SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

Space

Feeds

Home |Space | News

Found: first 'skylight' on the moon

A deep hole on the moon that could open into a vast underground tunnel has been found for the first time. The discovery strengthens evidence for subsurface, lava-carved channels that could shield future human colonists from space radiation and other hazards.

The moon seems to possess long, winding tunnels called lava tubes that are similar to structures seen on Earth. They are created when the top of a stream of molten rock solidifies and the lava inside drains away, leaving a hollow tube of rock.

Their existence on the moon is hinted at based on observations of sinuous rilles – long, winding depressions carved into the lunar surface by the flow of lava. Some sections of the rilles have collapsed, suggesting that hollow lava tubes hide beneath at least some of the rilles.

But until now, no one has found an opening into what appears to be an intact tube. "There's sort of a chicken-and-egg problem," says Carolyn van der Bogert of the University of Münster in Germany. "If it's intact, you can't see it."

Finding a hole in a rille could suggest that an intact tube lies beneath. So a group led by Junichi Haruyama of the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency searched for these "skylights" in images taken by Japan's Kaguya spacecraft, which orbited the moon for almost two years before ending its mission in June.

Deep cave

The team found the first candidate skylight in a volcanic area on the moon's near side called Marius Hills. "This is the first time that anybody's actually identified a skylight in a possible lava tube" on the moon, van der Bogert, who helped analyse the feature, told New Scientist.

The hole measures 65 metres across, and based on images taken at a variety of sun angles, the the hole is thought to extend down at least 80 metres. It sits in the middle of a rille, suggesting the hole leads into a lava tube as wide as 370 metres across.

It is not clear exactly how the hole formed. A meteorite impact, moonquakes, or pressure created by gravitational tugs from the Earth could be to blame. Alternatively, part of the lava tube's ceiling could have been pulled off as lava in the tube drained away billions of years ago.

Radiation shield

Finding such an opening could be a boon for possible human exploration of the moon (see What NASA's return to the moon may look like).

Since the tubes may be hundreds of metres wide, they could provide plenty of space for an underground lunar outpost. The tubes' ceilings could protect astronauts from space radiation, meteoroid impacts and wild temperature fluctuations (see Can high-tech cavemen live on the moon?).

"I think it's really exciting," says Penny Boston of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in Socorro. "Basalt is an extremely good material for radiation protection. It's free real estate ready to be exploited and modified for human use."

Blocked passage?

But even if astronauts were to rappel into the hole, they might not be able to travel far into the tube it appears to lead into. "I would bet a lot of money that there's a tube there, but I would not bet nearly so much that we could gain access to the tube," says Ray Hawke of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, who has also hunted for lunar lava tubes.

Rubble or solidified lava might block up the tube. "It could be closed up and inaccessible," Hawke told New Scientist.

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which should be able to snap images of the area that are at least 10 times as sharp, could help reveal more about the hole. And more lava tube openings may be found.

The Kaguya team is still combing over images of other areas in search of additional skylights. And Hawke says a proposal is in the works to use LRO's main camera to snap oblique shots of the lunar surface. This could help reveal cave entrances that are not visible in a bird's-eye view.

Journal reference: Geophysical Research Letters (in press)

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

The Moon Is A Death Star

Fri Oct 23 01:46:51 BST 2009 by Ken

The hole is a vent hole just like on the Death Star in the Star Wars movie! Now that "they" know that we know, they will be prepairing to fire their death ray and, "that's all folks!

The Moon Is A Death Star

Fri Oct 23 13:31:41 BST 2009 by Luke Skywalker
http://www.starwars.com

I aggree, I've got a bad feeling about that death star.My bad feeling started when Nasa lauched that Rocket into it. Now the death star has a reason to hit back. AAAAHHHHHH!!!

The Moon Is A Death Star

Fri Oct 23 14:49:17 BST 2009 by Obi-wan

Thats no moon!

The Moon Is A Death Star

Fri Oct 23 15:01:05 BST 2009 by TOMMY

The Moon Is A Death Star

Sat Oct 24 04:12:15 BST 2009 by Admiral Akkbar

It's a trap!!!!!!

The Moon Is A Death Star

Sat Oct 24 01:16:58 BST 2009 by Dennis
http://freetubetv.net

Interesting theory except that it's remain dormant for far too long.

The Moon Is A Death Star

Sat Oct 24 04:10:58 BST 2009 by eris

I think it's important that we pick a name for it. I have a humble suggestion:

TMA-1

Tubular Magma Anomaly - 1

:-)

The Moon Is A Death Star

Sun Oct 25 00:25:13 BST 2009 by Dr. Bowman

Hope they're keeping an eye on Jupiter when they punch through...

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 01:50:46 BST 2009 by yaya

The obvious thing to do is to drop a robot down it. That's going to be quite a challenge!

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 05:54:27 BST 2009 by nanodude

Yes, a mission should be designed to send a remotely operated semi-autonomous crawler down there to map it. Would need to have a long-lasting power source though, that place could be huge. Might make more sense to send a squadron of smaller crawlers. A challenge certainly but it need not be uber-expensive.

Alternatively wait until the next time we send humans to the moon. But to properly explore it could be deemed too hazardous, or just not possible with a limited O2 supply.

How cool would it be though to be the first human to explore lunar lava tubes?

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 09:00:16 BST 2009 by Matt

Long lasting power supply? How about anchoring a/some solar panels on the surface and send the rover down with a trailing wire?

The wire reserve could be on the surface and unwind as the robot moves further in, this would mean the rover could be small(er) with a huge power supply onboard.

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 16:24:52 BST 2009 by nanodude

That might work up to a point, but the lava tubes could be very extensive and the cable would limit the range of exploration. Also it's very likely to snag on the rubble that's surely strewn about the place. I think rechargeable batteries are the way to go, returning to the surface to catch some rays when needed.

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 20:19:00 BST 2009 by Constance

YAY!! Another environemnt for humans to pillage and destroy.

Just leave it alone!

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 21:20:55 BST 2009 by FreeMarket

Yes. Dust, rock and vacuum. Quite the environment.

You are free to speak for yourself, but some of us humans believe that we also have a right to exist and to use our natural intelligence to learn and explore.

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 21:29:05 BST 2009 by Constance

Yes, yes, of course ... 'our right to exist ... blah blah ..." nevermind the rights of everything else.

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 21:32:29 BST 2009 by Necro

aaw come on. really? pillage and destroy? The moon is like the Earth's sandpit. We're already screwing around with environments down here, and I don't think anyone's gonna mind if we messed with lunar tunnels. I say NASA points a rocket at that thing, maybe reveal more interesting things..

Probe That Hole

Fri Oct 23 21:54:41 BST 2009 by Constance

Does verbally downgrading the moon to 'the earth's sandpit' somehow mean we own it no respect and should feel free to do what want just to satisfy our big bulging brains?

I don't think so. Its much more than that. We and every living (and non-living) thing on earth depend on its presence for our continued existence.

We often over estimate our 'intelligence' and predict we can keep messing with something only to find out later we've destroyed it.

At some point one starts to question the wisdom of putting our prurient little fingers into everything ...

Really and truly the scientific/curiosity justification is a narcissistic one that completely bypasses genuine concern for the rights of all other things/beings to exist unmolested by us.

Probe That Hole

Sat Oct 24 08:25:37 BST 2009 by Boyd Blackwater

I don't think anyone's gonna mind if we messed with lunar tunnels." Necro

The moon men might. Who do you think painted those White Stripes around the hole?

Obviously something is up. By painting those stripes on the moon, it's as if those moon people wanted NASA to find them.

Maybe they are calling for help, or want our womenfolk or somethin?

Probe That Hole

Sat Oct 24 03:58:32 BST 2009 by Rob Williamson

Pillage and destroy another environment? On the moon? You're kidding right? Have you seen the surface of the moon lately? See all those craters? Hello ?

Asteroid impacts have already destroyed the surface of the moon. There is nothing that we could ever do to make it worse then it already is. Relax, take a pill, and get some sleep.

Probe That Hole

Sat Oct 24 05:37:01 BST 2009 by Dave
http://nssphoenix.wordpress.com

The extension on the Lunar X-Prize: explore he lava tubes and secure a living space below the regolith, safe from GCR.

Probe That Hole

Sat Oct 24 21:35:53 BST 2009 by Steverman

IF we figure out a clever way to explore the caves and tunnels fo the moon, the same technologies can then be expanded on to explore the caves of Mars. There's been seven openings found in the past 4 years, and the same hope that we'll find some cool stuff down below. In Mars' case, maybe life, likely fed by the subsurface water.

Sarlac?

Fri Oct 23 01:59:29 BST 2009 by Huh?

Just as likely to end up spending eternity inside the belly of a sarlac...

Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

This 65-metre-wide hole in the lunar surface extends at least 80 metres down and could be an opening into a larger lunar cave (Image: ISAS/JAXA/Junichi Haruyama et al.)

This 65-metre-wide hole in the lunar surface extends at least 80 metres down and could be an opening into a larger lunar cave (Image: ISAS/JAXA/Junichi Haruyama et al.)

Enlarge image

ADVERTISEMENT

Seven questions that keep physicists up at night

23:58 23 October 2009

From the nature of matter to that of reality itself, physicists are pondering the big questions at a 10-day physics festival in Canada

White House panel sees little point to new NASA rocket

00:45 23 October 2009

The Ares I rocket meant to replace the space shuttle will not be ready until two years after the space station is scheduled to be abandoned, says a blue-ribbon panel

Laser microscope aims to uncover alien life

18:06 22 October 2009

A rugged holographic microscope could be transported to an alien world like Europa to look for life in its icy underground seas

Jeff Greason: NASA must invest in human space flight

16:39 22 October 2009

The US human space programme is in trouble: the space industry mogul has some ideas for how to fix it

Latest news

Testicular tumours linked to offsprings' disease

18:00 25 October 2009

Undetected tumour cells may produce faulty sperm – which could be why older fathers are more likely to have children with genetic diseases

Dream job 3: Lead programmer for a dot-com start-up

12:00 25 October 2009

Another true-life story from our Graduate Careers Special: moving from a physics lab to Reddit.com, Christopher Slowe took a tip from drug dealers

How to turn pig poo into green power

11:00 25 October 2009

Anaerobic digestion is the most effective and environmentally sound method for generating electricity from pig slurry

Vive la différence of languages

10:00 25 October 2009

Languages are dying out at an alarming rate. But On the Death and Life of Languages by Claude Hagège shows that all may not be lost

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access