Looking for the Washington DC Examiner newspaper site?
Get the newspaper via email

Multimedia News

'Santa shooter' kills 9
6 photos
Bruce Jeffrey Pardo is seen in an undated pho...
Rolex Sydney to Hobart Yacht race
6 photos
Skandia caches through a wave during the star...
Christmas around the world
6 photos
Members of a winter swimmers association bath...
Maryland water main break traps motorists
6 photos
In this image rendered from video and provide...
Caylee Anthony mystery continues
6 photos
This undated photo released by the Orange Cou...

Commentary - Chris Stirewalt: Republicans try to turn Obama against the image of himself

Aug 14, 2008 3:00 AM (137 days ago) by Chris Stirewalt, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - W hatever dark arts Democrats believe Karl Rove has practiced, his greatest legacy to the penny loafer Machiavellis who populate the Republican Party is the unstinting use of bracketing.

That’s the idea that you never give your opponent a clean shot at an issue or a theme.  Whether it’s a protest, a television spot, or a competing press conference earlier in the news cycle, you place your opponent’s push for positive press inside a bracket of negativity.

Both parties do it, but the GOP has elevated it into an art form.

Students of Rove’s electoral alchemy, notably the bald bulldog running John McCain’s day-to-day operations, Steve Schmidt, were taught that everything needs a bracket.

This story continues below
Advertisement

When Barack Obama was floating a new energy policy that backed away from his opposition to offshore drilling, there were young Republicans outside the event handing out tire gauges mocking Obama for having said we could save as much oil as we could pump offshore if we all inflated our tires.

The Democrats have done plenty of bracketing too.

When McCain fired up Harley riders, Obama’s folks talked about McCain’s vote against a bill that would have made Harley the government’s sole supplier of motorcycles.

Or when McCain went to the Ohio town where the shipper DHL is about to purge its payroll, Obama’s camp got off a few shots about how McCain’s campaign manager advised the company.

But as John Kerry found out in 2004, the Republicans bracket with particular glee.

When Kerry would show up to speak on poverty and job losses in the Rust Belt, there would be a gaggle of GOPers — including a kid dressed up like a dolphin — outside the hall chanting the name of his yacht, the Scaramouche. (He was a rougish character from 19th century European theater, if you must know.)

Even if the press doesn’t bite, it’s hard for a brittle campaigner like Kerry to stay on message when being taunted every day by khaki-clad kids chanting “When I say scara, you say mouche! Scara… Mouche!”

But aside from rattling the candidate, the desired effect is a Pavlovian response in reporters and voters. When Kerry said he empathized with the poor, people thought of his big yacht with the silly, French name. The positive became a negative.

Since Republicans have invested so much in the tactic in the past, it’s logical that they would be the ones to take it to the next level.

And when Barack Obama is bathed in warm light and the cheers of 70,000 adoring fans in Denver two weeks from tonight, he’ll be bracketed with more precision than the NCAA basketball tournament.

And the Republicans have already done the draw.

There was plenty of insincere outrage when McCain’s team compared Obama to America’s favorite seamy starlets, Britney and Paris.

But there’s no question that, over the past two weeks, the idea of Obama being more style than substance has taken hold.

Plenty of people thought this would be the first issue-oriented, serious campaign since before someone at the Athenian agora said Pericles was soft on Sparta. Those folks were probably already Obama voters and don’t matter electorally anymore. 

What does matter for a candidate with as much going against him as McCain (age, a smile that threatens to crack his face, a dismal Republican brand, a penchant for verbal misfires, and a party base that found itself in a shotgun wedding with its nominee) is dispelling the myth that grew around Obama during the Democratic primaries.

An irascible 71-year-old can’t run against a charismatic healer whose ascent alone could redeem the nation, or as Michael Knox Beran called him “Barack Obama, shaman.”

Obama’s team, repeating the error of Democrats past, took the bait and not only responded to McCain’s small TV buy and silly Internet ads, they did ads of their own to try to brand McCain as a celebrity himself.

I’m sure the McCain team wishes that were so, but worse for Obama is that his spot, along with Paris’ own Web retort, turned what was essentially a stunt into two weeks of discussion and television programming.

Even if Obama’s speech at the Denver Broncos’ stadium is a 99-yard touchdown run, the Pavlovian response will kick in and some swing voters will think celebrity, not leader.

Chris Stirewalt is the political editor of The Washington Examiner.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:34 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 15, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

@Examiner Reader at 3:11 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2 said:
I don't really feel like going into all the flaws of your argument, but limiting voting to people of an IQ above 120 will eliminate the vast majority of the electorate. The average IQ is 100 and the standard deviation is about 15 points. This means that about 68 percent of people fall between 85 and 115. Then the rest are distributed above and below that range about equally. This means that only 16 percent of the population would be above and IQ of 115 and many of those people would still be below 120. You may be inclined to believe that you are smarter than the average bear, but are you sure you are in the top 10 percent of the entire human race? I seriously doubt it, because history shows us that when a government is controlled by an elitist group, it is significantly more likely to be overthrown by the general population. In order to have the "smartest" rule, there would have to be a majority in this group to ensure control. This defeats the purpose you were proposing to begin with.

48 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:54 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 10, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

yo momma said:
I think that felons shouldn't vote they got they own problems and if there in jail they should not be given any rite

30 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:50 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 10, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Jamir Johnson said:
I think we all should have a right to vote. I mean how could one say that America's opinion is heard during elections or polls if over 2 million of America's citizens can not speak out there opinion and virtues. Just because you commit a crime does not mean you have no sense of morality.

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:26 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 8, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
i think they should but it depends on the crime but they should if there out of jail and finished probabtion or anything like tht.. cuz they stil are citizens

16 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:15 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 8, 2008 re: "Thomas Schaller: Imagining a post-Sept. 11 world with Gore as president"

Examiner Reader said:
poop

16 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:33 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 29, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

lizzy star said:
SERIOUSLY? felons should be able to vote. a reason they can't is because is they have "bad judgment" well i guarentee a fourth of americans have bad judgment. by the way check your resources and make sure they don't contridict them selfs. hint hint roger clegg.

47 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:22 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 29, 2008 re: "Mark Newgent: Stupid environmentalist tricks in College Park"

Birdzilla said:
According to these eco-wackos all this GLOBAL WARMING will make the earth look like it did in that stupid movie WATERWORLD in which we get tosee that idiot KEVIN KOSNER swimming and looking like a complete dork, Al gore can stop global warming by geeting his piehole closed and cutting off all that HOT AIR he produces

14 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:06 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 24, 2008 re: "Dan Popeo: The American legal profession must clean its own house"

Arthur Mboue said:
Please do not clean where you live, you will be swearing in yourself as a Social Secretary. Just save money for a professional, no money, trouble Arthur Mboue

28 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:04 PM MST on Sun., Nov. 23, 2008 re: "Mark Newgent: Stupid environmentalist tricks in College Park"

Birdzilla said:
The green freaks are always pulling off stupid stunts all the time making how stupid they are

24 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:08 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 22, 2008 re: "Lawrence Haas: Democrats should beware of the post-Vietnam syndrome"

ertrcnar said:
comonmoncn

25 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:26 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 18, 2008 re: "Stephen Bainbridge: Libertarians, conservatives part on animal cruelty laws"

Ethically curious said:
Too often these sensitive topics arise from anthropomorphizing creatures: we can only assume what an animal feels, as it is limited in its ability to express itself. Foie Gras supporters argue that birds suffer less from force-feeding than if placed in a poultry factory-farm: it's difficult to say if that's true. However, I think there is a fundamental difference between Foie Gras consumption and watching a dogfight: what it says of the consumer. There is no appeal to a dogfight (or bullfight) other than watching an animal suffer - the contest has no meaning unless the animals are mistreated. Other animal sports, say dog racing, do not require a dog to be harmed. I find it difficult to believe that enjoying suffering does not somehow make one less than human. Foie Gras consumers, on the other hand, are interested only in eating; if fatty goose liver were available certified "cruelty-free," I imagine many would enjoy it. I think this is an important distinction

23 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:14 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 18, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
felons should have the right to vote becaus ebefore they served they were able to so they should now...

23 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 12, 2008 re: "What are you reading this summer?"

Examiner Reader said:
it's good to be first, i just read god's warrior's vs satan's ????---i'm letting you and everyone know that this is destined for the big screen. it's huge- i'm going to say it ----i told you so.

20 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:53 AM MST on Sat., Nov. 1, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

Ron said:
Hell of a list...forgot "bitter clingers", "above my pay grade","punished with a child","spread the wealth","just a guy in the neighborhood", "typical white person", "civilian security force", "my brother's keeper" except for his real grandma, aunt and half-brother,Khalidi, Ayers , Wright, Dohrne, ...raise the cost of capital for business in a recession...I AM TERROFIED!

36 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:39 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 28, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - YES: Punishment shouldn’t be confused with basic rights"

billyjoe said:
thanx for making my daddy vote

32 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:47 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 24, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

shanda said:
hi guys

35 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:13 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 22, 2008 re: "Timothy P. Carney: Sweeping Boeing’s bank under the rug"

Examiner Reader said:
Your article is pretty misinformed. The Exim Bank exists as an arm of the US government because it has access to the US government's sovereign right to demand payment via Bank of International Settlements mechanisms. Hence if say GE built a power plant in Azerbaijian, commercial banks would not finance it without Exim Bank financing as the first loss piece. If the project were to default, the US would demand payment on behalf of the Exim Bank and the BIS would be obligated to add the defaulted amount to the Azeri balance sheet.

34 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 21, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

Charles Nickalopoulos said:
Would Obama be something like Carter, probably.

37 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:53 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 16, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - YES: Punishment shouldn’t be confused with basic rights"

Jennifer Wade said:
I'm an educated white female who's at an incredible disadantage being a felon. Many women that I speak to with this issue are experiencing simlar difficulties. Do you have any workshops, articles, or advocates that I could tap and encourage my colleagues to look at too. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jennifer Wade wade.ja@hotmail.com P.S. The stigma that goes with alcoholism and felon is very powerful.

41 agree | 39 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:22 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 12, 2008 re: "Kim Priestap: Americans don’t want more government health care"

maria said:
lol since americans have never experianced a decent health care system...except the rich.!!!for the rest of the usa!!.they actually dont know what they want...idiots apparently want what the top 1% the thiefs!! are trying to sell to them...

40 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:55 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 7, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

Jane said:
Pretty soon Obama will propose we contribute 100% of our hard earned salaries to the government via taxes for his programs so he "The Chosen One" who has such a fine education and is so much better than the rest of us can decide who gets what. He is trying to make mules out of hard working Americans. Wake up people!

64 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:15 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 30, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

Steve said:
And how much power does the wind farm supply when the air is still? I'm more a proponent of geothermal power, Tidal power, Nuclear power or Satellite based solar reflection. For the time being it won't matter the upcoming depression will kill consumption for the next 10 years anyway.

54 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:49 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 27, 2008 re: "Terrence Scanlon: Is ACORN disenfranchising the process itself?"

Examiner Reader said:
was obahama associated with this group?

55 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 25, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
If you are born american your for father fought for your rights. No one shold be able to take your rights away because you made a mistake in the past. You do the time for your crime then when it is paid you still are american and you should have the rights of one. Yes I'M an exoffender I got a sentence of six years not a sentence to take my rights away and sure did not here the judge say you can not get a good job no more.Why can an employer deny me a job becouse of the past that is like not hiring becouse I'm black or white that is breaking the law right. I did they take my right to carry a handgun when my crome did no invole a handgun. I think my for fourfathers fought fo that right for me. Why does a illegal mexican have more rights than an american born felon.We are people that pay taxs like everyone else. We put are shoes on one at a time like you. We have familys we need to support just like you. ONly god can judge>>>>>> Lance Dishman

54 agree | 48 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:00 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

flmom said:
I registered to vote today. I hope my vote makes a differance. Not every convicted felon is the same. Should we all be punished the same?

52 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

flmom said:
I was used as an example at a time when many women were being sentenced for being involved and supporting men who sold drugs. I myself had a very small child with this person and was in love, so I thought. I was charged and sentenced to 2 years in prison due the fact that I knew this person was doing what he was doing and I did nothing to stop this person. This was the roughest time in my life. I had never sold drugs myself and had no previous record. I was just that, guilty by association. I have alway been a productive member of society. I have served my time but this will follow me for life. I acept this and go on from day to day. This is very embarrassing for me. I cannot volunteer at my childrens schools or for their sports teams. I know most will say you get what you deserve for being involved with this person. I say to that...I have not seen or spoken to this person in 12 years. Should I pay for the rest of my life for a mistake I made when I was 18 years old? I registered to v

56 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:49 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 22, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

flmom said:
As of 2007, the law changed to make it much easier for Florida residents to vote after having been convicted of many felonies. According to the new law, if you have been convicted of a nonviolent felony, have fully completed your sentence and have paid all restitution, if ordered, your right to vote has been restored automatically. You do not have to do anything to restore your right to vote. I am very grateful that this has taken place. I have had this right taken away from me due to the fact that I have not always made responsible decisions in life. During my young adult life (12) years ago, I involved myself with a person who introduced me to a not so responsible way of life. I was used as an example at a time when many women were being sentenced for being involved and supporting men who sold drugs. I myself had a very small child with this person and was in love, so I thought. I was charged and sentenced to 2 years in prison due the fact that I knew this person was doing what he

49 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:00 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 20, 2008 re: "Thomas Schaller: Imagining a post-Sept. 11 world with Gore as president"

Examiner Reader said:
Emily wrote that that there have been no attacks since 9-11-01 "attack" (really and Inside Job, by the Rumsfeld/Cheney/BushCo Gangster Administration to Benifit Halliburton and other War Corporations) . . . WHAT ABOUT THE ANTHAX ATTACKS>>>?

52 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:28 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 15, 2008 re: "Peter Schweizer: Conservatives more honest than liberals?"

Examiner Reader said:
I really wish you would list the exact sources for those studies.

58 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:12 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 12, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

firstchoicepharmacy.co.uk said:
Hi Guys, Just though i would say Hi!, sorry if this is the wrong section mods! cheers

60 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:35 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Tax bandits will have plenty to celebrate this April 15"

Norah Schaefer said:
I would like you to include in the tax bandits the county of Dade in Florida that has tripled and quadrupled the property taxes in the past four years, forcing people who own rental property into foreclosure because they are unable to pay taxes like $14,000 on a small 2 bedroom 2 bath home. People are so quick to blame banks, but the reality is that many of my rental properties have old loans with mortgage payments of around $1,200 monthly and an additional escrow for taxes and three insurance policies around $ 1,800. (Just about the amount I get in rent). This is criminal and leaves the property owner unable to keep good rental property with good long term tenants. The only alternative is foreclosure. It makes me sick.

56 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:05 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Melanie Scarborough: Obama on Obama is scary truth"

Emily said:
Obamas tactics are very concerning considering the unstable world we live in today. After Bush (with congress support)announced war against Iraq. Did we have any more terrorist attacks on our soil? Nope. Not a single one. Obama isn't taking this seriously enough. "Obama will secure all loose nuclear materials in the world within four years. … "--- Four years. Need I say more? What will happen between then and now?

59 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
To say that felons should not be able to make or vote laws in becuase they dont follow them is not always the truth. I was conviced of a felony at the age of 20,(Im 36 now) and I served 3 1/2 years in prison for it. On my release I decided to change my life and becuase a LAW ABIDING citizen. In the 16 years since my trouble I have not been in trouble at all minus a few traffic tickets. While it was a very difficult climb out of being a felon to being a productive member of society, to this day I still seem to pay the price for my mistakes even though I am no longer considered a criminal ill always be a felon and always judged for it. I say ive been a productive member of society and I beleive my work ethic shows that. I have worked and thrived for companies like MS, HP, Apple, LSI Logic, and AOL. I make a decnt amount of money and pay my share of taxes... when do I get to start being a normal citizen? Dont I deserve it now? yet I still have issues renting apartments.

53 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:20 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 10, 2008 re: "Rep. Howard McKeon: Why I will vote to keep secret ballots for union elections"

Rick Veck said:
Republican spin, since when have they started looking after worker's best interest?

61 agree | 63 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:38 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 9, 2008 re: "Jay Ambrose: Free speech for me, not for thee"

Jay Ambrose said:
I'm a racist.

63 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:49 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 7, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

hythiptughFah said:
?????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ???? ????????? ?????????????? ????

57 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:58 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 5, 2008 re: "Paul Chesser: Beware of climate control"

Maddie said:
Im in First Lego leage and the research is on climate control! Thanks Paul Chesser

65 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:13 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 5, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
YES:they should have an opinion also.

63 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:03 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 2, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
If you agree to 'filter' who can vote and who can't, I say filter better: dont let felons vote, but also any other unqualified citizen due to theire incompetency in making a clear voting decision: any moron with an IQ lower than 120; the undeducated (higer degree or more required) ; the unemployed (you're not contributing to the economical advancement of this contry, you shoudn't have a say), any smoker, drinker or obese to fat (hey, you cant make healthy decisions for yourself, don't bother trying to decide this contries futur)...this list is endless, and in the end, any criteria can be 'logically justified' and I bet a lot of you dont mind until you're the one deemed as incompetent to vote. if basic human rights like the one to vote are not guaranteed for all, we fall back on totalitarism: sacrifice the small for the greater good. Not only was that the communist motto but Hitler was a strong believer too, well most dictators.

61 agree | 58 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:11 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2008 re: "Logan Gage: What does being president have to do with evolution?"

Examiner Reader said:
The Question should read; "What does being President have to do with belief in common ancestry". The term evolution is ambiguous. (not certain of any specific interpretation.)

59 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:51 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 1, 2008 re: "Logan Gage: What does being president have to do with evolution?"

StewDaPew said:
Allowing ideology and/or theology to dictate what is scientifically accurate or correct is fascism. Please stop demanding that others must share in your faith. One man's faith is anothers fiction. If you want to teach your children mythical yet comforting stories please do so in a private setting.

56 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:40 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 29, 2008 re: "Meghan Cox Gurdon: Uncommon death in the suburbs"

Islam = Fascism said:
This kind of garbage flourishes in a culturer where our own Federal Government, despite being involved in the Global War on (dont say Islamic) Terror, goes out of their way to court the worst leaders aad countries in the Muslim world, like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Pakistan, and mouths lying platitudes about Islam being a religion of peace.

61 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:53 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 28, 2008 re: "Robert Cox: GOP candidates bailing out of PBS All-American Forum debate"

bxtf opdiwrke said:
vxwre qcmswo xzts yfvcd iwjzdtbpf qziraosy tgmbhu

64 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:01 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 27, 2008 re: "La Shawn Barber: Local liberals learning new lessons on ‘diversity’"

no no los illegals said:
You should see Huntington Ave. in Alexandria (Fairfax Co.) - it's like a landfill was spread down the length of the street... What, they don't have trash cans in El Salvador (they certainly don't have recycling bins.. heh)?

65 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:38 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 25, 2008 re: "Sen. Bill Frist: Free trade pact will benefit U.S., India and strengthen democracy"

Examiner Reader said:
i always hang up on calls made by indi people, cant understand a word they say.

72 agree | 64 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:25 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 22, 2008 re: "Mary Katharine Ham: Just go to Don’t Go!"

Lifeofthemind said:
Mary Katherine, Please comment on the current conditions at TownHall. Since you departed have been reading a string of reports of anti-Semitic activty. This is most distressing. Perhaps you could help encourage them to clean their house. If quiet diplomacy does not work then you may feel a public statement is in order.

68 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:51 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 20, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

Examiner Reader said:
Folks I am going to ask a big favor of you..a friend of mine who has moved to the island of kythera,Greece is in the throes of will they or wont they get wind power on the island,,problems aplenty..could you send this article to him to help him in his quest. Here is e-mail address;james@kythera-family.net Thank you if you can...Geocoroneos@netzero.net

74 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:55 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

Examiner Reader said:
I've watched Picken's closely, he seems legitimate. As people have already mentioned he stands to profit from this venture. He requires our government to build and infrastructure that would allow for the energy produced by his wind farms to be sent to areas outside the heartland. The natural gas based cars are for fleets of cars not for the average citizen (I'm waiting for the volt). Most of you find yourselves in a bit of a pickle, you want cleaner renewable energies but you don't like big business. I loathe big government, as should any one who loves freedom and knows history. Big business needs to be regulated, we should see to that. We should not stifle new green energies because we don't trust big business; we should regulate big business because we don't trust them, let their greed power our homes and chevy volts, and let them compete with other greedy American business. I'd rather pay greedy Americans than transport 700 billion of our dollars to other countries.

74 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Timothy Carney: Shocking! Windmill owner wants subsidies!"

Examiner Reader said:
If he didn't own them you would be calling him a hypocrite.

70 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:45 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Should felons have the right to vote? - NO: Felon disenfranchisement is actually a good idea"

Examiner Reader said:
This article is flawed on so many levels, but I'll just touch on one here. People who have committed felonies and served their time deserve, on release, all of their rights back. The entire point of our prison system is to rehabilitate, yet when someone gets released we disenfranchise them and the system by saying that we don't trust them with a basic responsibility, like voting. It's hypocritical to say that a man being released from his debt to society is "free" when he can't do simple things like find a good job or live in "this" neighborhood or talk to "that" person. And it's made ten times worse when we deny them the most important right we have as Americans, and that's the right to better our situation and government by VOTING. You're effectively saying that an ex-con doesn't deserve any more rights than those he had while in prison except for a better view.

70 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement