Subscribe to New Scientist

Environment

Feeds

Home |Environment |Physics & Math | News

Plan to pierce heart of urban monster volcano

TO ANCIENT Romans the Phlegraean Fields hosted the entrance to Hades. In modern times it is better known as the site of a "supercolossal" volcanic eruption 39,000 years ago.

Will we see the next disaster coming? That's one of the questions an ambitious drilling project hopes to answer by sinking boreholes into Campi Flegrei, as the giant collapsed volcanic crater is now called. Starting as early as next month, the Campi Flegrei Deep Drilling Project is planning to drill seven holes in the region (see map).

Though the researchers on this particular project point out that any risk is small, it will begin amid debate about whether such endeavours are safe, given the unknowns of a volcano's interior. A few say drilling might even trigger a major eruption.

Though the caldera has no visible volcanic cone, it dwarfs nearby Vesuvius. "Most of the metropolitan area of Naples is located within the caldera," says Giuseppe De Natale of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology's (INGV) Vesuvius Observatory in Naples, who is leading the project.

The volcano has no visible cone but it dwarfs Vesuvius, and most of Naples is in its caldera

"A major eruption, like the one 39,000 years ago, would leave large parts of Europe buried under a thick layer of ash," says Agust Gudmundsson of the Royal Holloway University of London, one of the researchers involved in the drilling project. Since then, smaller eruptions have occurred every few centuries.

According to a study of the region by Roberto Isaia of the INGV and colleagues, Campi Flegrei is "one of the highest risk volcanic areas on Earth" and may now be primed for a blast. Isaia and colleagues found deposits from an intense period of eruptions around 4000 years ago. Before the eruptions the Earth's crust rose by several metres all across the caldera. Worryingly, crustal uplift is exactly what has happened recently. Since the late 1960s, the port of Pozzuoli near the caldera's centre has risen by around 3 metres. Hazard planners should prepare for eruptions in decades or less, Isaia concludes (Geophysical Research Letters, in press).

The drilling could reveal fracture zones and pockets of magma whose location can usually only be inferred. This could show exactly where magma might ascend and collect prior to an eruption. Meanwhile, rock samples could be tested under high stresses in the lab to help model the ground deformation prior to eruption. De Natale told New Scientist that the project - which is under the auspices of the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program and the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program - will start in December or January.

Several incidents have plagued similar projects. In June, the Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP), which aims to tap geothermal energy from hot magma, had to be stopped. At 2104 metres down, magma streamed into the borehole, causing a small explosion as the drilling fluid vaporised. That project is on hold, though it will start again in 2011 with a new borehole, says Guðmundur Ómar Friðleifsson of the IDDP. And in 2005, researchers working on a drilling project in Hawaii got a fright when magma hotter than 1000 °C leaked into the borehole.

"Under unfavourable conditions, contact of the drilling fluid with magma could be very dangerous," says Ralf Büttner, a volcanologist at the University of Würzburg in Germany. "It is even theoretically conceivable that, ultimately, a major eruption could result."

Though he does not single out the Campi Flegrei project, he warns that not enough is known about what happens in the guts of a volcano to justify drilling. "Knowledge about the viscosity and processes of gases in magma is very limited." What we do know is based on extremely small samples, which makes it difficult to extrapolate the results to larger masses, he says. So volcanic drilling projects are often based on "wishful thinking rather than on hard facts", he adds.

The greatest risk would be if the drilling accidentally pierced a silica-rich magma chamber under high pressure, releasing trapped gases, saysVolker Dietrich, also of the University of Würzburg. "The threat of explosion is extremely high. Theoretically, any type of eruption could be triggered," says Dietrich. "In some circumstances, the risk is of a total disaster."

Researchers on the Campi Flegrei project accept that there are some small risks, but say prior safety assessments found that triggering a major eruption is unlikely. Christopher Kilburn of University College London, one of the lead scientists, points out that a pressure release would need to occur over a significant portion of a magma reservoir to trigger an eruption. This is "unlikely to be satisfied by a small borehole, unless, perhaps, the magma was about to erupt anyway," he explains. Bernd Zimanowski at the University of Würzburg agrees. He says that drilling into "a tough magma chamber is no different from pricking some extremely tough cookie dough".

In any case, the Campi Flegrei drilling is unlikely to hit magma. Boreholes are expected to reach a maximum depth of 4 kilometres, around half the depth of any known reservoirs, according to Jörg Erzinger of the German Research Centre for Geosciences in Potsdam (GFZ). Even if magma flows into a borehole, Ulrich Harms, another GFZ scientist, argues it would not necessarily be dangerous. "Situations like that provide exceptional insights," Harms says.

Issue 2733 of New Scientist magazine
  • Like what you've just read?
  • Don't miss out on the latest content from New Scientist.
  • Get New Scientist magazine delivered to your door, plus unlimited access to the entire content of New Scientist online.
  • Subscribe now and save

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Lancing The Boil

Thu Nov 05 07:10:21 GMT 2009 by Sandy Henderson

There seems to be a common interest here with yellowstone in the USA. It may now be a matter of some urgency to develop drilling techniques that would allow hot magma to be released in a controllable fashion. The rewards in terms of geothermal energy and products moulded from the cooling magma may be great, and the security benefit from avoiding catastrophic eruption immense.

Lancing The Boil

Mon Nov 09 17:51:09 GMT 2009 by Joker

I predict...

If all goes well... one group of experts will be on telly looking good...

If all goes badly... another set of experts will be on telly looking good.

Ciao!

Lancing The Boil

Mon Nov 09 18:22:49 GMT 2009 by Julio

Good Idea!

But: As the article sais:

"...a magma chamber is like some extremely tough cookie dough"

So it seems we need much larger holes to release the preasure.

After all we need engineers with new ideas

Engineers and volcanologists should work together to control volcanoes

Love that project!

Real great stuff.

Seems one of the most fascinating scientific project ever.

I d like to see the results.

What does a big volcano like that look inside???

No one knows. That really is a big deal...

Lancing The Boil

Mon Nov 09 22:20:46 GMT 2009 by PeterY

Bad. Bad. Bad idea.

"Lancing the boil", will expose the hot rock to reduced pressure probably turning safe rock and magma into eruptable magma, thereby triggering an eruption. Drilling small holes may do nothing ... I am no expert. But a lot of the reason the caldera is safe is because it is under pressure, changing that would be extremely dangerous I would think.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Sun Nov 08 20:38:46 GMT 2009 by Giuseppe De Natale

I was negatively surprised about the article. Although me, and several volcanologists gave broad explanation of why the project is absolutely safe from eruption risks, the writer neglected all the detailed arguments to report confused and generic claims about eruption risks by drilling at volcanoes. This is not scientific journalism, but just scientific gossip! However, just to recall one the main arguments that were missed in the article: in the same area, a dozen of drilling holes were made in the first half of '80s for geothermal exploration, reaching 3 km of depth, without any accident, not even a smallest one, and with bottom temperatures very far from magmatic ones. In the new project, we will only go 1 km deeper and we can perfectly control the eventual proximity of magma batches because we will continuously measure the temperature, and will stop anyway before 500°C (magmatic temperature is just the double).

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 17:07:40 GMT 2009 by mike

'This is not scientific journalism, but just scientific gossip!'

No, it's sensationalism.

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 18:00:04 GMT 2009 by Paul

Agreed. It seems like New Scientist has been lowering the bar to get more sensational headlines. Very much a shame! Guys? What's the end goal here, do you want to dumb things down and become Scientific American? Or go all the way and become Popular Science?

Please DON'T underestimate the need for precise, intelligent, detailed scientific news. Please aim higher!

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 21:33:54 GMT 2009 by Nicolai

"gas drilling is safe": triggered mud volcano in java, immense flooding of an huge area,

triggered quakes M>7,

"geothermal drilling is safe": triggered quakes M>6

"mining is safe": triggered quakes M>6

"dams are safe": triggered quakes M>7

Scientists who do not except open discussions on possible risks or on the uncertainties of their knowledge are not reliable. Sorry.

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Tue Nov 10 13:07:04 GMT 2009 by Alan
http://www.xxxpartners.co.uk

Nicolai

What's the difference between

"except"

and

"accept"?

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 18:00:20 GMT 2009 by Enrico M.

Dear Mr. Scientist, why are you so sure? The article is quoting experts who discuss the risk. It doesn't state that your drillings are dangerous. The article is quoting scientists who argues that even scientists do not know exactly what could happen. Most things about earth are unknown. Thats why we have geologists, dont you think so?

Sorry for my opinion. Best regards from Lugano!

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 19:29:14 GMT 2009 by Disappointed

Sadly, it is true. This magazine has turned into a pool of pseudo scientific sentationalism.

Well, my subscription will not be renewed. Good luck.

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 22:16:42 GMT 2009 by Tom

Dear scientist!

Blame your collegues who are quoted not the magazine...

However, the article sais: "In any case, the Campi Flegrei drilling is unlikely to hit magma..."

Why do some scientists seem to be so angry when it comes to a public discussion on their projects?

Reminds me of my teachers who could not stand opposition.

Sad...

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Mon Nov 09 23:55:18 GMT 2009 by T R

I imagine it must be terribly frustrating for this scientist, engaged in a large-scale project which may lead to new and exciting theories about volcanism, to see his work ignored in favour of a discussion about a completely hypothetical disaster scenario.

Kind of like the poor guys at CERN having to explain for the umpteenth time that, no, a black hole is not going to consume the Earth.

Most scientists are committed to the public understanding of science because they want to share the excitement of their discoveries, but they must surely despair of the public ever truly understanding what it is they do

Not Scientific, Just In Search Of Easy Scoop!

Wed Nov 11 16:44:27 GMT 2009 by TheWatcher

Good luck to you and all that are working on this project. By the article, it sounds like you are trying to avoid a major eruption that would effect all of Europe.

Hope They Improve Forecasting Eruptions!

Mon Nov 09 11:49:39 GMT 2009 by Silvio S.

I hope they improve forecasting eruptions.

We are living on a bomb in Naples.

Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Drill if you dare (Image: R.W.W./Ambra Galassi/Flickr)

Drill if you dare (Image: R.W.W./Ambra Galassi/Flickr)

1 more image

ADVERTISEMENT

Mini ice age took hold of Europe in months

18:00 11 November 2009

Detailed studies of ancient climate have revealed that the onset of Europe's "Big Freeze", 13,000 years ago, was anything but glacial

Water purifiers for the poor fail to prove their worth

12:21 11 November 2009

Ceramic filters are the only water cleaners proven to work, as many studies into the effectiveness of treatments are flawed

Andrea Marshall: Queen of manta raysMovie Camera

14:41 10 November 2009

The marine ecologist discusses diving, underwater beauty parlours and the discovery of a new species

Innovation: Can technology persuade us to save energy?

18:17 06 November 2009

Gadgets and systems designed to steer us towards greener behaviour are under development, and they work – if we'll let them

Latest news

Propelled by light: the promise and perils of solar sailing

21:30 11 November 2009

Despite earlier failures, the Planetary Society is gearing up to test another solar sail in space in a year – executive director Louis Friedman explains why

Less loud sounds can still damage ears

22:00 11 November 2009

If the results in mice translate to humans, the laws that determine the noises workers can be exposed to may need to change

Today on New Scientist: 11 November 2009

18:00 11 November 2009

Today's stories on newscientist.com, at a glance, including: what the LHC is really looking for, how a mini ice age took hold of Europe in months, and how to get a club-winged manakin excited

Suite of chatterbox genes discovered

18:00 11 November 2009

A set of 116 genes influenced by Foxp2 could have coevolved to give humans language

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access