500+ attendees.

[edit] Common traits and tenets

While all non-denominational churches will differ to some degree, there are a number of aspects that are common to almost all of them.

Because they do not look to any human organization for doctrine, non-denominational churches generally claim the basic tenet of sola scriptura, that the Bible alone is the source of doctrinal authority. From this, a number of similar doctrinal points can be found across most non-denominational churches, such as those found in the Nicene Creed and the Apostles' Creed. Individual churches differ in terms of how literally they interpret various texts of the Bible.

Since most Christian non-denominational churches stemmed from the Protestant movement, almost all of them hold to the five solas, which are solus Christus, sola scriptura, sola fide, sola gratia, and Soli deo gloria (solely to God be glory).

Because the five solas are the main tenets of the Protestant faith, many non-denominational churches are Protestant churches. However, some non-denominational groups reject this term for etymological reasons, stating that they are not protesting anything.

Many non-denominational churches can also be considered Evangelical, especially concerning how one may be saved. Often (though certainly not always), non-denominational churches are loosely Baptist in doctrine and often borrow from charismatic, Pentecostal, Calvinist or fundamentalist ideas and practices as well.

Outside of doctrinal areas, non-denominational churches are generally more accepting of people from various religious backgrounds and political views. Services are occasionally modeled after those of another denomination, but are also usually tailored to the preferences of the congregation, and can change drastically even from week to week.

[edit] Criticism

The most basic criticism of non-denominationalism is the duality of its nature; while non-denominationalism may be a move toward a more ecumenical church body, it may be used as a marketing ploy. This may be as simple as "tricking" some Christians into attending a church or college that does not share their beliefs, or it may be as subtle as a church or college calling itself "nondenominational" simply to increase attendance or enrollment, focusing on that quantitative response rather than the quality of community or education.

A main argument against non-denominationalism claims that the pastor or teacher at such a church often has no theological degree, and can become a leader of the church without any of the theological training, or even a undergraduate degree that large denominations generally require. A well-known example is Joel Osteen, the leader of Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, who has no theological education at all, and has never studied at a seminary.[8]

While this does not apply to every non-denominational church, those to which it does argue that maturity and knowledge are all that are required for leadership, not completing a course in seminary. Seminary study is a valuable supplement to the means of grace outlined by Paul, but it cannot provide a substitute for those biblical qualifications for church office.[citation needed]

Other critics maintain that there is no such thing as a truly "non-denominational" church, that all churches adhere to a core set of beliefs in some form, just as denominational churches do, even if those beliefs are not as formalized as a named denomination, and even if that church's adherents form a single congregation.[citation needed] One defense against such a criticism is to argue that the basis of a "denomination" is the association with practices and beliefs as defined by human standards, whereas "non-denominational" groups do not adhere to any such practices or beliefs — their beliefs are strictly in adherence with divine mandates.[citation needed] However, this may presuppose the standard of distinction addressed by the question: if their beliefs are not divine, then they in fact do adhere to human standards and denominational norms.

[edit] Examples

The following organizations and institutions label themselves as non-denominational:

While in general, these groups will not have formal legal ties between individual congregations and consider themselves non-denominational, outsiders often describe them as denominations in and of themselves due to their close associations, equivalent doctrine, similar worship practices, and the ease of using one name to cover a larger group of churches.

[edit] References

  1. ^ AskOxford: Search Results
  2. ^ Bowden, J. (ed.) (2005)Christianity: The Complete Guide. Continuum.
  3. ^ Avis, P. 'Church' in Bowden, J. (ed.) 'Christianity: The Complete Guide' (2005)
  4. ^ Dr. James Walker in The Theology of Theologians of Scotland. (Edinburgh: Rpt. Knox Press, 1982) Lecture iv. pp.95–6.
  5. ^ New Bible Dictionary, 3rd edition, in loc.
  6. ^ Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, 1:431.
  7. ^ "Simple Churches: Q&A with ACU’s Kent Smith and Harding’s Marvin Crowson" (2006-06-01). Retrieved on 2006-09-20.
  8. ^ Liichow, Robert S.. "The Leaven of Lakewood". Retrieved on 2008-01-06.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Languages