Subscribe to New Scientist

Environment

Feeds

Home |Environment |Science in Society |Opinion | News

Wild text messages from the mean rivers of New York

The Bronx river is not a New York neighbourhood where you expect to find a celebrity. But José is no ordinary celebrity. He's the first beaver to live in the Big Apple for 200 years – and now you can text him to find out how he's doing.

The artists, engineers and designers of the Environmental Health Clinic at New York University have deployed buoys in the Bronx and East rivers that show the public what the city's submerged wildlife is up to.

The buoys – tubes that emerge just above the surface and hang down a couple of metres below – are equipped with sonar that detects moving fish and mammals, and sensors that provide information on water quality, such as the amount of oxygen dissolved in the water. Distinct sonar signatures reflected from the different animals allows species to be identified.

The aquatic life creates a light show above water that mirrors the animals' movements: each time an animal passes by, a blue diode lights up at the top of the buoy – see video here.

Fishy business

But you don't have to be nearby to benefit. The information can also be transmitted by text message to anyone with a US phone.

Over the next month, New Yorkers will be invited to text "EastRiver" or "BronxRiver" to 41411: they will be informed of the number and species of fish that are moving around the arrays at that moment.

And there's a twist: the text messages read as though the animals themselves had sent them. So at 1.52 am on Friday, a herring in the East river texted New Scientist: "It's pretty nice down here." Dissolved oxygen, apparently, was higher than the week before.

When we checked conditions across town in the Bronx, we got a message from José – named after José Serrano, the Bronx congressman who has supported work to clean up the river: "Just swung by the art centre. Water feels good. The dissolved oxygen must be pretty high today."

Project leader Natalie Jeremijenko is an artist, an engineer and director of the Environmental Health Clinic. She wants to eliminate the "do not disturb" approach to urban environments and instead encourage people to interact with their natural surroundings in an informed way.

"People look at the rivers and just see a mirror surface," Jeremijenko says. She hopes that her project will reveal the water's "insides" to the public and make them more curious about it. She also hopes that by "interacting" with the fish and texting the buoys regularly they might become more familiar with the water conditions that encourage a lively aquatic environment and those that keep fish away.

The project, called Amphibious Architecture, is part of the exhibition Toward the Sentient City, which opened yesterday at the Architectural League, New York.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2

Add Video Too

Mon Sep 21 18:08:00 BST 2009 by Jeremy

It would be a small step to add miniature cameras to the buoys and be able to send pictures of what's happening underwater.

Add Video Too

Mon Sep 21 19:11:24 BST 2009 by RK
http://twitter.com/rukku

Ahttp://www.. they don't Twitter? It would've been great if they Twittered :D

Protection

Mon Sep 21 19:40:12 BST 2009 by James Wilson

wouldn't the lights themselves disturb the natural environment in the river?

Protection

Tue Sep 22 01:09:02 BST 2009 by Kim

I imagine there's a lot of light pollution already - a little more on top of a buoy doesn't seemlike it's going to make much of a difference...

Good Idea!

Wed Sep 23 08:49:20 BST 2009 by Natalia

as a zoologist i think this is such a good idea...if a balance can be struck between showing people the wildlife and nurturing its needs, the public could finally have a reason to care about and want to understand the animals we share earth with

Comments 1 | 2

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Network of floating sonar tubes at Pier 35 in the East River.  (Image: New York City Economic Development Corporation)

Network of floating sonar tubes at Pier 35 in the East River. (Image: New York City Economic Development Corporation)

ADVERTISEMENT

Climate change may trigger earthquakes and volcanoes

18:53 23 September 2009

Even tiny changes in weather and climate can trigger geological disasters, so we should be wary of provoking the planet further

Omens are worsening for Copenhagen climate talks

17:59 23 September 2009

Nothing said yesterday by leaders of China and the US take us any closer to a new agreement on carbon emissions

US dirty bomb attack would bring clean-up chaos

15:08 23 September 2009

The government has no strategy for cleaning up the radioactive mess after an attack, an official watchdog warns

Competition: Track your trash

13:19 23 September 2009

New Scientist has teamed up with MIT's SENSEable City Lab to launch the British arm of their Trash Track experiment. To get involved, enter our competition

Latest news

How far could you travel in a spaceship?

18:54 23 September 2009

An astronaut could reach the edge of the cosmos and return – as long as they know when to slam on the brakes

Climate change may trigger earthquakes and volcanoes

18:53 23 September 2009

Even tiny changes in weather and climate can trigger geological disasters, so we should be wary of provoking the planet further

Asteroid attack: putting Earth's defences to the test

18:51 23 September 2009

A massive rock will strike the planet in 72 hours. Would we prepare or panic? The US air force tried to find out

The population delusion

18:40 23 September 2009

There are 7 billion of us and counting, but the raw numbers hide a multitude of complexities

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access