SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

Tech

Feeds

Home |Tech |Environment | News

Stealthy wind turbines aim to disappear from radar screens

For all their environmental appeal, wind turbines have few fans in the military or among air traffic controllers. Strange as it might seem, radar systems easily confuse the turbines' rotating blades with passing aircraft. Now a company has developed a "stealthy", radar-invisible blade that could see many more wind farms springing up across the UK and elsewhere.

The concern over wind turbines is delaying their deployment. According to the UK Government's Department of Energy and Climate Change, plans for over 5 gigawatts of wind power are currently stalled by aviators' objections .

It is no less of an issue elsewhere: last month the German army blocked investment in some new wind power projects because of radar interference concerns. Even in the US, where the population density is lower, the Department of Defense is investigating whether turbines could weaken radar defences.

At the root of the problem is the fact that traditional radar sweeps across an area, scanning a particular location only once every few seconds. It detects moving objects by looking for a Doppler shift in the reflected radar signals. If an aircraft flies low over a wind farm, it becomes difficult to distinguish whether those shifts have come from the aircraft's movement or the rotating turbine blades.

Concealed blades

One solution would be to require all aircraft that fly over wind farms to carry transponders to identify themselves, says Nicola Vaughan, head of aviation at the British Wind Energy Association. Indeed, she says transponder-mandatory zones already operate over two offshore wind farms in UK waters. However, this is more problematic for land-based farms as large numbers of light aircraft, which generally don't have transponders, fly over them.

Vestas, a wind turbine manufacturer, may have a better answer. Last week it carried out the first test of a "stealthy" turbine blade, built in collaboration with defence technology company Qinetiq.

It is relatively easy to hide objects from radar by applying an absorbent coating – an approach used to disguise vehicles. This is no good for wind turbines, though. "The mass of the blade is critical," says Steve Appleton of Vestas. Blades can be up to 45 metres long, so slapping on a thick, radar-absorbent coating of paint would add substantial extra weight. "The blades flex in the wind too," Appleton adds, so any coating is likely to crack and flake off.

Instead, a radar-absorbing blade has been designed from scratch, and in such a way that Vestas' existing manufacturing process isn't significantly altered – so it doesn't push up costs. Although Vestas is not releasing details of the design as yet, Appleton says the blade behaves like a Salisbury screen – incoming radar waves bounce off two surfaces that are precisely spaced so that the reflections interfere and cancel each other out.

Perfect replicas

To achieve like-for-like generating power, the stealth blade will have to resemble a standard blade as closely as possible. That must have been a huge challenge for the designers, says Lee Ford, a specialist in radar-absorbing materials at the University of Sheffield in the UK. "It's not just a case of sticking a Salisbury screen onto the outside," he says. "They will have had to redesign the internal structure, which is already complicated – the blades aren't just a piece of metal."

Appleton says the new blade successfully reduced radar reflection, but as the test was of a single blade, it is too early to give an exact figure on how much reduction will be achieved in practice. Still, he says the blades could reduce radar reflectance by an order of magnitude or even more. "We could be talking about a reflectance reduced to a few per cent," he says.

Stealth blades are not the only potential solution. Last week the UK government, various wind-power companies and the Crown Estate announced a £5.2 million ($8.5 million) fund to investigate how to bring turbine-spotting technology to radar operated by the National Air Traffic Services – the UK's main air navigation service provider.

US contractor Raytheon will work with NATS to develop the technology over the next 19 months, which will include "enhanced software algorithms for radar processing and tracking" according to Ginny McAdams of Raytheon.

Sweeping improvements

Technology firm Cambridge Consultants thinks it already has a radar solution to turbine-spotting. Its "holographic infill radar" generates a 3D image of the wind farm 10 times per second, so it can track the movement of reflective objects in the area and distinguish a rotating blade from a fast-moving aircraft (New Scientist, 25 October 2008, p 24). "We completed a successful trial for the UK Ministry of Defence last year," says Gordon Oswald, creator of Holographic Radar. Aviation authorities in the UK are studying those trials to see whether the technology is suited to widespread use.

Vaughan says that having so many options on the table gives grounds for optimism. "It's a really big issue, but it's very much on the government's radar now."

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3

Low Over A Wind Farm?

Fri Oct 23 16:11:37 BST 2009 by lamorpa

"If an aircraft flies low over a wind farm..." I suspect there are bigger problems from this, like getting your airframe damaged and crashing.

Low Over A Wind Farm?

Fri Oct 23 16:31:36 BST 2009 by Bill in Detroit
http://nmwoodworks.com

Yeah ... like incoming fighters or missiles. By interposing the wind farm between the planes and the radar, precious seconds or even minutes could be gained.

Low Over A Wind Farm?

Sat Oct 24 16:09:47 BST 2009 by stoffer

I do not understand something. The turbines are standing on the ground. How is a turbine more problematic than a hill of an equivalent height?

How is a turbine a problem, when a plane is flying over it?

I would assume that all modern radars have enough resolution in all three dimensions to distinguish between the planes and the turbines.

This must be a problem for really old radars.

What comes to my mind now, is that the radars can be easily fooled by a few low-flying drones engineered to emulate radar properties of a wind turbine.

So, what is alarming about this is, is that the radar systems are obsolete and need to be upgraded.

Low Over A Wind Farm?

Sat Oct 24 18:05:03 BST 2009 by Richard

As pointed out in the article, the turbine blades are both reflective and moving, unlike hills.

Wind Turbines Warm The Planet

Fri Oct 23 16:17:29 BST 2009 by Kevin Wilson

The Earth cools itself by the latent heat of evaporation. Thats why you feel cold as you exit the sea, or a swimming pool. This is an effect of wind velocity. Wind Turbines act to reduce the downstream wind velocity, and therefore there exists a downstream sector that pre- turbine installation, was cooler.Kevin Wilson

Wind Turbines Warm The Planet

Fri Oct 23 16:41:33 BST 2009 by Deadhead

Bollocks, are you saying that wind turbines contribute to global warming? Are you mad? I think you've got atmospheric temperature mixed up with ground temperature laddy

Wind Turbines Warm The Planet

Fri Oct 23 17:50:10 BST 2009 by Bob

and atmospheric wind speed vs ground wind speed. Most of the energy is at high altitudes.

Wind Turbines Warm The Planet

Fri Oct 23 21:42:07 BST 2009 by mike

The earth does not cool itself by latent heat of evaporation, because the evaporated water (and thus the heat it contains) stays within the earth's atmosphere.

Wind Turbines Warm The Planet

Sat Oct 24 21:23:46 BST 2009 by Steve

Actually water vapour is the main greenhouse gas accounting for 95% of the effect and responsible as the main transport mechanism of heat in the atmosphere to the high latitudes where most of the radiative cooling takes place.

If this atmospheric heat transfer didn't take place, the greenhouse effect on its own would maintain the global temperature at 77C rather than the 15C we enjoy - or so I read.

However, I am not sure that a few wind turbines will affect global heat transfer.

I Think

Fri Oct 23 17:02:24 BST 2009 by genetic

...that the birds would rather have global warming than be hacked up by giant propellers. won't anyone think about the poor birdies?!?!

I Think

Fri Oct 23 19:14:57 BST 2009 by Matg

Hacked? Pushed, more likely. These are noisy installations, and the birds are sure learn in a couple of generations.

I Think

Fri Oct 23 23:15:28 BST 2009 by Rod Buck

No one seems to address the main problem with wind farms - that they are spectacularly useless. The wind doesn't blow reliably... therefore, if you rely in ANY way on their output, in the absence of power storage on a massive scale, (not possible yet) you have to have 100% backup that can be brought online within minutes at worst if the wind drops. That means having a conventional power station cranked up and running on light load (inefficiently) all the time. Thus, you have merely doubled your capital expenditure for the same output - oh yes, and wasted fossil fuels on the constantly-running backup unit.

Tidal power would make much more sense, in that you know precisely when it'll be available, and can plan accordingly.

I Think

Sat Oct 24 21:35:23 BST 2009 by Steve

Hi Rod,

You are wasting your breath. The summary for governments part of the first IPCC report had already set out the conclusion of apocalyptic global warming unless we cut carbon emissions, despite the body of the report not supporting this.

All governments that signed up to the various protocols are now committed to cutting carbon emissions by all mean possible, including the grossly impractical wind turbines. Even though they realised they had been duped. Hence the Stern Report's whitewash of the various IPCC reports' contradictions.

It is actually worse than you suggest, since it is not possible to combine the most efficient combined cycle gas turbine power stations with wind farms to maintain supply, and it would in fact generate less CO2 to just build a CCGT station!

Comments 1 | 2 | 3

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Stealth blades could prove less problematic (Image: Mark Sykes/SPL)

Stealth blades could prove less problematic (Image: Mark Sykes/SPL)

ADVERTISEMENT

How to turn pig poo into green power

11:00 25 October 2009

Anaerobic digestion is the most effective and environmentally sound method for generating electricity from pig slurry

Memory and forgetting in the digital age

10:00 24 October 2009

Do you want to remember everything? Total Recall by Gordon Bell and Jim Gemmell says you do; Delete by Victor Mayer-Schonberger says you don't

Augmented reality system lets you see through wallsMovie Camera

17:21 23 October 2009

If walls could be transparent, there would be fewer road accidents at blind corners. An augmented reality system could just make that come true

White House panel sees little point to new NASA rocket

00:45 23 October 2009

The Ares I rocket meant to replace the space shuttle will not be ready until two years after the space station is scheduled to be abandoned, says a blue-ribbon panel

Latest news

Testicular tumours linked to offsprings' disease

18:00 25 October 2009

Undetected tumour cells may produce faulty sperm – which could be why older fathers are more likely to have children with genetic diseases

Dream job 3: Lead programmer for a dot-com start-up

12:00 25 October 2009

Another true-life story from our Graduate Careers Special: moving from a physics lab to Reddit.com, Christopher Slowe took a tip from drug dealers

How to turn pig poo into green power

11:00 25 October 2009

Anaerobic digestion is the most effective and environmentally sound method for generating electricity from pig slurry

Vive la différence of languages

10:00 25 October 2009

Languages are dying out at an alarming rate. But On the Death and Life of Languages by Claude Hagège shows that all may not be lost

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access