Login

This is a preview of the full article

New Scientist full online access is exclusive to subscribers as part of their subscription package.
Registered users are given limited access to content, find out more
Subscribe and save 20% Get instant full access
  • Save over 20% on your subscription
  • Gain instant online access - Including 20 years of archive
  • Receive New Scientist magazine delivered to your door every week
  • Access the most comprehensive round up of the latest news in science

Home | Opinion

Geo war

Pictures of spreads from New Scientist magazine

Another plea in your pages for geoengineering (12 September, p 34) makes me wonder if I am alone in my concern about the potential for warlike abuse of these techniques. Several of those now discussed could be used to intentionally damage territories and populations by inciting droughts or floods, or by changing sea or air chemistry.

The 1978 Environmental Modification (ENMOD) convention banned hostile use of geoengineering techniques. With talk of implementing these technologies, isn't there a case for digging out and updating that convention?

To continue reading this article, log in or subscribe to New Scientist

Subscribe and save 20% Login
Start to benefit from all New Scientist has to offer
  • A subscription to New Scientist provides you with a complete package for all your science news, comment and analysis, for work, studies or conversation. Keep up-to-date with key global science topics allowing you to always remain 'in the know'.
  • A subscription includes; New Scientist magazine delivered to you every week and full online access to NewScientist.com 24/7, including 20 years of online archive.
  • Try the New Scientist subscription package today, save 20% and start to benefit from all New Scientist has to offer.
Picture of New Scientist in print and online
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.