Court orders new wording for King Co. initiative
Leading initiative proponent Tim Eyman won a court battle Sept. 11, 2008, to reword the ballot title of a measure that would make it harder to amend the King County charter by initiative.[1]
"They just put a stake in the heart of this thing," Eyman said. "There's no way the voters will vote for this now."[1]
The measure, to go before King County voters in November, would double the number of signatures needed to place proposed charter amendments on the ballot. The original ballot wording chosen by county officials didn't mention that the requirement would be increased, only that the measure would "establish a process and signature threshold for amendments to the King County Charter by citizen initiative, as provided in Ordinance No. 16221."
King County Superior Court Judge John Erlick ordered that the wording be changed to explain clearly that the measure would boost the number of signatures required from 10% to 20%.[1]
Eyman said that no county with a 20% signature theshold has ever had a successful initiative.
|