Cramér–Rao bound

In estimation theory and statistics, the Cramér–Rao bound (CRB) or Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB), named in honor of Harald Cramér and Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao who were among the first to derive it, expresses a lower bound on the variance of estimators of a deterministic parameter. The bound is also known as the Cramér–Rao inequality or the information inequality.

In its simplest form, the bound states that the variance of any unbiased estimator is at least as high as the inverse of the Fisher information. An unbiased estimator which achieves this lower bound is said to be efficient. Such a solution achieves the lowest possible mean squared error among all unbiased methods, and is therefore the minimum variance unbiased (MVU) estimator. However, in some cases, no unbiased technique exists which achieves the bound. This may occur even when an MVU estimator exists.

The Cramér–Rao bound can also be used to bound the variance of biased estimators. In some cases, a biased approach can result in both a variance and a mean squared error that are below the unbiased Cramér–Rao lower bound; see estimator bias.

Statement

The Cramér–Rao bound is stated in this section for several increasingly general cases, beginning with the case in which the parameter is a scalar and its estimator is unbiased. All versions of the bound require certain regularity conditions, which hold for most well-behaved distributions. These conditions are listed later in this section.

Scalar unbiased case

Suppose $\theta$ is an unknown deterministic parameter which is to be estimated from measurements $x$, distributed according to some probability density function $f(x;\theta )$. The variance of any unbiased estimator ${\hat {\theta }}$ of $\theta$ is then bounded by the inverse of the Fisher information $I(\theta )$:

$\mathrm {var} ({\hat {\theta }})\geq {\frac {1}{I(\theta )}}$

where the Fisher information $I(\theta )$ is defined by

$I(\theta )=\mathrm {E} \left[\left({\frac {\partial \ell (x;\theta )}{\partial \theta }}\right)^{2}\right]=-\mathrm {E} \left[{\frac {\partial ^{2}\ell (x;\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{2}}}\right]$

and $\ell (x;\theta )=\log f(x;\theta )$ is the natural logarithm of the likelihood function and $\mathrm {E}$ denotes the expected value.

The efficiency of an unbiased estimator ${\hat {\theta }}$ measures how close this estimator's variance comes to this lower bound; estimator efficiency is defined as

$e({\hat {\theta }})={\frac {I(\theta )^{-1}}{{\rm {var}}({\hat {\theta }})}}$

or the minimum possible variance for an unbiased estimator divided by its actual variance. The Cramér–Rao lower bound thus gives $e({\hat {\theta }})\leq 1.$

General scalar case

A more general form of the bound can be obtained by considering an unbiased estimator $T(X)$ of a function $\psi (\theta )$ of the parameter $\theta$. Here, unbiasedness is understood as stating that $E\{T(X)\}=\psi (\theta )$. In this case, the bound is given by

$\mathrm {var} (T)\geq {\frac {[\psi '(\theta )]^{2}}{I(\theta )}}$

where $\psi '(\theta )$ is the derivative of $\psi (\theta )$, and $I(\theta )$ is the Fisher information defined above.

Apart from being a bound on estimators of functions of the parameter, this approach can be used to derive a bound on the variance of biased estimators with a given bias, as follows. Consider an estimator ${\hat {\theta }}$ with bias $b(\theta )=E\{{\hat {\theta }}\}-\theta$, and let $\psi (\theta )=b(\theta )+\theta$. By the result above, any unbiased estimator whose expectation is $\psi (\theta )$ has variance greater than or equal to $(\psi '(\theta ))^{2}/I(\theta )$. Thus, any estimator ${\hat {\theta }}$ whose bias is given by a function $b(\theta )$ satisfies

$\mathrm {var} \left({\hat {\theta }}\right)\geq {\frac {[1+b'(\theta )]^{2}}{I(\theta )}}.$

Clearly, the unbiased version of the bound is a special case of this result, with $b(\theta )=0$.

Multivariate case

Extending the Cramér–Rao bound to multiple parameters, define a parameter column vector

${\boldsymbol {\theta }}=\left[\theta _{1},\theta _{2},\dots ,\theta _{d}\right]^{T}\in \mathbb {R} ^{d}$

with probability density function $f(x;{\boldsymbol {\theta }})$ which satisfies the two regularity conditions below.

The Fisher information matrix is a $d\times d$ matrix with element $I_{m,k}$ defined as

$I_{m,k}=\mathrm {E} \left[{\frac {d}{d\theta _{m}}}\log f\left(x;{\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right){\frac {d}{d\theta _{k}}}\log f\left(x;{\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)\right].$

Let ${\boldsymbol {T}}(X)$ be an estimator of any vector function of parameters, ${\boldsymbol {T}}(X)=(T_{1}(X),\ldots ,T_{n}(X))^{T}$, and denote its expectation vector $\mathrm {E} [{\boldsymbol {T}}(X)]$ by ${\boldsymbol {\psi }}({\boldsymbol {\theta }})$. The Cramér–Rao bound then states that the covariance matrix of ${\boldsymbol {T}}(X)$ satisfies

$\mathrm {cov} _{\boldsymbol {\theta }}\left({\boldsymbol {T}}(X)\right)\geq {\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\psi }}\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)}{\partial {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}}[I\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)]^{-1}\left({\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\psi }}\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)}{\partial {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}}\right)^{T}$

where

• The matrix inequality $A\geq B$ is understood to mean that the matrix $A-B$ is positive semidefinite, and
• $\partial {\boldsymbol {\psi }}({\boldsymbol {\theta }})/\partial {\boldsymbol {\theta }}$ is a matrix whose $ij$th element is given by $\partial \psi _{i}({\boldsymbol {\theta }})/\partial \theta _{j}$.

If ${\boldsymbol {T}}(X)$ is an unbiased estimator of ${\boldsymbol {\theta }}$ (i.e., ${\boldsymbol {\psi }}\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)={\boldsymbol {\theta }}$), then the Cramér–Rao bound reduces to

$\mathrm {cov} _{\boldsymbol {\theta }}\left({\boldsymbol {T}}(X)\right)\geq I\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)^{-1}.$

Regularity conditions

The bound relies on two weak regularity conditions on the probability density function, $f(x;\theta )$, and the estimator $T(X)$:

• The Fisher information is always defined; equivalently, for all $x$ such that $f(x;\theta )>0$,

${\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\ln f(x;\theta )$

exists, and is finite.

• The operations of integration with respect to $x$ and differentiation with respect to $\theta$ can be interchanged in the expectation of $T$; that is,

${\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\left[\int T(x)f(x;\theta )\,dx\right]=\int T(x)\left[{\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}f(x;\theta )\right]\,dx$

whenever the right-hand side is finite.

This condition can often be confirmed by using the fact that integration and differentiation can be swapped when either of the following cases hold:

1. The function $f(x;\theta )$ has bounded support in $x$, and the bounds do not depend on $\theta$;
2. The function $f(x;\theta )$ has infinite support, is continuously differentiable, and the integral converges uniformly for all $\theta$.

Simplified form of the Fisher information

Suppose, in addition, that the operations of integration and differentiation can be swapped for the second derivative of $f(x;\theta )$ as well, i.e.,

${\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \theta ^{2}}}\left[\int T(x)f(x;\theta )\,dx\right]=\int T(x)\left[{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \theta ^{2}}}f(x;\theta )\right]\,dx.$

In this case, it can be shown that the Fisher information equals

$I(\theta )=-\mathrm {E} \left[{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \theta ^{2}}}\log f(X;\theta )\right].$

The Cramér–Rao bound can then be written as

$\mathrm {var} \left({\widehat {\theta }}\right)\geq {\frac {1}{I(\theta )}}={\frac {1}{-\mathrm {E} \left[{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \theta ^{2}}}\log f(X;\theta )\right]}}.$

In some cases, this formula gives a more convenient technique for evaluating the bound.

Single-parameter proof

The following is a proof of the general scalar case of the Cramér–Rao bound, which was described above; namely, that if the expectation of $T$ is denoted by $\psi (\theta )$, then, for all $\theta$,

${\rm {var}}(t(X))\geq {\frac {[\psi ^{\prime }(\theta )]^{2}}{I(\theta )}}.$

Let $X$ be a random variable with probability density function $f(x;\theta )$. Here $T=t(X)$ is a statistic, which is used as an estimator for $\psi (\theta )$. If $V$ is the score, i.e.

$V={\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\ln f(X;\theta )$

then the expectation of $V$, written ${\rm {E}}(V)$, is zero. If we consider the covariance ${\rm {cov}}(V,T)$ of $V$ and $T$, we have ${\rm {cov}}(V,T)={\rm {E}}(VT)$, because ${\rm {E}}(V)=0$. Expanding this expression we have

${\rm {cov}}(V,T)={\rm {E}}\left(T\cdot {\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\ln f(X;\theta )\right)$

This may be expanded using the chain rule

${\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\ln Q={\frac {1}{Q}}{\frac {\partial Q}{\partial \theta }}$

and the definition of expectation gives, after cancelling $f(x;\theta )$,

${\rm {E}}\left(T\cdot {\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\ln f(X;\theta )\right)=\int t(x)\left[{\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}f(x;\theta )\right]\,dx={\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}\left[\int t(x)f(x;\theta )\,dx\right]=\psi ^{\prime }(\theta )$

because the integration and differentiation operations commute (second condition).

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality shows that

${\sqrt {{\rm {var}}(T){\rm {var}}(V)}}\geq \left|{\rm {cov}}(V,T)\right|=\left|\psi ^{\prime }(\theta )\right|$

therefore

${\rm {var\ }}T\geq {\frac {[\psi ^{\prime }(\theta )]^{2}}{{\rm {var}}(V)}}={\frac {[\psi ^{\prime }(\theta )]^{2}}{I(\theta )}}=\left[{\frac {\partial }{\partial \theta }}{\rm {E}}(T)\right]^{2}{\frac {1}{I(\theta )}}$

which proves the proposition.

Examples

Multivariate normal distribution

For the case of a d-variate normal distribution

${\boldsymbol {x}}\sim N_{d}\left({\boldsymbol {\mu }}\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right),C\left({\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)\right)$

with a probability density function

$f\left({\boldsymbol {x}};{\boldsymbol {\theta }}\right)={\frac {1}{\sqrt {(2\pi )^{d}\left|C\right|}}}\exp \left(-{\frac {1}{2}}\left({\boldsymbol {x}}-{\boldsymbol {\mu }}\right)^{T}C^{-1}\left({\boldsymbol {x}}-{\boldsymbol {\mu }}\right)\right).$

The Fisher information matrix has elements

$I_{m,k}={\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\mu }}^{T}}{\partial \theta _{m}}}C^{-1}{\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}{\partial \theta _{k}}}+{\frac {1}{2}}\mathrm {tr} \left(C^{-1}{\frac {\partial C}{\partial \theta _{m}}}C^{-1}{\frac {\partial C}{\partial \theta _{k}}}\right)$

where "tr" is the trace.

Let $w[n]$ be a white Gaussian noise (a sample of $N$ independent observations) with variance $\sigma ^{2}$

$w[n]\sim \mathbb {N} _{N}\left({\boldsymbol {\mu }}(\theta ),\sigma ^{2}I\right).$

Where

${\boldsymbol {\mu }}(\theta )_{i}=\theta ={\text{mean}},$

and ${\boldsymbol {\mu }}(\theta )$ has $N$ (the number of independent observations) terms.

Then the Fisher information matrix is 1 × 1

$I(\theta )=\left({\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\mu }}(\theta )}{\partial \theta _{m}}}\right)^{T}C^{-1}\left({\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {\mu }}(\theta )}{\partial \theta _{k}}}\right)=\sum _{i=0}^{N}{\frac {1}{\sigma ^{2}}}={\frac {N}{\sigma ^{2}}},$

and so the Cramér–Rao bound is

$\mathrm {var} \left({\hat {\theta }}\right)\geq {\frac {\sigma ^{2}}{N}}.$

Normal variance with known mean

Suppose X is a normally distributed random variable with known mean $\mu$ and unknown variance $\sigma ^{2}$. Consider the following statistic:

$T={\frac {\sum _{i=1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\mu \right)^{2}}{n}}.$

Then T is unbiased for $\sigma ^{2}$, as $E(T)=\sigma ^{2}$. What is the variance of T?

$\mathrm {Var} (T)={\frac {\mathrm {var} (X-\mu )^{2}}{n}}={\frac {1}{n}}\left[E\left\{(X-\mu )^{4}\right\}-\left(E\left\{(X-\mu )^{2}\right\}\right)^{2}\right]$

(the second equality follows directly from the definition of variance). The first term is the fourth moment about the mean and has value $3(\sigma ^{2})^{2}$; the second is the square of the variance, or $(\sigma ^{2})^{2}$. Thus

$\mathrm {var} (T)={\frac {2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}{n}}.$

Now, what is the Fisher information in the sample? Recall that the score V is defined as

$V={\frac {\partial }{\partial \sigma ^{2}}}\log L(\sigma ^{2},X)$

where $L$ is the likelihood function. Thus in this case,

$V={\frac {\partial }{\partial \sigma ^{2}}}\log \left[{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\pi \sigma ^{2}}}}e^{-(X-\mu )^{2}/{2\sigma ^{2}}}\right]={\frac {(X-\mu )^{2}}{2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{2\sigma ^{2}}}$

where the second equality is from elementary calculus. Thus, the information in a single observation is just minus the expectation of the derivative of V, or

$I=-E\left({\frac {\partial V}{\partial \sigma ^{2}}}\right)=-E\left(-{\frac {(X-\mu )^{2}}{(\sigma ^{2})^{3}}}+{\frac {1}{2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}}\right)={\frac {\sigma ^{2}}{(\sigma ^{2})^{3}}}-{\frac {1}{2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}}={\frac {1}{2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}}.$

Thus the information in a sample of $n$ independent observations is just $n$ times this, or ${\frac {n}{2(\sigma ^{2})^{2}}}$.

The Cramer Rao bound states that

$\mathrm {var} (T)\geq {\frac {1}{I}}.$

In this case, the inequality is saturated (equality is achieved), showing that the estimator is efficient.

See also

• Chapman–Robbins bound

Further reading

• Kay, Steven M. (1993), Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation Theory, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-345711-7. Chapter 3.
• Shao, Jun (1998), Mathematical Statistics, New York: Springer, ISBN 0-387-98674-X. Section 3.1.3.