Arizona Proposition 107 (2006)

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on marriage
2008
Arizona Proposition 102
Arkansas Adoption Ban
California Proposition 8
Florida Marriage Amendment
2006
Arizona Prop 107
Colorado Prop 43
Alabama Marriage Act
Idaho Amendment 2
South Carolina
South Dakota Amendment C
Tennessee Marriage Act
Virginia Marriage Act
Wisconsin Question One

Arizona Proposition 107, also called the Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Arizona Relating to the Protection of Marriage Act, appeared on the November 7, 2006 ballot in Arizona. It failed, with 721,489 (48%) votes in favor and 775,498 (52%) votes against. Prop 107's defeat marked the first time that voters had rejected such an amendment. The measure made it to the ballot as an citizen initiative.

In 2008, opponents of gay marriage tried again with the Marriage Protection Amendment on the November 2008 ballot, which was approved by voters.

If Prop 107 had passed in 2006, it would have added this language to the Arizona Constitution:

"To preserve and protect marriage in this state, only a union between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage by this state or its political subdivisions and no legal status for unmarried persons shall be created or recognized by this state or its political subdivisions that is similar to that of marriage."

Contents

Text of the proposal

The language that appeared on the ballot:

ANALYSIS BY LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

Pursuant to Arizona state statute, marriage between persons of the same sex is void and prohibited. Arizona law does not recognize a marriage contracted in any other state or country that is between two persons of the same sex.

Proposition 107 would amend the Arizona Constitution to provide that in order to preserve and protect marriage:

1. Only a union between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage by the State of Arizona or its cities, towns, counties or districts.

2. The State of Arizona and its cities, towns, counties or districts shall not create or recognize a legal status for unmarried persons that is similar to marriage.

FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT

State law requires the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) Staff to prepare a summary of the fiscal impact of certain ballot measures. Proposition 107 is not projected to have a state cost.

Funding of the campaigns for and against

Two committees formed to support the measure: "Protect Marriage Arizona", which spent $1,019,143, and "Defend Marriage Arizona", which spent $19,950.

Two committees also formed to oppose the measure: "Arizona Together Opposed", which spent $1,831,504, and "No on 107", which spent $66,189.

Donors to committees supporting Proposition 107

Under Construction.

Donors to committees opposing Proposition 107

Donors to this group included William Lewis ($715,000), the Human Rights Campaign ($155,055), the Coalition for Progress ($100,000), the Gill Action Fund ($25,000) and Jonathan Lewis ($5,000).

See also

External links

References



To connect to everything on Ballotpedia about Arizona and its ballot—laws, history, statewide ballot measures, ballot access, and more, visit:

Personal tools