Subscribe to New Scientist

Opinion

Feeds

Home |Opinion |Environment |Life | Opinion

Andrea Marshall: Queen of manta rays

The marine ecologist discusses diving, underwater beauty parlours and the discovery of a new species.

Why did you decide to study manta rays?

I've been telling everyone since I was 5 years old that I wanted to study sharks - all my work was to that end. But when I finished my degree, I went to Mozambique on vacation and stumbled upon the largest population of manta rays in the world. No one knows much about manta rays, so I saw this amazing opportunity to study them. Since then I've fallen in love with them.

What's so great about these fish?

They behave differently to other fish. They engage you as a diver, approach you, interact with you - it's a pleasure to work with them.

While in Mozambique you discovered a new species of manta ray. How did that happen?

When I first came here I didn't know anything about manta rays, but I saw what I thought were two different species. I was laughed at and told I was wrong. So I gathered enough information - morphological, behavioural, genetic - to prove that there really are two species. I named it Manta alfredi after Alfred Whitley, who provided the first detailed scientific description of manta rays in 1936.

Manta ray "beauty parlours" have also been a focus of your research. How are they special?

Cleaning stations are pretty well known in the marine environment, but for manta rays it's an extraordinary event. Because they are so large, "cleaner fish" partition up the ray and clean different parts of the animal. It looks so co-operative and gentlemanly. The mantas have to eat 14 per cent of their body weight a week in plankton, so any time taken out from feeding has to be invested in something important. As they can spend up to 8 hours having parasites removed and shark bite marks cleaned, it must be detrimental if they're not groomed.

You have successfully tracked a manta ray using a satellite tag. What did you find out?

The results suggest that they are oceanic wanderers, moving huge distances - up to 1100 kilometres - and travelling across international boundaries. This has implications for their management and conservation.

What else have you discovered?

We now know that they can give birth to one live pup every year, but usually they don't. This makes them less fecund than most other sharks and rays, and that makes them extremely vulnerable.

Are manta rays under threat?

In the IUCN Red List assessment we did in 2006 we called them threatened, but the more we find out about them the more we realise that in many places they should be listed as vulnerable. The threats go from minor - net entanglements, boat strikes, habitat degradation, and inappropriate ecotourism - to major threats. In some areas, 500 to 1000 rays are killed annually for their gill rakers, which are used in Chinese medicinal products. That's completely unsustainable.

Profile

Andrea Marshall has set up a ray adoption scheme at giantfish.org. Her work with the giant manta ray in Mozambique will be featured in an episode of BBC TV's Natural World series, titled Andrea: Queen of the Mantas, to be shown in the UK on 11 November.

Issue 2733 of New Scientist magazine
  • New Scientist
  • Not just a website!
  • Subscribe to New Scientist and get:
  • New Scientist magazine delivered to your door
  • Unlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issues
  • Subscribe Now and Save

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Andrea Marshall Queen Of The Manta's

Wed Nov 11 21:41:30 GMT 2009 by Carole Heath

I saw this programme on TV with Andrea and her team and her quest to help protect the giant Manta Rays, what wonderful animals these Rays are. I really admire Andrea for what she is doing to try and help the dilemma of the Rays. It would be a real tragic thing if these creatures are wiped out by humans because of greed regarding their use in certain types of medicine. I do hope as Andrea has said that areas of our planet where they live can be protected. There is so much to learn from our oceans which us humans still have yet to find out about. Most scientists say that life most likely evolved in our oceans which I agree with. We need people like Andrea and her team to enlighten others to the problems of wonderful animals like Whales and Mantas which may become extinct if us humans don't act now, I myself belong to the Whale and Dolphin consservation society and hope my membership help's in some way to help these animals survive for us to wonder at ,good luck Andrea you have my best wishes great stuff.

Errors: Who's Name Is It?

Thu Nov 12 02:19:41 GMT 2009 by R Merritt

Some serious errors: "I named it Manta alfredi after Alfred Whitley, who provided the first detailed scientific description of manta rays in 1936." The first description of a manta ray was by Donndorff in 1798 (somewhat earlier than 1936). The name alfredi was used by Krefft in 1868 for Prince Alfred's manta ray. In 1936, G.P. Whitley (not Alfred Whitley) referred to Daemomanta alfredi (Krefft, 1868) in a scientific paper about manta rays in Australian waters. Manta alfredi (Krefft, 1868), revised from Daemomanta alfredi, has been considered a synonym for Manta birostris since well before Andrea Marshall has applied the name to the mantas she has observed.

Errors: Who's Name Is It?

Thu Nov 12 07:26:59 GMT 2009 by Dr. Andrea Marshall
http://www.marinemegafauna.org

Thank you for your comments. 'Manta birostris' is actually credited to Walbaum (1792). Additionally while the film or the PR surrounding this film may have been misleading or misinterpreted, we have indeed resurrected 'Manta alfredi' (Kreft 1868) from Whitley's (1936) description of what appears to be a reef manta ray, the smaller species. None of the early reports or descriptions of manta rays were detailed which was very difficult for us when trying to resolve this issue. The taxonomic history of the genus 'Manta' has always been questionable and convoluted, with 'Manta' having one of the most extensive generic and species synonymies of any living genus of cartilaginous fish. Ultimately, our resolution was to resurrect 'Manta alfredi' and have the new giant species (which is also the most widely distributed species) retain the name of 'Manta birostris'. Our paper on the subject entitled Redescription of the genus 'Manta' with resurrection of 'Manta alfredi' (Kreft 1868) (Chondrichthyes; Myliobatoidei, Mobulidae) will be published in the journal Zootaxa shortly (before the end of the year).

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Falling in love with manta rays (Image: <a href="http://www.saveourseas.com">Save Our Seas Foundation</a>)

Falling in love with manta rays (Image: Save Our Seas Foundation)

Enlarge image

3 more images

ADVERTISEMENT

Indefatigable Spirit

18:06 11 November 2009

The plucky little Mars rover has achieved more than anyone dared dream – it would be churlish to criticise NASA for trying to rescue it

Fair play: Monkeys share our sense of injustice

18:00 11 November 2009

Our instinctive reaction to displays of greed and conspicuous consumption has its origins in the primate world, says Frans de Waal

DARPA: Inventing this side of the impossible

The A160 hummingbird, just one of many DARPA project that have found military or commercial use (Image: DARPA)

11:40 11 November 2009

In The Department of Mad Scientists, Michael Belfiore gets half the story of DARPA, the US military agency that brought us the internet and GPS

Stop selling out science to commerce

14:08 09 November 2009

Corporate might and commercial pressures are undermining research. It's time for scientists to blow the whistle, say Stuart Parkinson and Chris Langley

Latest news

Propelled by light: the promise and perils of solar sailing

21:30 11 November 2009

Despite earlier failures, the Planetary Society is gearing up to test another solar sail in space in a year – executive director Louis Friedman explains why

Less loud sounds can still damage ears

22:00 11 November 2009

If the results in mice translate to humans, the laws that determine the noises workers can be exposed to may need to change

Today on New Scientist: 11 November 2009

18:00 11 November 2009

Today's stories on newscientist.com, at a glance, including: what the LHC is really looking for, how a mini ice age took hold of Europe in months, and how to get a club-winged manakin excited

Suite of chatterbox genes discovered

18:00 11 November 2009

A set of 116 genes influenced by Foxp2 could have coevolved to give humans language

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access