Skip to content
Click on cover to enlarge
I stumbled off the dark, curtained bus into the blinding desert sunlight. A sergeant shouted for volunteers to unload gear. I lit a cigarette in the marginal shade afforded by a mesh tarp staked out in the sand and watched as soldiers from the 82nd Airborne tossed heavy canvas duffel bags into heaps from the backs of trucks. The temperature was already 45 C, and it wasn’t quite 9am.

A young Marine with an M-16 slung over his shoulder pulled a bottle of water from a nearby pallet and unscrewed the top. I recognized him from the bus. He’d sat in the front seat, one of two designated shooters who were authorized to return fire in the unlikely event our bus was attacked on the highway.

“Hey shooter,” I said. “Not much to shoot at in Kuwait.”

He swished the warm water around in his mouth, spat into the dust, and grinned. “Yeah, but I’m ready,” he said. He was nineteen years old, and this was his first tour. He was headed for Iraq. I was headed for Afghanistan, on assignment for Harper’s Magazine. I snapped a photo of him, M-16 in one hand, bottle of water in the other, his chin tilted up like a boxer about to enter the ring.

We dragged our gear to a fleet of buses that took us to Camp Ali Al Salem, an airbase not far from the border with Iraq. Ali Al Salem was a transition point for soldiers rotating into and out of the war zone. Unlike the bases in combat areas that belonged to particular military units, Ali Al Salem didn’t belong to anybody. It had the listless atmosphere of a rural bus station. I didn’t expect to be there more than a day or two, but I was stranded there for a week.

Huge concrete blast walls ringed the camp. Inside the walls were row upon row of tents laid out in a grid, with wide, sandy lanes between blocks. Soldiers wandered from their air-conditioned tents to the air-conditioned mess hall or the air-conditioned MWR (morale, welfare, and recreation) buildings where they played ping-pong or checked their email. The sound of Ali Al Salem was a chorus of clicks and whirs as hundreds of air conditioning units cycled on and off, undercut by the steady drone of diesel generators the size of minivans.

It was late July, and hot. The temperature rose above fifty degrees during the day. The steel doorknobs on the latrine and shower trailers were hot to the touch. I spent a lot of time in the latrine trailers, reading the graffiti I found there because I had nothing better to do. Much of it was arcane, full of military acronyms and slang that only soldiers could understand. But one main theme stood out: soldiers were being stretched to the limits of endurance.

A few months earlier, in April 2007, the U.S. Department of Defense had extended combat tours from twelve to fifteen months. In the graffiti, soldiers expressed their growing fatigue and anger—mostly with each other. When they weren’t scribbling Chuck Norris jokes or questioning the fighting ability of other units, they were slamming soldiers who dared give voice to their dissatisfaction.

I can still vividly recall the upper case ballpoint handwriting of one soldier who listed the number of men killed and wounded in his unit. He didn’t plead for sympathy or prayer; he simply wrote down the numbers. The response was harsh for its tone of glib detachment. “Should’ve worn their eye-pro (short for “eye protection,” or goggles) one soldier wrote. Another soldier suggested that the wounded and killed should’ve trained harder, as if any soldier in the war had been trained to survive an IED blast, or to avoid getting shot by someone who looked to them like every other Iraqi civilian.

I began photographing the graffiti because I realized that it would soon be erased by the cleaning crews who regularly swabbed the stalls. I made a point of visiting every latrine trailer on base, squeezing into more than 100 stalls and shooting in the dead of night to avoid suspicion. The air conditioning in some of the trailers had broken down and the oppressive heat and stench made me dizzy. The graffiti you see here is almost certainly gone now.

I got a C-17 flight from Kuwait to Bagram Air Field (BAF) in Kabul, Afghanistan, where I spent three days. BAF was similar to Ali Al Salem insofar as it was a point of transition, except it was much larger, and it was set amid a bustling city, separated from it by razor wire, dirt-filled Hesco barriers, and concrete blast walls. Some areas of the base had yet to be cleared of Soviet-era landmines. The thousands of soldiers stationed at BAF, including many international troops, lived in metal Conex trailer ghettos, or in low concrete buildings behind gates and armed guards.

Most soldiers, however, passed through BAF en route to remote bases in the Afghan countryside. At BAF they stayed near the terminal in tents for a night or two, and relieved themselves in rows of Port-a-Johns. The graffiti I found in those Port-a-Johns was specific to soldiers serving in Afghanistan. For instance, ISAF—International Security and Assistance Force, or NATO soldiers in Afghanistan—took quite a beating. But overall, it shared the same form and spirit of the graffiti I’d read in the latrine stalls at Ali Al Salem. All soldiers were suspicious that rival units were having an easier time of it, and they were ruthless in their criticism of each other.

I flew from BAF to my final destination, Forward Operating Base (fob) Salerno, located in Khost, Afghanistan, within artillery range of the Pakistan border. fob Salerno was nothing like Ali Al Salem or BAF. The place was immaculate, including the latrines, perhaps because the base belonged to a single unit, the 82nd Airborne’s 4th brigade combat team. It was their home for an entire year, and I suppose it was a point of pride to keep the place tidy (they paid crews of local Afghans to pick up trash and clean the latrines).

A few weeks later, I returned to BAF on my way out of Afghanistan. I stayed there for a few more days, walking the sprawling base from one end to the other, looking for Port-A-Johns I’d missed the first time around. The day before I left BAF, on a hot August afternoon that brought a dusty wind whistling down from the mountains, turning the air a murky beige color, my camera suddenly stopped working, and my survey of latrine graffiti came to an end.

It’s tempting to view these photographs as the “true” or “authentic” voice of American soldiers. But that would be missing the point. Graffiti is public by definition—it’s not a private confession. It’s a surface effect of something far broader and infinitely more complicated than what can be contained in a hastily scribbled line or two.

I look at these photographs and read the words in the same way I read the expression on the face of that 19-year old Marine I met on my first day in Kuwait. When I snapped his picture, he took a moment to pose. He wanted anyone who might later look at the photograph to know that he was tough, that he wasn’t frightened, that he was ready for whatever was coming his way in Iraq. But his expression at that moment wasn’t the sum of who he was, just as the graffiti you’re reading here isn’t the whole truth about what American soldiers think and feel about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So how should you look at the graffiti in these photographs? As a fleeting moment in a six year-old war—nothing more. The words on these walls are snatches of an overheard and ongoing conversation that changes by the day, soldier’s talking to other soldiers at a time when soldiers are being asked to give more than they have been giving, which is already too much.

Steve Featherstone can be contacted at steve dot featherstone at gmail dot com.

Comments (11 comments)

Goose: Astounding. I'd love to see hi-res ones which were easier to read. Do you have an album somewhere, or even a book? March 24, 2008 00:31 EST

Featherstone: Thanks for the kind words, Goose. A literary journal called "A Public Space" has published 10 latrine graffiti photos in their current issue (#5). The photos are mostly different than the ones you see here. You can order a copy through their website, I believe, at www.apublicspace.org. March 25, 2008 06:08 EST

Eric Morse: One of the grafitti shown mentions the Romans in Mesopotamia. One of the admitted archaeological deficiencies of Roman military latrines is that they had no stall partitions. However the Roman grafitti that have been found at military sites around the Empire (and on slingstones and similar munitions) suggest that not much has changed. One would give a lot to have found as many grafitti at Dura-Europus or Hadrian's Wall as have been found at Pompeii. (X Fretensis RULES!) April 06, 2008 09:57 EST

Anonymous: I find it very disturbing to see variations on the Nazi Swastika in the bottom right of the last picture...
April 09, 2008 18:19 EST

Featherstone: I've been told that what appear to be 'variations on the Nazi Swastika' in the last image are, in fact, anarchy symbols and not Swastikas. However, Swastikas were apparent on other walls not shown here.

...and thanks for the info about the Romans, Eric. Very interesting. April 10, 2008 06:28 EST

Drenalin: Great stuff here.
I have always thought it was facinating to see what personal thoughts will come out once people are removed from the thoght it self. In the grand old tradition that is the mens room wall the thoughts of many can be displayed freely with out the thought of retribution as they are not listed to an individual. They suddenly become a public display of a private thought.

Anony - those are not Nazi Swastikas - and more over the Swastika was not in the begining Nazi by origin. It was called the Pin-Wheel and you can find it on cave walls and in other artifacts from the Native American's history. Though I am sure you will and have found the Nazi symbols in many of fart boxes in the desert and more over I am sure you have found many gang references as you did in the last picture and others. The gang's of the America's have a strong presence in todays military machine. April 11, 2008 15:54 EST

noodleman: The swastika was/is also used extensively in Asia ... well before the Common Era began. So it's not an exclusively Native American symbol. April 16, 2008 18:22 EST

Anonymous: In my extensive experience drawing and viewing symbols of anarchy, I've only seen images like those when looking at variants of the swastika.

That being said, the swastika has a long history but most of those uses would be classified as archaic, if this sort of thing were collected in a dictionary. April 16, 2008 19:39 EST

mr trail safety: the 3-sided 'swastika' is the white-power glyph. The r/w Afrikaaners use it as their mark. April 17, 2008 11:59 EST

Leon: Re: photo number 9 - do we see the results of military censor's work? Are censors flying to every latrine to do their job? April 20, 2008 13:46 EST

Featherstone: ...a 'white power glyph'... very interesting mr. trail safety. Thanks for the info. I didn't see a lot of those. In fact, if someone wanted to draw a Swastika, they simply just drew one, usually backwards (in one image not shown here, someone drew a backwards swastika and someone else crossed it out and drew one in the correct orientation), but there wasn't much of that king of thing at all. As for censors, that's a good question Leon. I doubt very much that there's a military censor, Sharpie-equipped, going around blacking out words. Why bother when the cleaning crews could do the job much easier. But I did find it interesting that people seemed to take as much time blacking out graffiti as they did writing their own. April 26, 2008 19:42 EST

Comment on this article


Will not be displayed on the site

Submit a comment online

Submit a letter to the Editor


    Cancel

The Walrus E-Newsletter

Online exclusives, events, offers:
get news of everything Walrus.


Article Tools

»    RSS Feed      Bookmark and Share

»  Printer-friendly page

»  Email this article

»  Comment on this article

»  More in this issue

»  More in Online Exclusive

»  More from Steve Featherstone

»  BUY THIS ISSUE

ADVERTISE WITH US