Subscribe to New Scientist

Space

Feeds

Home |Space |Tech | News

NASA seeks its one true glove

Would you pay $250,000 for a pair of gloves? That's what's NASA is offering to the winners of its Astronaut Glove Challenge.

Bending fingers inside pressurised gloves in space is difficult – a day's worth of precision work often results in bruises, abrasions and damaged fingernails. So NASA is holding a competition this week in Titusville, Florida. At least two teams are expected to compete. Among them will be engineer Peter Homer, who took home $200,000 at the first challenge in 2007 and is now developing his glove for use on suborbital flights.

Unlike the previous competition, this year's competitors have been asked to include the glove's outermost layer, the thermal micrometeoroid garment. This layer is designed to provide insulation from temperature swings and solar radiation and to protect against micrometeoroids and space debris.

To qualify for a prize, competing gloves will have to better the performance of NASA's current model. Gloves will be evaluated on how easily they can be bent while pressurised and how well competitors are able to perform 30 minutes of dexterity tests.

The gloves will also be filled with water to test their strength.

NASA will award $250,000 to the top performer and $100,000 to the runner-up. An additional $50,000 will go to the best outer layer design.

If all the prize money is not claimed, it may be reused in another round of the glove competition. But NASA could also put the funds toward a new competition, says Andrew Petro, Centennial Challenge programme manager at NASA headquarters in Washington DC. The glove challenge is one of six incentive prizes recently offered by the agency, but more may be on the way. "We expect to start one new one this year, if not several, depending on funding," Petro says.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 17:01:58 GMT 2009 by Madlintelf

How about we use all those leftover Michael Jackson gloves, the astronauts deserve a little bling!

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 17:28:11 GMT 2009 by Brandon

The problem is that sequins perform poorly against micro meteorites, Also due to the porous nature of the material used, when exposed to a vacuum the suit decompresses causing the astronaut do die within seconds.

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 17:41:46 GMT 2009 by James

Nothing gets past you Brandon lol

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Wed Nov 18 14:29:46 GMT 2009 by kei

thats rude

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 17:51:30 GMT 2009 by oalexis

Why so Serious?

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 17:50:57 GMT 2009 by Troy H.

Actually, while it wouldn't be suitable for part of the pressure holding part of the glove... the sequins could provide enhances protection while still remaining flexible... kinda like dragon skin... you might be onto something...

*runs to the patent office*

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 21:31:39 GMT 2009 by alan

@Troy H.

Cool, did you invent a dragon?

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Tue Nov 17 22:47:34 GMT 2009 by Peter

If he works for SpaceX he might have...

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Wed Nov 18 01:35:00 GMT 2009 by Wil

Then they would have to add the following tests:

1. Grabbing the crotch while shouting "Hoooooo"

2. Moon walking while wearing a full space suit

3. Removing a fedora from the top of the space helmet, then throwing it like a frisbee

Hey, Can We Use Michael Jackson's Gloves?

Wed Nov 18 02:07:52 GMT 2009 by Steve

Unfortunately, the first time an astronaut stepped into space, he would realize that he needed gloves for *both* hands!

Skin

Tue Nov 17 18:45:20 GMT 2009 by Rodney

I suspect the main problem arising in the design of the gloves, is the conflict between the fact that the body is pressurised, and the skin is elastic and prestretched, and all these glove designs have this covering of multiple layers of inflexible restrictive frictional multilayer material. Present designs have trouble with pressure because they are like balloons, as they flex, they change volume, and so the air pressure inside forces it to flex back. What might end up being needed is a pin tactile waldo mechanism, where the hand and fingers are in a flexural mechanism within the ,palm, of the glove, but a variation on a braile reader is used to pass direct pressure sensations to the fingertips?

Or we could say that gloves are too bulky, and accept a finger impact at the rate of one a year of operation equivalent, and thus be able to use lightweight skintight gloves with armor only round the palm?

Fingertip accuracy and armour plating are always going to be a conflict of intrests, as its the armour design and implementation that the limitation, not the glove as such.

Still, anything to move things forward, and add to the $10 thousand leather and ceramic plate bikers outfit to hopefully end up with space tourist and motobike courier capable of walking away from any situation. At this rate, even a straight from orbit jump.

Virgin Galactic better start putting the orders in.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Comments 1 | 2

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

True glove (Image: NASA)

True glove (Image: NASA)

1 more image

ADVERTISEMENT

Ripples in space divide classical and quantum worlds

18:00 18 November 2009

We're made of subatomic particles that can be in two places at once. So why can't we?

Meteor showers: good for skygazers, bad for satellites

16:59 16 November 2009

Several space missions have been damaged or destroyed by meteoroids over the years – David Shiga rounds up the casualties

Mystery 'dark flow' extends towards edge of universe

12:46 16 November 2009

Over a thousand galaxy clusters are streaming in one direction across the sky – some think it's the first sign of a neighbouring universe

NASA to restart primate irradiation testing

11:07 16 November 2009

The effect of space radiation on astronauts is still a big question mark for deep space exploration – primate research is meant to cut it down to size

Latest news

Ripples in space divide classical and quantum worlds

18:00 18 November 2009

We're made of subatomic particles that can be in two places at once. So why can't we?

Four ways to feed the world

18:00 18 November 2009

By 2025 there will be 9 billion people on Earth, all needing food. We look at the best ways to stave off starvation

The race to build a 1000 mph carMovie Camera

18:00 18 November 2009

You want to be the fastest thing on four wheels. Should you use jets or rockets? Or both?

Killer bees: nasty sting, not so smart

17:18 18 November 2009

A new study has compared the wits of Africanized killer honey bees with those of a more docile European breed, reports Ewen Callaway

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access