Duane Gilbert Fornall, 41, and Michele Lee Fornall, 34, were charged with the felony offenses Tuesday during a hearing in Missoula County Justice Court. The husband and wife each face four counts of sexual intercourse without consent, five counts of incest and one count of accountability to rape. Both remain in custody at the Missoula County Detention Center on $500,000 bail.
Missoula police detectives began investigating the couple last week after one of the alleged victims told a counselor that her father was sexually abusing her and her three sisters. All four girls are under the age of 14.
According to charging documents filed Tuesday, Michele Fornall told police detectives that the couple had been having sexual intercourse with all four girls every weekend for the past year. The woman said she had also been having sex with her son, and that Duane Fornall had participated.
Duane Fornall admitted having sex with two of the girls every weekend for the past year.
Incest carries a maximum penalty of 100 years in prison and a $50,000 fine, while sexual intercourse without consent carries a maximum penalty of 100 years or life.
Add your comment now! Write your comment in the form below.
(Email address is for verification only. If you'd like to email a story, look for the link above)
JR wrote on May 13, 2009 8:14 AM:
Naked on a red ant pile would be sufficient. "
GU wrote on May 13, 2009 9:43 AM:
Les wrote on May 13, 2009 1:32 PM:
Lorrie wrote on May 13, 2009 2:17 PM:
Jen wrote on May 13, 2009 2:53 PM:
If I'm way out of line here I'm sorry, but it's the first thing that came to my mind. "
ymdana wrote on May 13, 2009 7:42 PM:
ymdana wrote on May 13, 2009 7:42 PM:
Debbie Shepard wrote on May 13, 2009 11:02 PM:
WitchHunt wrote on May 13, 2009 11:06 PM:
Who cares about the feelings or welfare of the children when there is tantilizing story about sex to fill the pages.
And to the rest of the posters, notice the word "charged" is used in the article, not "convicted". But who cares - right.
These type of charges have a very poor history of ever turning out to be true.
Hitler and the Nazis had very little on the Child Protective Services in this town, you'd find that out very fast if you've ever know anyone that had an encounter with them.
Imagine if you ran an agency and at the end of the year you only had a couple of small fish to show for all your work, or put more blunty, for all the government funding you get, that doesn't bode well for your job security, couple that with the fact that you have a personal adjenda, and have been annonited with special legal powers and are here "to help the children". Then all you need is some teenage kid to say something about their parents, oh a teenage kid would never lie or be deveous. Well you should get the point, what you have is a receipe for disaster. I've seen this more than once. Our society should kleens itself immediately of the child protective services as if they were a Third Reich incarnation. "
Bravo wrote on May 13, 2009 11:18 PM:
Even if this story turns out to be true, which I doubt, that agency does need to be gutted and started over. Our kids deserve more than a bunch of hacks out on regular witchhunts parading as justice. Some of the stuff they've tried to pull is absolutely criminal, in total violation and an abomination of our freedoms here in america. What they've done to decent innocent people, people who's virtue far exceeds that of their accusers is dispicable to say the very least. "
SomthinNotRight wrote on May 13, 2009 11:24 PM:
Miranda wrote on May 14, 2009 8:23 AM:
kathy wrote on May 14, 2009 8:27 AM:
B wrote on May 14, 2009 11:45 AM:
Either way, there are a whole bunch of lives ruined. Please reserve judgement until this case is heard. "
AfewPoints wrote on May 14, 2009 12:28 PM:
1. That the parents did this.
2. That normal kids would make up such a story.
3. The justice system released the families name.
4. The Missoulian put the name in the paper.
Personly, I find 2,3, and 4 very easy to beleive.
Miranda Wrote
"Normal kids just don't think that way" - my dear Miranda you are naive beyond beleif. Besides not all kids are normal - an 11 year old kalispeel kid just shoot and killed his father the other day, kids do unbeivable stuff all the time, even in good homes with decent well intentioned parents.
Of course it is really sad if this story turns out to be true - but what is really reprehensible here is the behavior of the autorities and the newspaper for printing the names, they are either ignorant beyond beleif or simple don't give a crap about the kids as long as they get their job done, you pick which one you think. So they have already proved their worth (or worthlessness) in our society, but that of the parents is still to be determined as of yet they are only charged. The others have already convicted themselves when they released and printed the names. "
sick wrote on May 14, 2009 12:38 PM:
Someone should check into your background and see what you have done to innocent children, if for one second you find this behavior ok, why would any kid make up a story like this and the parents admit to it, if it didnt happen, you are sick and should be punished just as much as them, "
ToSicko wrote on May 14, 2009 7:06 PM:
you wrote in reference to me:
"for one second you find this behavior ok"
Did I say it was ok ? You need to check in with the nearest hospital immediately and tell them you are having delusions. Perhaps your medical mariquana doseage needs to be scaled back a bit, maybe cut the ponytail, lose a couple of that tatoos... Geez don't we get them all in Missoula, where do these people come from.
You wrote:
"why would any kid make up a story like this and the parents admit to it"
Mr Sick you are suffering from a common delusion, that being that if you can't understand something therefore it can't happen. Do you understand E = MC^2, probably not, so I guess that means your furnace shouldn't be working - you are a baffon, can you undertand that.
An 11 year old killed his father last week, can you explain that ? Whether you can or can't doesn't mean it did happen.
And lastly, a common practice of the Child Protective Services is to threaten and use coercive tactics to get statements out of parents. So these people admitting to it doesn't surprise me in the least.
Remember that they are still only 'charged'. Innocent until proven guilty. "
been there... wrote on May 15, 2009 1:59 PM:
He served only 3 years in prison and is now out living his life with nothing more than to register as a sex offender.
my mother divorced him and was able, thank God, to keep all of us kids due to her honesty and cooperation with CFS in our town.
if it were not for the bravery of my older sister in stepping forward, who knows where we would be today? Each of my sisters and I deal with the past in our own way, but have done many years (cumulatively and individually) of counseling to be able to have "normal" lives. everyone in our town knew who we were and what happened to us based on our stepfather's name being printed in the paper.
i pray these children will not face the same shame our family did based on parental actions. may justice be served. "
Disgusted wrote on May 15, 2009 3:16 PM:
Look, if their children (not one but ALL of them) are saying their parents molested them, and parents are saying yep we did that, people do need to perk up and listen. Yes, teens make up lies about their parents, we have had that very thing happen to us. And unequivocally, we have DENIED it because it was a LIE. Never did CPS or any other agency try to coerce us into saying we did something that we did NOT do. And by the way, the article said one of their girls told...we don't know the age of that child so let's not assume it was a teen huh?
Lastly, this has nothing to do with the boy who shot his father in Kalispell. How can any of you even try to compare the two? "
Jo wrote on May 15, 2009 3:46 PM:
We used to have a problem with those claiming victims had false memories. Now it's false allegations. Anything to deny abuse.
I work in domestic violence. At least 3 women are killed a day. I would gladly give up my job (as would most of us in the abuse field) for there to be non-violence. "
WaitAndSee wrote on May 15, 2009 8:52 PM:
Second, if this story was about some women killing her husband, people like you would be the first to say, let's wait and see what happens after the facts come out and what the jury says.
Unfortunately, there is nothing we love more in today's society then to have someone we can all come together over and hate with venom, in this case sex offenders - mostly because its a male crime, with the sightest hint of proof we're ready to shoot them, witnessed the post on here that have already convicted them.
Sorry but I've hear, WAY to many stories of abuse by the CPS, so much so that whenever they are involved in anything I immediately assume they are on another whichhunt. I saw first hand their heavy handed tatics here in Missoula - and have heard other horrors stories. More than a few groups have appealed to authorities to rein them in.
Are the people in this story guilty ? - We'll see, but I've read about too many of these trumped up cases, confessions not withstanding to make any assumptions anymore - but you feel free too.
My guess is that if you never hear anything about the final outcome - it's because they dropped the case. "
WaitAndSee wrote on May 15, 2009 9:06 PM:
Your off on the deep end - twisting what previous posts have said. Let's hope you don't get picked for jury duty.
Good thing we don't live in the old south, you people appear the kind that would be dragging people out of the jail before the trial and string them up to the nearest tree.
You wanna find someone guilty - find the authorities and the paper for releasing those names. If things weren't bad enough for these poor kids, now they have to live with their names being thrown out into the public spotlight....that is criminal in my book and it should be in your's too.
Unfortunately the slobbering masses love their titilating sex stories, can't wait to string up another culprit, preferbably some white guy, and the press loves it....the childrens feelings be damned if it makes good press....and everyone goes around saying "the poor children" what a bunch of hypocrates.
You people need someone to hate so bad you can't wait for the next pervert to come along to release your venom in, whether their guilty or not. "
RealProof wrote on May 15, 2009 9:15 PM:
"I work in domestic violence. At least 3 women are killed a day."
Well there you have it - proof, that makes these people guilty to. Yea so what women shoot their husbands everyday of the week too. What does that have to do with this story ?
Nobody ever said abuse didn't happen, or these people might not be guilty - did they ? You need to take a class to improve your cognitive skills and basic reading comprehension. "
Murphy wrote on May 16, 2009 9:39 AM:
1.10% of victims will report the abuse.
2.5% of the accused will admit to the accusations
3.Child molesters are busy--15% of the adult population was molested as children--15% of the adult population of Missoula.
4. The average costs per child paid by society will be $250K in lost productivity and health care--according to the Department of Justice.
6. As for the media here: The Missoulian not only named the family, without noting it had the children's permission---but the reporter repeated the accuseds' description of the crimes as "having sex." "
2Cents wrote on May 16, 2009 12:35 PM:
Are those government numbers you are citing ? A person would be very naive in this day and age to put an truth what so ever in government numbers.
I'd love to know how they came up with this one -
"The average costs per child paid by society will be $250K in lost productivity and health care"
Anyone with any insight knows that there is a strong bias and incentive to exaggerate government study numbers for the benefit of contiuned and increased funding of their study. If you don't find a problem you simply don't get more funding and the bigger the problem, the more you get. Rarely does a study ever find nothing wrong - well I've never seen one.
Another flaw in your logic. if the children gave persmission to release names...the authorities and newpaper in this case should have enough sense to not print them, for obvious reasons. Do you think these kids are old enough to give 'consent' for certain acts, of course not, so I doubt they know the ramifications of releasing their names either - these poor children are getting exploited from everyside. "
Cold North Wind wrote on May 16, 2009 9:38 PM:
I like the red ant hill idea - -or- Tim's - Maybe the names are already "fake"- and two of the children can stay now with their mother- with no law forced visits to a rapist - -maybe that mom and kids can move- fast.Couldn't the powers that be- help out with new names and moving costs ? relocation costs ? oh wait- that would be too logical - "
tim mickey wrote on May 13, 2009 6:41 AM: