Laws governing the initiative process in Ohio

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Ballot law
Image:ExamineBallot.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
2009 lawsuits
Statutory changes
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges

Contents

The laws governing initiatives and referenda in Ohio are contained in:

  • Article II, sections 1, 1a and 1g of the Ohio Constitution.
  • Article XVI, section 1.
  • Ohio Revised Codes (RC) 3501.05, 3501.38, 3501.381, 3501.382, 3503.06, 3513.10.
  • ORC Chapter 3519.

For details, see: Procedures for qualifying an initiative in Ohio.

Initiative and Referendum in the Ohio Constitution

Amending the constitution

§1a The first aforestated power reserved by the people is designated the initiative, and the signatures of ten per centum of the electors shall be required upon a petition to propose an amendment to the constitution. When a petition signed by the aforesaid required number of electors, shall have been filed with the secretary of state, and verified as herein provided, proposing an amendment to the constitution, the full text of which shall have been set forth in such petition, the secretary of state shall submit for the approval or rejection of the electors, the proposed amendment, in the manner hereinafter provided, at the next succeeding regular or general election in any year occurring subsequent to ninety days after the filing of such petition. The initiative petitions, above described, shall have printed across the top thereof: “Amendment to the Constitution Proposed by Initiative Petition to be Submitted Directly to the Electors." (1912)[1]

Initiative to enact laws

§1b When at any time, not less than ten days prior to the commencement of any session of the General Assembly, there shall have been filed with the secretary of state a petition signed by three per centum of the electors and verified as herein provided, proposing a law, the full text of which shall have been set forth in such petition, the secretary of state shall transmit the same to the General Assembly as soon as it convenes. If said proposed law shall be passed by the General Assembly, either as petitioned for or in an amended form, it shall be subject to the referendum. If it shall not be passed, or if it shall be passed in an amended form, or if no action shall be taken thereon within four months from the time it is received by the General Assembly, it shall be submitted by the secretary of state to the electors for their approval or rejection at the next regular or general election, if such submission shall be demanded by supplementary petition verified as herein provided and signed by not less than three per centum of the electors in addition to those signing the original petition, which supplementary petition must be signed and filed with the secretary of state within ninety days after the proposed law shall have been rejected by the General Assembly or after the expiration of such term of four months, if no action has been taken thereon, or after the law as passed by the General Assembly shall have been filed by the governor in the office of the secretary of state.

The proposed law shall be submitted in the form demanded by such supplementary petition which form shall be either as first petitioned for or with any amendment or amendments which may have been incorporated therein by either branch or by both branches, of the General Assembly. If a proposed law so submitted is approved by a majority of the electors voting thereon, it shall be the law and shall go into effect as herein provided in lieu of any amended form of said law which may have been passed by the General Assembly, and such amended law passed by the General Assembly shall not go into effect until and unless the law proposed by supplementary petition shall have been rejected by the electors. All such initiative petitions, last above described, shall have printed across the top thereof, in case of proposed laws: “Law Proposed by Initiative Petition First to be Submitted to the General Assembly.”

Ballots shall be so printed as to permit an affirmative or negative vote upon each measure submitted to the electors. Any proposed law or amendment to the constitution submitted to the electors as provided in section la and section 1b, if approved by a majority of the electors voting thereon, shall take effect thirty days after the election at which it was approved and shall be published by the secretary of state. If conflicting proposed laws or confl icting proposed amendments to the constitution shall be approved at the same election by a majority of the total number of votes cast for and against the same, the one receiving the highest number of affirmative votes shall be the law, or in the case of amendments to the constitution shall be the amendment to the constitution. No law proposed by initiative petition and approved by the electors shall be subject to the veto of the governor. (1912)

Referendum to challenge laws enacted by General Assembly

§1c The second aforestated power reserved by the people is designated the referendum, and the signatures of six per centum of the electors shall be required upon a petition to order the submission to the electors of the state for their approval or rejection, of any law, section of any law or any item in any law appropriating money passed by the General Assembly. No law passed by the General Assembly shall go into effect until ninety days after it shall have been filed by the governor in the office of the secretary of state, except as herein provided.

When a petition, signed by six per centum of the electors of the state and verified as herein provided, shall have been filed with the secretary of state within ninety days after any law shall have been filed by the governor in the offi ce of the secretary of state, ordering that such law, section of such law or any item in such law appropriating money be submitted to the electors of the state for their approval or rejection, the secretary of state shall submit to the electors of the state for their approval or rejection such law, section or item, in the manner herein provided, at the next succeeding regular or general election in any year occurring subsequent to sixty days after the filing of such petition, and no such law, section or item shall go into effect until and unless approved by a majority of those voting upon the same. If, however, a referendum petition is filed against any such section or item, the remainder of the law shall not thereby be prevented or delayed from going into effect. (1912)

Exemptions and limitations

Emergency laws not subject to referendum

§1d Laws providing for tax levies, appropriations for the current expenses of the state government and state institutions, and emergency laws necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, shall go into immediate effect. Such emergency laws upon a yea and nay vote must receive the vote of two thirds of all the members elected to each branch of the General Assembly, and the reasons for such necessity shall be set forth in one section of the law, which section shall be passed only upon a yea and nay vote, upon a separate roll call thereon. The laws mentioned in this section shall not be subject to the referendum. (1912)

Powers, limitation of use

§1e The powers defined herein as the “initiative” and “referendum” shall not be used to pass a law authorizing any classification of property for the purpose of levying different rates of taxation thereon or of authorizing the levy of any single tax on land or land values or land sites at a higher rate or by a different rule than is or may be applied to improvements thereon or to personal property. (1912)

Legal challenges to Ohio laws

Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters

On November 27, 2006, in her ruling on Citizens for Tax Reform v. Deters, federal court judge Susan Dlott found that Ohio's law ORC 3599.111 that forbade paying petitioners by the signature was unconstitutional.

The decision was appealed to the Sixth Circuit, where Dlott's ruling was upheld. Ohio has indicated that it may appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Moore v. Brunner

On June 2, 2008, in the case of Moore v. Brunner, a federal judge agreed with third party presidential candidate Brian Moore's legal claim that Ohio's rule about non-resident circulators is unconstitutional. The judge issued a restraining order enjoining the Ohio Secretary of State from enforcing the law.

Changes in the process

The Ohio State Legislature placed a statewide ballot proposition on the November 4, 2008 ballot, the Initiative Deadlines Act, that changes the deadline for submitting signatures on initiatives from 90 days pre-election to 125 days pre-election. Ohio voters approved the amendment. This change, and other changes to make it harder to qualify initiatives for the Ohio ballot, are supported by the Ohio spokesperson for the National Federation of Independent Businesses, who says that it is too easy for put initiatives on the ballot.[2]

References

  1. Full text of the Ohio Constitution
  2. Petition process called into question

See also

Personal tools