Agreed. It seems like New Scientist has been lowering the bar to get more sensational headlines. Very much a shame! Guys? What's the end goal here, do you want to dumb things down and become Scientific American? Or go all the way and become Popular Science?
Please DON'T underestimate the need for precise, intelligent, detailed scientific news. Please aim higher!
ADVERTISEMENT
18:00 13 November 2009
Today's stories on newscientist.com, at a glance, including: why you shouldn't mix cocaine and pepper spray, a green makeover for piezoelectronics, and a joyride through the nanoworld
15:24 13 November 2009
Residents of Second Life have spent one billion hours in this digital world. Now its founder has plans to push the concept much further in a new virtual venture
13:57 13 November 2009
Two peculiar white dwarfs with more oxygen than carbon are like nothing anybody has seen before
13:51 13 November 2009
Planting forests in the tropics could be a waste of time and money, compared with planting them at high latitudes
For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist print Edition
ADVERTISEMENT
We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.
