Skip to content
Click on cover to enlarge
illustration by Tamara Shopsin

Skype Love

«  page 1 of 4  »

Are we drawn closer by being farther away?

by Jonathan Garfinkel

illustration by Tamara Shopsin

Published in the Escape: Summer 2008 issue.  » BUY ISSUE     

Bookmark and Share             Facebook         Stumble      Get The Walrus on your Blackberry or Windows Mobile        RSS


“It is an interesting question — what one tries to do, in writing a letter — partly of course to give back a reflection of the other person.” So wrote tireless correspondent Virginia Woolf to her friend Gerald Brenan, on October 4, 1929. Now all it takes to capture an accurate reflection of someone far away is a Skype account. This raises another interesting question — what are we trying to do when we Skype?

Skype is the most popular and sexiest form of VoIP, or Voice over Internet Protocol — a technology that allows any computer with a broadband Internet connection to act as a telephone. Skype was created in 2003 by the same Danish and Swedish entrepreneurs and Estonian software developers who created Kazaa (a file-sharing program similar to Napster). Since then, Skype has taken the communications world by storm: as of April 2008, it had more than 309 million registered accounts.

Its popularity is no mystery: anyone can download the software for free, and talk to anyone else with Skype, anywhere in the world, also for free. This includes the option of video conferencing. (Skype makes most of its money from people who “SkypeOut,” buying credit that lets them Skype land lines or mobiles for as little as 2.1 cents a minute.)

The technology has created a wave of Skype Love, which means millions of romantic partners around the world can live in different cities, countries, and time zones and not actually be separated, as long as they have a computer with an Internet connection, a microphone, and a webcam. The sound quality is not always the best — it ranges from a cut above the telephone to echoey or garbled — but there is something comforting in its retrograde tinniness (like jazz on a crackly LP). And who can argue with no long-distance charges and no maintenance fees?

For the past year and a half, I’ve depended on Skype to stay in touch with my girlfriend, a writer and translator who has been based in Vilnius, Lithuania, while I move around from Canada to Europe to the Middle East to, most recently, the Caucasus, doing research for a new book. In a Skypeless world, we might have been less inclined to hang in there, but now separation is less challenging. To be able to see her, and for her to see me, is more satisfying than a telephone call, email, instant message, or letter; the silences are more comfortable, the flow of conversation more natural. The image of my girlfriend’s face and the familiar environment — her piles of poetry, her thick Lithuanian dictionary, a white tunic she bought in Rajasthan — conjure up so many other sensory associations (her smell, her touch) that sometimes I feel we’re in the same room. It’s a strange and modern feeling: to be so intimate and yet so far apart.

According to Skype’s “Users Online” status, there are millions of us out there at any given moment of the day, sitting in front of our computers for two, three, sometimes ten hours at a time, gazing into the pixellated eyes of our beloved. (So far, people have Skyped for more than 100 billion minutes.) Obviously,this makes being apart less lonely. But has it brought people closer? Does it make us better lovers? Does sitting in front of a webcam free us up to talk more intimately? And what the hell do we talk about so often for so long?

Me: Hey.
She: Hey.
Me: How’s it going?
She: It’s going.

A long pause. A really long pause — not awkward, just adjusting to Skype Reality: volume, screen angle, the pleasure of seeing.

Me: You look really nice today.

Comments (4 comments)

Megan Shank: My partner of six years and I have been geographically separated by the Pacific Ocean for the past two years due to our employment/academic situations and find Skype to be a great comfort.

Garfinkel's piece profoundly resonates with me, and I laughed out loud several times while reading it. He's truly on to something with the Scrabulous-Skype activity.

The increase of couples choosing to go the distance will undoubtedly become a greater market that companies seek to capitalize on. For example, researchers at MIT's Media Lab are developing Wifi Wine Glasses that light up when your better half takes a sip. Pair it with a Hug Shirt, a Bluetooth accessory for Java-enabled mobile phones, which uses smart technology pads to send hugs internationally via SMS.

First wine, then hugs? Sounds like it might lead to Skype sex that makes your partner's pixelated pupils pop. July 01, 2008 21:02 EST

Anonymous: thanks July 05, 2008 12:44 EST

eclecto: I confess, for years I've clung to a luddite's wariness of any suggested benefits of virtual communication. Lately I've started to shift. But this articles kicked me forward a few stages. Better, more considered communication through Skype? Wow, that's paradigm shifting - and I think I aggree with the new reality. Not as a replacement for embodied relationships, but as a very beneficial alternative when the need arises. Must muse on this further. July 29, 2008 15:13 EST

Anonymous: just up for playful fun. August 15, 2008 20:06 EST

Comment on this article


Will not be displayed on the site

Submit a comment online

Submit a letter to the Editor


    Cancel

The Walrus E-Newsletter

Online exclusives, events, offers:
get news of everything Walrus.


Article Tools

»    RSS Feed      Bookmark and Share

»  Email this article

»  Comment on this article

»  More in this issue

»  More in Technology

»  All articles by Jonathan Garfinkel

»  BUY THIS ISSUE

ADVERTISE WITH US