Marriage-related ballot measures and initiatives

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on marriage
2008
Arizona Proposition 102
Arkansas Adoption Ban
California Proposition 8
Florida Marriage Amendment
2006
Arizona Prop 107
Colorado Prop 43
Alabama Marriage Act
Idaho Amendment 2
South Carolina
South Dakota Amendment C
Tennessee Marriage Act
Virginia Marriage Act
Wisconsin Question One

Contents

Most marriage-related ballot measures and initiatives offer definitions of marriage as a union of one man and one woman. In defining marriage in that fashion, proponents are saying that when a man and a man, or a woman and a woman, enter into a committed relationship with each other, their arrangements with each other should not legally be considered a marriage. These ballot measures are sometimes collectively referred to as Defense of Marriage Amendments or "DOMAS".

Altogether, voters in 29 states have passed state constitutional amendments that ban gay marriage: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment empowering the legislature to outlaw same-sex marriage; that state's lawmakers then did so in 1998.

However, not all marriage-related amendments and initiatives are about defining marriage; some of them relate to adoption, custody, divorce and other marriage-related issues.

2009

2008

Failed, abandoned, withdrawn, or headed for a future ballot

2007

2006

In 2006, voters in nine states had the opportunity to weigh in on ballot measures about how to define marriage. Each of the nine measures in one way or another was an attempt to legislatively define marriage as between a man and a woman. The Arizona initiative lost, representing the first time that a marriage-related amendment has been defeated.

Initiated measures in 2006

Legislative referrals in 2006

2006 campaign finance

According to a report from the National Institute on Money in State Politics[1]

  • $18 million cumulatively was spent by political committees working for and against the nine proposals.
  • Opponents of the measures outspent advocates by about 3-1.
  • Only in Tennessee did supporters raise more money than opponents
  • The Arlington Group contributed $1.65 million through "member groups and affiliates".
  • Gay and lesbian rights groups contributed $5.64 million, mostly through the Gill Action Fund.
  • Tim Gill and his connections cumulatively contributed $5.28 million to defeat the measures.
  • Churches and their employees gave $234,344 to support the measures, versus $1.9 million in 2004.

Kansans vote on marriage in 2005

Thirteen states vote on marriage in 2004

Primary election ballots

November ballot

Nevada re-votes on marriage in 2002

Three DOMAs in 2000

1998

  • Alaska Marriage Amendment (1998), amending "the Declaration of Rights section of the Alaska Constitution to limit marriage. The amendment would say that to be valid, a marriage may exist only between one man and one woman." Passed with 68.1% of the vote.

1992

External links

Notes

  1. The Money Behind the 2006 Marriage Amendments from the National Institute on Money in State Politics, July 23, 2007 (PDF)
  2. New York Times, "Ballot initiative that would thwart gay marriage is embroiling California", February 25, 2000
Personal tools