Today's New International Version

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Today's New International Version
Full name: Today's New International Version
Abbreviation: TNIV
NT published: 2002
Complete Bible published: 2005
Translation type: Dynamic and Formal Equivalence
Version Revised: New International Version (NIV)
Publisher: Zondervan
Copyright status: Copyright 2005 International Bible Society
Genesis 1:1-3
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
The Bible in English
Old English (pre-1066)
Middle English (1066-1500)
Early Modern English (1500-1800)
Modern Christian (1800-)
Modern Jewish (1853-)
Miscellaneous
This box: view • talk • edit

Today's New International Version is an English translation of the Bible developed by the Committee on Bible Translation, or CBT. The CBT is the same organization that translated the New International Version (NIV) in the 1970s. The TNIV is a new translation based on the NIV. It is explicitly Protestant like its predecessor; the deuterocanonical books are not part of the translation. The TNIV New Testament was published in March 2002. The complete Bible was published in February 2005. The rights to the text are owned by the International Bible Society (IBS), a nonprofit ministry that uses revenue gained from bible sales to translate and distribute bibles in indigenous languages all over the world. Zondervan, an evangelical Christian communications company, publishes the TNIV in North America. Hodder & Stoughton publish the TNIV in the UK and European Union.

The translation took more than ten years to complete. Thirteen evangelical scholars were dedicated to doing the translation; Dr. Ronald Youngblood, Dr. Kenneth Barker, Professor John H. Stek, Dr. Donald H. Madvig, Dr. Richard T. France, Dr. Gordon Fee, Dr. Karen H. Jobes, Dr. Walter Liefeld, Dr. Douglas J. Moo, Dr. Bruce K. Waltke, Dr. Larry L. Walker, Dr. Herbert M. Wolf and Dr. Martin Selman. Forty other scholars, many of them experts on specific books of the Bible, reviewed the translations teams work. They all came from a range of conservative and complementarian denominational backgrounds.[1][2]

Contents

[edit] Translation Philosophy

It was felt by the translators that many passages in older translations are misleading to contemporary readers. The intent of the TNIV translators was to produce an accurate and readable translation in contemporary language. The Committee on Bible Translation (CBT) wanted to build a new version on the heritage of the NIV and make it a balanced, mediating version, one that would fall in-between the most literal translation and the most free;[3] word-for-word (Formal Equivalence)[3] and thought-for-thought (Dynamic Equivalence).[3]

For translation a wide range of manuscripts were reviewed. The Masoretic text, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Greek Septuagint or (LXX), the Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion, the Latin Vulgate, the Syriac Peshitta, the Aramaic Targums, and for the Psalms the Juxta Hebraica of Jerome were all consulted for the Old Testament. The Dead Sea Scrolls were occasionally followed where the Masoretic Text seemed inconsistent. The United Bible Societies Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament text was used for the New Testament.[4]

[edit] TNIV Differences

There are a number of changes in the TNIV. Dr. Craig Blomberg stated in a 2003 paper titled, The Untold Story of a Good Translation, that 70% of the changes in the TNIV move in a "more literal direction three times more often than not". Dr. Mark Strauss has stated that the majority of changes are, "based on advances in biblical scholarship, linguistics, and archaeology".[5]

In Matthew 1:18, where the NIV says that Mary was “with child”, The TNIV simply says Mary was “pregnant”.

In Luke 12:38, the phrase “fourth watch of the night” employed in the NIV is changed to “shortly before dawn” (Luke 12:38) in the TNIV.

The TNIV translators have, at times, opted for more traditional Anglo-Saxon or poetic renderings than those found in the NIV. For example, “the heavens” is sometimes chosen to replace the “the sky,” as is the case in Isaiah 50:3: "I clothe the heavens with darkness and make sackcloth its covering."

At times the TNIV offers a different or nuanced understanding of a passage. For example, in the NIV, Psalm 26:3 reads, “For your love is ever before me, and I walk continually in your truth.” The TNIV reads, “For I have always been mindful of your unfailing love and have lived in reliance on your faithfulness.”

There are a number of changes in this one verse, but of special note is the TNIV’s translation of the Hebrew word ’emet. The TNIV translators took this word to mean more than simple honesty in Psalm 26:3, referring more specifically to reliability or trustworthiness.

Examples of other changes are “truly I tell you” becomes “I tell you the truth”; “fellow workers” becomes “coworkers”; “the Jews,” particularly in John's Gospel, often becomes “Jewish leaders” when the context makes it apparent what the statement's real meaning is; “miracles,” especially in John, become the more literal “signs”, “miraculous signs”, or “works”. The word for “spirit”, where there is a good chance it means the Holy Spirit, is now capitalized, “Peter” is rendered “Cephas” when the Greek merely transliterates the Hebrew name.

Other notable changes are that “Christ” has regularly been rendered as “Messiah”, “saints” has often been replaced with terms such as “God's people” or “believers”.

[edit] Gender Accuracy and the TNIV

Cover of an TNIV NT, 2002
Cover of an TNIV NT, 2002

Among other changes made are those involving the use of inclusive language to refer to people. Various terms for this are "gender accurate", "gender neutral", or "gender inclusive". For example, in the TNIV, Genesis 1:27 reads: "So God created human beings in his own image." Older translations use the word "man" to translate the word 'adam' employed in the original Hebrew--the same word used as the proper name of the first man married to the first woman, Eve. Matthew 5:9 reads: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God." Here the word 'sons' found in older Scripture versions as the translation of the Greek word 'huioi' is changed to "children". Masculine references to God (e.g. "Father", "Son", etc) are not modified in the TNIV.

Opponents of this approach point out that many of the terms in question carry male denotations and/or connotations in the original Hebrew and Greek. Some Bible translators argue that, while there are passages in the text that lend themselves to inclusive language, other changes are unfaithful to the original Hebrew and Greek. Critics of inclusive language claim that, in order to achieve its aims, inclusive language can force an incorrect translation onto the text. For example, they claim:

  • Translators substitute plural nominative pronouns for masculine singular pronouns in order to remove the "man" and the "he" pronoun, as in the case of Psalm 1:1: "Blessed are those who do not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers". Critics point out that the singular in this verse highlights the struggle of the individual against the wicked masses. Other examples of this are Revelation 3:20: "Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with them, and they with me." and John 6:44; "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day".

Proponents of inclusive language translations of Scripture argue that the grammatical gender of a word has no bearing on its meaning. (For example, in Spanish the word for table, mesa, is grammatically feminine, but that does not mean tables are female.) The two main arguments in favor of inclusive language are:

  • It is believed that no such male nuances of meaning exist in many passages; therefore translations like the TNIV more accurately communicate the meaning of the text. For example, words like "adelphoi" previously translated "brothers", could be understood as gender inclusive and was (dependent upon context) comprehended in New Testament times as inclusive. With the shift of time and customs, "brothers" has become understood as an inaccurate use to denote a mixed-sex group. It is right therefore in a large number of passages to use "brothers and sisters" to avoid such miscommunication.[6]
  • Traditional forms of English (in which terms like "man" and "he" applied to both genders) are falling out of everyday use and are likely to be misinterpreted, especially by younger readers. Also it is argued that use of what is termed "the singular they" does not obscure the individual application of passages like Revelation 3:20, because such use is increasingly common in the English language and is understood by most readers.

Less than 30% of the changes in the TNIV involve the use of inclusive language[7]. The TNIV's approach to gender inclusive language is similar to that of the New International Version Inclusive Language Edition (NIVI),[8] New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), the New Living Translation (NLT), the New Century Version (NCV), and the Contemporary English Version (CEV).

[edit] The TNIV and hoi ioudaioi

In the TNIV some original Greek text references to hoi ioudaioi (literally, the Jews), are changed from the original English translation of "the Jews" to "Jewish leaders", or simply "they." For example, in the Gospel of John (e.g. John 18:36), the TNIV translators changed the translation of the Greek words, hoi ioudaioi, from "the Jews" to "Jewish leaders." This change has been called for by Jewish leaders as a way of avoiding wording in the Gospel of John being misunderstood and a number of evangelical scholars agree with this change.[9] [10] [11] The TNIV is not alone among English Bible versions in following recent biblical scholarship on this matter.[12]

[edit] The TNIV Launch

  • In 2002, Zondervan published the TNIV New Testament.
  • In 2005, Zondervan planned to advertise the TNIV in Rolling Stone as part of its campaign to launch the full TNIV Bible to “spiritually intrigued 18 to 34 year olds.” Just weeks before the ad’s scheduled run date, Rolling Stone pulled the ad, citing a policy against religious advertisements in its magazine. Beginning with a story in USA Today, media frenzy ensued and two weeks later, Rolling Stone reversed its position and published the ad.[13]
  • In 2006, Zondervan announced the production of The Bible Experience, an audio recording of the TNIV featuring performances by Angela Bassett, Cuba Gooding Jr., Blair Underwood, Denzel Washington and several other leading celebrities. The Bible Experience New Testament was released in October 2006. It has since become a best seller.[14] The planned launch for the complete TNIV audio bible is October 2007.
  • In 2006, Zondervan launched the TNIV Study Bible with study notes and a 700 page topical index.
  • In 2007, the International Bible Society released The Books of the Bible which makes several changes in formatting of the text. The TNIV text is used without chapter-verse divisions, all headings removed, and footnotes moved to the end of each book. The books are also arranged in a different order, and some books are combined into a single volume as they were originally written. (Example: 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings were originally a single book. They are recombined in The Books of the Bible as Samuel-Kings.)[15]
  • In 2008, Zondervan will release the TNIV Reference Bible. University teacher Rick Mansfield stated in an online review of a preview copy that it's, “the edition of the TNIV I wish I had been using from the very beginning.”[16]

[edit] Supporters and Critics

Denominations supportive of the TNIV include the Christian Reformed Church (CRC), which officially endorsed the TNIV as an acceptable translation for use, the Evangelical Covenant Church and the Free Methodist Church of North America. Leading scholars from the Free Methodist Church of North America had a varied response from it "constitutes no threat" to "most accurate ever".[17]

Evangelical scholars and pastoral leaders supportive of the TNIV include Ronald F. Youngblood, Herbert M. Wolf, Mark L. Strauss, Tremper Longman III, Alan Johnson, Dennis Okholm, Gilbert Bilezikian, Paul E. Koptak, Linda Belleville, John Ortberg, Robert C. Andringa, John Armstrong, Adam Hamilton, John Stek, Emeritus Bates, Donald H. Madvig, Kenneth L. Barker, Gordon Fee, Richard T. France, Karen H. Jobes, Walter Liefeld, Douglas Moo, Martin J. Selman, Rob Bell, Bruce K. Waltke, Craig Blomberg, Darrell Bock, Don Carson, Jim Cymbala, Peter Furler, Bill Hybels, Tremper Longman, Erwin McManus, Ben Patterson, Dr. Ben Witherington III, Terry C. Muck and others.[18]

Authors supportive of the TNIV include Lee Strobel, author of The Case for Christ; John R. W. Stott; Philip Yancey; Rob Lacey, author of The Word on the Street; Diane Komp, M.D., author of A Window to Heaven; Dan Kimball, author of The Emerging Church and Emerging Worship, Terri Blackstock, Ken Davis, and Scott Evans.

The Presbyterian Church in America and the Southern Baptist Convention passed resolutions opposing the TNIV and other inclusive language translations.[19] [20]

Evangelical scholars and pastoral leaders critical of the TNIV include J. I. Packer, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Wayne Grudem, D. James Kennedy, Albert Mohler, John Piper, Dennis Rainey, Pat Robertson, R.C. Sproul, Joni Eareckson Tada, and others.[21]

Dr. Craig L. Blomberg, a New Testament Professor, states in regards to the TNIV, "It is a reasonable expectation, however, that its critics should treat it fairly. Why have they not commented on the scores of places in which the TNIV is more literal and/or more accurate than the NIV completely apart from the inclusive-language debate, especially since their criticisms rely so heavily on valuing highly literal translations?"[22]

[edit] See also

The Bible in English
Old English (pre-1066)
Middle English (1066-1500)
Early Modern English (1500-1800)
Modern Christian (1800-)
Modern Jewish (1853-)
Miscellaneous
This box: view • talk • edit

[edit] References

  1. ^ About The TNIV.
  2. ^ The Committee on Bible Translation.
  3. ^ a b c Barker, Kenneth L. The Balance Translation Philosophy of the TNIV (HTML). Retrieved on 2007-11-29.
  4. ^ Preface to Today's New International Version Bible.
  5. ^ TNIV Debate between Dr. Wayne Grudem and Dr. Mark Strauss at Concordia University
  6. ^ Literal Is Not More Accurate If It's Unintelligible.
  7. ^ Today's New International Version: The Untold Story Of A Good Translation.
  8. ^ Comparing the Three NIVs, Christianity Today, January 2002
  9. ^ Selected Bibliography for the Gospel of John
  10. ^ Johannine Passion Narrative Issues
  11. ^ Bible Resource Center :: American Bible Society
  12. ^ [B-Greek] Re: Scrivener 1894 errors
  13. ^ Ad for a Bible doesn't fit (HTML). USA Today. Retrieved on 2007-12-15.
  14. ^ Audio Bible a Surprise Christmas Best-Seller (HTML). HCJB Global. Retrieved on 2007-12-15.
  15. ^ The Books of the Bible.
  16. ^ TNIV Reference Bible: Hands-On Review (HTML). THIS LAMP...and that's all I need. Retrieved on 2007-12-15.
  17. ^ The TNIV Debate: A Studied Response.
  18. ^ Positive Reviews of Today's New International Version Bible.
  19. ^ Presbyterian Church in America Rejects the TNIV
  20. ^ Southern Baptist Convention Rejects the TNIV
  21. ^ Statement of Concern by Evangelical Leaders.
  22. ^ http://www.tniv.info/pdf/Blomberg.pdf#search=%22TNIV%20Untold%20Story%22

[edit] External links

v • d • e
English language translations of the Christian Bible
Middle English
16th-17th century
18th-19th century
20th century
21st century
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Today%27s_New_International_Version"
Personal tools