President Barack Obama has given a major boost to next month's UN climate change negotiations in Copenhagen by offering firm targets for cuts in US greenhouse gas emissions. The move, announced today, has been widely welcomed by climate change campaigners. But although they may seem generous, the proposed targets are in fact far from what developing nations and climate scientists have called for.
Obama said the US was prepared to cut its emissions of greenhouse gases by 17 per cent by 2020 and by 83 per cent by 2050 "in the context of an overall deal in Copenhagen that includes robust mitigation contributions from China and the other emerging economies".
At first glance, that sounds similar to commitments made by other wealthy nations. The European Union, for instance, is aiming to cut its emissions by 20 per cent cut by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050. But the US president is measuring his cuts against 2005 emissions; most other nations use 1990 as a baseline.
The difference is subtle but significant: US emissions grew by almost 15 per cent between those dates. Using 1990 as a baseline, Obama's pledge translates into a cut of around 4 per cent.
That is well short of the 25 to 40 per cent cuts that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says are required from developed nations to avoid the most dangerous consequences of climate change.
More cuts may come
The US may, however, achieve bigger cuts than Obama's statement makes apparent. It is likely that the pledge relates to a scheme to limit emissions from specific industries, such as the energy sector. Alexia Kelly, a climate policy expert at the World Resources Institute in Washington DC, points out that other domestic policies, such improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency, will bring further reductions.
The White House announcement does not say how the cuts will be achieved. The House of Representatives has, however, passed a bill containing similar reductions, and the Senate is considering legislation with a slightly more ambitious target. The presence of those bills will at least allow Obama to point to domestic action when negotiating at Copenhagen. He also has the option of bypassing Congress and imposing cuts through existing legislation, such as the Clean Air Act. "I suspect that it will be a combination of the two," says Kelly.
Obama's pledge also contains interim targets for the US: a 30 per cent cut below 2005 levels by 2025 and a 42 per cent cut by 2030. This addresses one major complaint from developing nations, which have been calling for a more detailed reductions timetable for the next few decades.
Will all this add up to enough incentives to bring China and India – two major polluters that have so far resisted calls to regulate their emissions – on board a global deal? "That we don't know," says Kelly. With the UN climate negotiations less than a fortnight away, we may not have to wait long to find out.
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
So what? He WON'T bypass Congress. Nor should he in a democracy.
I voted for the guy but am realizing I made a mistake
Yeah, a lot of people are starting to wake up.
Yeah McCain would surely have done a better job with pollution standards, just like the last guy.
I find it ironic how so called "conservatives" have little interest in conserving their God's creation.
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
Obama Needs To Go Green
Wed Nov 25 21:53:28 GMT 2009 by wind4me
http://www.Wind4me.com
Obama needs to match the Chinese at least........minimum! How can we let China get ahead of us in this green race to the finish ?
I trust you're being facetious. The Chinese have greatly surpassed the US in both CO2 emissions and traditional pollutants like SOx, NOx, etc.
The Chinese are way ahead in the race for the green. They hold trillions of our dollars and are laughing all the way to the bank as we bankrupt our country to stop the fraudulent "Global Warming".
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.