Wikipedia:Layout
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page documents an English Wikipedia style guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense and the occasional exception. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. |
This Wikipedia Guide to Layout is an annotated, working guide to the basics of laying out an article. Complicated articles may be best modeled on the layout of an existing article of appropriate structure. This guide is not about how to use wiki markup (see Help:Editing for that); nor is it about writing style (see Manual of Style for that).
Contents |
[edit] Lead section
The lead section may contain optional elements presented in the following order: disambiguation links (dablinks), maintenance tags, infoboxes, images, navigational boxes (navigational templates), introductory text, and table of contents, moving to the heading of the first section.
|
Click "Show" to display the full details of these elements.
|
[edit] Body sections
[edit] Headings and paragraphs
- Further information: Wikipedia:Section and Wikipedia:Manual of Style
Headings. These are located at the top of sections and subsections. They help to make an article clearer, and they populate the table of contents that users can choose to view (the default) or not to view, under their "Preferences". Headings are hierarchical; you should start with a "second-level" heading (two equals signs on each side: ==Heading==) and follow it with third- and then fourth-level subheadings (===Subheading===, ====Subsubheading====), and so forth.
Very short or very long sections and subsections will make an article look cluttered and will inhibit the flow. If the order in which sections should appear is unclear, use alphabetical or chronological order. Alphabetical order is especially useful when sections are divided on the basis of crieteria such as country or state. Between sections there should be only a single blank line; multiple blank lines unnecessarily lengthen the article and can make it more difficult to read.
Paragraphs. Articles generally comprise paragraphs of running prose. Bullet points should be minimized in the body of the article, if they are used at all; however, sometimes a bulleted list can break up what would otherwise be a large, grey mass of text, particularly if the topic requires significant effort on the part of readers. Bulleted lists are typical in the reference and reading sections at the bottom. Between paragraphs—as between sections—there should be only a single blank line; bullet points are not usually separated by a line.
The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized, since they can inhibit the flow of the text; by the same token, paragraphs that exceed a certain length become hard to read. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading; in such circumstances, it may be preferable to use bullet points. See also Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Paragraphs.
Subtopics. The degree to which subtopics should either appear in a single articles or be given their own pages is a matter of perceived logic and of controlling the total length of the article.
[edit] Section templates and summary style
Main article. When a section is a summary of another article that provides a full exposition of the section, a link to that article should appear immediately under the section heading. You can use the {{Main}} template to generate a Main article: link.[2]
Other references under the section title. If one or more articles provide further information or additional details (rather than a full exposition—see above), references to such articles may be placed immediately after the section heading for that section, provided they are not wikilinked in the text. These additional references should be grouped along with the {{Main}} template (if there is one), for easy selection by the reader, rather than being scattered throughout the text of a section. You can use one of the following templates to generate these links:
- {{Details}} – this generates For more details on this topic, see
- {{Further}} – this generates Further information:
- {{See also}} – this generates See also:
[edit] Standard appendices
Certain optional standard sections, when used, should be placed at the bottom of an article. The plural form of the section name should be used.[3] Common appendix sections are discussed below. These sections should all be level 2 headings so that they appear as sections rather than subsections in the table of contents.[4]
With the exception of Works, sections which contain material outside Wikipedia (including Further reading, and External links) should come after sections that contain Wikipedia material (including See also) to help keep the distinction clear. The sections containing notes and references often contain both kinds of material and, consequently, appear after the See also section (if any) and before the Further reading section (if any). Succession boxes and navigational footers go at the end of the article, following the last appendix section, but preceding the "categories and interwiki links".
[edit] Works
Contents: The "Works," "Bibliography", or "Publications" section provides a list of books or other works created by the subject of the article.
Location: Usually precedes the other optional appendices.
Format: A list, usually ordered chronologically.
[edit] See also
Contents: The "See also" or, less commonly, "Related topics" section provides internal links to related Wikipedia articles. "See also" is the most appropriate place to link a Portal with {{portal}} template.
A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in a hypothetical "perfect article" are suitable to add to the "See also" section of a less developed one.[5] Links already included in the body of the text are generally not repeated in "See also"; however, whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. A "perfect" article then may not have a "See also" section at all, though some links may not naturally fit into the body of text and others may not be included due to size constraints. Links that would be included if the article were not kept relatively short for other reasons may thus be appropriate, though should be used in moderation, as always. These may be useful for readers looking to read as much about a topic as possible, including subjects only peripherally related to the one in question. The section should not link to pages that do not exist.
Location: The See also section, if used, follows the Works section, if used.
Format: The links should appear in a bulleted list. It is helpful to alphabetize the links if there are more than a few of them. Also provide a brief explanatory sentence when the relevance of the added links is not immediately apparent. For example:
-
- Related person made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005.
[edit] Notes, Footnotes, or References
Contents: This section, or group of sections, presents the explanatory notes and a list of the references that support the information in the article.
Location: The notes and references appear after the See also section (if any) and before the Further reading and External links sections (if any).
Format: The format of these sections, their titles, and the specific information in each depends on the citation style used in the article. Implementation details regarding different citation styles can be found at Wikipedia:Citing sources#Adding the citation. As explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Consistency, it is inappropriate to change an article from one defined citation style to another unless there is a reason that goes beyond mere choice of style.
[edit] Further reading
Contents: A list of any books, articles, or other publications that is recommended to readers as further reading, useful background, or sources of further information.
This section does not include publications that were used as reliable sources in writing this article; these should be cited as references. Websites and online publications are normally listed in the "External links" section instead of in this section, although editors occasionally prefer to merge very short lists of publications and external links into this section. To avoid unnecessary duplication of information, publications listed in any other section of the article should not be included in "Further reading".
Location: This section is placed after the References section and before the External links section (if any).
Format: This is a bulleted list, usually alphabetized, as explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works). Publications listed in this section are cited in the same reference style used by the rest of the article.
[edit] External links
Contents: Place here any relevant websites that have not been used as sources and that you recommend for readers of the article. Unlike wikilinks, which are often used within the article's text, external links are normally limited to the "External links" section. Links to external websites used as sources should be listed in the "References" or "Notes" section. External links may be listed in the section "Further reading", instead of having a separate section specifically for external links.
Location: If there is an External links section, it should be last for a number of reasons, including: So many articles have the External links section at the end that many people expect that. Some External links and references sections are very long, and when the name of the section is not visible on the screen, it could cause problems if someone meant to delete an external link, and deleted a reference instead. Keeping the External links last is also helpful to editors who patrol external links.
Format: External links should be arranged in a bulleted list, with a short description of the link and no blank lines between items. By convention, if the article is about a company or organization, then their official website is the first link in the list.
[edit] Links to sister projects
Links to Wikimedia sister projects should be under the last appendix section. If there is no external links section into which to integrate the templates (e.g. {{commons}}, {{wikibooks}}, {{wikinews}}), inline versions of templates (e.g. {{commons-inline}}, {{wikibooks-inline}}, {{wikiquote-inline}}) are usually available. See Category:Interwiki link templates to check whether an inline template exists.
[edit] Navigational footers, categories, interlanguage links etc.
Various navigational aids go at the end of the article, following the last appendix section. The conventional order is:
- Succession boxes and navigational templates
- Categories
- Stub templates. It is usually desirable to leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it.
- Interlanguage links
[edit] Formatting
[edit] Images
You should always be watchful not to overwhelm an article with images by adding more just because you can. Unless clearly better or more appropriate images are available, the existing images in the article should be left in place.
Images should ideally be spread evenly within the article, and relevant to the sections they are located in. All images should also have an explicative caption. An image should not overwhelm the screen; 300px may be considered a limit, as this is approximately half Wikipedia's text space's width on a 800x600 screen. It is a good idea to try to maintain visual coherence by aligning the width of images and templates on a given page.
When placing images, be careful not to stack too many of them within the lead, or within a single section to avoid bunching up several section edit links in some browsers. Generally, if there are so many images in a section that they strip down into the next section at 1024x768 screen resolution, that probably means either that the section is too short, or that there are too many images.
If an article has many images, so many, in fact, that they lengthen the page beyond the length of the text itself (this also applies if a template like {{taxobox}} or {{Judaism}} is already stretching the page), you can try to use a gallery, but the ideal solution might be to create a page or category combining all of them at Wikimedia Commons and use a relevant template ({{commons}}, {{commonscat}}, {{commons-inline}} or {{commonscat-inline}}) and link to it instead, so that further images are readily found and available when the article is expanded.
[edit] Horizontal rule
The use of horizontal rules (----) in articles is deprecated. They were once used to separate multiple meanings of a single article name. However this is now done with disambiguation pages.
They are occasionally used to provide separation inside some templates (e.g. {{politbox}} derivatives), within some discussions, or when needed in some format specialties.
[edit] See also
- Help:Editing
- Help:Preferences
- Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines shows how to use headings on talk pages
[edit] Footnotes
- ^ Why maintenance tags are evil.
- ^ Syntax:
{{main|Circumcision and law}}
This produces:
- ^ See, e.g., Wikipedia:External links#External links section.
- ^ Syntax:
== See also ==
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]Which produces:
See also
- ^ This of course refers only to links related to the topic, not links that are incidental, e.g. linking to a jargon word in a sentence
|
||||||||||||||||
