Subscribe to New Scientist

Physics & Math

Feeds

Home |Physics & Math |Tech | News

Rainbow trapped for the first time

Oh, to catch a rainbow. Well, it's been done for the first time ever – and with just a simple lens and a plate of glass at that. The technique could be used to store information using light, a boon for optical computing and telecommunications.

All-optical computing devices promise to be faster and more efficient than current technology, but they suffer from the drawback that signals have to be converted back and forth from optical to electrical. The ability to "slow" light to a crawl or even trap it helps, as information in the light can then be manipulated directly.

In 2007, Ortwin Hess of the University of Surrey in Guildford, UK, and colleagues proposed a technique to trap light inside a tapering waveguide, which is a structure that guides light waves down its length. The waveguide in question would use metamaterials – exotic materials that can bend light sharply.

The idea is that as the waveguide tapers, the components of the light are made to stop in turn at ever narrower points. That's because any given component of the light cannot pass through an opening that's smaller than its wavelength. This leads to a "trapped rainbow".

Gilded waveguide

While numerical models showed that such waveguides would work in theory, making them out of metamaterials remained a distant dream. Now Vera Smolyaninova of Towson University in Baltimore, Maryland, and colleagues have used a convex lens to create the tapered waveguide and trap a rainbow of light.

They coated one side of a 4.5-millimetre-diameter lens with a gold film 30 nanometre thick, and laid the lens – gold-side down – on a flat glass slide which was also coated with film of gold. Viewed side-on, the space between the curved lens and the flat slide was a layer of air that narrowed to zero thickness where the lens touched the slide – essentially a tapered waveguide.

When they shone a multi-wavelength laser beam at the open end of the gilded waveguide, a trapped rainbow formed inside. This could be seen as a series of coloured rings when the lens was viewed from above with a microscope: the visible light leaked through the thin gold film.

Simply amazing

Shorter-wavelength green light was trapped at a point where the taper became too thin for it to penetrate the waveguide. Longer-wavelength red light was trapped further out, where the taper was thicker, with intermediate wavelengths in between (www.arxiv.org/abs/0911.4464).

"I think it's beautiful that we can create such complex phenomena using a very, very simple configuration," says Smolyaninova. "It's amazing."

Hess agrees. He is delighted to see his theoretical prediction validated and impressed by the simplicity of the experiment. Setting the lens on the slide, he says, "is a very, very elegant way of tapering".

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Wow

Thu Nov 26 18:23:21 GMT 2009 by Rushnerd

Ronnie James Dio will be thrilled to hear this.

Wow

Thu Nov 26 20:47:36 GMT 2009 by Simon

Yeah, should brighten him up after the whole stomach cancer diagnosis thing :S ...fantastic stuff though

Wow

Thu Nov 26 22:47:10 GMT 2009 by dogigniter

hehe, only if its dark :)

Wow

Fri Nov 27 08:15:46 GMT 2009 by Dancaban

Sad to hear, one of the few rock frontmen I haven't seen.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Diagram, Please

Thu Nov 26 19:18:04 GMT 2009 by John Lambert
http://www.elfink.com

This is a case where a clear diagram would be far more valuable than a photo. The description and photo together still leave me pondering the exact arrangement.

Diagram, Please

Fri Nov 27 04:36:37 GMT 2009 by david m

My thoughts exactly. e.g. where was light trajectory?

Newton's Rings?

Thu Nov 26 19:38:43 GMT 2009 by Graham

What is the difference between this and the phenomenon that causes Newton's Rings? As I remember it Newton's rings is an effect where, when a lens is placed on a class plate, concentric rings are seen. The rings are formed by interference between light reflected from the flat and curved surfaces.

This article seems to describe exactly the same thing.

Newton's Rings?

Fri Nov 27 09:19:10 GMT 2009 by Steve

Absolutely. I can see nothing new in this at all. This is exactly Sir Isaac's setup and here

(long URL - click here)

there are photos of the rainbow produced by white light illuminating exactly this setup (lens on plane). Surely all these folk have done is to enhance the reflectivity by gilding the lily.

I'll have a look in 'Optiks' and see if the old chap hadn't tried that as well - he silvered anything that didn't move.

And-why can't NS put a stop to this blasted spamming from the christmas shop - it has been going on for ages and appears everywhere.

Newton's Rings?

Fri Nov 27 09:20:27 GMT 2009 by Vin

yes now you mention it, it does look like the same set up, so i am similarly confused. Although there is the difference of the gold 30 nanometre layer. Maybe that makes all the difference?

Newton's Rings?

Fri Nov 27 14:33:42 GMT 2009 by Jeff Hecht
http://www.newscientist.com

The trapped rainbow pattern does look the same as Newton's Rings, but it's produced differently. Newton's rings are produced by light passing down through a lens sitting on a flat glass surface. Light that has passed through the lens is reflected from the flat glass back into the lens, causing interference effects. The trapped rainbow is produced by light entering from the side, between the curved lens and the flat glass, when the two surfaces are covered by thin gold films. The two processes are different, but produce effects that look the same.

Newton's Rings?

Fri Nov 27 18:52:23 GMT 2009 by Agent420

I'm not sure that it makes a difference which direction the light comes from, the frequencies of light are still separated.

Newton's Rings?

Sat Nov 28 17:01:21 GMT 2009 by Vin

Thanks for clarifying that, but now im wondering, if the light is trapped, how can we see it? I mean if we can see it then something is stimulating our eyes' light receptors? Shouldn't it be like a black hole?

Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Capturing light (Image: Tom and Steve/Flckr/Getty)

Capturing light (Image: Tom and Steve/Flckr/Getty)

1 more image

ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome to the high-carbon future

11:06 27 November 2009

From coal, soot and pencils to electronics, nanoribbons and atom-thick semiconductors – carbon is turning out to be even more talented than we thought

Superconductors can come in from the cold

17:10 26 November 2009

Calculations suggest that a wire can be an electrical superconductor even if some sections are at room temperature

The eye-catching best of fluid dynamics

10:19 26 November 2009

This week, physicists at the Division of Fluid Dynamics meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, exhibited their best experimental images in a "gallery of fluid motion"

Dark power: Grand designs for interstellar travel

18:00 25 November 2009

We could reach the stars if we built a black hole starship or a dark matter rocket – we've got the physics to do it

Latest news

Shrink-to-fit spacesuit eases astronauts' workload

10:00 29 November 2009

Astronauts will one day get suited and booted in seconds by stepping into an overlarge, part-robotic spacesuit that contracts to fit them

Early Snowball Earth may have melted to a mudball

11:00 28 November 2009

If the icy tropics of 700 million years ago were covered in dust, this could have helped melt the ice

Art, embodied

13:00 27 November 2009

A new exhibit at the Mori Art Museum in Tokyo celebrates the intersection of art and science in the human body - featuring works from Leonardo da Vinci to Damien Hirst.

Today on New Scientist: 27 November 2009

18:03 27 November 2009

Today's stories on newscientist.com, at a glance, including: the first basic blueprint for bacteria, the high-carbon future, and how the hammerhead got its hammer

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access