Washington

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The Washington Hub

on Ballotpedia

Image:Red-checkmarksmall.jpg Washington on Ballotpedia

This page is a hub to connect you to everything on Ballotpedia about Washington and its ballotlaws, history, statewide ballot measures, ballot access, and more.

  • If you want to read about everything to do with ballots and ballot propositions in Washington, you've come to the right place. Use this page as a hub to find what you seek.


Washington ballot initiative news

Court orders new wording for King Co. initiative

Leading initiative proponent Tim Eyman won a court battle Sept. 11, 2008, to reword the ballot title of a measure that would make it harder to amend the King County charter by initiative.[1]

"They just put a stake in the heart of this thing," Eyman said. "There's no way the voters will vote for this now."[1]

The measure, to go before King County voters in November, would double the number of signatures needed to place proposed charter amendments on the ballot. The original ballot wording chosen by county officials didn't mention that the requirement would be increased, only that the measure would "establish a process and signature threshold for amendments to the King County Charter by citizen initiative, as provided in Ordinance No. 16221."

King County Superior Court Judge John Erlick ordered that the wording be changed to explain clearly that the measure would boost the number of signatures required from 10% to 20%.[1]

Eyman said that no county with a 20% signature theshold has ever had a successful initiative.

Supreme Court to rule on I-960

The Washington Supreme Court will begin the process Sept. 9, 2008, of deciding whether a provision of Initiative 960, which requires that all tax increases be approved by supermajority vote in both houses, is unconstitutional.[2]

Senate Democrats follow through with threatened lawsuit; Court denies request for rush ruling

The democratic leadership filed their expected lawsuit March 3, 2008, against the requirement for a supermajority to raise taxes imposed by I-960 and asked the state Supreme Court for an expedited ruling on the matter.[3]

The court denied the motion for a rush decision.

"This isn't about 960, and this isn't about undoing the will of the people," Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown (D-Spokane) said. "This is about defending the constitution and the Legislature's ability to pass laws under the constitution."

But The News Tribune disagreed: "Actually, it's precisely about undoing the will of the people, because that's the only effect the lawsuit would have. The people of Washington will understand that, even if the Democrats in the Legislature don't."[4]

...more Washington ballot initiative news

Washington ballot basics

Statewide ballot measures
County and city ballot measures
Laws and history
Managing, covering, and spinning initiatives
Vote fraud
General Information
Key government officials


Washington community on Ballotpedia

...get started now

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Seattle Post-Intelligencer: "Eyman wins court battle with county over ballot issue," Sept. 11, 2008
  2. Business Examiner: "Court to decide I-960 suit this fall," July 18, 2008
  3. Seatle Post-Intelligencer: "WA court denies Democrat's request for quick tax lawsuit ruling," March 6, 2008
  4. News Tribune: OPINION: "Senate lawsuit takes dead aim at voters' will," March 9, 2008
Personal tools