Chief Justice of India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (May 2008) |
This article is part of the series: |
Other countries · Politics Portal |
The term Chief Justice of India refers to the highest judge in the Supreme Court of India. This also makes it the highest judicial position obtainable by a judge in India. The Chief Justice not only heads the administrative functions of the Supreme Court but also sits actively as a presiding judge in Supreme court of India.
On the administrative side, the Chief Justice carries out the following functions;
- allocation of matters to various other judges of the Supreme Court
- maintenance of roaster
- appointment of court officials
- general and other miscellaneous matters relating to supervision and functioning of the Supreme Court.
As the chief judge, the Chief Justice is also responsible for the allocation of cases and appointment of constitutional benches which deal with important matters of law. In terms of Article 145 of the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure of 1966, the Chief Justice allocates the work to the other judges who are bound to refer the matter to him in case they require the matter to be looked into by a bench of higher strength.
Contents |
[edit] Appointment of Chief Justice of India
Under the Constitution of India, in terms of Article 124 the manner of appointment of the judges to the Supreme Court was provided. However there was no specific provision as to the appointment of the Chief Justice to the Supreme Court. Therefore the process for the appointment of the judges to the Supreme Court was followed for the Chief Justice as well. This in practice meant that the most senior judge in the Supreme Court would be proposed by the Government of India to the President who would approve the same and thus the Chief Justice would be appointed in consultation with such other judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts in the States as the President may think necessary. Here seniority did not mean the age but meant the seniority within the Supreme Court. Therefore the judge with the most experience in the Supreme Court was generally nominated by the Government and he would be appointed as the Chief Justice.
However this convention was breach on a number of occasions, most notable of which was the appointment of Chief Justice A.N. Ray who was appointed as the Chief Justice superseding three judges who were senior to him. This was done during the time when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister of India. This was allegedly done as he was considered liberal and understood to be supporting the government in its actions and Indira Gandhi, who at that times was facing constitutional crisis, with her appointment being challenged by activist Raj Narain and major legal barriers remained to her continuance as the Prime Minister.
After the Emergency, the Supreme Court in a series of historical decisions conferred a lot of powers to itself. One of these was the declaration (in the constitutional bench S.P. Gupta - II case) that the Government of India would be bound to nominate only the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court for the position of Chief Justice, thereby ruling out any possible abuse by the Government or its ability to influence the judiciary. Since then the convention has been followed without any exceptions.
Once appointed, the Chief Justice remains in office until his retirement or unless removed by impeachment or by resignation.
[edit] Trivia
Lists of miscellaneous information should be avoided. Please relocate any relevant information into appropriate sections or articles. (November 2008) |
- In terms of Article 60 of the Constitution of India the Chief Justice of India administers oath of office to the President of India.
- In the absence of the Vice-President of India and the President of India, it is the Chief Justice who serves as the Acting-President of India.
- The Chief Justice is the ex-officio Chancellor/Visitor to most autonomous law schools in India
- There has been no female Chief Justice of India till date. Justice Ruma Pal, who was appointed as the judge of the Supreme Court on 28 January 2000 could have been the first female Chief Justice of India had she been appointed two days earlier. However on 26 January 2000, Justice Y.K. Sabharwal was appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court and thus he acquired seniority over her by two days and went on to become the Chief Justice of India.
- Justice H. J. Kania who became the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was in fact the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of India, which was the predecessor to the Supreme Court of India, before being transferred to and being appointed the Chief Justice of India.
[edit] Chief Justices of Supreme Court of India
No. | Name | Took office | Left office | Originating State | Major decisions during tenure as Chief Justice |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | H. J. Kania | 15 August 1947 | 16 November 1951 | Bombay (now Maharashtra) | AK Gopalan v. Union of India |
02 | M. P. Sastri | 16 November 1951 | 3 January 1954 | Madras (now Tamil Nadu) | |
03 | Mehr Chand Mahajan | 3 January 1954 | 22 December 1954 | Lahore/Kashmir | |
04 | B. K. Mukherjea | 22 December 1954 | 31 January 1956 | West Bengal | |
05 | Sudhi Ranjan Das | 31 January 1956 | 30 September 1959 | West Bengal | |
06 | Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha | 30 September 1959 | 31 January 1964 | Bihar | |
07 | P. B. Gajendragadkar | 31 January 1964 | 15 March 1966 | Bombay (now Maharashtra) | |
08 | A. K. Sarkar | 16 March 1966 | 29 June 1966 | West Bengal | |
09 | K. Subba Rao | 30 June 1966 | 11 April 1967 | Madras (now Tamil Nadu) | Golak Nath vs. The State of Punjab |
10 | Kailas Nath Wanchoo | 12 April 1967 | 24 February 1968 | Uttar Pradesh | |
11 | M. Hidayatullah | 25 February 1968 | 16 December 1970 | present Chattisgarh | |
12 | Jayantilal Chhotalal Shah | 17 December 1970 | 21 January 1971 | present Gujarat | |
13 | S. M. Sikri | 22 January 1971 | 25 April 1973 | Punjab | Kesavananda Bharati vs. The State of Kerala |
14 | A. N. Ray | 25 April 1973 | 28 January 1977 | West Bengal | ADM Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla |
15 | Mirza Hameedullah Beg | 29 January 1977 | 21 February 1978 | Uttar Pradesh | |
16 | Y. V. Chandrachud | 22 February 1978 | 11 July 1985 | Bombay (now Maharashtra) | |
17 | P. N. Bhagwati | 12 July 1985 | 20 December 1986 | Bombay (now Maharashtra) | |
18 | R. S. Pathak | 21 December 1986 | 6 June 1989 | Uttar Pradesh | |
19 | E. S. Venkataramiah | 19 June 1989 | 17 December 1989 | Mysore (now Karnataka) | |
20 | S. Mukharji | 18 December 1989 | 25 September 1990 | West Bengal | |
21 | Ranganath Misra | 25 September 1990 | 24 November 1991 | Orissa | |
22 | Kamal Narain Singh | 25 November 1991 | 12 December 1991 | Uttar Pradesh | |
23 | M. H. Kania | 13 December 1991 | 17 November 1992 | Maharashtra | |
24 | Lalit Mohan Sharma | 18 November 1992 | 11 February 1993 | Bihar | |
25 | M. N. Venkatachaliah | 12 February 1993 | 24 October 1994 | Karnataka | |
26 | A. M. Ahmadi | 25 October 1994 | 24 March 1997 | Gujarat | |
27 | J. S. Verma | 25 March 1997 | 18 January 1998 | Madhya Pradesh | |
28 | M. M. Punchhi | 18 January 1998 | 9 October 1998 | Punjab | |
29 | A. S. Anand | 10 October 1998 | 1 November 2001 | Jammu & Kashmir | |
30 | S. P. Bharucha | 2 November 2001 | 6 May 2002 | Maharashtra | |
31 | B. N. Kirpal | 6 May 2002 | 11 November 2002 | Delhi | |
32 | G. B. Pattanaik | 11 November 2002 | 19 December 2002 | Orissa | |
33 | V. N. Khare | 19 December 2002 | 2 May 2004 | Uttar Pradesh | Best Bakery Case, T.M.A. Pai v. Union of India (reservation in private educational institutions) |
34 | Rajendra Babu | 2 May 2004 | 1 June 2004 | Karnataka | |
35 | R. C. Lahoti | 1 June 2004 | 1 November 2005 | Uttar Pradesh | |
36 | Y. K. Sabharwal | 1 November 2005 | 14 January 2007 | Delhi | Land Ceiling Case (M.C. Mehta v. Union of India) |
37 | K. G. Balakrishnan | 14 January 2007 | (incumbent) | Kerala | OBC Reservation case (Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India) |
[edit] Other notable judges
Since the appointment to the office of the Chief Justice of India has been by convention on basis of seniority, the procedure has been criticised by various jurists and cosntitutional experts as being averse to talent and non-recognition of leading abilities. On this count various judges of the Supreme Court are named who showed inspiring leadership ability but because of the seniority rule could not become the Chief Justice of India. Some of these names have been;
- Justice H.R. Khanna who delivered the landmark dissent in Habeas Corpus case.
- Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer known for his human right approach and literary merit in decision-making.
- Justice R.S. Sarkaria known for his immaculate understanding of Administrative law etc.
- Justice O.P. Chennappa Reddy for his landmark decisions on constitutional law.